Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Joint Appellant Reply Brief

Joint Appellant Reply Brief

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,036|Likes:
Published by xx444

More info:

Published by: xx444 on Jan 06, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

10/27/2013

pdf

text

original

 
No 09-5080
Consolidating No. 09-5161
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,et al.,Case Below 08-2254 JRAppellants,v.Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a naturalperson; de facto President in posse; and asde jure President in posse , also known asBarack Obama, et al.Appellees.
==================
APPELLANTSREPLY BRIEF
==================
John D.HemenwayD.C. Bar #379663Counsel for Appellant4816 Rodman Street, NWWashington DC 20016(202)244-4819 johndhemenway@comcast.net
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1223831 Filed: 01/05/2010 Page: 1
 

TableofContents
………………………………………………………
iTableofAuthorities
……………………………………………………
.iiTHE LACK OF ADVERSITY ARGUMENT IS NOTWELL TAKEN AND NOT SUPPORTED BY THEAUTHORITY CITED
…………………………………………………..
1THE SAME IS TRUE OF THE ARGUMENT THAT
THERE IS NO COGNIZABLE “STAKE” ……………………………..
8ARTICLE III STANDING APARTFROM INTERPLEADER
………..
17THE FAILURE TO CONSIDER THE AMENDED COMPLAINTIS GROUNDS FOR REVERSAL
………………………………………
21RULE 11 SANCTIONS AND BIAS
……………………………………
23CONCLUSION
…………………………………………………………
.27
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1223831 Filed: 01/05/2010 Page: 2
 
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

 Ashcroft v. Iqbal
, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1947 (2009).......................................................22
 Bankers Trust Co. v. Mffrs. Nat’l. Bank of Detroit 
, 139 F.R.D. 302, 307(S.D.N.Y.1991)..............................................................................................14,15
 Barr v. Clinton
, 370 F.3d 1196, 1199 (D.C.Cir.2004)..............................................7
 Bates v. Rumsfeld 
, 271 F.Supp. 2d 54, 62 (D.D.C.2002),.......................................19
 Berg v. Obama
, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D.Pa.2008)
……………………………
.26
 Bierman v. Marcus
, 246 F.2d 200, 203 (3d Cir. 1957)..............................................4
 Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents
403 U.S. 388 (1971)....................25
*Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.
, 498 U.S.533 (1991)
……………………………………………………………………
..24
 DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
, 547 U.S. 332, 342 (2006)...................................20
 Districtof Columbia v. Air Florida, Inc.
,750 F.2d 1077, 1084 (D.C.Cir.1984)..................................................9,10,11, 22
 Ellipso, Inc. v. Mann
, 460 F.Supp.2d 99, 103 (D.D.C.2006)..................................22
Freeman v. B&B Assocs.,
790 F.2d 145, 150-51 (D.C.Cir.`1986)..........................20
*Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs., Inc.
, 528 U.S. 167, 180-81(2000)................................................................................................................19
 Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.
, 733 F.2d 484, 488 (7
th
Cir.1984).................................................................................................................2
 Likety v. United States
, 510 U.S. 540 (1994)
……………………
...
……………
.25Linda R.S. v. Richard D.
FN
22
,410 U.S. 614 (1973))........................................18, 20
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1223831 Filed: 01/05/2010 Page: 3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->