Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_____________________________________________________________
Microfinance Community
'We the People' is a start-up not-for-profit social venture corporation registered under the Societies
Registration Act, 1860. We aim to provide institutional, financial and business development services and
integrate socio-economic objectives with innovative business propositions and revenue flow mechanisms
to promote equitable economic growth and sustainable human development.
Under our micro-finance operation, soon we are planning to launch micro-insurance operations in both
the categories - life insurance and general insurance. Many of our rural clients are looking for various
micro-insurance products, but, due to lack of knowledge of various available insurance products and in
the absence of backward as well as forward linkages, they are unable to avail such opportunities.
In light of the above, 'We The People' has been exploring possible partnership options with various
insurance companies for launching micro-insurance for our customers. However, we are grappling with a
few issues with regard to micro-insurance. Therefore, we would like to learn and replicate from the work
done so far which would add immense value to our micro-insurance operation. We would be grateful if
members could share:
• Experiences of innovative models, best practices, case studies, in provision of micro insurance
services by civil society organizations, microfinance institutions, insurance companies, IRDA
(Insurance Regulatory Development Authority) Authority, financial institutions, corporations, other
professionals. Evaluation reports and lessons learnt from such initiatives would be appreciated.
• Are there instances of NGOs that have been able to launch micro-insurance products both in rural as
well as urban areas? Did they do this as 'Composite Corporate Agent' or 'Corporate Agent' or ‘Micro
Insurance Agent’? What are the advantages and disadvantages of becoming a 'Composite Corporate
Agent' or a 'Corporate Agent' or a ‘Micro Insurance Agent’? Or are there any other better options in
this sector for NGOs?
• Are NGOs registered under Society Registration Act, 1860; Indian Trust Act, 1880 and Section 25 of
Companies Act, 1956, allowed to promote micro-insurance with due approval of IRDA?
Summary of Responses
Comparative Experiences
Related Resources
Responses in Full
Summary of Responses
Responding to the query requesting case studies and innovative models along with lessons learnt
providing micro-insurance services, members emphasized that micro-insurance is a first step in providing
social and economic security to the poor, particularly business and livelihood security. They also noted
that the life and non-life insurance market has enormous potential in India.
Elucidating the challenges of delivering micro-insurance, members outlined the three biggest
challenges from the intermediaries’ perspective to providing services to low-income clients- burdensome
claims documentation, delays in paying claims, and occasional claims rejections. These issues pose
serious difficulties for intermediaries trying to market insurance products. Another challenge for insurance
providers is the lack of specific data for the micro-insurance target market, which makes pricing of
products complex. Without actuarial calculations, premiums are likely to be set too high or too low. At the
same time, respondents stressed that insurance operations can also help microfinance institutions (MFIs)
and development organisations attain secure and sustainable operations.
Additionally, members noted the key difference between delivering traditional services and micro-
insurance products is the client base, which can have significant implications for distribution of micro-
insurance. Given their familiarity with specific characteristics of low-income clients and due to their
proximity to potential clients, NGOs and MFIs are often positioned well to provide insurance and market
insurance products to this target group. However, respondents recommended NGOs and MFIs start
working as ‘insurance awareness agents’ and eventually move to selling products. Moreover, delivery of
insurance products and claim settlements ideally needs routing through an established network that
clients trust (e.g. post offices and rural banks).
Delving into the legal aspects of provision of insurance by NGOs, members clarified NGOs can
register as a service provider according to the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA)
guidelines and serve an agent for the insurer; however, it is not necessary for NGOs to work as an agent.
The IRDA regulations also allow for granting “corporate agency” to NGOs exclusively doing insurance
intermediation. In such cases, according to the Guidelines on Licensing of Corporate Agents, IRDA, 2005,
the corporate agent should be a Public Limited Company with a minimum share capital of Rs. 15 Lakhs.
Corporate agents, members advised, need to canvass insurance products with the help of qualified (as
per the regulations) insurance professionals. Members pointed out that compared to corporate agents,
the regulations are somewhat more liberal and flexible for micro-insurance agents. Additionally, within
the Micro Health Insurance Regulation of 2005, IRDA has identified NGOs, MFIs and SHGs as the bodies
that can act as agents.
Respondents provided several case studies and models for delivering micro-insurance. One example
was a sectoral resource centre in Tamil Nadu, which is providing various insurance products in
partnership with private insurers. Citing experiences in delivery of innovative products in Karnataka and
Orissa, members mentioned that the schemes in the Karnataka example serve both rural and urban
populations with the intermediary playing the role of micro insurance agent. Another insurance model
was of a joint collaboration between community-based organisations, MFIs and mainstream financial
institutions to address the pension needs of the poor. A third example was mutual insurance schemes
from Andhra Pradesh, with self-administered and mutually managed products.
Members also cited experiences from a donor-supported fund, which has supported three major
insurance companies in a public private partnership mode. The three models include:
• Private company which is using a network of village internet portals to market and distribute a range
of life and general insurance policies to farmers in Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh
• Insurance company collaborating with NGO-MFIs and Self-Help Groups (SHGs) including a
Community Rural Insurance Group to deliver innovative micro-insurance products and advisory
services to individuals from lower socio-economic rural communities
• Private insurance company using multiple channels and services to meet the needs of low-income
clients in rural and urban areas including towns in Andhra Pradesh and offering affordable mass-
market and tailor-made life insurance and pension products
Along with discussing different experiences, respondent advised analyzing experiences with micro-
insurance products developed and administered by collectives of poor (cooperatives or producer
companies) across the world. Further, they recommended providing technical assistance to existing
collectives on mutual insurance products or developing products for these organisations.
Based on some of these experiences, a respondent shared key lessons learned on disturbing insurance
to low-income people. These lessons are compiled in an unpublished review of insurance models and
good practices from several countries,:
• Technology can reduce cost, time and effort in distribution (e.g. to fill insurance proposals and
transfer them for vetting to insurance companies).
• Existing infrastructure and distribution systems, familiar to poor clients (like local opinion leaders),
can be leveraged to sell insurance.
• The ‘insurance concept’ can be disseminated using appropriate and innovative promotional,
marketing and operational strategies (i.e. web casting, mobile vans with videos, websites), thereby
enhancing the effectiveness of message being promoted and facilitating better understanding.
• Setting up a quick and fair claims service is one of the most important aspects for effective
distribution; intermediaries could expedite claims payment procedures, reduce or eliminate the
likelihood of claims being rejected, or pay claims directly and be reimbursed later by the insurer.
Additionally, intermediaries could ensure the required documentation is appropriate for their low-
income clients, and easy and inexpensive to access. When a claim is paid, the intermediary could
arrange a special ceremony to make a spectacle, sometimes even involving the local officials- this
event creates significant public relations value and word-of-mouth marketing.
• Simple products work best because they are easier for organizations to administer and for clients to
understand.
• Acturial costing analysis is required to determine the appropriate commission for intermediaries and
premium loadings, to cover administrative expenses, and to set up an effective premium collection
system that minimizes and/or prevent lapses.
• Avoid entangling insurance and credit risks by mixing insurance with loans.
• Organizations need systems to ensure proper distribution controls and guidelines.
Complementing the national insurance regulator as being “enabling” and a trend setter with regard to
good policies, a member also provided details of regulation of the commission structure in India.
Finally, while highlighting the differences between urban and rural contexts, respondents pointed out that
no follow-up is required to renew policies or provide post sales servicing for urban middleclass customers,
as compared to rural customers where the intermediary has a significant role to play in terms of servicing
the customer and providing post sale support. This factor, they argued, calls for designing a variable
commission structure. IRDA recently recognized this fact and through the micro-insurance regulation has
eliminated the ‘heaped structure’ and introduced annual flat (20%) commissions. However, capping of
commissions remains to ensure lower prices for the poor.
In summary, members stressed that distribution channels for micro-insurance must suit customers and
deliver what they want. This means that effective implementation of micro-insurance requires a
comprehensive understanding by implementing organisations of their target clients and focused efforts in
to educate clients on insurance services and products.
Comparative Experiences
Tamil Nadu
Sectoral Resource Centre Develops Risk Mitigating Insurance Products (from Sayed Imtiaz
Ahmed, Centre for Insurance and Risk Management, IFMR, Chennai)
The Centre for Insurance and Risk Management (CIRM) is a sectoral resource centre looking at
developing customised risk mitigating instruments (including insurance) to address the various risks the
poor face. It was established to provide the poor with insurance and other risk mitigating options. As of
now, it has launched three micro insurance products- health, weather and livestock in the country
through partnerships with private insurers. Read more
Andhra Pradesh
Partnership to Provide Affordable Health Insurance (from Vineet Sinha, Centre for Micro Finance,
Chennai)
Healing Fields Foundation is an NGO, which works to promote health awareness and delivery of health
insurance products to poor clients, in partnership with insurance companies, NGOs, and the government.
Under its Healthcare Financing Delivery Project, it delivers a health insurance product called ‘Parivar
Suraksha Bima,’ which was specially designed for the rural sector. The product allows the subscribers
access to affordable and quality medical treatment. Read more
Micro Insurance for Landless, Daily Waged Rural Poor (from Ramesh S. Arunachalam, Micro
Finance Consulting Group, Chennai; response 1)
TATA-AIG, a private insurance agency, received funding from Financial Deepening Challenge Fund to
start an insurance project in September 2003 to provide life insurance services to the landless poor and
daily rural wageworkers. By the end of August 2006, the agency had insured over 12,000 individuals,
collecting of over Rs. 40 Lakhs in premium. Read more
Public Private Community Partnership For Insurance Provision (from G. V. Krishnagopal, Access
Livelihoods Consulting India Private Limited, Secunderabad)
Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty (SERP) introduced insurance services as part of its poverty
alleviation programme in 2003. Community based organisations, mainly SHGs and their Federations, are
co-opted to run cattle and life insurance schemes including education on insurance, sales and marketing
of insurance products, facilitating member enrollment, collection of premium and transfer to district level
institution. Read more
Karnataka
From Sayed Imtiaz Ahmed, Centre for Insurance and Risk Management, IFMR, Chennai
Multiple States
Life and Livelihood Insurance Products through Effective Partnerships (from Vigyan Vikram
Singh, BASIX, Dhaulpur)
BASIX, through Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd, an NBFC, is engaged in retailing insurance at the
doorstep of rural customers. It partnered with insurance companies to design both credit-linked and
direct insurance products in the area of life, livestock, health and rainfall insurance. It has succeeded in
providing the entire life and livelihood protections services through a single channel and has achieved
quick turn around time for claim settlements. Read more
Related Resources
Recommended Organizations
TATA-AIG Life Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai (from Vineet Sinha, Centre for Micro Finance,
Chennai and Ramesh S. Arunachalam, Micro Finance Consulting Group, Chennai; response 1)
Peninsula Towers, 6th floor, Peninsula Corporate Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai
400013; Tel.: 1-800-11-9966; info@tata-aig.com; Click here
Collaborating with NGO-MFIs and Self-Help Groups to deliver micro-insurance products and
advisory services to the low-income socio-economic strata in the rural India
From Sayed Imtiaz Ahmed, Centre for Insurance and Risk Management, Institute for Financial
Management and Research, Chennai
Centre for Insurance and Risk Management (CRIM), Institute for Financial Management and
Research, Chennai
8th Floor, Eastern Wing, Fountain Plaza Building, 31/2A, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai 600008 Tamil
Nadu; http://www.ifmr.ac.in/cirm/cirm.html
Involved in product development, training, dissemination and advocacy in the field of micro
insurance services for the poor
MART, New Delhi (from M. V. Raman, Java Softech Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad)
A-108, 2nd Floor, New Friends Colony, New Delhi 110065; Tel.: 91-11-26926527; Fax: 91-11-26926943;
mart@airtelbroadband.in; http://www.martrural.com/knowledge.htm
Marketing and research team conduct rural market research such as micro insurance in rural
areas
Recommended Documentation
Global Review of Insurance Models and Best and Good Practices: Evidence from 14 Countries
By Swainson, Jeremy and Ramesh S. Arunachalam; Internal Working Paper, Enterplan FDCF, UK; 2006
To avail of a copy contact Ramesh S Arunachalam
Working paper consisting of best and good practices in the field of micro insurance services in 14
countries and provides an overview of global of insurance schemes
http://www.financialdeepening.org/data/documents/AMP.pdf
Project document on Reliance Insurance Company (formerly ANP Sanmar Assurance Company) it
outlines the objectives, specific activities, progress achieved, and services offered
From Sayed Imtiaz Ahmed, Centre for Insurance and Risk Management, Institute for Financial
Management and Research, Chennai
Institute for Financial Management and Research: Centre for Insurance and Risk
Management
Institute for Financial Management and Research
http://www.ifmr.ac.in/pdf/CIRMbrochure.pdf (Size: 261 KB)
Report on the Centre, setup as a sectoral infrastructure support system focusing on building
product development capabilities for insurance and other risk mitigating instruments
Study of the Utilisation Pattern of Hospital-Based Health Insurance Plan Targeted Towards
Lower Socio-Economic Group
By V. P. Bhaskaran, Satyashankar P. and Rajendra P. Patankar; Journal of the Academy of Hospital
Administration, Vol. 16, No. 1; 2004
http://www.indmedica.com/journals.php?journalid=6&issueid=25&articleid=229&action=article
Study examines salient features of the Manipal Health Card, a type of insurance plan, provided
under the comprehensive health benefit scheme of Manipal Academy of Higher Education Group
Dr. G. Gandhi, Faculty, National Insurance Academy (NIA), Pune (from Vikash Kumar, Grameen
Koota, Bangalore)
25, Balewadi, Baner Road, NIA PO, Pune 411045 Maharashtra; Tel: 91-20-27204000/444; Fax: 91-20-
27292396/04555; drgg@niapune.com
Contact for recent developments in micro-insurance, NIA work includes design and development of
products in rural insurance, micro-insurance, personal lines insurance, and agriculture insurance
Responses in Full
An NGO can be registered as a service provider as per IRDA guideline. It is not necessary to work as
Agent/Corporate agent (though they definitely can be an agent for an Insurer e.g. TATA AIG has good
numbers of NGO/MFI agents for their rural insurance products).
I have been working with the DFID Enterplan FDCF (Financial Deepening Challenge Fund) Projects in
India for the last three years and we have three major insurance companies as partners as part of public
private partnership:
1) Megatop Ltd (A subsidiary of ITC IBD) which delivers a wide range of life and general insurance
services through the e-choupal channel in several states;
2) Tata - AIG Life Insurance Company Ltd, which delivers innovative life insurance services through the
Community Rural Insurance Group and other Channels all over India; and
3) Reliance Life Insurance, which uses multiple channels and services low income clients in rural and
urban areas including towns and offers mass market products.
Please see some key lessons in distribution of insurance to low income people (Source: Swainson, Jeremy
and Ramesh S Arunachalam (2006), "Global Review of Insurance Models and Best and Good Practices:
Evidence from 14 Countries" - Unpublished Internal Working Paper, Enterplan FDCF, UK and compilation
from several other studies). Lessons in Distribution of Micro-Insurance (much of this comes from the
FDCF projects in India):
• Technology can be a significant cost reducer in distribution.
• Utilizing channels that already exist to deliver a range of products to target clients is an effective way
to market insurance, provided the right promotional, marketing and operational strategies are used
• Using electronic mechanisms to perform tasks like filling of insurance proposals, transfer of the same
for vetting to insurance companies etc can reduce time/effort/costs in distribution.
• Multiple and innovative promotional strategies including web casting, mobile vans with videos,
websites etc enhance effectiveness of the insurance message being promoted and facilitate easy
understanding of ‘insurance concept’ by target group.
• Local opinion leaders are uniquely positioned to sell difficult products like insurance and this is
particularly true while serving BoP (Bottom of the Pyramid) clients.
• An efficient claims processing system is one of the most important aspects for effective distribution.
Intermediaries could pay the claims, and then be reimbursed from the insurer, based on
documentation that is appropriate for their clients.
• Efficiency depends equally on the distribution as on the simplicity of the product or product menu.
Simple products work best because they are easier to administer and easier for clients to understand.
Adding riders is fraught with difficulties as even small riders may have large consequences.
• More challenges tend to emerge for intermediaries and the insurer to manage their relationship. From
the intermediaries’ perspective, the three biggest challenges tend to be: 1) burdensome claims
documentation, 2) delays in paying claims, and 3) occasional claims rejections—all of which are
particularly troubling since the poor tend to be lukewarm about insurance at best. If claims are
difficult to make, if they are delayed or rejected, the intermediaries—not the insurers—will face
significant public relations problems. The intermediaries will have to ensure that the documentation
requirements are appropriate for the low-income market, including ensuring that documents are easy
and inexpensive to access (while being difficult to forge). Also, intermediaries should try to expedite
claims payment procedures and reduce or eliminate the likelihood that claims are rejected.
• Pricing is not only a problem for intermediaries, but also for insurance providers. They do not have
specific data for the micro insurance target market, so instead they price their products based on
projections from the Indian population in general. Without actuarial calculations, premiums are either
likely to be set too high—which means that clients are getting poor value for money—or too low,
which can place the entire scheme in jeopardy.
• Without an accurate costing analysis, intermediaries will not be able to determine how much they
need to earn, in commission or through premium loadings, to cover their administrative expenses.
• When a claim is paid, the intermediary must arrange a special ceremony to make a spectacle,
sometimes even involving the District Collector or other local officials, to demonstrate to others that
they are true to their word. This event creates significant public relations value and word-of-mouth
marketing.
• In summary, the distribution channels must suit customers. They should deliver what clients want in
a way that will reach them. To provide cost-effective service to a low-income clientele, the channels
needs to:
o Adopt a suitable institutional and distribution structure that is suitable for today and
tomorrow
o Keep administrative costs low by using technology, outsourcing some functional
responsibilities and leveraging existing infrastructure for distribution
o Use a distribution system that is familiar and comfortable to the customers
o Provide good claims service that responds quickly and fairly,
o Set up an effective premium collection system to minimize or prevent lapses
o Avoid entangling insurance and credit risks by mixing up insurance and loans in the
distribution
o Establish systems to ensure that controls and guidelines are properly followed in
distribution
Please let me know in case you require the contact details of the above-mentioned projects.
Sayed Imtiaz Ahmed, Centre for Insurance and Risk Management, Institute for Financial
Management and Research, Chennai
CIRM is a sectoral resource centre within Institute for Financial Management and Research in Chennai
(http://www.ifmr.ac.in/cirm/cirm.html) which looks at developing customised risk mitigating instrument
(including insurance) to address the various risk that the poor face. It was established to address the
acute need for providing the poor with insurance and other risk mitigating option, which addresses their
risk and provides a safety net, which prevents them from falling back in to the trap of poverty.
In this realm, we have realized that there is a lack of actuarially sound micro insurance product due to
the lack of valid data required for product designing. This is again compounded by the fact that most of
the risk mitigation and hedging done by poor are inefficient due to a lack of knowledge and awareness.
To address this challenge, we have till now, launched various micro insurance products (health, weather
and livestock insurance) in the country in partnership with private insurers.
In this regard, the micro health insurance experience of the Dharmasthala Trust in Karnataka
(Sampoorna Suraksha Programme), Manipal Association of Higher Education, Manipal and Orissa (KAS
Foundation) serves as good examples of innovative product being delivered through efficient channels of
delivery. In this regard the example of Dharmastahala as well as the Manipal experience is interesting as
these schemes serves both rural and urban populations with the intermediary playing the role of micro
insurance agent.
In fact, CIRM is doing documentation of best practices as case studies for ILO. Besides, ILO has prepared
a report called “India: An Inventory of Micro Insurance Schemes” attached at the link
http://www3.ilo.org/public/english/protection/socsec/step/reslib/publ.php?idpubl=831&lang=EN.
As far as corporate agents are concerned, they should canvass insurance product with the help of
insurance professionals who satisfy the qualifications laid down in the regulations. Here the regulation
also allows for grant of corporate agency for exclusively doing insurance intermediation in which case
grant of corporate agency can be considered by an insurer. In such cases, the corporate agent should be
a Public Limited Company with a minimum share capital of Rs. 15 Lakhs (Guidelines on Licensing of
Corporate Agents, IRDA, 2005).
Compared to this for the micro insurance agent, the regulation are somewhat more liberal. As per the
above guidelines, NGOs and SHGs who work as corporate agent can apply to IRDA for securing
exemption from the requirement to maintain any fund. Within the micro health insurance regulation of
2005, IRDA has identified NGOs, MFIs and SHGs as the bodies who can act as the agent. Further there is
more flexibility in their operation compared to corporate agents.
Please do let us know if you require any particular information on the given topic.
Perumal Koshy, World Association for Small and Medium Enterprises, New Delhi
Promoting affordable and quality health care for the poor is very important. But there is a problem with
the whole approach and the way in which 'promotion' is planned. When NGOs target rural rich for
marketing health insurance products, it is not the poor that are the targeted customers but the rich,
landlords, moneylenders of rural India. If they could get the business from the rich people from each
Gram Panchayat, that would constitute a huge market. But it comes under the broad area of rural
marketing and has nothing much to do with poor people. Hence, it is doubtful whether any health
insurance product is available which is meant for rural poor.
The IRDA has been a trend setter with regard to good policies. In my opinion, IRDA is a very sensitive
and enabling regulator as illustrated below (Source: Regulatory Change from Heaped to Flat/Uniform
Commission (Source: Swainson, Jeremy and Ramesh S Arunachalam (2006), "Global Review of Insurance
Models and Best and Good Practices: Evidence from 14 Countries"- Unpublished Internal Working Paper ,
Enterplan FDCF, UK and compilations from several other studies):
• Typical Commission Structure for insurance in India is heaped and capped with 30% in first year, 6%
is second year etc.
• This reflects an upper/middle class urban bias as after initial sales; such customers can be easily
contacted by insurer in the subsequent years and supported.
• Also, post sales servicing for such customers is not a major issue - either the insurer and/or
customers can easily reach each other and request/provide required service.
• Hence, such a heaped and capped structure does not affect renewals and persistency and policies do
not lapse normally as the customers are also aware and educated.
• However, for micro insurance, the intermediary has a significant role to play in subsequent years in
terms of servicing the customer: who is poor, not-so-literate, cannot be reached easily, may have
special sudden needs, can afford only to make premium payments in small amounts on a frequent
basis etc.
• Hence, having a heaped commission structure is not appropriate and this affects servicing in
subsequent years and also has potential to negatively impact persistency/renewals.
• Capping Commission is also not appropriate because it is based on a ‘notional’ cost of servicing low
income customers who are very heterogeneous and whose premiums are low in the first place. So,
often times, insurers are faced with either paying less than cost to intermediary which dis-incentivises
them and/or absorbing the loss, which disincentivises themselves and prevents scaling up.
• In fact, recognizing these, IRDA through the recent micro insurance regulation has done away with
the heaped structure and introduced flat (20%) commissions for any year. However, the capping of
commissions still exists for political and other reasons and ensuring lower price to the poor. Several
stakeholders played an important role in influencing the micro insurance regulation in India.
• Hence, use of heaped and capped premiums are avoidable due to the significant amount of work to
be done by intermediary in distribution of micro-insurance products – both initially, for sales and in
the subsequent years, for servicing.
There are key differences between traditional and micro-insurance products, which have significant
implications for distribution of micro-insurance and associated costs. These aspects would also come in
very handy while striking partnerships. Several differences deserve mention here:
• First is the aspect of proximity of insurer to customers, which is closer in case of traditional insurance
products (TIPs) than micro-insurance (MI) products, whose clients tend to be far removed and less
accessible.
• Second, is the issue of awareness of the customers and their preparedness to fulfill contractual
insurance obligations (in terms of prompt premium payments etc), again higher in case of TIP
customers and lower for BoP clients.
• Third is the issue of total premium value per policy and unit transaction value, both of which are
higher for traditional as opposed to micro-insurance products.
• Fourth is the aspect of number of transactions per policy, which is inordinately large for BoP clients
as opposed to TIP customers.
• Fifth, is the aspect of higher transactions cost, arising out of the above, again much lower in case of
traditional as opposed to micro-insurance products.
The key differences, as suggested by this review study, are summarized in Table below:
Thus, micro-insurance products have special characteristics, which make distribution naturally difficult for
any insurer/intermediary. Specifically, a high level of post sales service is required year after year, which
means higher costs of servicing clients. Also, commission structures have not afforded sufficient incentive
either due to inordinately high costs (because of remoteness and lack of easy access to customers)
and/or regulatory barriers. So, the most critical question is how to best to organize distribution between
insurers and intermediaries?
The past experiences reveal several specific strategies used to optimize on performance and these are
briefly enumerated below:
• First, channels have integrated technology to enhance efficiency of front-end processes.
• Second, channels have accessed some form of captive markets but managed them independent of
other financial services.
• Third, channels have re-orientated their business strategy and decentralized processes.
• Fourth, channels have employed local people as staff/agents.
• Fifth, segmentation of claims, although still not a dominant strategy, has been employed successfully
by some channels
I would like share one paper “Time to Mainstream Micro-Pensions in India” attached at the link
http://www.solutionexchange-un.net.in/mf/cr/res03040701.doc. This paper would help to understand
how formal financial institutions (e.g. UTI) have leveraged upon the delivery channels of MFIs (e.g.
SEWA) to meet pension needs of the poor in India. Similarly insurance services could be delivered
through joint collaboration between community based organisations, MFIs and mainstream financial
institutions. The point made about the importance of drastically reducing transaction costs, including
administrative costs and investment management costs in both the accumulation and pay-out phases,
should be borne particularly in mind as search is made for innovative ways to deliver insurance services
to lower income groups.
Not only new private insurance companies, four public sector companies and Life Insurance Corporation
have long tradition to serve poor people of India. Due to various reasons, these policies are not very
popular in market.
It is great to see that there is growing intervention on micro insurance schemes. Micro-insurance aims to
reach the poor with risk mitigation services. In fact poor people need so many services to break out their
poverty; micro insurance is one of the first steps to provide social and economic security. Micro insurance
operations can help MFIs and development organisation to attain secure and sustainable operation and it
will also help clients to manage their business and livelihood in secure manner.
Insurance products for the poor are different in characteristics and features from conventional insurance
products. The poor are more vulnerable to risk and environment where they are living. Their level of
awareness about risk mitigation services is very low. Thus, effective implementation of micro insurance
requires a comprehensive understanding by an implementation organisation about the target clients and
environment. Knowledge about environment where the micro insurance organisation is working gives also
a good idea to manage cultural diversity of clients.
This set of clients, need a product which should have simple and easily understandable processes as well
as affordable prices. One of the most important and critical factor to promote effective implementation of
micro insurance services is "Client education". Implementing organization should invest substantially for
awareness part about micro insurance.
In recent part, I got an opportunity to work on to some theoretical part of micro insurance. I wish to
share some of the important resource available on micro insurance subject:
• “Protecting the poor: A microfinance compendium" edited by Craig Churchill, ILO publication; Please
find this attached at the link http://www.ilo.org/public/english/support/publ/xtextmicr.htm
• Micro Insurance and Microfinance Institutions: Evidence from India, CGAP Working Group; attached
at the link www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/finance/download/cstudy15.pdf
• Besides one can also visit these websites for better understanding on this subject:
http://www.microinsurancecentre.org and http://www.microfinancegateway.org/microinsurance
Moreover one can contact Dr. G. Gandhi (gandhi.dr@gmail.com), Faculty, National Insurance Academy,
Pune for recent development in the field of micro-insurance in India.
In the year 2004-05 Marketing And Research Team MART New Delhi had conducted an extensive study
on the potential of rural insurance markets and they brought out good observations on the needs and the
potential of the insurance segment. The report was also approved by IRDA at that time.
Role of MFIs and NGOs to market insurance products is a good channel for their inherent strengths
acquired over the years, with proximity to the members of the groups who have been serviced with
financial products. However, the awareness and the importance of the insurance still needs to be
taken to the masses. NGOs or MFIs should not per se take the mode of selling insurance products rather
should first start as insurance awareness agents aggressively, and eventually the sale of products should
happen. Moreover, the channel for insurance products delivery and settlement of claims must be routed
through some established network where people have good trust. For example, Post Offices and rural
banks will be the best in the present circumstances.
And recently there was also an attempt to recruit MFIs and NGOs as agents for promoting policies. As
mentioned in other mails, the issue is:
• How seriously these agencies could reach the end customer?
• Whether the products designed are matching to the needs of poor in the market? For example ICICI
designed two products: Gram Mitra and Gram Suraksha earlier with a low premium of Rs. 100/- for
Rs 10000/- policy amount. There was some initial success. But subsequently I could not track the
progress of the scheme.
• Are rural insurance awareness programmes conducted regularly until the rural poor realize the
importance of these products?
• While we continue this effort, there can be clear strategy whom to target in what region depending
upon the socio-economic factors of the region.
• Unfortunately everyone wants to grab the bigger cake from the market simultaneously as a result
there is also an element of scare getting created in the rural customer. One needs to carefully
nurture this potential end customer and create your own market keeping in view of the customer's
requirements time to time.
• Rural rich always find their ways to reach for all sorts of benefits like any urban customer because of
his affluence and awareness. Whereas the rural poor are deprived of many benefits of all the
schemes and the same we find even in urban poor.
• One needs to start small and move with utmost care in promoting micro insurance products, as
acceptance of them is still a new concept in the rural areas. And the rural poor or rural customer
always look for value for the money in all the purchases they make. Once a negative impression is
created, it will spread like wild fire across everyone. Incidentally, they depend more on opinion
builders of the village and the influence will be much stronger than any ad campaign that could
make.
This Micro Finance forum needs to work out a clear strategy on how we can address the insurance needs
of rural poor in particular.
If one is trying to discover insurance products for the poor, it would be useful to understand the
experiences of the micro insurance products developed and being administered by the collectives of poor
(either cooperatives or producer companies) across the world. As Mr. Ramesh has pointed out the
features of the micro insurance products, some of the key points, which he has pointed out, are:
• Low cost of administration
• Proximity of the agency administering
• The number of transactions
• Ease of processing claims
All of these are inherent and inbuilt if insurance schemes are undertaken by true people's collectives at
the grassroots. I have personally had the opportunity to understand the following schemes, which I
would essentially call them as 'Mutual Insurance Schemes':
• Debt linked insurance in ‘Thrift and Credit Cooperatives’ promoted by Cooperative Development
Foundation (CDF)
• Cattle Insurance Scheme in ‘Mulukanoor Women’s Cooperative Milk Producers Union’ again
promoted by CDF
• Cattle and Life insurance schemes administered by SHGs and their Federations promoted by
Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty (SERP).
These are some of the interesting cases, while I am sure that there are umpteen examples of Mutual
Insurance across India. These products are more useful as they are self-administered and mutually
managed. So please give enough thought to insurance delivery models. I would say the best way is to
provide technical assistance to the existing collectives on mutual insurance products or developing
products for these organisations.
If you have further information to share on this topic, please send it to Solution Exchange for the
Microfinance Community in India at se-mf@solutionexchange-un.net.in with the subject heading “Re: [se-
mf] Query: Delivery of Micro Insurance Services- Experiences. Additional Reply”
Disclaimer: In posting messages or incorporating these messages into synthesized responses, the UN
accepts no responsibility for their veracity or authenticity. Members intending to use or transmit the
information contained in these messages should be aware that they are relying on their own judgment.