usym3728

o my lord...i have become a believer thanks to your argument.....i have found the lord!!

insaneLKH

It is illogical deduction. Point 1 is unclear statement, and no evidence to say that. Point 2 is the sample condition statement. Even if point 2 is absolutely true, point 3 may not be true. It is because point 2 only states the condition of the objectivity can only exist. And no one can says that the absolutely objectivity exist. It is the main mistake taken in the proof. If you can prove the absolutely objectivity exist, then you may find the "God" already, and the proof is meaningless. Please, don't tricks people, unless you think all of the people is a fool.

derrida

I don't see how premiss 2 follows from any of what you said in your article. It is physically impossible for me to directly see the inside of my eye, because that would involve taking it apart which would destroy my vision. But that doesn't mean that there's a tiny goblin inside making sure it's still there... Reality stays objective whether or not it can be quantified.

RyanMT

Okay your writing is seriously laughable. The fact that you have the gall to copyright such trash should be embarrassing to yourself.