Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword or section
Like this
16Activity
P. 1
Government Documents That Take UFOs Seriously. By Richard M. Dolan

Government Documents That Take UFOs Seriously. By Richard M. Dolan

Ratings:

5.0

(4)
|Views: 1,043 |Likes:
Published by sergejsh
"Since belief in UFOs is a near-professional suicide in most respected circles, what would it mean if we discovered that, within the classified world, people have taken it seriously for years?
It just so happens that they have. They do."
"Since belief in UFOs is a near-professional suicide in most respected circles, what would it mean if we discovered that, within the classified world, people have taken it seriously for years?
It just so happens that they have. They do."

More info:

Published by: sergejsh on Dec 22, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/15/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 1
Twelve Government DocumentsThat Take UFOs Seriously
by Richard M. Dolan
 
Copyright 2003 & 2009 by Richard M. Dolan. All rights reserved.Original source:http://keyholepublishing.com/Leading-UFO-Documents.html
Ask people what they think about UFOs, and you’re sure to get opinions ranging through all extremes andnuances. Some are so embarrassed by the topic that they simply refuse to consider any evidencewhatsoever, like the Pope refusing to look through Galileo’s telescope. Others claim not only to be certainthat aliens are here, but to have exact, insider knowledge of what it’s all about. Between these extremesare endless variations.It’s the same with how we approach the subject. Some people read UFO books for fun, like a mysterynovel or scary story. Others are more interested in scientific evidence, such as analysis of photographs,videos, or material samples. Still others prefer more hypothetical roads, like theories about the likelihoodof life elsewhere in the universe, or how an advanced propulsion system might work. There are a host of specialized studies, too, ranging from abductions, to crop circles, to animal mutilations, and more. Or, youmay focus on the believers and witnesses themselves by studying UFOs as an element of popular culture,or from a psycho-social perspective.Another approach is historical. There are, after all, government UFO documents that anyone can read.What do they say? Can these documents tell us whether the government or military have ever beeninterested in this phenomenon? If so, why?Granted, this approach might not be of the same value as subjecting a piece of flying saucer to laboratorytests. But it would certainly be important if the government had documents showing that UFOs are trulysomething extraordinary, and even possibly alien. Especially after telling the public the opposite for years.
 
 2Since belief in UFOs is a near-professional suicide in most respected circles, what would it mean if wediscovered that, within the classified world, people have taken it seriously for years?It just so happens that they have. They do.For many years, it was hard to obtain declassified government documents about UFOs. During the 1950sand 1960s, a few documents wended their way to the rest of the world, but this was rare. Then, in 1974,the U.S. government amended the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The result was a veritable goldenage of document releases that lasted roughly until a 1982 Executive Order from President Reagan. WhileUFO documents continue to be released, a repeat of the Great Flood of the seventies appears unlikely.Black-out, declassified UFO documents look rather cool, but most don’t provide any evidence for aliens,and many of them are not even that interesting. But some are
very
interesting. Whether they prove thatUFOs are aliens or something entirely different, they make it clear that this topic has been taken veryseriously at high levels, and has been subject to a great deal of secrecy.Considering how marginalized this subject is from mainstream culture, making this point is enough for aday’s work. There are always deeper waters within which to swim, but for now let us stay close to theshore and look at a few of these documents. Even though most of these are well-known to UFOresearchers, they continue to remain almost completely unknown to the wider public. Apparently, somethings are so obvious that they are invisible.
1. The 1947 Twining Memo.
For good reason, this is one of the most important UFOdocuments we have. On September 23, 1947, right at the beginning of the “modern” UFO era, General Nathan Twining,Head of the U.S. Air Material Command (AMC), wrote aclassified letter to Air Force General George Schulgenregarding the “flying discs.” He said the objects were “real andnot visionary or fictitious.” They may possibly be natural phenomena, he wrote, such as meteors. But:“the reported operating characteristics such as extreme rates of climb, maneuverability (particularly in roll), and action whichmust be considered evasive when sighted ... lend belief to the possibility that some of the objects are controlled either manually, automatically, or remotely.”Twining listed several common descriptions of UFOs. Theygenerally were silent, had a metallic or light reflecting surface,no trail, were circular or elliptical in shape, and often flat onthe bottom. Many descriptions indicated a dome on top.Several reports indicated they flew in formation. Quite specificinformation, indeed.UFO skeptics have pointed to Twining’s statement that no wreckage of a flying disc had been recovered.It’s true that he was probably in a good position to know. But what we don’t know is whether Twining
General Nathan Twining, author of theSeptember 23, 1947 memo. He later earned afourth star and became USAF Chief of Staff --and then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
 
 
 3would have been able to tell Schulgen about a UFO crash, if indeed such a thing happened. Simply put, if Schulgen lacked a “need to know,” Twining could not have told him.On the other hand, Twining did state that UFOs were not secret American craft. This came as a surprise toSchulgen, who expected to learn that there was nothing to the affair, that everything was under control.Was Twining was hiding the fact that UFO’s were classified technology? It’s a fair question.With the hindsight of more than fifty years, the answer seems to be no. There is simply no credibleevidence that the U.S. had any craft in 1947, experimental or otherwise, that could duplicate the reportedmaneuvers of flying saucers. Anyway, why would Twining tell Schulgen to keep studying flying saucersif they were simply classified American craft? If there were good reasons for doing so, none haveemerged.

Activity (16)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
ARCHIVITA added this note
Great find
ARCHIVITA liked this
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
kahuna1953 liked this
kahuna1953 liked this
lion255 liked this
aqarai liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->