Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Juvenille Detention Alternatives Initiative (the Annie E. Casey Foundation)

Juvenille Detention Alternatives Initiative (the Annie E. Casey Foundation)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 55|Likes:
Published by destinyschildren

More info:

Published by: destinyschildren on Jan 16, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





ASuccessful Approach to Comprehensive Reform
The Annie E. Casey Foundation 
The Annie E. Casey Foundation is a  private charitable organization dedi- cated to helping build better futures for disadvantaged children in the United States. It was established in 
by  Jim Casey, one of the founders of  
,and his siblings, who named the Foundation in honor of their mother. The primary mission of the Foundation is to foster public policies,human-service reforms, and commu- nity supports that moreeffectively meet the needs of today’svulnerable children and families. Inpursuit of this goal,the Foundation makes grants that help states, cities, and neighborhoods  fashion moreinnovative, cost-effective responses to these needs. For more information, visit the Foundation’s website at www.aecf.org.
Damaged Futures, Poor Results 
Imagine a model juvenile justice system: one that holds delin-quent youth accountable while helping them redirect their lives,that protects communities, saves scarce tax dollars, and locks uponly those youth who truly need to be confined. Sadly, in many  jurisdictions, the gulf between this ideal and the reality of juve-nile justice is far and wide.Every year, hundreds of thousands of youth are inappro-priately or unnecessarily detained in dangerous, overcrowdeddetention centers, which increases their risk of recidivism, seversfragile ties to families and schools, and costs taxpayers millionsof dollars.Despite sensationalized headlines about isolated incidents,most detained youth arecharged with non-violent offenses orrule violations. Detention, which generally occurs
adelin-quency finding, is intended for youth who pose a significantrisk of reoffending or fleeing the court’s jurisdiction. But thenumbers showthat most detained youth do not fall into eitherof those categories: more than two-thirds are charged with prop-erty or public order offenses and/or technical probation viola-tions or status offenses (like running away or breaking curfew).Many youth end up in detention because the system cannotaccurately distinguish which youth pose serious risks. Othertimes, youth are detained because they have frustrated or angeredsystem personnel who want to “teach them a lesson” or “get theirattention,” or because no parent is available to take them home.Sometimes youth remain detained because system inefficiencieshave delayed their cases. Increasingly, kids are detained because

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->