Log In | Sign Up | Help
Upload_transparent

Evolution and Homosexuality

 
 
 
 
 
Value This
Doc 		Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 15 43
Words: 8012 13640
Characters: 51628 81678
Lines: 50 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.44 5.99
Words per line: 160.24 21.89
Words per page: 534.13 317.21

Document Information

  • Add_to_favs_transparent
  • Flag

2,584 Reads | 6 Likes | 5 Comments | 8 Favorites

Added By
Description

Have you ever wondered how homosexuality fits in with evolution? Do atheistic Evolutionists believe homosexuality is a “viable alternative lifestyle?” Do Evolutionists make a distinction between “civil rights” for man and “scientific rights” for man? If so, which rights have greater weight - and what impact would that have on homosexuality? If you are at all curious about homosexuality in an evolutionary context, then this is a must read. It is the starting point in the discussion.

Pdf_16x16 15 Pages

Date Added

04/15/2008
Category

Uncategorized.

Tags
Groups

**0001 A GREAT GREECE - UNIVERSALITY ..., Bible, World Library Group_add

Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

Comments

Login or Signup to Leave a Comment

Robin Calamaio about 1 month ago

These comments by designything (below) are extremely instructive. This article is a challenge to evolutionists. It is not written for homosexuals. Also, it has nothing to do with theism. It is totally void of even a hint of theism. When designything concludes with “Suggested vocation: tabloid writer for ‘Heaven Speaks to Me Monthly,’” this demonstrates his/her bigotry and fear mongering toward some form of theism. Designything’s charge is an attempt to divert the substance of this treatise. It is totally irrelevant to this article, and one is left to conclude that to bring in such a charge - from thin air - is based upon bigotry towards, and fear of, some sort of theism. This is classic projection: the charge leveled at me, he/her is actually engaged in. We are left to wonder (if we are even interested) what form of theism is the target - but as that is has nothing to do with the contentions in the work, we may or may not bother seeking that out. But the bigger point is this: Designything is exactly what is ailing with Naturalism. He/she is a pseudo-evolutionist who has polluted Naturalism with his/her metaphysical fog of Humanism.

Evolution is a theory. It is a scientific theory. It is not a fact. It is not a scientific fact. It is not settled science. It is a speculative idea about how life spontaneously generated from inorganic material, with a fully operational reproductive system, and then profitably mutated for one to four billion years into the current complexity of organic life. This Article is a challenge toward these theorists who embrace homosexuality as compatible with the rudimentary principles of their theory. Simply stated, homosexual creatures, in species requiring heterosexual fertilization, do not reproduce. Therefore, if they do possess some physical beneficial adaptation for their particular species - it dies with them. In fact, their entire billion year progression leading to them goes extinct when they die. If all in a such a species develops homosexuality, then entire species goes extinct. And if all species develop this, then the entire globe would house some “sea urchins and aphis” and various microorganisms. That’s about it. (Comment continued in next post).

Robin Calamaio about 1 month ago

Evolution will always remain a theory, because it will never be proven. It will never be settled science. Actually, scientific, statistical probability studies have already conclusively demonstrated Evolution’s position just on the origins of life - is impossible. One living cell is so astronomically complex, it is statistically impossible to have randomly, spontaneously arisen from inorganic matter. And for it to pop into existence with a fully functional reproductive system as well ... this is beyond science fiction. Even for a DNA molecule or RNA molecule to spontaneously arise is statistically impossible. And even a relatively simple protein molecule randomly forming is impossible. Evolution can not be proven for a very simple reason - it is not true. I have often said that this theory will not survive this century. But I now believe its demise will come much sooner. Access to information via the Internet is changing everything. People are abandoning this sinking ship. And the contention that life was planted here from some outside galaxy or something solves nothing. It just kicks the can down the road as the question remains -where did those aliens get their life from?

Sometimes I have great sorrow for those who have so earnestly hoped in this myth. While they have desperately tried to make evolution pass from theory to fact, they have devoted themselves to an impossible task, with no hope of success. And even though they have successfully censured alternative explanations from the educational system, their propagandizing has been met with very limited success. Most of their audience intuitively knows evolution can not be correct. As they gain access to contrary scientific arguments and alternative explanations, it is amazing how easily decades of indoctrination is abandoned.

Robin Calamaio about 1 month ago

Now that really is a good try. The short sightedness and blindness of one who would attempt to normalize an activity that immediately ends that particular creature’s billion year lifeline is breathtaking. A homosexual creature ends its billion year lifeline when it expires. What you are attempting to normalize is most likely Evolution’s mechanism for bringing an end to a particular species line. If every dwarf chimp eventually becomes a pure homosexual, say in 100,000 years or so (evolution allows for millions of years in some gradual extinctions), this normal, acceptable behavior you espouse will result in ... no more dwarf chimps. I wonder how one will become a fossil in the tropics?

Your greatest error is that you take a present day snapshot of some specie’s homosexual behavior and because it exists you assume the behavior is progressive. After all, it even makes chimp males not fight - more docile. And that surely will make them more of a threat to other species who may be competing for the same ecological niche, right? It is you, and those of your psuedo social scientific rationalization camp, that seek to affirm as positive a lethal development in a species. As it spreads in a species, the species will grow? So if every creature on the globe develops this ... what?

Last point. You opened you comments accusing, “Fearmongering and bigotry.” How in the world you grasp for such a popular, and anti scientific irrelevant cliche, and then attempt to present your science ... well, I don’t call it “appalling,” but it is curious. This tact is often used by pro homosexuals everywhere. Please explain what you mean by this. What is the fear part? Are you, and yours, saying I am afraid of a creature ending his/her billion-year lifeline? Fear of what? And what is the bigotry part? Bigoted toward what? These are all Humanistic metaphysical concepts based upon what? I know I am missing something here because these types of “charges” have never made any sense to me.

Anyway, believe it or not, I appreciate your input.

designything@gmail.com about 1 month ago

Good try. Fear mongering and bigotry, appallingly and poorly dressed up as science.
To use your language Robin, you're the laughingstock.

To borrow from Petter Boeckman, Academic at the University of Oslo, one fundamental premise in evolutionary debates has been that homosexuality is unnatural. This premise is WRONG Robin.

Homosexuality is both common and highly essential in the lives of a number of species.
The most well-known homosexual animal is the dwarf chimpanzee, one of humanity’s closes relatives. The entire species is bisexual. Sex plays an conspicuous roll in all their activities and takes the focus away from violence, which is the most typical method of solving conflicts among primates and many other animals.

In fact, homosexuality is quite common in the animal kingdom has been documented in 1500 animal species.

Indeed, animals that live a completely homosexual life can also be found. This occurs especially among birds that will pair with one partner for life, which is the case with geese and ducks. Four to five percent of the couples are homosexual. Single females will lay eggs in a homosexual pair’s nest. It has been observed that the homosexual couple are often better at raising the young than heterosexual couples.

NO Robin, homosexuality is NOT as you emotionally say “a lethal change to a creature’s evolutionary
Line.” Indeed, scientific evidence suggests quite the opposite to your fiction.

No species has been found in which homosexual behaviour has not been shown to exist, with the exception of species that never have sex at all, such as sea urchins and aphis. Moreover, a part of the animal kingdom is hermaphroditic, truly bisexual. For them, homosexuality is not an issue.

Finally, you have to be kidding to suggest that, "just as heterosexuals go to great lengths to arouse and bait their target, so also homosexuals do among themselves. They even fight, sometimes to the death, over a prized “mate.”"
So gay men fight each other to the death over a preferred partner.

Either your English is remedial or you’re a real nutter. Perhaps it’s both. What utter trash!
Suggested vocation: tabloid writer for "Heaven Speaks to Me Monthly"

infois 2 months ago

If you have questions about
homosexuality just say out
loud now Jesus I believe and
I receive you in my heart you
can also google leroyjenkins to
get more help