20
coNNEXIo
s
Cost
Copyright
Atirst
step
Objection
ITU
Adopts
a
New
Meta-Standard
(continued)
TheITO
and
ISOhave,untilnow,onlymade
their
standardsavailablebypaper
at
great
cost.TheITOderivedannualrevenuesof
SFr
8million(roughlyUS$5million)fromdocumentsales.ISOalsomakesaconsiderableamountfromdocumentsalesalthoughtheyrefusetodivulgespecificrevenue
or
costfigures,claiming
the
informationis"proprietary."Highcost
hasmeant
that
the
most
important
communities
individualswhowillimplement
the
standards-have
not
hadreadyaccesstothesevitaldocuments.Manyconsideredone
ofthe
mostsurprisingaspectsoftheINTEROPsessionto
be
aspeech,madevia
the
videolinkfromGeneva,byAnthonyRutkowski,one
of
theseniorlawyers
at
theITU.Rutkowskipresentedadetailedanalysisof
the
legalbasisforassertingcopyrightonstandardsdocuments.Heconcluded
thatit
washighlydoubtful
if
internationalorganizations(suchasISOortheITO)would
be
able
to
successfully
assert
copyrightprotection
in
acourt
of
lawover
the
content
of
standards.(Thevideolinkwasprovidedcourtesy
of
USSprintandCompressionLabsIncorporated).Theannouncementby
the
ITUisaradicalchange
in
policy
and
represents
the
newleadership
of
Dr.PekkaTarjanne.Dr.VintonCerf,
the
chairman
of
the
lAB,underscoredthesignificanceofthesenewpolicieswhenheinformed
the
INTEROPaudience
that
he
had
receivedcallsfrom
the
WhiteHouseand
the
FCCwantingtoknowmoredetails.TheITOannouncement
is
an
importantstep,
but
it
isonly
the
firststep.ISO,ANSI.theIEEE.Bellcore.andallotherstandards-makingandstandards-coordinationbodies
must
firmlyendorsetheprinciple
that
the
resultsofthestandardsprocessshould
be
easilyaccessible
at
low
costornocost.
In
addition,bodieslikeISO
and
ANSIshouldinvestigate
their
processestosee
if
therearemeans
that
can.whilepreserving
the
vitalprincipleofdueprocess.enhance
the
speed
and
relevance
ofstan
dardsmaking.AnimportantfirststepwouldbetopostallworkingdocumentsontheInternet.Postingdocumentson
the
Internetistechnicallyfeasible.
In
less
than
onemonth.averysmallgroup
of
volunteerswereabletoconvertmost
ofthe
ITOstandards
set
(nottomentionscanning
in
images.settingup
the
hardwareandinstallingsupportsoftware).Therearenotechnicalreasonstonotpost
standards--all
objections
are
basedonapoliticaldesireto
retain
control
or
afinancialdesiretoenhancerevenue.ThemostcommonobjectionbygroupslikeANSItopostingstandardsis
that
documentsales"fund
the
process."WhileANSI
and
ISOrefusetodivulge
their
cost
and
revenuestructure,
it
iscertainly
true
that
underthecurrent
procedures
the
documentsalesareimportanttobothgroups.However.selling
standards
at
veryhighpricesundermines
the
verypurposeforwhichgroupslikeISO
and
ANSIwereformed.
It
is
as
if
the
AmericanCancerSocietyweretosellcigarettesasaway
of
funding
their
work.ISO
and
ANSIwereformedtopromote
the
widespreadacceptance
of
standards:
their
currentpoliciesseverelyunderminethose
goals.
Add a Comment