Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Decentralized Energy – The Main Choices
Gas Turbines
Reciprocating Engines
Large & small
Rooftop PV
Microturbines
On-site wind
3
About WADE
National DE organisations
UK CHPA, USCHPA, Cogen Europe etc.
4
WADE Network of DE Promotional Organisations
WADE Network
4th (Rio, 2003)
Other Events:
In train
1. DE Conference, Toronto, September 2006
WADE Annual International Conferences
2. Sugar Bagasse Cogeneration, Bangkok, November 2006
3. C20 Event, Municipal Energy Self Sufficiency, NYC, April 2007?
4. DE and Energy Security, ? , 2007
5. 8th Annual DE Conference, ? , 2007
5
WADE Research
DE Market
data
Future Studies:
Cogeneration and
the CDM,
September 2006
7
WADE Mission
8
Global DE Statistics
Source WADE Annual World Survey of DE 2006
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
0.0
Denmark 53.0
Finland 38.0
Netherlands 38.0
Latvia 37.5
Czech 26.4
Hungary 21.5
Germany 20.5
Turkey 17.6
Slovakia 17.5
Poland 17.2
Japan 16.7
Portugal 15.0
Austria 13.6
India 12.1
Canada 11.4
SouthAfrica 11.1
Estonia 11.0
WORLD 10.4 Where does your country stand?
Chile 10.0
China 10.0
Korea 9.8
9
Lithuania 9.7
Mexico 8.4
Uruguay 8.0
Luxembourg 7.9
Greece 7.8
Spain 7.8
Belgium 7.5
Italy 7.4
UK 7.2
Sweden 6.8
Slovenia 5.9
Indonesia 5.6
Uganda 5.6
Australia 5.4
France 4.9
US 4.1
Thailand 3.4
Brazil 3.3
Ireland 2.5
Argentina 1.9
Different Areas Require Different Approaches
Off-grid On-grid
Micro-grids Micro-grids
Village scale renewables Community scale renewables
Small scale industrial CHP Industrial CHP, large and small
Building-integrated Cooling
Heat and Power
10
Different Areas Require Different Priority Applications
11
World All-Energy Investment, 2001 - 2030
Network investment needs
exceed generation needs
by 17%
Gas
19%
Coal
46% Power generation
2%
Electricity
60% 54% Network T&D
Oil
19%
12
IEA Analysis - DE Scenario is lower cost
More renewables
2000
IEA comment:
“However, the reliance
1000 on more expensive
generating options in
the Alternative Policy
0 Scenario is likely to
Reference scenario Alternative scenario result in higher
electricity prices.”
Distribution
Transmission
Generation (new and refurbishment)
Source: International Energy Agency, 2003
13
WADE Economic Model
Object
To compare cost of DE and of central power in providing
new electricity demand growth over next 20 years
14
The DE Model – Inputs and Outputs
15
Applications of the WADE Economic Model
Delivered Costs
9.00
Retail Costs (p/kWh)
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
Centr Nucl
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
CG
CG
CG
CG
CG
CG
DE/Renew
Scenario
O&M Fuel Capital T&D
17
IEA Analysis – T&D Savings from Decentralized Energy
18
Policy and DE
1. Targets
2. Feed-in Tariffs
3. Renewable Portfolio Standards
4. Disclosure labeling on power bills
5. Public Benefits charges
6. Carbon taxes
1. Interconnection standards/rules.
2. Settlement rules
19
Financing and DE
Financial Drivers
1. Guaranteed financing for DE
2. Favorable loans for DE
3. Government buy-downs for residential, commercial scale
systems
4. Import-export duty exemptions
5. Grants
Financial Obstacles
1. High Transaction costs
2. Shortage of precedence
3. Lack of institutional capacity
20
DE and the Gleneagles Dialogue?
21
Thanks!
www. localpower.org
22
PART 2.
Climate for Decentralized Energy
23
What makes up the climate for DE?
24
Drivers/ Obstacles
25
Grid Extent (geographic)
26
Grid Extent (capacity)
27
Fuel Access
Natural Gas:
Distribution network in place?
Sparkspread (i.e. differernce between price per unit
of electricity and natural gas – High electricity price
combined with low gas price makes CHP attractive)
Biomass:
Distribution network in place?
Fuel seasonal? (e.g. sugarcane)
Sufficient storage space for fuel? Biomass is a low
energy density fuel compared to fossil fuels.
28
Generation Capacity
Centralized
capacity
spending
Demand (GWh)
Decentralized
capacity
50MW investment
1 5 10
Year
29
Heat Loads
30
Cooling Loads
Cooling Loads
More demand in Equatorial Regions/Developing
Nations
Can be combined in CCHP applications
31
Power Loads
32
Public Perception (opinion of DE)
33
Public Perception (environment and DE)
34
PART 3.
Experience from Abroad
35
Policy Drivers
EU Level
European Cogeneration Directive
European Energy Efficiency for Buildings Directive
European Emissions Trading Scheme
Case Studies
Portugal
Belgium
United Kingdom
USA
Japan
36
European Cogeneration Directive
37
European Cogeneration Directive
5 main drivers
38
European Energy Efficiency for Buildings Directive
39
European Energy Efficiency for Buildings Directive
40
European Emissions Trading Directive
41
European Emissions Trading Directive
42
Portugal
Feed-in Tariffs
Renewables and CHP of any scale are guaranteed generous feed-in
tariffs
Eff
carbon savings
reduced network use
PRIME Program
Many costs incurred by investors in renewables, efficiency and CHP,
are eligible for up to 50% capital cost reduction
Eligible costs include materials, feasibility studies, land, field trials,
transport etc…
Tax deductions
The government is currently considering a new tax
regime which may favor DE applications
43
Belgium
44
United States
State Initiatives
California: air pollution regulations are based on useful energy
output rather than pollution in exhaust per fuel input.
New York: “systems benefits charge” charges small surplus on
every kWh used and funds collected used to finance up to
50% of DE projects
Pennsylvania: RPS requires renewables and CHP
45
Japan
46
Remaining Obstacles
47