Log In | Sign Up | Help
Upload_transparent

An Inductive Proof for God's Existence II

 
 
 
 
 
Value This
Doc 		Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 2 43
Words: 313 13640
Characters: 1857 81678
Lines: 4 623
     
     
Letters per word: 5.93 5.99
Words per line: 78.25 21.89
Words per page: 156.5 317.21

Document Information

  • Add_to_favs_transparent
  • Flag

1,495 Reads | 2 Likes | 6 Comments | 3 Favorites

Added By
Description

No description. Ask the publisher to add a description

Word_16x16 2 Pages

Date Added

04/10/2008
Category

Uncategorized.

Tags
Groups

Group_add

Awards

Flame Hot

Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

Comments

Login or Signup to Leave a Comment

usym3728 4 months ago

o my lord...i have become a believer thanks to your argument.....i have found the lord!!

insaneLKH 7 months ago

It is illogical deduction.
Point 1 is unclear statement, and no evidence to say that.
Point 2 is the sample condition statement.
Even if point 2 is absolutely true, point 3 may not be true.
It is because point 2 only states the condition of the objectivity can only exist.
And no one can says that the absolutely objectivity exist.
It is the main mistake taken in the proof.

If you can prove the absolutely objectivity exist, then you may find the "God" already, and the proof is meaningless.

Please, don't tricks people, unless you think all of the people is a fool.

derrida about 1 year ago

I don't see how premiss 2 follows from any of what you said in your article.

It is physically impossible for me to directly see the inside of my eye, because that would involve taking it apart which would destroy my vision. But that doesn't mean that there's a tiny goblin inside making sure it's still there...

Reality stays objective whether or not it can be quantified.

RyanMT about 1 year ago

Okay your writing is seriously laughable. The fact that you have the gall to copyright such trash should be embarrassing to yourself.

seaview64 about 1 year ago

For not one scientist upon the face of earth has ever seen an atom, a molecule or electrons flying round such and can only theorise thereby. The fact is we are looking at 'thought' both in physics and god! And to solve both we must pose the question - Who posed the question for an answer here?

You will then solve both situations as to who creates the physical and the god!

seaview64 about 1 year ago

By that assumption and logic than you must be that observer and hence all beings thus must be it too! Therefore if we take that one step further we have then that all must be God to one extent or another (being that some have more ability potentially than others or are willing to show that potentiality than others.)