December 17th, 2009Published by:Ted Ollikkala3
who, at any given time – are switching paths, or adding on new ones in their quest for comfort and closure .
•
Comfort: from personal problems; including career,health, and relationships.
•
Closure: due to the inability to answer RamanaMaharshi's favourite (supreme) question 'Who am I?',and the Christian failure to account for reincarnation, which results in the uncomfortable theology of eternaldamnation in hell. And there are many experts in spiritual fields who are morethan willing to bring the seeker down their particular branch.Usually, it seems - they charge 'by the footstep' (or by thephone call, private consultation, or speaking engagement). Tomention a few examples, there is the tarot, astrology, auras,channeling, psychiv readings, and various self-empowermenttechniques (hypnosis, ESP, creating abundance, manifestingdreams, etc.) All of these fields are quite valid indeed, and dedicatedpractitioners are able to tap into the ethereal energy andachieve more or less the desired results. Past lives can beknown, as can certain future events, ancestors contacted andcommunicated with, etc. They deserve the fees they charge,as the initiate is not likely to accomplish any of these goals without expert advice.I will call these skills 'spiritual tools'. They are tools thatanyone (with a mind) would seemingly have the potential tolearn to use, given proper technique, diligence, and skill.However, certain persons are born with these innate abilities,such as the psychic abilities (for example, clairvoyance,channeling, prophecy, etc.) or discover them and developthem to a fuller level of expression at some point in theirpresent incarnation. Naturally, these people would seek toshare their ability to use these tools, and generally to make aliving at the same time.Some spiritually gifted people sought out fortune and fame onthis earth, others were uncomfortable with their gifts but wereforewarned that to use them for profit or personal gratification would be illicit.Examples of extraordinary people possessing spiritual giftsinclude saints of the Catholic Church (St. Teresa of Avila),Indian yogis (Paramahansa Yogananda), 'ordinary psychicsand healers' such as Edgar Cayce, Madame Blavatsky, Alice A.Bailey, and best selling authors such as Sylvia Browne and Zak Martin who have been commercially successful.There are a widespread number of people today who claimand demonstrate various psychic and spiritual gifts, tools, orabilities that were previously unknown, uncommon, or quiterare. They are only too happy to take on clients and readersof their books, tapes, etc. whose purpose is to increase wealth,develop psychic ability, control relationships, and so on.But now let us ask the million dollar question. What place dothese 'spiritual tools' have in the sincere seekers' strategy forgetting to the ultimate level, full enlightenment and union withthe creator?It seems to me that as many times as the great yogis and otherenlightened beings have warned about not being distracted by miracles, powers, and spiritual gifts that manifest asone purifies their consciousness through various techniques(meditation, prayer, fasting, devotion, etc.) this is the generalatmosphere that pervades (and perverts) the true essence of spirituality in the new millennium.It's time to set ourselves straight and align once againto the original purpose of the one guiding light, put ourmaterial desires for extraordinary comfort, excessive wealth,and control over others aside – and reach out for directcommunion and a personal relationship with our creator.These spiritual distractions, nuisances and petty trivialities belong in the lower worlds, the temporary material world of maya and the lower astral planes from whence various astralembodiments often seek to dispel their mischief upon mortals.Make proper use of your spiritual gifts to harmonize with thelife force and seek the straight and narrow. Seek ye always toaspire for the highest of the high, the mightiest of the mighty,the eternal and immortal power of love and creation.
Add a Comment