Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
NO.
08-0089
 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 
 MACOMB FUNDING GROUP, L.L.C.,
 Petitioner 
,v.INLINER AMERICAS, INC. N/K/A FIRSTLINER AMERICAS, INC., INLINER USA, INC., N/K/AFIRSTLINER USA, INC., and CAT CONTRACTING, INC.,
 Respondents.
 On Petition for Review from theFourteenth Court of Appeals at Houston, Texas
A
MENDED
P
ETITION FOR 
EVIEW
ABRAMS SCOTT & BICKLEY, L.L.P.Barry AbramsState Bar No. 00822700Ramón G. Viada IIIState Bar No. 20559350700 Louisiana, Suite 4000Houston, Texas 77002(713) 228-6601(713) 228-6605 (fax)A
TTORNEYS
F
OR 
M
ACOMB
F
UNDING
G
ROUP
,
 
L.L.C.
 
i
IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSELP
ARTIES TO THE
T
RIAL
C
OURT
S
O
RDER 
:Defendant, appellee, petitioner
:
MaComb Funding Group, L.L.C.
Plaintiffs, appellants, respondents
:
Inliner Americas, Inc. n/k/a Firstliner Americas, Inc., Inliner USA, Inc. n/k/aFirstliner USA, Inc., and CAT Contracting, Inc.
T
RIAL AND
A
PPELLATE
C
OUNSEL
:For Petitioner MaComb:
Barry AbramsState Bar No. 00822700Ramón G. Viada IIIState Bar No. 20559350A
BRAMS
S
COTT
&
 
B
ICKLEY
,
 
L.L.P.700 Louisiana, Suite 4000Houston, Texas 77002Telephone:(713) 228-6601Facsimile:(713) 228-6605At trial and on appealOn Appeal
For Respondents Inliner Americas, Inc. N/K/A Firstliner Americas, Inc., InlinerUSA, Inc., N/K/A Firstliner USA, Inc., and CAT Contracting, Inc.:
Timothy A. HootmanState Bar No. 099654502402 Pease StreetHouston, Texas 77003Telephone: (713) 247-9548
 
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL...................................iINDEX OF AUTHORITIES...............................................ivI.S
TATEMENT OF THE
C
ASE
.............................................2II.S
TATEMENT OF
J
URISDICTION
..........................................3III.I
SSUE
P
RESENTED
...................................................3IV.S
TATEMENT OF
F
ACTS
................................................3V.S
UMMARY OF
A
RGUMENT
.............................................4VI.A
RGUMENT
........................................................5A.The Appeal Was Timely Filed Within The Meaning Of Rule 26.1(b)......5B.This Courts
 Brittingham
Dicta Supports PetitionersPosition..........8C.The Logic Of The Majority Opinion is Flawed.......................9VII.C
ONCLUSION
......................................................11CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.............................................13APPENDIX1.
 Inliner Americas, Inc. v. MaComb Funding Group, L.L.C.
, No. 14-06-01084-CV (Majority Opinion)....................... Tab 12.
 Inliner Americas, Inc. v. MaComb Funding Group, L.L.C.
, No. 14-06-01084-CV (Dissenting Opinion).....................Tab 23.Order Granting Declaratory Judgment (May 17, 2006).............Tab 3
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more