Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
ENT Disorders and Homoepathy

ENT Disorders and Homoepathy

Ratings: (0)|Views: 35|Likes:
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
Research article

BioMed Central

Open Access

Homeopathic treatment of patients with chronic sinusitis: A prospective observational study with 8 years follow-up
Claudia M Witt*1, Rainer Lüdtke2 and Stefan N Willich1
Address: 1Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, D-10098 Berlin, Germany and 2Karl and Veronica Carstens-Foundation, Am Deimelsberg 36, D-45276 Essen, Germany Email: Claudia M Witt* - cl
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
Research article

BioMed Central

Open Access

Homeopathic treatment of patients with chronic sinusitis: A prospective observational study with 8 years follow-up
Claudia M Witt*1, Rainer Lüdtke2 and Stefan N Willich1
Address: 1Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, D-10098 Berlin, Germany and 2Karl and Veronica Carstens-Foundation, Am Deimelsberg 36, D-45276 Essen, Germany Email: Claudia M Witt* - cl

More info:

Published by: Dr Dushyant Kamal Dhari on Jan 22, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Page 1 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)
BMC Ear, Nose and ThroatDisorders
Research article
Homeopathic treatment of patients with chronic sinusitis: Aprospective observational study with 8 years follow-up
, RainerLüdtke
and StefanNWillich
Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, D-10098 Berlin, Germany and
Karl and Veronica Carstens-Foundation, Am Deimelsberg 36, D-45276 Essen, Germany Email: ClaudiaMWitt*-claudia.witt@charite.de; RainerLüdtke-r.luedtke@carstens-stiftung.de; StefanNWillich-stefan.willich@charite.de* Corresponding author 
An evaluation of homeopathic treatment and the outcomes in patients sufferingfrom sinusitis for
12 weeks in a usual care situation.
Subgroup analysis including all patients with chronic sinusitis (ICD-9: 473.9;
12 weeksduration) of a large prospective multicentre observational study population. Consecutive patientspresenting for homeopathic treatment were followed-up for 2 years, and complaint severity,health-related quality of life (QoL), and medication use were regularly recorded. We also presenthere patient-reported health status 8 years post initial treatment.
The study included 134 adults (mean age 39.8 ± 10.4 years, 76.1% women), treated by 62physicians. Patients had suffered from chronic sinusitis for 10.7 ± 9.8 years. Almost all patients(97.0%) had previously been treated with conventional medicine. For sinusitis, effect size (effectdivided by standard deviation at baseline) of complaint severity was 1.58 (95% CI 1.77; 1.40), 2.15(2.38; 1.92), and 2.43 (2.68; 2.18) at 3, 12, and 24 months respectively. QoL improved accordingly,with SF-36 changes in physical component score 0.27 (0.15; 0.39), 0.35 (0.19; 0.52), 0.44 (0.23; 0.65)and mental component score 0.66 (0.49; 0.84), 0.71 (0.50; 0.92), 0.65 (0.39; 0.92), 0.74 (0.49; 1.00)at these points. The effects were still present after 8 years with SF-36 physical component score0.38 (0.10; 0.65) and mental component score 0.74 (0.49; 1.00).
This observational study showed relevant improvements that persisted for 8 yearsin patients seeking homeopathic treatment because of sinusitis. The extent to which the observedeffects are due to the life-style regulation and placebo or context effects associated with thetreatment needs clarification in future explanatory studies.
Chronic sinusitis is generally accepted to be a common ill-ness incurring considerable costs, despite limited epide-miological data[1]. It is defined as an inflammation of thenasal mucosa and paranasal sinuses for at least 12 weeks which may cause nasal blockage or congestion, mucousdischarge, facial pain or pressure, and/or impaired smell.Polyps, which may or may not be present are increasingly recognized as part of the sinusitis pathology [1,2]. Several factors have been found to contribute to the disease,namely, insufficient ciliary motility, allergy and asthma,bacterial infection, and more rarely, morphological
Published: 27 July 2009
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
:7doi:10.1186/1472-6815-9-7Received: 16 March 2009Accepted: 27 July 2009This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6815/9/7© 2009 Witt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
:7http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6815/9/7Page 2 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)
anomalies, immune deficiencies and Samter's triad (sali-cylate sensitivity, asthma, nasal polyps). While the role of fungi and hormonal changes during pregnancy areunclear, it may also be an early symptom of systemic dis-ease [1,3,4]. Standard treatment recommendations are to suppress theinflammatory process with corticosteroids [1,5,6], antibi- otics may be also necessary to combat opportunistic infec-tions [1,7], and possible underlying diseases may require their own specific medication. Saline douching can pro- vide some symptomatic relief [1,2]. Surgical intervention  was found to be as effective as medical treatment, but should be reserved for refractory cases [1,3,5]. Some com- plementary and alternative medical (CAM) treatmentsmight be helpful as adjuvants [8]. It appears that homeo-paths are consulted more frequently by patients withacute and chronic sinusitis (13% of the homeopathy group vs. 7% of the conventional group in an observa-tional comparison study) [9], but to date no research haslooked into the effects of homeopathy for chronic sinusi-tis.Homeopathy is practised in many regions of the world[10], especially in high-income countries, where it is themost popular treatment form among the traditional, com-plementary, or alternative medical therapies [10-12]. Homeopathic prescribing accounts for concomitant symptoms in addition to the predominant pathology,therefore the same main diagnosis may be treated withdifferent remedies in different patients ('individualisa-tion'). The prescribed drugs ('remedies') are under con-stant debate. They are produced by alternating steps of diluting and agitating a starting substance ('potentiating'). After several repetitions, dilutions beyond Avogadro'snumber are reached, and the probability approaches zerothat even a single molecule of the starting substanceremains present in the drug. Such 'high potencies' areoften used, however their effects are the subject of scien-tific controversy. Apparently, the inconsistent results seen in meta-analysesof placebo-controlled trials pooling a great variety of dis-eases and ailments [13,14] might be a consequence of trial selection [15]. We analyzed the data from our prospectiveobservational study, which globally evaluated details andeffects under homeopathic treatment in a usual care situ-ation (3981 patients over 8 years [16-19]) with respect to diagnosis. This paper presents the 134 adults consulting ahomeopathic physician because of chronic sinusitis.
Study and Participants
In this prospective multi-centre observational study,patients were included consecutively upon their first con-sultation with a participating physician, and subsequently followed up, using standardised questionnaires. Thispaper analyses the patients suffering from sinusitis for 
12 weeks (defined as "an inflammatory process of themucous membranes of the paranasal sinuses [resulting]from any condition", ICD-9: 473.9 [20], ICD-10: J32.9)Study physicians were required to have passed certifiedtraining in classical homeopathy and have
3 years prac-tical experience (details of recruitment: [17]). Writteninformed consent and approval by the ethics review boardof the Charité University Medical Centre were obtained.
Data Collection
Before treatment (at baseline) and independent of their physicians, patients recorded the complaints that insti-gated homeopathic treatment, and rated their severity ona numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 = no complaints, 10 = max-imum severity) [21]. The health-related quality of life(QoL) was recorded with the MOS SF-36 [22] question-naire. The first questionnaires were personally given to thepatients by the study physicians and were completedbefore treatment. Patients sent them in sealed envelopesdirectly to the study office, from where they received fol-low-up questionnaires after 3, 12, and 24 months, and 8 years, with every complaint being transferred to the fol-low-up questionnaires to ensure continuous assessment. At baseline, 3, 12 and 24 months, the participating physi-cians recorded up to 4 diagnoses per patient and assessedtheir severity on identical NRS. On a continuous basis,they recorded the homeopathic treatment, use of any con- ventional therapies, and all referrals.
Statistical Analysis
 As outcome measures, we defined: mean sinusitis severity,mean severity of all baseline diagnoses (pooled physicianassessment), mean severity of all complaints (pooledpatient assessment), and QoL scores. Statistical analysis(using SAS/STAT 
 v9.2 software) followed the intention-to-treat approach: every included patient entered the finalanalyses. We replaced missing values as follows: Curedcomplaints: severity = 0 in subsequent records; deceasedpatients: severity = 10. The remaining missing values weremultiply imputed according to Rubin [23]. Each wasgiven 20 distinct, but plausible values, based on correla-tions with non-missing values and reflecting the overall variability of data. This generated a total of 20 distinct data tables, each with a full data set. These were analysedseparately (see below), and the results pooled to calculatetreatment effects and p-values. For each imputed data set,treatment effects were estimated on the basis of a general-ised multiple linear regression model, following the rec-ommendations by Diggle et al [24]. We assumed thetreatment course to be mixed with a piecewise linear part (0–3 months, 3–24 months, and 24 to 72 months). Theserial correlation was assumed to be exponential with
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
:7http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6815/9/7Page 3 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)
time. Standardised effects (d) were calculated by dividing treatment effects as estimated above by baseline standarddeviations. They were classified: as |d| > 0.8, large; |d| >0.5, medium; |d| > 0.2, small.Usually, patients seek treatment when their health isbelow average (such as severe pain, low QoL, etc.). A nat-ural alleviation of their diseases (regression to the mean)can be mistaken for an effect at the beginning of treatment [25]. In order to separate regression to the mean and treat-ment effects, the mean of the target population must beknown or plausibly assumed. For the QoL, we appliedMee and Chua's test [26] under the assumption that thepatients had the same QoL as the general German popu-lation [22]. For the NRS ratings no data describing a nor-mal population is available.
In the present analysis, we included 134 adult patients(Table1), who had been suffering from sinusitis for 10.7± 9.8 years. These patients were treated by 62 physicians(including 1 Ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialist). Almost all accompanying diagnoses assessed at baseline were chronic diseases that had previously been under treatment-mostly with conventional medicine (Tables1,2). All diagnoses seen in more than 5% of the patients were present for at least five years (Table2). Nasal polyps,immune deficiencies, or fibrosis were not diagnosed. The consultations consisted of an extensive initial consul-tation (table3), followed by the analysis of the case. Almost all patients received the first homeopathic medica-tion on the day of their first consultation, three patientshad to wait for 
1 week,
1 month, and longer, respec-tively. The subsequent consultations, about half of themtelephone calls, were much shorter than the initial history taking (Table3). Almost 60% of the patients were still inhomeopathic care or had only suspended it temporarily at 24 months (32% after 8 years) (table3).In the first 24 months, patients received 8.3 ± 6.2 homeo-pathic prescriptions. Half of all prescriptions were coveredby 10 homeopathic remedies (figure1), but in total, 145remedies were applied. Most used were the potencies:C200, 35.7%; C1000, 23.0%; C30, 14.2%; C10000, 7.6%;Q1, 3.5%; D12, 3.3%. (Letters indicate dilutions stepsduring manufacturing: 1/100 for centesimal (C-) poten-cies, 1/50000 for quinquagintamillesimal (Q-) potencies,and 1/10 for decimal (D-) potencies; numbers give thestep repetitions. For example, a "C200" preparation isdiluted-1/100-then-agitated 200 times. Thus, 88.3% of the remedies were potentiated to a dilution beyond Avogadro's number. The strongest improvements in the severity of complaints were seen in the first 3 months, they generally continuedduring the first 24 months and persisted for another 6 years (Table4). The physicians' assessments of the severity change tended to be more positive than patients' ownassessments (data not shown). The improvements inhealth-related QoL were of smaller effect size (Table4)but statistically significant. The latter was confirmed by Mee-Chua-tests for the mental component score (p =0.0859, p = 0.034, and p < 0.0001 at 3, 12 and 24months) but not for the physical component score (p =0.6869, p = 0.6859, and p = 0.1259). After 24 months,sinusitis and other baseline diagnoses were considerably relieved (Table5), while large reductions in the use of conventional medicines and health care services wereobserved (Table6). The observed improvements were stillpresent in the 8-year follow-up (Table4).
 This prospective multicentre observational study wasaimed to provide an overview of contemporary homeo-pathic health care and the outcomes in 134 patients withchronic sinusitis. During the observation period, assess-ments of disease severity and health-related quality of life(QoL) consistently showed substantial improvements,although the disease was long-standing, and had previ-ously been treated with conventional medicine. Similarly,the accompanying diseases (almost all chronic) weremarkedly ameliorated. Although the major improvementstook place within the first 3 months of homeopathic treat-
Table 1: Demographics and Baseline Status
Baseline Population (% & N)
Patients Total100.0% (134)Female76.1% (102)Age (Years, Mean ± SD)39.8 ± 10.4
10 Years School66.4% (89)
Patients Expected: Homeopathy... (% & N)
- Will Help67.9% (91)- Will Maybe Help30.6% (41)- Will Not Help0.7% (1)
Baseline Diagnoses (Mean ± SD)
Total, Number3.37 ± 0.74- Severity (NRS)5.8 ± 1.4Chronic, Number3.34 ± 0.76
Any Baseline Diagnosis Pretreated (% & N)
Any Treatment97.0% (128)Medication *87.9% (116)Surgery32.6% (43)Other65.9% (87)
8 Year Follow-Up (% & N)
Completed Questionnaires67.9% (91)Female Responders79.1% (72)NRS = Numerical Rating Scale: 10 = maximum, 0 = cured. * ExcludingHomeopathy.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->