L. A. Confidentiel : Les secrets de Lance Armstrong (L. A. Confidential : Lance Armstrong's Secrets) is a book by sports journalists David Walsh, of the The Sunday Times, and Pierre Ballester. It was published in 2004 and was awarded the Prix Gondecourt.
The book contains circumstantial evidence of cyclist Lance Armstrong's having used performance enhancing drugs, including statements from a number of former associates of Armstrong's including his former masseuse, Emma O'Reilly. Armstrong denies the claims and lodged a lawsuit to insert a denial into the book itself, which was rejected.[1] Cases for defamation were lodged against Walsh and Ballester but were dropped in 2006.
Walsh wrote about the book in The Sunday Times in terms which conveyed the impression that Armstrong was guilty of doping. Armstrong subsequently won a settlement and an apology from The Sunday Times after he sued it for libel.
The book has only been published in French.
L. A. Confidentiel : Les secrets de Lance Armstrong (L. A. Confidential : Lance Armstrong's Secrets) is a book by sports journalists David Walsh, of the The Sunday Times, and Pierre Ballester. It was published in 2004 and was awarded the Prix Gondecourt.
The book contains circumstantial evidence of cyclist Lance Armstrong's having used performance enhancing drugs, including statements from a number of former associates of Armstrong's including his former masseuse, Emma O'Reilly. Armstrong denies the claims and lodged a lawsuit to insert a denial into the book itself, which was rejected.[1] Cases for defamation were lodged against Walsh and Ballester but were dropped in 2006.
Walsh wrote about the book in The Sunday Times in terms which conveyed the impression that Armstrong was guilty of doping. Armstrong subsequently won a settlement and an apology from The Sunday Times after he sued it for libel.
The book has only been published in French.
L. A. Confidentiel : Les secrets de Lance Armstrong (L. A. Confidential : Lance Armstrong's Secrets) is a book by sports journalists David Walsh, of the The Sunday Times, and Pierre Ballester. It was published in 2004 and was awarded the Prix Gondecourt.
The book contains circumstantial evidence of cyclist Lance Armstrong's having used performance enhancing drugs, including statements from a number of former associates of Armstrong's including his former masseuse, Emma O'Reilly. Armstrong denies the claims and lodged a lawsuit to insert a denial into the book itself, which was rejected.[1] Cases for defamation were lodged against Walsh and Ballester but were dropped in 2006.
Walsh wrote about the book in The Sunday Times in terms which conveyed the impression that Armstrong was guilty of doping. Armstrong subsequently won a settlement and an apology from The Sunday Times after he sued it for libel.
The book has only been published in French.
we
that this high level was not detected inthe antidoping controls? Beta-hCG i 2
Htooical marker present in pregnant women of in people who have testouat
ae oaat the chorionic catcinoma type. Taking this male hormone effectively
caieet ce the production of testosterone, which explains is use for doping, of
to easne cheating, hCG is a hormone used after a treatment of anabolic steroids
tarcpat the production of testosterone,” explained Michel Audran, professor of
Re Ezeuty of Pharmacy at Montpelier, member of the research group, Science
tnd Industry against Blood Doping (SIAB), which makes its ‘contribution to the
BELO (French committe fr the preventipn and fight against doping): “Wihnen this
ceikidal is on anabolic steroids, his organism no longer needs his endogenous
testosterone.”
‘An “inexplicable” Non-detection
Comparable to taking anabotics, bts-hCG favors muscular growth in association
comet supplemented with proteins, increases traning capacity, stimulates
vit ei J eporeesiveness, and pushes back the fatigue threshold tn fact this
the wetted in 1063, detectable through wine analysis since 1987, was
sre te by lesson ofthe CIO and the ICU * in 1968. That year, arpa
aoa bY the Engleh professor Raymond Brooks revealed that 10% of al
ates cporsman resorted to I However, even ifbete-hCG was banned
cre sotematicaly tested for in urine because no offical threshold fora
weet eaing had been dfined, A rather troubling “maybe in such acase
por bela CG was only looked fri the testosterone eptestosterone ratio
aoe ier than 6. This standard figure was evidence of a suspicious male
ee dre lin an individual, Examples: if testosterone and epitestosterone
aan tucly 1.5, even 6-35 of 0-200, the subject dove not toot peetve.
sao erect jacques de Ceauiti, supervisor ofthe Laboratoire national de