Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
10-01-01 Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-01550) - CM/ECF - Table Summary of NEFs in Zernik v Connor, based on copies provided by Clerk on December 29, 2009

10-01-01 Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-01550) - CM/ECF - Table Summary of NEFs in Zernik v Connor, based on copies provided by Clerk on December 29, 2009

Ratings: (0)|Views: 46 |Likes:
Direct evidence of alleged fraud in operation of PACER and CM/ECF the case management systems of the United States courts. See separately - related declaration, and also the NEFs that were the source of data for the table.
Direct evidence of alleged fraud in operation of PACER and CM/ECF the case management systems of the United States courts. See separately - related declaration, and also the NEFs that were the source of data for the table.

More info:

Categories:Business/Law, Finance
Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Jan 02, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/06/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Dr Z
Joseph Zernik, PhDPO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; fax: 801 998-0917; email: jz12345@earthlink.ne
t
10-01-01 Review of NEFs in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) as received from USDistrict Court on December 29, 2009
Table 1. NEFs in Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-01550)
 Complaint was filed March 6, 2008 against some 10 judges of the Superior Court of California, Countyof Los Angeles, pursuant to
 Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law
- 42 USC §1983. It wasfurther alleged that conduct of such judges and others, in collusion with Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation amounted to
 Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization
 
(RICO)
pursuantto 18 USC § 1961–1968. Access to NEFs was allowed only by December 29, 2009, and data fromNEFs was compiled in the table below.
Dkt # - RequestedNEFsRec'd[Y/N]RSADigitalSig[Y/N]Parties & Counsellisted as recipients of NEF by emailNotes
1. Dkt #01- March 6, 2008Verified ComplaintY
Y
None1. RSA Sig incomplete2. Requesting clarificationby office of the clerk 2. Dkt # Unnumbered March 5, 2008 Issuanceof SummonsesY
N
None1. Therefore no valid andeffectual summonseswere issued in this case3. Dkt #04 March 5, 2008Notice of Reference tomagistrateY
N
None1. Therefore NoMagistrate had honest,valid and effectualauthority in the case4. Dkt #05 March 6, 2008Plaintiff Ex pateApplication for TROY
Y
None1. RSA Sig incomplete2. Requesting clarificationby office of the clerk 5. Dkt #09 March 6, 2008ReassignmentY
N
None1. Therefore – recusal of Judge Letts was invalidand ineffectual6. Dkt #10 March 7, 2008ReassignmentY
N
None1. Therefore- Recusal of Magistrate Nagle wasinvalid and ineffectual7. Dkt #14 March 21,2008 Minutes by JudgeVirginia PhillipsY
N
1. John W Patton - jwp@paslaw.com 
1. March 21, 2008 Minutesby Judge VirginiaPhillips – denying theTRO were dishonest,invalid and ineffectual.8. Dkt #27 March 31,2008 Minutes byMagistrate CarlaWoehrleY
N
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw,com 2. Michael L Wachtellmwachtel!@buchalter.com 3. Sarah L Overton
1. March 31, 2008 Minutesby Magistrate CarlaWoehrle, orderingPlaintiff to execute
 
Page
2/5
January 01, 2010
soverton@cmda-law.com 
Summonses weredishonest, invalid, andineffectual9. Dkt #33 April 18, 2008Minutes by MagistrateCarla WoehrleY
N
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw,com 2. Michael L Wachtellmwachtell@buchalter.com 3. Sarah L Overtonsoverton@cmda-law.com 
1. April 18, 2008 Minutesby Magistrate CarlaWoehrle, in re: Motionto Dismiss weredishonest, invalid, andineffectual.10. Dkt #43 POS forSummonses ReturnedExecutedY
Y
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw,com 2. Michael L Wachtellmwachtell@buchalter.com 3. Sarah L Overtonsoverton@cmda-law.com 
1. RSA Sig incomplete2. Requesting clarificationby office of the clerk 3. Notice that such entrywas in re: Summonsesthat were nevereffectually issued.. Notice that such entrywas in re: Summonsesthat were adulterated byPro Se Clerk ChrisSawyer.11. Dkt #57 May 15, 2008Minutes by MagistrateCarla WoehrleY
N
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw,com 2. Michael L Wachtellmwachtell@buchalter.com 3. Sarah L Overtonsoverton@cmda-law.com 
1. May 15, 2008 Minutesby Magistrate CarlaWoehrle, in re: OrderingPlaintiff not to fileanything in court weredishonest, invalid, andineffectual.12. Dkt #59 May 22, 2008Reply on Motion toDismissY
Y
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw,com 2. Michael L Wachtellmwachtell@buchalter.com 3. Sarah L Overtonsoverton@cmda-law.com 
1. RSA Sig incomplete2. Requesting clarificationby office of the clerk 13. Dkt #62 FirstAmended ComplaintY
Y
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw,com 2. Michael L Wachtellmwachtell@buchalter.com 3. Sarah L Overtonsoverton@cmda-law.com 
1. RSA Sig incomplete2. Requesting clarificationby office of the clerk 14. Dkt #63 June 6, 2008Minutes by MagistrateCarla WoehrleY
N
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw,com 2. Michael L Wachtellmwachtell@buchalter.com 3. Sarah L Overtonsoverton@cmda-law.com 
1. June 6, 2008 Minutes byMagistrate CarlaWoehrle, in re: FindingMoot Plaintiff’s ExParte Application forReconsideration of June6, 2008 Order not to fileanything in court weredishonest, invalid, andineffectual.
 
Page
3/5
January 01, 2010
15. Dkt #68 Motion todismiss First AmendedComplaint.Y
Y
1. Kathryn E DiCarlokdicarlo@cmda-law.com 2. Sarah L OvertonSQverton@cmda-law.com 3. John W Patton Jr jwp@paslaw.com 4. Michael L wachtellmwaGhtell@buchalter.com 
1. RSA Sig incomplete2. Requesting clarificationby office of the clerk 16. Dkt #69 Motion todismissY
Y
1. Kathryn E DiCarlokdicarlo@cmda-law.com 2. Sarah L OvertonSQverton@cmda-law.com 3. John W Patton Jr jwp@paslaw.com 4. Michael L wachtellmwaGhtell@buchalter.com 
1. RSA Sig incomplete2. Requesting clarificationby office of the clerk 17. Dkt #70 June 6, 2008Minutes by MagistrateCarla WoehrleY
N
1. Kathryn E DiCarlokdicarlo@cmda-law.com 2. Sarah L OvertonSQverton@cmda-law.com 3. John W Patton Jr jwp@paslaw.com 4. Michael L wachtellmwaGhtell@buchalter.com 
1. June 6, 2008 Minutes byMagistrate CarlaWoehrle, in re: Motionsto Dismiss weredishonest, invalid, andineffectual.18. Dkt #77 June 6, 2008Minutes by MagistrateCarla WoehrleY
N
1. John
W
Patton jwp@paslaw.com 2. Michael
L
wachtellmwachtell@buchalter.com 3. Sarah
L
Overtonsoverton@cmda-law.com 4. Jenna MoldawskyJenna.moldawsky@bryancave.com5. Kathryn
E
DiCarlokcticarlo@cmda-law.com 
1. June 6, 2008 Minutes byMagistrate CarlaWoehrle, in re: Motionsto Dismiss weredishonest, invalid, andineffectual.19. Dkt #102 March 18,2009 Order by JudgeVirginia PhillipsY
N
1. John W Pat ton jwp@pa.slaw.com 2. David J Pasternak djp@paslaw.com 3. Michael L wachtellmwachtell@buchalter.com 4. Sarah L Overtonsoverton@Cmda-law.com 5. Jenna Moldawsky j enna.moldawsky@bryancave com6. Kathryn E DiCarlokdicarlo@cmda-law.com 
1. March 18, 2009 Order byJudge Virginia Phillips,denying Plaintiff’sRequest to DisqualifyMagistrate CarlaWoehrle for a cause wasdishonest, invalid, andineffectual.20. Dkt #103- March 31,2009 Notice byMagistrate CarlaWoehrleY
N
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw.com 2. David J Pasternak djp@paslaw.com 3. Michael L wachtel]mwachtell@buchalter.com 4. Sarah L Overtonsoverton@cmda-law.com 5. Jenna Moldawsky jemna.moidawsky@bryancave.com 6. Kathryn E DiCarlokdicarlo@cmda-law.com 
1. March 31, 2009 Noticeby Magistrate CarlaWoehrle of Filing R & Rwas dishonest, invalid,and ineffectual.21. Dkt #104 March 31,2009 R & R byMagistrate CarlaWoehrleY
N
1. John W Patton jwp@paslaw.com 2. David J Pasternak djp@paslaw.com 3. Michael L Wachtellmwachtel@buchalter.com 
1. March 31, 2009 R & Rby Magistrate CarlaWoehrle to GrantMotions to Dismiss wasdishonest, invalid, and

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->