WATER CONTINGENCY PLANNINGTASK FORCE
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
21 December 2009
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Task Force acknowledges the dedication of the co-chairs:
•
John Brock Chairman and CEO, Coca-Cola Enterprises
•
Tim Lowe CEO, Lowe Engineers A special thanks to Technical Advisors who donated their time and resources to the Task Force effort.
•
AECOM
•
Arcadis
•
Brown and Caldwell
•
CH2M Hill
•
Golder & Associates
•
Jordan Jones and Goulding
•
MACTEC Engineering in partnership with Tanner and Associates, Tommy Craig, SchnabelEngineering and B&E Jackson Engineers
•
Post Buckley Shue & Jernigan
•
University of North Carolina, Environmental Finance Centerand
•
The Boston Consulting Group (Atlanta office) for coordination of Technical Advisor Teamsand overall process facilitation
ii
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
Page1
Executive Summary...............................................................................................................................4
2
Introduction............................................................................................................................................5
2.1
Background.........................................................................................................................................5
2.2
Limitations on scope of study...........................................................................................................7
3
Recommendations: supporting Policies and Actions.........................................................................8
3.1
Policy Recommendations to pursue now.......................................................................................9
3.2
Policy Recommendations in case of “Contingency Plan” requirements.....................................12
3.3
Additional policies for consideration.............................................................................................14
4
Recommended Contingency Solutions...............................................................................................14
4.1
Description of 2012 option portfolio..............................................................................................16
4.2
2015 contingency portfolio.............................................................................................................20
4.3
Recommended 2020 portfolio of options......................................................................................21
5
Methodology.........................................................................................................................................23
5.1
Task Force solution development process....................................................................................23
5.2
Primary’ and ‘Alternate’ 2020 portfolios........................................................................................25
6
Summary Of Task Force Feedback....................................................................................................29
6.1
Summary of Task Force feedback on principles..........................................................................29
6.2
‘Summary of Task Force feedback on portfolios...........................................................................30
6.3
‘No-regret’ and ‘contingency’ options............................................................................................31
6.4
Alternative views on key types of options.....................................................................................32
7
Topics Pending Further Evaluation....................................................................................................34
7.1
Determination of downstream flow impact..................................................................................34
7.2
Additional options requiring more detailed evaluation..............................................................35
7.3
Regional governance model............................................................................................................38
8.
Conclusion........................................................................................................................................38
DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS APPENDIX I.
List of Task Force MembersII.
Fact base: water situation, facts on usageIII.
Complete set of options evaluated with rationale, cost, yield, implementation feasibility IV.
Technical assumptions used in option evaluation V.
Task Force member survey results VI.
Comments and submissions provided to Task Force
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Water Contingency Final Report
Georgia WATER CONTINGENCY PLANNING TASK FORCE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1.3K
Reads
1
Readcasts
80
Embed Views
More From This User
Notes
Load more
