I.
That
Federal
urge
[Declaration_independence]
I’D
suppose
an
image
like
this
one,
is
what
most
of
us
associate
with
the
word
Federalism
and
Federal.
But
when
these
worthies
–the
gentlemen
here
immortalized
as
the
signers
of
America’s
declaration
of
independence-‐
put
pen
to
paper,
whatever
association
they
had
in
mind
was
different
from
the
kind
of
association
America
actually
became.
This
painting
commemorates
1776,
but
the
Continental
Congress
this
independence
declaration
produced
had
to
work
through
two
constitutions
before
the
United
States
of
America
became
a
truly
Federal
Republic
in
1789.
And
they
had
to
go
through
a
Civil
War
to
really
settle
issues
between
the
states,
left
over
from
the
birth
of
the
North
American
Union.
I’ve
been
enjoying
this
book,
“American
Creation,”
which
chronicles
the
main
issues
that
hounded
America’s
founding
fathers.
But
even
as
it’s
delightful
to
ponder
what
Washington,
Jefferson,
Adams
and
others
were
quarreling
over
in
the
18th
century,
why
is
Federalism
appealing
to
us?
[spanish_flag]
The
conquest
of
the
territories
that
now
compose
the
Philippines
was
undertaken
by
the
Spanish
on
a
kingdom-‐by-‐ kingdom
basis.
And
upon
getting
local
royalty
to
accept
Spanish
sovereignty,
the
Spanish
then
reorganized
territory
into
provinces.
At
first,
the
nerve
center
of
these
territories
was
Cebu,
and
then,
it
became
Manila.
[commonewealth_manolo]
The
Americans,
in
conquering
the
Philippines,
built
on
what
the
Spanish
had
established
and
created
new
provinces
of
their
own
–Rizal
Province
is
a
good
example.
They
formalized
local
and
provincial
governments,
taking
away
the
participation
of
the
Catholic
Church.
Again,
everything
was
administered
from
Manila.
[commonewealth_02]
When
we
successfully
negotiated
the
restoration
of
our
independence,
the
writers
of
the
1935
Constitution
were
concerned
with
keeping
the
country
together,
since
the
issue
of
independence
would
soon
be
an
accomplished
fact.
They
decided
they
preferred
a
strong
state.
[Unitarystates]
And
so,
our
development
has
led
us
to
being
classified
as
a
unitary
state,
one
where
there
is
a
strong
central
government.
[Marcos-‐afp]
Perhaps
the
greatest
innovation
to
the
way
our
country’s
been
organized
was
the
creation
of
regions
by
President
Marcos.
[Ph_regions_and_provinces]
This
was
a
way
to
neutralize
the
tendency
of
provincial
leaders
to
resist
national
interference:
or
put
another
way,
to
force
inwardly-‐looking
local
leaders
to
somehow
work
together,
at
least
on
a
regional
basis.
Since
then,
we’ve
adopted
the
concept
of
autonomous
areas,
of
which
the
ARMM
is
a
prime
example.
[Aguinaldo]
But
this
doesn’t
address
Federalism.
The
Spanish
never
thought
of
it;
the
Americans
who
lived
by
it
didn’t
transplant
it
here,
so
where
did
it
come
from?
Our
revolution
began
with
eight
provinces
placed
under
martial
law.
It
spread.
We
had
three
wars
of
independence.
First
was
the
Katipunan-‐led
revolution,
from
1896-‐1897.
Then
there
was
the
Aguinaldo
dictatorship
from
1898-‐1899.
Both
against
Spain.
And
then
there
was
our
First
Republic’s
resistance
to
American
conquest.
It
was
during
the
third
war
of
independence,
when
the
Malolos
Republic
ruled
much
of
Luzon,
that
President
Aguinaldo
had
to
try
to
find
a
way
to
include
the
rest
of
the
archipelago.
The
Visayan
Federal
Republic
was
constituted
in
Iloilo
and
had
to
be
convinced
to
recognize
the
government
in
Malolos,
which
it
did.
Aguinaldo
was
less
successful
in
courting
the
cooperation
of
the
Sultan
of
Sulu.
[-‐-‐Phil
Post
honors
Araneta
as
...a
visionary
who
lived
a
life
dedicated
to
spreading
the
gospel
o]
With
the
defeat
of
the
First
Republic,
and
with
the
creation
of
a
strong
central
government
in
1935,
thinkers
and
leaders
like
Salvador
Araneta
remained
dissatisfied
with
the
setup,
and,
looking
back
to
what
might
have
been
in
the
1890s,
revived
Federalism
as
a
way
to
organize
our
country
in
the
1960s
and
1970s.
The
idea
has
remained
interesting
to
some
in
the
Visayas
and
of
increasing
interest
to
some
in
Mindanao.
[141107_02jr_640]
President
Arroyo,
for
one,
has
been
moderately
interested
in
Federalism
and
in
2005
and
2006,
expressed
support
for
it.
[102307-‐1jr_640]
But
her
past
and
present
allies,
have
been
more
interested
in
parliamentary
government
than
a
Federal
system.
Former
President
Ramos,
for
one,
has
been
ambivalent
about
federalism.
Former
Speaker
de
Venecia,
in
2006,
tried
to
engineer
a
shift
to
parliamentary
government
but
nearly
sparked
People
Power.
[080308_03co_640]
So
what
might
be
President
Arroyo’s
own
preferences,
her
own
devout
wish?
We
might
find
out
in
July,
when
she
delivers
her
state
of
the
nation
address.
But
what’s
interesting
is
that
the
Senate,
which
fought
constitutional
change
in
2006,
has
taken
the
lead
in
reviving
Federalism.
What
that
proposal
is,
is
what
we’ll
tackle
when
we
return.
II.
Pimentel’s
Proposal
THAT
was
from.
The
Senate
proposal,
per
news
reports,
is
as
follows.
The
country
will
be
subdivided
into
eleven
federal
states.
Let’s
take
a
look
at
these
states,
since
you
and
I
might
wake
up
one
day
finding
ourselves
residents
of
one
of
them.
Here
they
are,
with
their
state
capitals,
too.
1.
The
State
of
Northern
Luzon
;
2.
The
State
of
Central
Luzon
;
3.
The
State
of
Southern
Tagalog;
4.
The
State
of
Bicol
;
5.
The
State
of
Minparom
;
6.
The
State
of
Eastern
Visayas
;
7.
The
State
of
Central
Visayas
;
8.
The
State
of
Western
Visayas
;
9.
The
State
of
Northern
Mindanao
;
10.
The
State
of
Southern
Mindanao
;
and
11.
The
State
of
BangsaMoro
12.
The
Federal
Administrative
Region,
Metro-‐Manila.
The
executive
department,
that
is,
the
presidency,
will
remain
in
Metro
Manila.
Congress,
however,
will
be
in
Tagbilaran
City,
out
of
sight
and
perhaps,
out
of
mind.
Where
do
these
proposals
leave
our
regions
(17
at
present)?
Shouldn’t
they
have
provided
a
basis
for
new
Federal
States?
After
all,
provinces
have
evolved
a
relationship
with
each
other
based
on
the
present
regions.
One
obstacle
is
that
forming
new
states
–a
case
of
consolidating
territory
and
resources-‐
clashes
with
the
tendency
of
provincial
politicians
to
protect
themselves
by
gerrymandering
smaller
and
smaller
provinces.
We
have
gone
from
52
provinces
in
1951
to
81
provinces
as
of
2007.
Indonesia
and
Malaysia
haven’t
gerrymandered
on
this
scale;
Thailand
has
actually
reduced
the
number
of
its
provinces
(see
my
column,
“Gerrymandering,”
08/06/07).
Federalism
ignores
this
reality
altogether.
Returning
to
the
proposed
states,
each
state
will
elect
six
senators.
Filipinos
overseas
will
elect
nine
senators.
The
Senate
would
thus
go
from
the
24
members
it’s
had
since
1916,
to
a
membership
of
75.
As
an
appetizer
for
the
House,
which
would
have
a
maximum
of
350
members,
the
term
limit
(currently
three
terms)
would
be
raised
to
a
maximum
of
four
terms,
still
at
three
years
per
term
for
representatives
(Senators
will
stay
at
a
maximum
of
two
terms
of
six
years
per
term).
And
finally,
since
we
should
all
follow
the
money,
one
big
reason
Federalism
is
attractive,
is
that
provinces
think
it’s
a
way
to
guarantee
they
keep
more
money
for
themselves.
Here’s
a
couple
of
slides
from
Senator
Pimentel’s
proposal,
which
details
how
the
distribution
of
our
taxes
would
take
place.
Take
a
look.
But
you
may
have
noticed
that
as
former
national
treasurer
Liling
Briones
recently
put
it,
what
these
proposals
do
is
add
a
new
layer
to
our
government.
We’ve
had
to
live
with
national
and
local
governments;
you’d
now
have
state
governments,
since
existing
provinces
will
be
retained
within
the
proposed
Federal
States.
And
the
implications
of
adding
and
not
reducing
our
government
costs,
is
what
we’ll
tackle
when
we
return.
III.
Interview
IV.
My
view
EVEN
as
the
House
is
poised
to
begin
discussions
with
the
Senate
on
Senator
Pimentel’s
Federalism
proposal,
the
public
has
a
lot
of
catching
up
to
do,
beginning
with
getting
its
hands
on
the
actual
text
of
the
Senate’s
resolution
and
then
dissecting
it.
The
public
needs
to
do
this,
because
once
the
House
starts
haggling
with
the
Senate
over
Federalism,
the
public
could
end
up
squeezed
out
of
the
discussion.
Since
the
Senate
has
put
Federalism
back
on
the
table,
revisiting
the
issue
will
be
useful.
At
present,
the
concept
of
Federalism
is
still
too
alien
and
abstract
for
the
public
at
large
to
really
get
excited
about
it,
even
as
quite
a
few
people
have
gotten
obsessed
with
the
idea.
Reintroducing
the
idea
to
the
public
will
help
focus
attention
on
the
many
proposals
being
put
forward
to
improve
our
political
system
and
foster
development
and
democratization
in
the
country.
But
let’s
talk.
The Philippine historical earthquake catalog: its development, current state and future directions. By Maria Leonila P. Bautista and Bartolome C. Bautista Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS), Department of Science and Technology (DOST), Quezon City, Philippines