Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
15Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Zakir Naik is a liar

Zakir Naik is a liar

Ratings: (0)|Views: 653 |Likes:
Published by 791987

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: 791987 on Dec 30, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/06/2012

pdf

text

original

 
There is a proverb in Sanskrit which states that if one mixes even a littlepoison in the food, the entire plate has to be rejected.We shall understand the implications of this proverb through a case study.We shall take one of the articles of Dr Zakir Naik, the self-proclaimed scholarof comparative religion for this. We have already seen in previous series howDr Naik has ably proved that Prophet Muhammad was predicted in Hinduscriptures, even if meant accepting that the Prophet was a ghost, demon,mass-murderer. You can review the analysis of Dr Naik’s researchathttp://agniveer.com/featured/prophet-hindu/as a three part series.Today, we shall take the excellent research article: “Introduction toHinduism” by Dr Zakir Naik. You can review the original articleathttp://www.irf.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=128What we shall do here is to edit the article by strikethrough
 
of certainportions and providingreplacement in red colorand
comments in italics
.By the end of the article, you would realize how a little poison makes theentire food deadly. You shall also realize this further when we analyze hisnext article on Hinduism in future.
A REQUEST: KINDLY PROVIDE YOUR COMMENTS AND FEEDBACK SOTHAT WE ARE MOTIVATED FOR FURTHER RESEARCH ANDIMPROVING UPON OUR WORK. ALSO SHARE THE CONTENT AND SITEWITH FRIENDS IF YOU FND IT USEFUL. KNOWLEDGE THAT IS NOTSHARED EVENTUALLY GETS DESTROYED.
So here we BEGIN:
INTRODUCTION TO HINDUISM by Dr. Zakir Naik
(We shall review hismedical knowledge in a later post on Science in Quran and Vedas)
 “The most popular among the Aryan religions is Hinduism.” 
 
(1. Very smartly, he has started by sowing doubts that Aryan and Hinduism imply different things. Later he says that Hinduism isbased on Vedas.2. Can Dr Naik or his IRF Team name few other religions which are Aryan but not Hinduism? Can they prove that the word Arya did not originate from Vedas? The strategy was Divide and Rule by sowing seeds of differences among smaller groups)
Dr Naik: “‘ Hindu’ is actually a Persian word that stands for the inhabitants of the region beyond the Indus Valley. However, in common parlance,Hinduism is a blanket term for an assortment of religious beliefs, most of which are(which is)based on the Vedas, the Upanishads and the BhagavadGita. “(as final authority and Upanishads and Geeta as other guiding texts)
(Even Upanishads and Mahabharat claim Vedas to be the Supremeauthority and clearly state that all other texts including Purans areto be interpreted in lines with Vedas. This is important because,what IRF will do is to twist and try to manipulate the meaning of verses to suite there own agenda of proving Muhammad left, right and center!)
Dr Naik: “II INTRODUCTION TO HINDU SCRIPTURES.
There are several sacred scriptures of the Hindus. Among these are theVedas, Upanishads and the Puranas.
1. VEDAS:
1. The word Veda is derived from vid which means to know, knowledge parexcellence or sacred wisdom. There are four principal divisions of the Vedas” (although according to their number, they amount to 1131 out of whichabout a dozen are available)
(1. This sentence was deliberately put to prove that complete Vedasare not available and hence Hindus should accept Quran as full and final message of God.
 
2. But the fact is that there are only 4 Vedas and ALL are available inexactly same format as they were first given.3. The 1131 number of branches being referred is those of explanations/ variants of original Veda Samhitas. The original still remain intact without change of even a single pronunciation or  pitch)
 
.Dr Naik: “According to Maha Bhashya of Patanjali, there are 21 branches of Rigveda, 9 types of Atharvaveda, 101 branches of Yajurveda and 1000 of Samveda).2. The Rigveda, the Yajurveda and the Samveda are considered to be moreancient books and are known as Trai Viddya or the ‘Triple Sciences’. TheRigveda is the oldest and has been compiled in three long and differentperiods of time. The 4th Veda is the Atharvaveda, which is of a later date.
 
” (1. All Vedas are considered to be of same age. They were revealed at inception of human civilization. There is no proof whatsoever toconclude that Vedas were written over a long period of time and  some Vedas are older, some of later date.2. Dr Naik has brought forth the baseless conjecture of westernindologists and communists to suit his own agenda.3. Fact remains that there is not one single evidence to support hishypothesis except that it suits the agenda of invaders to prove that even Aryans were invaders and Vedas are not revealed.4. Dr Naik has been openly challenged officially to come for a debateon this, but he prefers to remain in hiding.)
Dr Naik: “3. There is no unanimous opinion regarding the date of compilation or revelation of the four Vedas. According to Swami Dayanand,founder of the Arya Samaj, the Vedas were revealed 1310 million yearsago” (1.97 billion years ago)

Activity (15)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Abhijit Mukadam liked this
javedk_33 liked this
javedk_33 liked this
Doctor Jones liked this
gorz22 liked this
blaire312 liked this
Aminullah01 liked this
Raj liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->