Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Pertussis Article

Pertussis Article

Ratings: (0)|Views: 882 |Likes:
Published by Meryl Dorey
A thesis about how governments use coercion and incorrect information to force people to vaccinate against whooping cough.
A thesis about how governments use coercion and incorrect information to force people to vaccinate against whooping cough.

More info:

Published by: Meryl Dorey on Jan 28, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/20/2012

pdf

text

original

 
1
COERCIVE ANDMANDATORYIMMUNISATION
ByJudy Wilyman (BSc,MSc,DipEd)
j.wilyman@murdoch.edu.au
 
2
ABSTRACT
In 2008 StateGovernment’s in Australia implementedmandatoryimmunization policies for health professionals working in clinical situations.Australia also has a Childhood Immunisation Schedule which recommendsthirteen vaccines be administered to infants beforetwo years of age. Thisarticle uses pertussis epidemiology as a case study to examine the evidencesupporting Australia’simmunization policies. It concludes that there is ashortage of reliableindependent evidence supporting these policies. Theresults of this research show that pertussis vaccine is not controlling theincidence of pertussis in the community nor the mortality and morbidity of thisdisease. It concludes that the implementation of mandatory immunizationpolicies is unethicalif it cannot be shown there is a serious risk to thecommunity if vaccinesare not used.
KEY WORDS
pertussis, epidemiology, immunization, mandatory, policies, public health
Acknowledgement
I would like to acknowledge Senior Lecturer Glenn Mitchell,AssociateProfessor Brian Martin and Associate Professor Peter Dingle for their directionin writing this article. I would also like to acknowledge the support given by agrowing number of parents and health professionals concerned aboutmandatory immunisation.
 
3
INTRODUCTION
Immunisation is a medical intervention for healthy individuals, which is basedupon theories that have evolved over time. It was accepted as a strategyagainst infectious diseases two hundred years ago at a time when ourknowledge of immunology and genetics was very different.The social contextof these times was also very different. If public health policies are based uponevidence and theories that are changing over time and without full knowledgeof the mechanisms involved, there is the potential for policies to be harmful tothe health of the community. To be certain of the health benefits of mandatoryand coercive immunisation policies it is important to examine the history ofvaccination and debates over evidence and theory. This paper uses a casestudy of pertussis to analyse the supportive evidence for immunisationpolicies.Throughout the twentieth century the pertussis vaccine was continuallyquestioned with respect to both efficacy and safety (1)(2).The AustralianGovernment promotes immunisation programs as the main reason whyinfectious diseases such as pertussis are no longer causes of death anddisability in Australia. The Government also claims that the pertussis vaccineis the most effective means of controlling the incidence of pertussis in theAustralian population.This analysis will examine the evidence that is used to support thesestatements in order to determine whether mandatory immunisation policiesare appropriate. Finally, it raises the question of why necessary safety datahas not been collected.

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Carol Calderwood liked this
snowycat liked this
danytal3 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->