Dr ZDr ZDr ZDr Z
Joseph Zernik, PhDPO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750;Fax: 801 998-0917; Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Blog:http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
SUNDAY, JANUARY 17, 2010
10-01-17 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - Requests for responseson requests in re: dockets integrity.
US District Court, Los Angeles
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:59:57 -0800To: Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the US District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFrom: joseph zernik
Subject: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - Request forresponses on requests dated January 4, 2010 in re dockets integrity.
Cc: Dawn Bullock, Records SupervisorJanuary 16, 2010Terry NafisiClerk of the US CourtCentral District of California
RE: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) Requests forresponses on requests dated January 4, 2010 in re dockets integrity.
Dear Clerk Nafisi:Please accept this notice as a reminder of requests for information from your office, made in person toRecords Supervisor Dawn Bullock on December 29, 2009, and also in writing, in letters dates January4, 2010.
In a December 29, 2009 visit to the US District Court, LA, requests were made to access court records,to inspect and to copy. Most requests were denied, but access was allowed to several NEFs (Noticesof Electronic Filings) in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) . Such NEFs cemented concernsregarding honesty, validity, and effect of the PACER docket under such caption.The US District Court would not certify its dockets. Moreover, no statements appear in the dockets inthe name of the Clerk or any Clerk Deputy, as such. Therefore requests were made, and requests aremade herein, for statements by the US District Court, LA - Terry Nafisi, whether the dockets in Zernik vConnor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were honest, valid, and effectualdockets, in compliance with US law. Please accept this request also as Custodian of Records of theUS District Court, LA, pursuant to California Law, as a request for custodian of records declarationregarding the PACER dockets of Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914).