Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This paper examines the auction characteristics that are the determinates of the final bid
price for 500 eBay auction for brand new 30GB Apple IPods. The auction characteristics
of interest in this study are shipping price, buy-it-now, and seller reputation. These three
factors are the three variables that contribute the most empirically to the literature. The
main findings are that bidders undervalue the listed shipping price, IPods sold using buy-
it-now go for a higher price than those sold in standard auctions, and the power seller
classification is the best measure of seller reputation and leads to greater profits than non-
power sellers. From these results some strategies to maximize profits are purposed for
eBay sellers.
Ryan Praskievicz
May 11, 2007
ryanpraski@gmail.com
1
I. Introduction
The goal of this paper is to create an econometric model for the determinants of
final auction prices on eBay.com. The driving force behind this project is that when
buying and selling items on eBay.com I have observed wide variations in prices of
homogeneous goods. This drove me to wonder if there were some optimal auction
inefficiencies. The main topics covered in this paper are the effect of seller reputation on
final bid price, the effect of buy-it-now auctions on seller revenue, and the effect of
shipping price on final bid price. The topics will be investigated using data compiled
from 500 eBay auctions for brand new 30GB IPods collected over an 18 day period in
March 2007. The motivation behind the paper is that homogenous goods sell for widely
different prices on eBay. Focusing on a homogenous good will allow the model to isolate
the auction characteristics that are causing the variations in the final bid prices. Seller
reputation will be considered in terms of both numerical and percentage feedback ratings.
Beyond the basic seller reputation measures, being a professional eBay power seller is
expected to have the largest effect on final bid price. A power seller is a recognized title
given to eBay sellers that have averaged at least $1000 in sales on eBay in the previous
three consecutive months, have their eBay account in good financial standing, have 100
or more feedback of which is 98% or more is positive, and have been an active member
for at least 90 days. It goes beyond just the feedback rating and sends a signal to buyers
that the seller is committed to continuing to providing high quality service. The buy-it-
now feature on eBay allows sellers to offer a buy price that lets the buyer immediately
2
end the auction and purchase the item. In a normal eBay auction a seller will set an
buyers submit bids and the bids are accepted until the auction period has completed. In a
buy-it-now auction sellers set a price that they are willing to sell the item for
immediately. If a buyer wants to purchase the item for the buy-it-now price they simply
accept the price specified by the seller and upon their acceptance the auction is complete.
This option is especially appealing to buyers who have a high opportunity cost of time
and have high costs associated with waiting to get their item. The effect of the shipping
price on the final bid price is somewhat puzzling. We’d expect that because the shipping
price is easily observable, bidders would factors it in with their bid price as part of the
total cost, but as theory and the empirical results from this study show, a one dollar
increase in shipping price may result in a less than $1 decrease in final bid price. These
primary factors: seller reputation, buy-it-now, and shipping price along with bidding
characteristics, the day of the week and several control variables will be examined in this
study.
II. Theory
The theoretical question central to this study is: how can the price of a
homogenous good vary? In a setting where there are many sellers and easily observable
differences in prices, economic theory suggests that the price should be driven to the
competitive level and no seller should have the opportunity to make an economic profit.
What then causes the model of perfect competition to break down and prices to vary
when examining homogenous goods sold on eBay? I purpose that the value of the total
3
product a buyer purchases from an eBay seller is the sum of the monetary value of the
item and the value the buyer places on the service associated with the eBay auction. The
monetary value of the item is constant as the good is homogenous, but the value of the
AGGREGATE EBAY PRODUCT VALUE = MONETARY VALUE OF THE ITEM + VALUE OF THE SERVICE
Where AGGREGATE COST for the buyer = FINAL BID PRICE + SHIPPING PRICE
The value of the service is not homogenous across all sellers, so the aggregate eBay
product value varies and thus you observe wide variations in final auction bid prices for
The value of service is a function of the seller’s reputation, the shipping price, and the
opportunity cost of time for the buyer. This study will examine reputation by focusing on
the effect that being a power seller has on the final bid price of the auction and will also
consider the effect of numerical and percentage based seller feedback rating on the final
bid price. It will go on to explain the effect the value of the shipping price on the value
of the service and its effect on the final bid price. Finally, it will consider the buyer’s
opportunity cost of time. Buyer’s who have a high opportunity cost of time associated
with searching through many eBay auctions for an item will utilize the buy-it-now option.
The effect that the buy-it-now option has on the final bid price will be examined.
SELLER REPUTATION
The data collected in this study looks at seller reputation in three forms: the sellers
overall numerical feedback rating, the sellers percentage feedback rating, and whether or
not the seller is a power seller. The overall feedback score is the sum of all the positive
and negative feedbacks left for the seller and is displayed next to the sellers username on
4
the item’s auction page. The percentage feedback rating is found just below the
numerical feedback rating on the auction page. This measures the percent of positive
feedback the seller has received to their total feedback. A power seller denotation is put
next to the seller’s numerical feedback rating on the auction page. Power sellers are eBay
top sellers who sustain a consistent high volume of monthly sales and a high level of total
Fraud and misleading information are both major threats to the online marketplace
and eBay tries to combat it with their community feedback system. When an auction
transaction is completed both the buyer and seller have the opportunity to rate each other
on the transaction. They can give each other positive, neutral or negative feedback and
also leave a short comment justifying their rating. For a positive feedback an eBay user
is given + 1 to their overall feedback rating, -1 for a negative, and 0 for a neutral. The
feedback rating stays with the user for the entire life of their account on eBay. The rating
is displayed next to every member’s user id and can be seen by anyone accessing eBay.
EBay also maintains a unique feedback history page for each member which shows every
comment every left for the user. Creating an online community where buyers and seller
can meet in an environment where fraud is minimized is integral to eBay’s current and
future success. There are five fundamental community values that eBay lists on their
website:
5
With the goodness of people valued so highly by the eBay community there is expected
to be a positive effect on the final bid price associated with increases in percentage and
numerical based feedback of sellers. The greatest effect of seller reputation on final bid
price is expected to come from power sellers. Being a power seller is the highest level of
In this study seller reputation will be measured by both the percent feedback
rating and whether or not the seller is a power seller. The numerical feedback rating will
be included in a model, but will not be the focus due to the inconsistent conclusions about
it in the literature. The numerical feedback rating takes into account the negative
feedback of a seller because it the percent of positive feedbacks to the sellers total
number of feedback. This will allow for comparisons with the consistent conclusion in
the literature that negative feedback of the seller causes the final bid price to decrease,
seller is probably the best signal to the buyer that the seller has a good reputation. It
signals additional information beyond the observable feedback ratings. The two
important signals are that seller does a relatively large volume of business on eBay $1000
per month for the previous 3 months and the seller’s account with eBay is in good
financial standing. These additional signals complement the power seller’s 98%
feedback rating and show that they have a commitment to selling on eBay. Power sellers
can be considered more professional eBay sellers who have a history of good service and
sales on eBay. Power sellers have a higher implicit cost than non power sellers of
misleading buyers as fraud will result in them quickly losing their power seller status,
6
thus they have an even greater incentive to provide buyers with good information and
good service. The status of a power seller is a strong signal to buyers that the sellers have
a good reputation and should lead to high final bid prices of auctions.
SHIPPING PRICE
below the current bid price. The amount charged for shipping is left up to the seller. The
“Sellers may charge reasonable shipping and handling fees to cover the costs for mailing, packaging, and
handling the items they are selling. While eBay will not prescribe exactly what a seller may or may not
charge, eBay will rely on member reports and its own discretion to determine whether or not a seller’s
shipping, handling, packaging, and/or insurance charges are excessive”
(http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/listing-shipping.html).
This leads to wide variations in shipping prices for homogenous goods and factors
into the value of the service of the eBay auction. Since, the shipping price is clearly
spelled out you’d expect buyers to simply add it to their bid price when calculating the
total cost of the auction. This should be the relevant cost for bidders to consider when
making the decision to bid. As theory suggests though, in items where the shipping cost
is a small fraction of the total cost buyers will not take a $1 increase in the shipping price
and add it into a $1 increase in the total cost of the item. When shipping is a small
fraction of the total cost of the item, buyers consider it as an add-on cost much like a tip
on a restaurant bill. Like the bidders, the restaurant goers don’t consider the total cost of
the meal, which is the sum of the tip and meal bill, when making their dining decisions.
They undervalue the cost of the tip in terms of its addition to the total cost of the meal.
Equivalently, a $1 increase in the shipping cost, where the shipping cost is a small
fraction of the total value of the item, will not lead to an equivalent $1 decrease in the
value of the service. Holding the monetary value of the good constant, due to an IPod
7
being a homogenous product, the aggregate eBay product value will decrease by less than
$1. It is important to note though, that in items where the shipping price is a large
fraction of the total cost or total value of the item buyers consider it more in their
decision making. In these cases a $1 increase in shipping price causes the buyer to
decrease the aggregate value of the eBay auction by the full $1.
BUY-IT-NOW
buy-it-now price for potential buyers that results in the immediate completion of the
auction if the seller accepts the price. It differs from a standard auction in which the
seller choose a duration of 1, 3, 5, 7, or 10 days and potential buyers may submit bids
from the listing of the auction throughout the duration of the auction period. With buy-it-
now the seller sets the price and if a buyer accepts the auction ends immediately. The
theory underlying the decision to use buy-it-now in eBay auctions center on risk-aversion
and impatience as well as other transactions costs from both the buyer and sellers side. A
risk-averse seller has a distaste for volatility and uncertainty of the final bid price
associated with a standard auction. The seller is willing to trade-off the risk of
uncertainty for a lower return in the form of a certain buy-it-now price. As Matthews and
Katzman point out, the buy-it-now price produces higher expected utility for the seller
even though it may result in an inefficient allocation of the item. Buyers and seller have
an opportunity cost associated with their time in both the search for the item and the time
they wait to receive the item as the buyer or send it as the seller. In setting the buy-it-
now price the seller balances their opportunity cost of time associated with waiting for
the completion of the auction with the potential revenue lost from the auction not running
8
for its full duration. As the seller’s opportunity cost of time increases the buy-it-now
price set decreases as the seller is willing to trade-off lower potential revenues with the
lower opportunity cost of their. From the bidder side, if they have a strong taste for
having the item in the current period they will prefer buy-it-now over a standard auction.
An IPod is a type of item that people buy on impulse. In an impulse buy bidders have a
high opportunity cost of time and have a greater willingness to buy the item in the current
period versus wait for future periods. The value of the services is then an increasingly
feature that eliminates the opportunity cost of time and maximizes the value of the
service and the aggregate value of the eBay item being sold.
Bidding is what drives an auction and eBay auctions are no different. On eBay
the seller sets the minimum bid and based on the minimum bid price eBay assigns
bidding increments. When someone wants to bid on an item they enter their maximum
willingness to pay at the given time. This does not have to be the in the given increment,
it can be any amount the bidder chooses. For example: if the opening bid is $1 and the
bidder decides at this time they are willing to pay $100 they can enter a bid of $100.
Ebay will show that the current maximum bid is $1 until another bidder joins the auction.
If another bidder comes along they see the current bid is at $1. He decides he’s willing to
pay $50 for the item. He enters the bid and eBay comes back and says you’ve been
outbid and pushes the bid to $51. In this way eBay is acting as a proxy bidder for the
first bidder and will continued to bid up for him until bidding passes the $100 bid that he
entered.
9
The total number of bids should have positive impact on the final bid price. The
theory behind this claim is that as the number of bidders increase, these potential buyers
get into a bidding war. This leads these buyers to make impulsive decisions and in the
According to theory the effect of the opening bid price on the final bid price is
ambiguous. Intuition would suggest that a lower opening bid price should generate
increased attention for your auction, especially when many homogenous goods are being
offered for sale. The increased interest should result in increased bidding and as
explained above the increased bidding results in a higher final bid price. A lower
opening bid price may also cause a lower final bid price as potential buyers may use the
opening bid price as a measurement of the value of your particular auction. The potential
bidders see the low opening bid price and it causes them to undervalue the item as they
see the low start price and are less willing to pay a price far above this low opening price.
In the literature this is a psychological phenomenon known as the anchoring theory. This
implies that the low opening bid prices serve as an anchor that effectively hold the final
bid price down. Again, the aggregate effect of these two counteracting effects is
uncertain.
Ebay users are constrained in their usage of time, just like anyone else, as there is
only so much time in a day and only some many days in the week. These time
constraints drive the underlying decision making to purchase an item on the side of the
buyer. As leisure time increases you’d expect the time buyers spend on eBay to also
increase. The peak traffic on eBay should then be on the weekends and as the traffic on
10
the website increases there is a greater customer base, a greater demand for items, and
this should lead to a higher final bid price. According to Hsiao in his about.com guide to
maximizing your auction bids by timing, he says that Sunday brings the peak amount of
weekend should, therefore higher final bid prices than those ending on week days.
CONTROL VARIABLES
SHRINKWRAP: Online auctions create the opportunity for fraud and misleading
representations of items by the seller. For the IPod the bidder can only be sure it is brand
new if it is still in its original retail shrink wrap. Sellers can convey this information to
buyers by showing pictures of the item in the shrink wrap or by stating that it is shrink
wrapped in the item description. The fact that the IPod is still in the original packaging
sends the signal to the buyer that the IPod is not a lemon, a store return, or a damaged
unit. This is an unambiguous signal that allows both the buyer and seller to have
buyer that it is not of the same high quality as a brand new factory sealed IPod. It’s likely
that the IPod was returned and was damaged or misused. People would rather buy an
untainted IPod, so they are willing to pay more for brand new factory sealed retail IPods,
and less for refurbished IPods. Being refurbished decreases the monetary value of the
IPod and thus the aggregate value of the IPod decreases as well. This causes the final bid
price to decrease.
11
III. Literature Review
eBay was founded in 1995 and has grown to a significant marketplace over its
short lifetime. Because the business is at the beginning of its life and has evolved a great
deal since 1995, when Pierre Omidyar originally launched the website, economic
feedback on final bid prices. In their study on the determinants of price of coins on eBay
Lucking-Reiley et. al (2006) found that the coefficient to the seller’s numerical feedback
rating was not statistically significant in any specification of their models (p. 9). Wan
and Teo (2001) also examines the determinates of the price of coins on eBay. The
authors find that the coefficient to the seller’s numerical feedback is significant in one of
their four specifications and in that particular specification the coefficient is negative
which goes against the theory as the authors point out (p. 906). Bajari and Hortacsu
(2003) also examine coins and find that the overall seller reputation has a positive and
statistically significant effect on the final bid price (p. 336). The inconsistency in the
literature leads to the question: is there a better measure of seller reputation that can be
used to determine final bid price? A consistent conclusion drawn from the literature is
that negative feedback is a better measure of seller reputation used to determine the final
bid price. Both Lucking-Reiley et. al as well as Bajari and Hortacsu find that the
coefficient to negative feedback is negative and statistically significant. This study will
consider seller feedback percent and whether or not the seller is power seller as the
12
SHIPPING PRICE: Hossain and Morgan (2006) suggest, prospective buyers
often separate the bid prices and shipping price, thus systematically underestimate the
total cost. The buyer considers shipping as an add-on cost. The hypothesis that results
from this assertion is that in auctions for items where the shipping cost is only a small
fraction of the total cost, the buyer will underestimate the total cost due to the add on
effect of the shipping cost. In items where the shipping cost is a large fraction of the total
cost buyers will look at the shipping costs more carefully and factor it into their bidding
strategy, and thus bid lower prices. This study will investigate how the shipping price of
their item for immediate sale. On eBay, the buy-it-now option disappears once someone
bids on the item whereas Yahoo and Amazon offer permanent buy-it-now options. Buy-
it-now allows buyers to immediately purchase the item and not wait for the auction
duration to pass by before they know if they have won or lost the auction. In a standard
auction, buyers submit bids during the auction period and have to wait until the entire
duration of the auction has passed before they know if they have won or lost the auction.
There is a possibility that after all the waiting they still might be outbid in the last second
of the auction. The buy-it-now option eliminates the uncertainty of being outbid and
guarantees that the buyer wins the auction. Matthews and Katzman (2006) found that in
the second quarter of 2001, 35% of items on eBay were listed with the buy-it-now option
and in December 2001, 45% were listed with the buy-it-now option. Two of the theories
explaining the use of buy-it-now are presented in the Ockenfels et. al (2006) paper. The
authors find that risk aversion and impatience as well as other transaction costs from both
13
the buyer and seller side provide the underlying theory for the use of the buy-it-now
option.
Opening Bid and Number of Bids: Häubl and Popkowski Leszczyc (2003) do an
experiment selling postal stamps and find that as they increased the opening bid price the
final bid price they received in the auction increase. They find that this evidence supports
the anchoring theory in that a minimum bid serves a psychological anchor hold down
increases in bid prices. Bidders see the low price and psychological they cannot bring
themselves to increase the bid too far above the anchor. Lucking-Reiley et al find that as
the minimum bid price increases the final bid price also increases and they also support
the anchoring theory suggesting that a minimum bid serves as a point of reference for
bidders who enter the auction. Wan and Teo also found that the minimum bid had a
positive and statistically significant effect on the final bid price. In Bajari and Hortacsu
(2003) the number of bidders is found as a positive determinant of final bid price.
IV. Model
The three primary auction characteristics that this study will focus on is the effect
of seller reputation, shipping price, and buy-it-now on the final auction price for brand
new 30GB IPods. To isolate these effects the model must control for other factors that
independently affect the final bid price. The following is the general model:
FINAL BID PRICE= the dependent variable. It is the dollar amount of the final bid
price.
AUCTIONPAGEVIEWS= number of times the item’s eBay auction page was viewed.
14
SHRINKWRAP= a dummy variable equal to 1 if the seller refers to in the description or
shows in an actual photo of the item that the IPod is still in it’s original
box and shrink wrapped or 0 if it isn’t.
REFURBISHED= a dummy variable equal to 1 if the IPod is refurbished or 0 if it isn’t.
CARCHARGER= a dummy variable equal to 1 if a car charger is included in the final
bid price of the auction and 0 one is not.
U2EDITION= a dummy variable equal to 1 if the IPod is a special edition U2 version and
zero if isn’t.
ENDSUNDAY= a dummy variable equal to 1 if the auction ends on Sunday or zero if it
ends on any other day of the week.
TOTALBIDS= total number of bids placed on the auction.
OPENINGBID= the opening bid price of the auction.
SELLERREPUTATION= this will be considered using 3 different measures. The
numerical and percentage feedback ratings will be unique
variables and a dummy variable equal to 1 if the seller is a
power seller and zero if the seller isn’t also will be included.
SHIPPINGPRICE= the dollar price of shipping for the item.
BUYITNOW= a dummy variable equal to 1 if the IPod was sold using buy-it-now or
zero if it isn’t.
The FINAL BID PRICE is the dependent variable and its variation for IPods is
the driving force behind this study. This model sets out to explain the dollar effect of the
auction factors on the final bid price. The control variables are:
listing the auction possibly by the incorrect spelling in the title or placing the auction in
the wrong selling category (i.e. putting it in the sports memorabilia rather than the
consumer electronic category). All these factors should lead to decreased traffic to your
auction page and thus a lower final bid price. As auction page views increase, ceteris
paribus, the final bid price will increase. The remaining four control variables control for
the differing monetary value of the IPod being sold. Recall the equation presented in the
theory section that the aggregate value of the IPod auction is the sum of the monetary
value of the IPod and the value of the service these four control variables effect the
15
monetary value of the IPod. Being shrink wrapped increases the monetary value versus
IPods that aren’t shrink wrapped as it is an unambiguous signal that the IPod that you are
bidding on is certainly the factory sealed retail IPod. Being shrink wrapped will increase
the final bid price of the IPod, ceteris paribus. Being refurbished has the opposite effect
on the final bid price as consumers are buying an IPod that was previously misused or
defective. Being refurbished will decrease the final bid price of the IPod, ceteris paribus.
The car charger is an extra that is included in the auctions to help entice potential buyers
to bid on the seller’s IPod. The price of various car chargers from the apple store on
apple.com is around $20. With this in mind, including a car charger in your auction with
the IPod should increase the final bid price, ceteris paribus. The final control variable is
whether or not the IPod offered for sale is a U2 Edition IPod. The price of the 30GB U2
Edition IPod on apple.com is $279.00 which is $30 more than the standard 30GB IPod at
$249.00. The U2 Edition IPod has the distinctive red and black U2 colors and has laser
engraved signatures of all four U2 band members on the back of the IPod. Thus, a U2
Edition IPod should increase the final bid price of the IPod in the model, ceteris paribus.
The effect of total bids on the final bid price is expected to be positive as more
bidders lead to a bidding war between potential buyers heating up and this leads to
impulsive decision making. The result is that the final bid price should increase, ceteris
paribus. The effect of the opening bid price on the final bid price is uncertain. As stated
in the theory section and literature review, there are both positive and negative effects of
the opening bid price on the final bid price. Setting a lower opening bid price may serve
to attract more potential buyers and create the bidding war described above by increasing
the number of bidders and resulting in a greater final bid price. Setting a lower opening
16
bid price may also serve to hold the final bid price down. Potential buyers figure the
opening bid price in when valuing the auction and end up undervaluing the aggregate
value of the eBay product when the opening bid price is set low relative to other
homogenous IPods. A psychological anchor is set that holds the final bid price low and
thus the excepted effect of the opening bid price on the final bid price is uncertain.
Seller reputation is expected to have a positive effect on the final bid price. As
seller reputation improves the final bid price should increase. In all different model
specifications using numerical, percent, and power seller variables all are expected to
have a positive effect on final bid price. The power seller variable is expected to have the
greatest effect as it sends the best signal to potential buyers that they are purchasing their
item from a professional eBay seller who has the greatest incentive to provide them with
high quality service. In the online community sellers value this quality assurance greatly
and should be willing to pay a premium for it. So, being a power seller is expected to
increase the final bid price by more than the other seller reputation variables, ceteris
paribus.
Shipping price is expected to have a negative effect on the final bid price, but a $1
increase in the shipping price is not expected to have an equivalent $1 decrease in the
final bid price, ceteris paribus. As stated in the theory and literature, when shipping is a
small percentage of the overall cost of an item potential buyers undervalue the cost of
shipping and thus for an IPod where shipping is a small fraction of the total cost of the
item, a $1 increase in the shipping price is not viewed as a full $1 increase in the total
17
If an IPod is sold using buy-it-now, ceteris paribus, it is expected to sell for a
greater price than if it is sold using a standard auction. This is because an IPod is
suggested to be an impulsive type of buy or a gift purchase. If this is the case then the
group of potential buyers that are purchasing the item will have a high opportunity cost of
time and are willing to pay a higher price in the current period to forgo waiting for the
auction duration to be completed. Also, if the buyers are purchasing the item as a gift
they may not be able to risk losing out on the auction in the last second so their risk
aversion causes them to highly value the buy-it-now option and pay more in terms of the
DATA SECTION
The mean final cost (mean final bid price + mean shipping price) of the new
shrink wrapped 30 GB IPods in the sample is $229.96. The cost of a new shrink wrapped
IPod from apple.com is $249 with free shipping. The difference is $19.04 and this can be
consider the opportunity cost for buying an IPod on eBay versus direct through apple or
other retail locations. The opportunity cost of purchasing an IPod on eBay is the cost
associated with the time it takes to search for the item. For people who are experienced
eBay users the search costs are lower so they have a lower opportunity cost of buying on
eBay. Using advanced search techniques allow buyers to get the right item at the right
price at the right time. Another opportunity cost is the time it takes to wait for the
auction to finish on eBay versus purchasing the item at a retail location. If a buyer has a
strong preference for getting the IPod as soon as possible, say because they want the IPod
for a cross country trip they are going on the next day, then their opportunity cost of
waiting for the auction to finish is very high. The buy-it-now option in the auction may
18
decrease this so called “waiting time cost”, but there is still the wait time associated with
V. Research Methods
This paper examines 500 completed new 30 GB IPod auction from March 11 through
March 28, 2007. The specific search phrase used in finding the auction data on eBay was
“30 GB IPod New”. If you are registered eBay user, eBay allows you to access
completed auction data from the previous 30 days. Each auction was accessed
individually. The following variables were recorded: final bid price, shipping and
handling price, start day, start time, end day, end time, the duration of the auction in days,
the winning bidder’s numerical feedback score, the seller’s numerical feedback score, the
seller’s percentage feedback rating, whether the seller was identified as a power seller,
total number of bids on the item, total number of unique bids on the item, opening bid
price, auction page views, whether or not the seller accepted paypal money orders and
cashiers checks or personal checks, number of payment options (1,2 or 3), whether the
auction included a stock photo or an actual photo of the IPod, whether or not you could
concluded from the picture or description that the IPod was still in its original retail
shrink wrap, whether or not the Ipod was sold using the Buy-it-now feature, whether the
Ipod was white, black, or the U2 special edition version, whether the Ipod was
refurbished or not, and whether or not it came with extras like a case or car charger.
19
VI. Results
Model 1
Dependent Variable: FINAL BID PRICE
Variable Coefficient P-Value
N 389
R-squared .4193
20
Model 2- Seller Feedback Percent
Dependent Variable: FINAL BID PRICE
Variable Coefficient P-Value
N 389
R-squared .3729
21
U2EDITION 26.3188 *** 0.00
N 389
R-squared .3691
SELLER REPUTATION
The focus of the goodness of people in the eBay community seems to materialize in
the feedback patterns of users, although these statistics are biased upward slightly
compared to the entire population due to an omitted variable bias. Users who have been
kicked off of eBay for having too many negative feedbacks are not included in the
sample. The mean seller feedback percent of the IPod data sample collected is 98.66%.
34.6% of sellers in the sample have a 100% feedback rating and 81% of the sample have
a feedback rating greater than or equal to 99%. The large percentage of sellers with
excellent feedback ratings is consistent with Calkins (2001) assertion that eBay as an
institution has created a feedback system which puts a very high cost on members who
give negative feedback. The direct cost is usually a retaliatory negative feedback from
the seller if you are the buyer or visa-versa if you are the seller. Another cost of negative
22
feedback for a user is possible harassment or personal attacks as retaliation for giving the
accessible by the party retaliating allowing the user to attack this person directly, so this
further increases the cost of leaving negative feedback. The mean final bid price for
power sellers is $216.99 which is greater than the mean for non power sellers at $211.00.
concern because seller feedback measures and being a power seller should be correlated.
Examining the correlation coefficients between the three variables, the correlation
between power seller and seller feedback number is of concern at 0.347. It is possible to
measure of seller reputation, a one unit increase in numerical feedback rating for the
seller leads to a $0.000245 increase in the final bid price, ceteris paribus. The sign is
positive as theory suggests, but the result is not statistically significant as the p-value is
seller reputation, a one percent increase in the seller’s feedback rating leads to a $0.1318
increase in the final bid price, ceteris paribus. This is significant at the 10% level with a
p-value of 0.0726. The percentage feedback rating takes into account the effect of
negative feedback on the final bid price. As empirical studies show, taking into account
the affect of negative feedback is a better predictor of final price. Buyers on eBay don’t
put a premium on the raw number of feedback a seller has, but buyers do penalize sellers
for having negative feedback or in this case lower feedback percentage ratings. Finally,
23
the powerseller dummy variable was included as the sole measure of seller reputation in
the regression. The powerseller variable takes into account both the numerical feedback
rating and the percent feedback rating along with criteria listed above in the descriptive
section on power sellers. A power seller’s IPod auction ended with a final bid price
$7.71 more than a non power seller, ceteris paribus. This result is statistically significant
at the 1% level with a p-value of 0.000. The difference in mean final cost for power
sellers and non power sellers is $231.47 – $222.68= $8.79. The model predicts that the
difference should be $7.71, but it holds all other factors constant isolating the effect
Restricting the sample to just include power seller by setting the power seller
dummy variable equal to 1 allows the model to display the different effects on the
24
BUYITNOW 4.758 * 0.0667
N 214
R-squared .466
power sellers. Intuitively, this is in line with the above analysis on power sellers and
further supports the assertion that power seller is the best measure of seller reputation. If
buyers are confident in the credibility of the seller due to their power seller status the
amount times the auction page is viewed should have no effect on the final bid price. The
power seller denotation lessens the search cost for the buyers and increases their
.4261. The coefficient value falls and though the variable is no longer statistically
significant the fall in the coefficient is consistent with the analysis that fewer page views
are need to increase bid price because of the power seller status.
If power sellers as a group can use their seller reputation to get a higher final bid
price and buyers are more confident in the power seller’s credibility the next question is:
are there any observable differences in the buyers who use power sellers as opposed to
the buyers who use non power sellers? Breaking the sample up into power sellers and
non power sellers the average numerical bidder feedback for IPods from power sellers is
70.05 and the average numerical bidder feedback for IPods that aren’t from power sellers
is 86.09. The average bidder feedback for the entire sample is 77.74. The level of bidder
feedback is a measure for experience with eBay. When you complete a transaction on
eBay the other party in the transaction leaves you a feedback. Feedback increases as you
25
complete additional eBay transactions. Buyers who buy IPods from power sellers have
lower feedback, on average than buyers who buy IPods from non power sellers. More
experienced buyers have lower search costs in seeking out better prices. Also, less
experienced buyers may be skeptical of eBay and electronic transactions, therefore they
place a higher value on the certainty the power seller designation gives the buyer.
SHIPPING PRICE
In the case of the IPod data collected the mean final bid price is $214.05 and the mean
shipping and handling price is $13.11 for an average total price of $227.16. Shipping is
therefore 5.77% of the total price which is a relatively small percentage of the total cost
of the item. Based on the theory suggested by Houssain and Morgan as shipping and
handling cost increases by $1, ceteris paribus, the final auction price should decrease, but
by less than one dollar. In Model I a $1 increase in the shipping price causes a $0.80
decrease in final bid price, ceteris paribus. This result is statistically significant at the 1%
level.
If buyers don’t consider the full cost and consider shipping as an add-on cost,
even though it is clearly stated, there is an inefficiency in the market and sellers can
exploit this inefficiency to maximize their auction profits. A logical question from this
discovery is: are sellers currently systematically exploiting this market inefficiency?
Consider power sellers discussed in the previous section. Power sellers are a group of
sellers whose status denotes them as eBay professionals. As a group they use their seller
reputation to receive final bid prices that are statistically significantly larger than non
26
power sellers. Through their experience and position as professional sellers exploiting
the market inefficiency in sellers under valuing a marginal dollar of shipping cost seems
plausible. When examining the mean values of shipping prices power sellers charge
$14.48 as compared to non power sellers who charge $11.68 on average. On average
power sellers charge more for shipping and at the same time on average they receive
more for final bid $216.99 versus $211.00. The total mean cost (final auction price +
shipping price) for power sellers is $231.47 and $222.68 for non-power sellers.
Performing the restricted regression in the previous section, on power sellers supports the
claim that power sellers do in fact exploit the market undervaluation of shipping price.
For the entire sample a $1 increase in shipping price cause a $0.80 decrease in the final
bid price. For the restricted sample of power sellers a $1 increase in the shipping price
causes a $0.71 decrease in the final bid price. The coefficient on shipping price in the
BUY-IT-NOW
The theory underlying the decision to use buy-it-now in eBay auctions center on
risk-aversion and impatience as well as other transactions costs from both the buyer and
sellers side. A risk-averse seller has a distaste for volatility and uncertainty of the final
bid price associated with a standard auction. The seller is willing to trade-off the risk of
uncertainty for a lower return in the form of a certain buy-it-now price. As Matthews and
Katzman point out, the buy-it-now price produces higher expected utility for the seller
even though it may result in an inefficient allocation of the item. Buyers and seller have
an opportunity cost associated with their time in both the search for the item and the time
27
they wait to receive the item as the buyer or send it as the seller. From the bidder side, if
they have a strong taste for having the item in the current period they will prefer buy-it-
now over a standard auction. An IPod is a type of item that people buy on impulse. If
IPod buyers are in fact impulsive then they will be impatient with the bid process and
prefer auctions with buy-it-now. 25.4% of the IPods sold in the sample were sold using
buy-it-now and 74.6% were sold using standard auctions. Because that data was gathered
after the auctions were completed you cannot tell what percent of the auctions offered the
To test empirically to see if a premium is paid for, we can examine the data
gathered in this IPod study. The first result is that the mean final bid price of IPods
bought using buy-it-now is greater than those bought using standard auctions: $222.43
versus $211.20. Looking at the regression, if an item is sold using buy-it-now, ceteris
paribus, the auction will get $5.09 greater final bid price than if the item is sold in a
standard eBay auction. This result is statistically significant at the 1% level with a p-
value of 0.0063. The $5.09 that buyers are willing to pay is the premium associated with
the impatience of the bidder. The fact that the difference in the mean difference between
IPods sold with buy-it-now and those sold without buy-it-now is $11.23 and the
difference holding all else constant is only $5.09. This leads me to believe that seller
reputation comes into play when offering buy-it-now meaning that power sellers are more
likely to offer buy-it-now than non power seller. The restricted sample is more
concentrated with power sellers than the entire 63.77% versus 50.80%. As a seller the
cost of buy-it-now, as listed on eBay’s website, is $0.25 additional for items selling over
28
$50. As a seller this small additional cost is far exceeded by the $5.09 benefit, so it is
logical to include a buy-it-now option when selling an IPod in order to maximize profits.
opening bid price leads to a $.055 increase in final bid price, ceteris paribus. This result
auction goes on prospective buyers get caught in the excitement associated with the
auction. Considering total bids captures this excitement factor, though it is slightly
biased upward due to the proxy bid structure that eBay has, described above. Total bids
capture repeat bids by the same bidders. A one total bid increase, ceteris paribus, causes
a $0.404 increase in the final bid price. This result is statistically significant at the 1%
The result on the Sunday dummy variable is interesting as it implies that IPod
auctions that end on Sunday will sell for $4.48 less than IPod auction that end on any
other day of the week. This result is statistically significant at 5% level and the negative
effect on the final bid price of ending the IPod auction on Sunday is consistent
throughout all specifications on the model. Though theory suggests that the weekend
should yield higher traffic and higher bid prices this does not seem to be the case for
IPods. Since an IPod is an impulse buy it may be that people don’t need to wait for the
weekend to use their leisure time. With their high opportunity cost associated with
29
waiting to purchase an IPod they are willing to go on eBay during the week and purchase
the IPods often using the buy-it-now option which further supports this claim.
Control Variables
The price of a factory sealed IPod is $249, with free shipping, from Apple.com.
75.6% of the 500 auctions observed were for IPods in their original factory sealed shrink
wrap. The average total price (final bid price + shipping price) of these shrink wrapped
IPods is $229.96. The average total price of the IPods that are not factory sealed is
$218.41. In Model I an IPod that is shrink wrapped will sell for $10.99 more than an
IPod that is not shrink wrapped, ceteris paribus. This result is significant at the 1% level.
The U2 Edition and the inclusion of a car charger in the auction are both control
variables in the regression. The U2 Edition IPod has a final auction price $27.08 greater
than the standard black or white 30GB IPod, ceteris paribus. Including a car charger in
the auction causes the final bid price to be $15.36 greater than if it was not included,
ceteris paribus. Refurbished is another control variable and IPods that are refurbished
have a price $12.79 lower than non refurbished IPods, ceteris paribus.
The final bid price of a refurbished IPod is $12.79 less than an IPod that hasn’t
been refurbished. This result is statistically significant at the 1% level and is consistent
with the theory that the monetary value of the refurbished IPod decreases the final bid
price. The inclusion of a car charger also has the expected effect increasing the final bid
price by $15.36. Again the retail value of car chargers on apple.com is $20 so this result
30
VII. Conclusions
In conclusions the factors having the most direct effect on final bid price are
shipping price, the seller reputation measured in terms of being a power seller, and the
use of buy-it-now. If sellers meet the criteria for being power seller they should sign up
with eBay immediately because they will increase their revenue. In the case of the IPods,
they will increase their revenue per IPod by $7.71 holding all else constant. As a seller
you also should charge a high fixed shipping price because buyers do not consider a $1
increase in the shipping price as a $1 increase in the total cost of the auction. Bidders
increase in the shipping price leads to a $0.80 decrease in the final bid price, ceteris
paribus. Power sellers should increase their shipping price by even more to increase
revenues as a $1 increase in their shipping prices leads to a $0.71 decrease in the final bid
price of the auction. Offering buy-it-now is the final piece in the puzzle for a seller trying
to maximize their profits selling new 30GB IPods. The seller should look at other buy-it-
now prices and in this case the seller should consider the mean buy-it-now price of
$222.43 and set their buy-it-now at or close to this price. By setting this price impatient
buyers who are willing to pay a premium to get the item faster will buy. To the degree
the seller is risk-averse they should decrease the buy-it-now price relative to the mean. In
this way the seller is placing a premium on minimizing the volatility in final bid prices.
These conclusions add to the literature currently available and for the most part are in line
with results from previous studies. An application of this model to another data set may
be instructive in the future and a test of these findings may further solidify the results as
31
References
Bajari, P. and Horacsu, A. “The Winner’s Curse, Reserve Prices, and Endoenous
Entry: Empirical Insights from eBay Auctions.” RAND Journal of
Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2, (Summer 2003), pp. 329-355.
Calkins, Mary M., “My Reputation Always Had More Fun Than Me: The Failure of
eBay's Feedback Model to Effectively Prevent Online Auction Fraud.” 7 RICH.
J.L. & TECH. 33 (Spring 2001),
http://law.richmond.edu/jolt/v7i4/note1.html#h4b
Hsiao, Aron. "Maximize Bids by Timing Your Listings." About.Com. 1 Apr. 2007
http://ebay.about.com/od/sellingeffectivel1/a/se_timing.htm
Katzman, B. and T. Matthews (2006). The Role of Varying Risk Attitudes in an Auction
with a Buyout Option. Economic Theory 27. 597-613
Wen Wan and Hock-Hai Teo. “An Examination of Auction Price Determinants
on eBay.” School of Computing, National University of Singapore. The
paper was presented at the 9th European conference on Information
Systems in Bled, Slovenia, June 27-29, 2001.
www.ebay.com
32