The 2007-08 state budget this year camedown to a battle of wills, with 25,000 stateworkers furloughed and a partial shutdown of state government occurring for one day.Although I am pleased the stalemate isover, I could not lend my support to the finalspending plan. We fought off the governor’sseven proposed new taxes, but still, I amdisappointed that spending is far above therate of inflation. As a government, we shouldbe looking at ways to contain spending, notadd to it.The final budget was more than 3.7 percentmore than last year, totaling nearly $27 billion.My first budget in 2001 was nearly $20 billion.In six years, the budget has grown more than35 percent.With a $650 million surplus at the end of the 2006-07 fiscal year, we should be findingways to return that money to the taxpayer,not add new government programs that willonly lead to even greater state spending inthe future.In addition, I continue to be appalled atthe level of borrowing our governor insists isneeded to move Pennsylvania forward.Many members of the agriculture commu-nity called my attention to the importance of retaining the $3 million budget item to supple-ment crop insurance premiums. I and many of my counterparts from rural areas of the statealso recognize the importance of this budgetitem as an essential risk management tool tohelp protect farmers, and the state’s economy,from the effects of devastating crop losses.Unfortunately, even though I consider it oneof the most successful programs the state hasever embarked upon by using state dollarsas an incentive for private sector investment,and even though I conveyed this messageduring budget negotiations, my efforts wereonly marginally successful. The governor pro-posed to cut this funding by two-thirds to only$1 million. While the goal was to restore thisfunding to the $3 million level of past years,we were only able to get agreement with theadministration to fund the program at $1.5million for fiscal year 2007-08.For this reason, combined with concernsabout increased spending and borrowing, aswell as other ill-advised priorities reflected inthe budget, I was a “no” vote on final passageof the budget. Nonetheless, it did pass andwe will have to work within its limits for thenext year.
Stevenson Votes ‘No’to Inflated StateBudget
Legislative Meetings Set for Fall
Please join me this fall at one of three legislative meetings I have scheduled around the 8th District.This is an opportunity for me to give you an update on legislative activity in the Capitol, hear your concernsabout issues in our area, and to answer your questions about state government.The meetings are scheduled for:• Friday, Sept. 28, 8 to 9:30 a.m. – Doc Stewart Hall, Harmony.• Thursday, Oct. 25, 6 to 8 p.m. – Pine Grove Community Center, North Street in Grove City.• Friday, Oct. 26, 8 to 9:30 a.m. – West Sunbury Firehall, 772 Hall Road, West Sunbury.Please let us know if you can come so we can plan for your attendance. You may call my Grove City office at(724) 458-4911 or my Butler office at (724) 284-1431. I hope to see you there!
House OKs Bill to IncreaseBad Check Service Charge
Businesses would be better able to recover costs from writers of bad checks under legislation I have introduced that recently won thesupport of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives.Bad checks cost businesses millions of dollars each year, but be-cause of current state law, merchants’ hands are tied when it comesto recovering their costs.When a business or organization deposits or cashes a bad check,its account is charged the bank’s processing fee, and this legislationwill allow it to recoup the loss it has encountered by raising its servicefee from $20 to $50.House Bill 296 allows individuals, organizations and businessesto charge a service fee of $50 when a bad check has been passed tothem. If the actual amount of service charges incurred by the payeeis more than $50, then the actual amount will be assessed againstthe bad check writer.It is against the law in Pennsylvania for a person to knowingly andintentionally write a check for which there are not sufficient funds tocover and he or she fails to make good within 10 days after receivingnotice of the refusal of the check.Upon conviction, the person who wrote the bad check must reim-burse the payee or such other party the face amount of the check, aswell as any service charge if written notice of the service charge wasconspicuously displayed on the payee’s premises when the checkwas issued.A written notice of the service charge amount must still be conspicu-ously displayed at the place of business.The legislation is now with the state Senate for consideration.
Time to Renew Do Not CallRegistration
Some Pennsylvania residents need to renew their registration onthe state’s Do Not Call list to continue avoiding telemarketing calls.Registration for the Do Not Call list is only valid for five years fromthe date of initial registration. The list is updated quarterly, so if youregistered when the list first came out in 2002, your listing expires Nov.1. If you were not able to re-register by the Sept. 15 deadline, you canstill re-register. You may, however, experience some telemarketingcalls for a couple of months until your registration is updated.Phone subscribers should be aware of several exceptions to theDo Not Call law by which telemarketers may call your home even if it is registered on the Do Not call list. The exceptions include callsfrom:
•
Telemarketers who have had an established businessrelationship with you up to 12 months prior to the call.
•
Tax-exempt charitable organizations, veteran’s organizationschartered by the U.S. Congress and calls made on behalf of apolitical candidate or political party.
•
Telemarketers calling at the express request of the residentialtelephone customer.For more information on how to be placed on the Do Not Call listor to renew your registration, visit my Web site at
DickStevenson.com
, or call the Office of the Attorney General at 1-888-777-3406.
Add a Comment