.diagnosis is potentially life saving to those who are HIVpositive.Program management of XDR TB and treatment design inHIV negative and positive people:
¡
Adhere to WHO Guidelines for the ProgrammaticManagement of Drug Resistant TB;
¡
Improve MDR TB management conditions;
¡
Enable access to all MDR TB second-line drugs,under proper conditions;
¡
Ensure all patients with HIV are adequately treatedfor TB and started on appropriate antiretroviraltherapy.
l
Laboratory XDR TB definition:
XDR TB is defined as resistance to at least rifampicin andisoniazid from among the first line anti-TB drugs (which isthe definition of MDR TB) in addition to resistance to anyfluoroquinolone, and to at least one of three injectablesecond-line anti-TB drugs used in TB treatment(capreomycin, kanamycin, and amikacin).
l
Infection control and protection of health careworkers with emphasis on high HIV prevalencesettings.
l
Immediate XDR TB surveillance activities and needs:
Strengthen laboratory capacity to diagnose, manage andsurvey drug resistance; Commence rapid surveys of drug-resistant TB so that the extent and size of the XDR TBepidemic, and its association with HIV, can bedetermined.
l
Advocacy, communication and social mobilization:
¡
Initiate information-sharing strategies that promoteeffective prevention, treatment, control of XDR TBat global and national levels and also in high HIVprevalence settings;
¡
Strengthen communication with affectedcommunities and individuals;
¡
Develop a fully-budgeted plan with the resourcesand funding required to address XDR TB, includingthrough necessary improvements in overall TBcontrol and HIV care in the immediate and mediumterm;
¡
Initiate resource mobilization.Many of the lessons-learned from the MDR TB outbreaks in theUnited States in the 1990s are being brought to bear toaddress this urgent situation. This includes expertise in rapidoutbreak response, surveillance, building laboratory capacity,and infection control, all while keeping a focus on overall TBprogram strengthening as the crucial element to prevent thedevelopment and transmission of MDR and XDR TB. Our countryhas accrued more than 10 years of experience addressing drug-resistance in resource-limited settings and contributedsubstantively to development of the DOTS-Plus strategy andglobal policy on MDR TB. This puts us in an unparalleled positionto respond to the current crisis; we will rely on nationalpartners such as the National TB Controllers Association andthe National Coalition for the Elimination of Tuberculosis,American Thoracic Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Staff from the Division of Tuberculosis Elimination(DTBE) and the Global AIDS Program (GAP) to continue andexpand work with colleagues in WHO, U.S. Agency forInternational Development, South Africa MRC, and with otherinternational partners to provide technical assistance, shareexpertise, and mobilize financial and technical resources torespond to action items to address XDR TB.In addition to providing our expertise and technical assistanceto our international partners, we must also ensure that ourdomestic programs are capable of diagnosing, treating, andpreventing TB, including XDR TB. The hard work by many instate and local health department programs has resulted in adecline in TB trends, including in 2005 the lowest reportednumber of persons diagnosed with TB disease in the UnitedStates. However, that very success makes us vulnerable to thecomplacency and neglect that come with fewer personssuffering with TB. In the 1970s and early 1980s, the nation letits guard down and TB control efforts were neglected. Thecountry became complacent about TB, and many states andcities redirected TB prevention and control funds to otherprograms. Consequently, the trend toward elimination was
Add a Comment