The 2009-10 fiscal year budget in Pennsyl-vania was not finalized for 101 days becauseit was difficult for the negotiating parties tofind common ground for compromise. Some of us in the Legislature wanted to cut the size of government. We opposed tax increases. Somemembers favored increasing taxes and the sizeof the state budget.I saw lawmakers sink to new lows duringthis process. I was astounded when the gov-ernor needlessly vetoed billions of dollars infunding for public schools and social servicesto put pressure on the Legislature to increasetaxes, and I was astonished when the HouseDemocrat leadership proposed a state budgetthat completely eliminated funding for higher education. The tricks and ploys seemed never ending during the impasse.On a positive note, I was also thrilled whena small group of House Democrats joined with
The 2009-10 Budget: The Highs and LowsEfforts to Change Budget Process
Local School Districts Receive Increases in State Budget
School District 2009-10 BEF Inc. 2009-10 BEF Ttl SEF Ttl BEF/SEF/ARRAInc. over 08-09 BEFBrandywine Heights Area $076,984, 2.00% $3,926,155 $0,986,747 $05,445,766, 12.6%
Fleetwood $495,861, 9.31% $5,822,082 $1,149,678 $07,584,247, 17.1%Kutztown $062,099, 2.00% $3,167,034 $0,858,066 $04,600,743, 16.1%
Parkland $270,179, 4.28% $6,585,611 $3,261,344 $12,559,160, 31.1% Northwestern Lehigh $157,876, 2.97% $5,475,614 $1,269,852 $07,372,662, 11.9%
BEF = Basic Education Funding SEF = Special Education Funding Ttl = Total Funding ARRA = American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
I am drafting my own legislation to improve the budget pro-cess and establish milestones that must be met by legislativeleadership and the governor, who are largely responsible for the pace of the budget process. It was a gross misuse of power bythe majority Appropriation Committee chairman, who did notintroduce a budget bill until July 11. This single act caused atleast a 30- to 40-day delay and contributed to the 101-day bud-get impasse. My legislation would take away their leadership position for a two-year period for missing budget deadlines.This would be more persuasive than docking pay.Other members have also proposed that the executive branchand General Assembly meet deadlines. The following measureswould help prevent a handful of people conducting backroommeetings from blocking a budget deal. We can never again al-low individuals, families and services to be held hostage to forcea tax increase.•A bipartisan Speaker’s Commission on Budgetary Re-form has been proposed that would determine timelinesand milestones in the budget process and institute conse-quences if these are not met. Performance-based budget principles would be adopted and greater involvement by
2009-10 BudgetFast Facts
• Final 2008-09 deficit (lastfiscal year): $3.25 billion.• Total 2009-10 spending(current fiscal year): $27.8billion.• New or increased taxes:$1 billion a year.• Revenue shortfall to date2009-10 fiscal year: $160million and counting.• Rainy Day Fund balanceafter this budget: $0.• Health Care ProviderRetention Account bal-ance after this budget: $0.
their Republican counterparts to oppose an in-crease to the Personal Income Tax (PIT). Our bi-partisan alliance essentially killed the ideaof raising the PIT, taxing the arts and placing anew tax on our local fire departments and com-munity organizations.This was a year when leadership made dealsand the “powerless” rank-and-file membersrefused to be forced into voting for legislationthey could not support. That is why there werethree different highly publicized “deals.”In the end, I joined the majority of my caucusin opposing the final budget proposal for sev-eral key reasons:
• It spends more than currentrevenues can sustain.• It increases taxes on employers,which will stifle economic growth.• It completely drains all of Pennsylvania’s reserve funds.
every House member would be ensured. This commissioncould also implement budget continuity for state governmentoperations to prevent state workers or service providers whodepend on state money from being held hostage in the future.•
House Resolution 460
would institute a Committee of theWhole process to resolve budget impasses, allowing Housemembers to openly discuss budget-related topics and reach acompromise.•
House Bill 936
would automatically extend the last year’s budget if no new state budget is enacted by 12:01 a.m. on July 1.
•
House Bill 937
creates a more definitive timeline for futurestate budgets. If deadlines are not met by the House or Sen-ate, the daily pay for each member in the chamber delayingthe process would be docked until action is taken.•
House Bill 1629
proposes salary forfeitures by the governor,his cabinet and secretary of the budget, as well as Houseand Senate members when a budget impasse goes past July.Salaries would not be restored retroactively.•
House Bill 1751
would ban the act of leveraging roll callvotes for promises of legislative favors, hiring of staff, grantapprovals and capital projects.
Add a Comment