Stanley Hubbard has penned a five-page letter defending KSTP-TV and his station's controversial accusation that Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges was photographed flashing a gang sign.
Stanley Hubbard has penned a five-page letter defending KSTP-TV and his station's controversial accusation that Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges was photographed flashing a gang sign.
Stanley Hubbard has penned a five-page letter defending KSTP-TV and his station's controversial accusation that Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges was photographed flashing a gang sign.
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.
November 26, 2014
Via U.S. Mail and Email ~jkealina@amail,com
Jonathan Kealing, President-elect
Minnesota Pro Chapter
‘Society of Professional Joumalists,
P.O, Box 141152
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Dear Mr. Kealing,
‘As @ member of the Vinnesota Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists
(Minnesota SPJ or Chapter), | am disappointed in how the Chapter has responded to
KSTP-1V's coverage of Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges's participation in a get-out-
the-vote event with Neighborhoods Organizing for Change (NOC). | believe the
Chapter lacked professiona protocol in its actions regarding same.
‘On November 19, 2014, the Minnesota SPJ asked KSTP-TV to “disavow’ its
reporting, saying that our story was “fundamentally flawed and based on a faulty
premise.” This, because you decided the image in the report showed Mayor Hodges
‘making what the Chapter called a “sily gesture.” KSTP-TV reported that gesture as a
known gang sign. We were informed ofthat fact by several law enforcement agencies.
You even went so far as fo suggest that we would try to mislead. To suggest that
KSTP-TV would ever deliberately distort any fact in any story is totaly out of line. We
have never done so and wenever will do so.
Putting aside the question of whether it is an appropriate role of the Chapter to
decide whether any particular news story should or should not air, we acknowledge that
‘our roporting roeulted in a groat deal of eriiciam. As a responsible news organization,
\we understand that approprate public critique, criticism and scrutiny of the media's work
play an important role in society. However, when professional journalists themselves
criticize another news orgarization, | hope we can all agree that itis incumbent on those
journalists to follow the highast standards of professional journalism.
We know that social media is able to control Intomet conversation on any given
topic. As | am sure you krow, much of what appears on the Intemet lacks credibilly.
‘We have read all too many Intemet messages about our coverage from people (and, in
any cases, “bots’) who obviously had not seen our coverage, or who came to the‘Mr. Jonathan Kealing
November 28, 2014
Page 2
Internet with a predetetrrined point of view. Sadly, a number of respected news
organizations have engazed in what any unbiased professional journalist would
recognize as inadequate irdependent reporting about our story. The fact that our report
‘was the “top trending” story in the Twittersphere for a day or two does not lend veracity
to the tweets, blogs and posts it engendered,
‘Two national news organizations reported critically on our coverage without
bothering to ask us about our coverage. One such organization interviewed a law
enforcement source used in our first report, and did not include his interview in their on-
air product ~ pethaps because what he said did not support the tone of the Twitter
comments.
|Lam concemed that some members of the Minnesota SPJ and its board have
been “taken in’ by a delberate attempt through misinformation on the Intemet to
‘embarrass and discredit KSTP-TV. The SPJ Code of Ethics itself says that a journalist
should verify information bafore releasing it. Had you done so, you would have found
that KSTP-TY has not, in this instance or ever, allowed itself to be used by one political
group to make points aganst another political group, however, KSTP-TV will always
‘welcome any credible and corroborated critique of its work.
Truth be told, those in the Chapter who have criticized us have not addressed
any of the facts pertaining to our coverage.
* This story was brought to us by law enforcement personnel not affliated with the
Minneapolis Police Department or Police Officers Federation (POFM) — and not,
‘as you contend, sources who "cannot be defended.”
‘Our reporter's source informed him that the reason the subject photograph
created concern in law enforcement was the then-current feuding between rival
Minneapolis gangs, including the Stick Up Boys. Because of the ongoing
investigation being undertaken by law enforcement at the time — which we now
know resulted in 11 federal indictments last week — our reporter was asked not to
report that specific fact in order not to jeopardize the investigation, We did,
however, accurately report on November 6, 2014 that, °S EYEWITNESS NEWS
‘was alerted to the photo by law enforcement after they discovered the photo on
the man's Facebook page while doing investigative work." Especially in this
context, our reporter was told that the Mayor's use of gesture that focal law
enforcement associated with the Stick Up Boys “could create serious problems
{for guys on the street and the public.” And given the U.S. Attomey’s actions on
November 21, 2014, it should now be clear that KSTP-TV did not, “deliberately
distort facts or context,” as you assert
‘+ We were aware that there was friction between the Mayor, the Chief of Police,
and the POFM, but we determined that should not deter our reporting on what we‘Mr. Jonathan Keating
November 26, 2014
Page 3
Wore told by multiple credible sources was an incident that had the potential for
jeopardizing public safety.
‘+ As for KSTP-TV’s use of the President of the POFM nits report, he was the only
uniformed, active duty police officer willing to go on the record. To be clear, we
did not seek out a representative of the POFM for our story, and, again, nor was
the POFM our source. Given the U.S. Attomey's actions on November 21, 2014,
It should now be dear that KSTP-TV neither "deliberately distorfad) facts or
context,” as you assert, nor “allowed Itself to be used by one politcal group to
make points againstits political opponent.”
‘+ We contacted the Mayor's office two days before the story ran. Following the
‘exchange of a few emails and one phone conversation with a spokesperson from
the Mayor's office n which the spokesperson claimed not to understand the
story, the Mayor dic not talk to us. As a result of a subsequent Data Practices
‘Act request, we have since leamed that our email exchanges with the Mayor's
office were shared aith NOC prior to the airing of our story, as well as emails
between the mayor’ offieg and NOC evidencing their coordination.
‘+ We tried to contact Navell Gordon through his employer, NOC, which was the
only contact information we could find for him. In response to our request for an
interview with Mr. Gordon, the NOC’s executive director replied, "Not a chance.”
* Our reporter spoke ty eight different law enforcement officers from three separate
law enforcement agencies, each of whom independently confirmed what we had
been told about the hand gesture. Not one person associated with law
enforcement we interviewed characterized it as a “silly gesture.” The Minnesota
‘SPJ offers no attritution for its characterization of the gesture in the relevant
context ofits use by Mayor Hodges with Mr. Gordon. (Nonetheless, we note that
in our November 13, 2014 coverage, we reported that, “5 EYEWITNESS NEWS
admits, and reported, that the poses struck by Hodges and Gordon appear to be
playful -- simple pointing - and it's hard to understand why such a seemingly
innocuous photo could be potentially dangerous. But police say the mere
existence of it could put the public, and possibly police, in danger.")
+ What we were told by local law enforcement was corroborated by the president
of the Midwest Gang Investigators Association, an out-of-state voluntary
association of law enforcement agencies that researches and addresses gang
violence in nine Midwest states, including Minnesota.
‘+ Prior to our story airing, Mr. Gordon's social media posts featured pictures of him
and others making the hand sign in question, plus offensive, provocative and
derogatory commenis about the police, with what appears to be a gun in his belt,
along with numerous photos of what appear to be automatic weapons.Mr. Jonathan Kealing
November 28, 2014
Page 4
‘+ Public records reflect that Mr. Gordon had been arrested for aggravated armed
robbery on August 2, 2014, two months before the picture in question was taken.
+ KSTP-TV made the editorial decision to blur Mr. Gordon's image, not name him,
and not name his employer, because the story was never intended to be about
him or the NOC. Instead, as noted, our story accurately reported what several
Jaw enforcement personnel were telling us was an incident that they felt created
the potential for creating a risk to public safety. And, again, the Mayor and her
office were given ample opportunity to respond, but chose not to. We do not
know who initially identified Mr. Gordon as the person appearing in our report, or
‘who was behind making it seem that he was the focus of our story, but it was not
Us. Only in response to criticism of our reporting did we address Mr. Gordon’s
presence in the report, long after it had already been made public, including by
Mr. Gordon himself
‘Since our story first aired, a number of prominent community leaders have
‘expressed support for our coverage, confirmed that our story raised a legitimate issue of
public importance and was not “deeply flawed," and commended us for airing this story
Similarly, we have received support from many different law enforcement personnel, as
‘well as a number of reporters, all of whom are members of the Chapter.
We do not make edtorial decisions based upon popular opinion, Twitter trends,
‘or potential social media backlash. We recognize our obligation to our community to
report the news responsibly, and that's what we did
Finally, itis importart to consider the context in which this tip was brought to us
and in which our report aired. This tip was brought to us by law enforcement (to
reiterate, not by the MPD or POFM) shortly after the Brookiyn Center shooting
referenced in the U.S. Attorney's November 21, 2014 nows conference. We do not
know whether the tip we received was in any way related to that shooting, but it does
feveal the context in which law enforcement was operating — as the StarTribune
reported on Saturday, November 22, 2044, "a foothold of area gangs clashing over
control of the local drug and weapons trade" — and the information with which law
enforcement was working, atthe time.
Perhaps most disappointing of all is the fact that most, f not all, serious news
organizations that addressed our coverage — including, the board of the Minnesota SPJ
= simply “followed the herd” and tracked the trend on Twiter in their derision of our
coverage, Rather than resfonsibly questioning law enforcement’s motivation in bringing
this story forward, and digging deep into whether it truly represented a public safety
issue, they instead chose ‘o simply Ignore that which was reported, and go with the
‘much easier and much more popular “silly gesture” angle. We respect other media's
right to do just that, but object to the Chapters "rush to judgment” in the absence of any.
of its member organizations or board members doing any independent, critical analysis
Prior to publishing ts demand for a disavowal.‘Mr. Jonathan Kealing
November 26, 2014
Page 5
Clearly it is disturbing to many that otherwise playful gestures presumably
innocently made by a puble official can have a totally unintended meaning in a different
context. Nonetheless, thet is exactly what our reporters were told by numerous law
enforcement sources. Nanely that while a “gun” gesture may be funny and innocent in
many contexts, itis nether funny nor innocent in @ neighborhood plagued by gun
violence and a “foothold of area gangs.” The recent announcement by federal officals
that the indicinent Uf 11 high profile individoals fom bao warring gangs, allegedly
involved inthe North Minneapolis drug and weapon trade, underecores the seriousness
of the current gang situation. Our decision to broadcast the story stemmed from law
enforcement comments thet that they were seeing a significant uptick in gang related
activity and the picture ofthe Mayor making the gesture they believed could be used by
one ofthe gangs to "disrespect the other, possibly sparking a new round of violence
| have a great deal of respect for the many fine journalists and news
‘organizations that are members of the Chapter. But | believe that, before the Chapter
land its board take the drastic and unprecedented step of calling on another member
‘organization to "disavow" a report, they must first conduct a thorough, thoughtful, critical
and independent investigaton.
| note that there is to be a forum at the Siha Center regarding the so-called
Pointergate" story. | was a friend of Otto Silha's. He and | had mutual respect for each
other. ito Sia was a great journalist. Based on my friendship with him, | am sure
that if he were alive today, he would be sadly disappointed at this non-professional
criticism of a respected rews organization by those who elther haven't done their
background work properly or have an axe to grind. It matters not whether a mob is on
the stet or on the Internet
{believe that any news organization which is concemed with the news, and not
poltical correctness, would run the story that Channel 5 ran.
Stem O_
‘cc: Chris Newmarker, MN SPJ President
MN SPJ Board Members
‘SSHnib