Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
COUNCILDATE
1/12/10
 AGENDA ITEM
7B
 
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Olympia, WashingtonJanuary 12, 2010
Ordinance Adopting Interim Commercial District Zoning Regulations __________________________________________________________________
CITY MANAGER’SRECOMMENDATION: Provide guidance to staff on the proposed interim rezone ordinanceand on the proposed date and location for the public hearing.STAFF CONTACT
: Tom Morrill, City Attorney, 753-8449Keith Stahley, Director CP&D, 753-8227Jan Weydemeyer, Senior Planner, 753-8592
ORIGINATED BY
: Olympia City Council
PRESENTERS ANDOTHERS NOTIFIED
: Tom Morrill, City AttorneyKeith Stahley, Director CP&D
ATTACHMENTS
BUDGET IMPACT/SOURCE OF FUNDS
: Unclear as to staff resources needed to implement the interim rezone,a permanent rezone and any necessary changes to the ComprehensivePlan.
PRIOR COUNCIL/COMMITTEE REVIEW
: January 5, 2010 City Council meeting
BACKGROUND:
On January 5, 2010, the Olympia City Council directed staff to bring aproposed ordinance for an interim rezone of certain properties locatedon the isthmus between the southern end of Budd Inlet and CapitolLake. The direction for the interim rezone was to change the currentzoning on the affected properties back to the zoning that existed priorto January 1, 2009. The proposed interim rezone is intended to remainin effect until a permanent rezone and changes to the ComprehensivePlan are in place at the end of 2010. Staff was also directed to bringback a proposed date for a public hearing that is within forty-five daysof the date of adoption of the proposed interim rezone ordinance.Finally, Council asked staff to provide a brief outline of the schedule of events that will follow adoption of an interim rezone.
ANALYSIS AND OPTIONS
: If Council wants to prevent the filing of any new developmentapplications under the existing zoning for certain properties on theisthmus, Council will need to take some form of interim action,because a final decision to rezone the properties cannot be reached ina time frame that would ensure that no new development applicationsare submitted under the present zoning. There are two main types of interim actions that the Council can take: (1) a moratorium or (2) an
 
interim zoning ordinance. A moratorium is used primarily to prevent anexisting use for a specified period of time. An interim zoning ordinancecan be used to modify an existing zone to allow certain uses andprohibit others for a specified period of time. Both a moratorium andan interim zoning ordinance would provide the City sufficient time tofurther evaluate the appropriate long term uses and allowed buildingheights for the affected isthmus properties.The proposed interim rezone is the most common type of interimzoning ordinance. If adopted, it would revert the zoning on theaffected isthmus properties back to the zoning that was in place priorto January 1, 2009. The previous zoning was Urban Waterfront (UW),which allows for a variety of uses including commercial and residential,seeTable 6.01 in OMC 18.06.040. The UW zone also limits buildingheights to thirty-five (35) feet.Council could adopt the proposed rezone or could decide to rezone theproperty on an interim basis to a different zone other than the previouszoning. A review of Table 6.01 in OMC 18.06.040illustrates that thereare a variety of land uses and zoning types that may be appropriate forthe affected isthmus parcels.Another option the Council has through the use of an interim zoningordinance is an interim modification of existing developmentregulations. This is sometimes referred to as a text rezone ascompared to a use rezone. Such an interim rezone would amendexisting city development regulations that control how an allowed usecan be developed in certain circumstances.In summary, if the Council’s intent is to have a proposed action takeeffect immediately, there are only a few types of actions that meetthat requirement: a moratorium or an interim zoning ordinance.However, each type of action may have a variety of different possiblepermutations. A complete discussion of the various possible differentpermutations is beyond the scope of a staff report and could requireextensive legal analysis.In addition to a brief discussion of options, Council also asked for abrief outline of the schedule of events that would follow the adoptionof an interim rezone. After the initial adoption of an interim zoningordinance, the City Council must hold a public hearing within 60 days.Following the public hearing, the City Council must promptly adoptfindings of fact justifying its adoption of the interim ordinance. Theinterim ordinance is effective for six months, but may be effective upto one year if the Council adopts a work plan for studies related to theinterim ordinance.If an interim rezone is adopted, Council will need to consider adding anitem to its docket for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan so thatfinal changes to the Official Zoning Map are consistent with theComprehensive Plan Map. The normal procedure for amending theComprehensive Plan and associated development regulations includes abriefing before Planning Commission followed by a public hearing,deliberation and a recommendation to the City Council. The currentPlanning Commission calendar appears to be heavily booked through
Page 2 of 3
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more