/  5
 
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
IN
THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
THE
22nd JUDICIAL CIRCUITMcHENRY COUNTYSHARON
ANN
MERONI,PATRIOT'S
HEART
MEDIA NETWORK, INC.vs.MCHENRY
COUNTY GRAND
JURY,FOREMAN
ANDGRAND
JURY MEMBERS
)))
) No.: 09
MR
399
)
))
II
NOTICE
OF FILING
To; Clerk
of
the CourtMcHenry County
Government
Center2200 N. Seminary AvenueWoodstock,
JL
60098
FII.ED
JAN
-72010
PLEASE
TAKE NOTICE
that
on
January 7,2010, I caused to
be
filed with the Circuit Clerk
of
McHenry County, State
of
Illinois, the attached People
of
the State
of
Illinois Response to Emergency Petition
f~
-~,
"""'"
m,
M,H"",
C~o/
""""
1:1_
1';,.
]E
~RA
. Assistant State's Attorney
CERTIFICATE
OF
SERVICE
The undersigned, a non-attorney, on oath state I served this Notice
of
Filing and People
of
the State
of
Illinois Response to Emergency Petition for Redress Before the McHenry County Grand Jury, by mailing acopy
to
Sharon
Ann
Meroni,
728
NWHwy., Fox
River
Grove,
IL
60021,
by
placing a
copy
of
the
same
in
the
U.S.
mail
depository located
at
2200 N. Seminary Ave., Woodstock,TIlinois,
on
or
before 4:00p.m.
on
this
~
of Jann .
~fled
and Sworn to before
me
this
V
rr==
day
of
January, 2010.
L;/;?.fa~mJ~
;t<.~L","",-t.
(POTARY
 
INTHECIRCUIT
COURT
OF
THE
22ND
JUDICIAL CIRCUITMCHENRY
COUNTY,
ILLINOIS
....
LED
SHARON
ANN
MERONI,)
J'AN
PATRIOT'S
HEART
MEDIA
NETWORK)
-121110
INC., et al. )
u:t'"_EM. """"
)
,_ENAY
c:rv.
em.
CU<,
Petitioner,vs.MCHENRY COUNTY GRAND JURY,FOREMAN
AND
GRAND JURYMEMBERS
)
))
))
)
Case No. 09
MR
399Defendant. )
----------------'---------------n
)
'<.
r.-
t.
J
PEOPLEOF THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
RESPONSE
TO
EMERGENCYPETITION
FOR
REDRESS
BEFORE
THE
MCHENRY
COUNTY GRAND
JURY
NOW
COME the People
of
the State
of
Illinois, by and through their attorney,
LOUIS
A.
BIANCm,
State's Attorney for McHenry County, Illinois, by and through hisduly appointed assistant, JEFFREY BORA, and
in
response
to
Petitioner's Motion,respond as follows:The Petitioner asks to be appointed as a special prosecutor in order to commence
an
investigation in front
ofthe
grand jury. Pursuant to 55 ILCS 5/3-9008, a specialprosecutor
may
be appointed by a court "whenever
..
the State's attorney is interested inany cause or proceeding, civil
or
criminal, which it is or may
be
his duty to prosecute
or
defend, the court
in
whlch said cause
or
proceeding is pending
may
appoint somecompetent attorney to prosecute
or
defend such cause or proceeding."Generally, the State's Attorney is granted
the
authority "[t]o commence andprosecute
all
actions, suits, indictments and prosecutions, civil and criminal, in the circuitcourt for his county, in which
the
people
of
he State or county
may be
concerned."(emphasis added). 55 ILCS 5/3-9005. The Grand Jury is granted the authority
to
"subpoena and question any person against whom the
State
'8
Attorney
is seeking a bill
of
 
indictment, or any other person, and to obtain or examine any docwnents or transcriptsrelevant to the matter being prosecuted by the
State's Attorney.
725 ILCS
511
12-4
(emphasis added).In this matter, the Petitioner's motion
to
appoint her as a special prosecutor failsfor several reasons. First, the Petitioner has failed
to
make any showing that voter fraudhas occurred in the State
of
Illinois.
In
order for a Special Prosecutor to be appointed, thePetitioner would have to provide a factual basis for this Court to believe that a matterwould, or could be, pending before it.Second, the Petitioner has failed to make any showing that the State's Attorney
is
interested in this alleged action. For the purposes
of
the appointment
of
a specialprosecutor, the state's attorney must be interested as
"(1)
a private individual, or (2) aparty
to
the action."
Id.
Although the Petitioner claims that "this voter fraud potentiallyreaches into all elected offices in the County", the Petition fails to state one specific factto support that argwnent. Because the appointment
of
a special prosecutor infiinges upona state's attorney's exclusive powers, "the appointment is only warranted
if
based uponspecific factual allegations
of
'interest' within the meaning
of
the statutes allowing suchappointments."
McCall
v.
Devine,
334 Ill.App.3d
192,205,267
m.Dec. 602, 777 N.E.2d405 (2002). Furthermore, "speculation and suspicion are insufficient bases on which to"infiingeupon these exclusive powers.
Id.
"Rather, the petitioner must present sufficientevidence to support a conclusion that the putative personal conflict is so great that itwould influence the State's Attorney's discharge
of
his duties."
People
v.
Arrington, 297
Jll.App.3d
1,4,
231
IILDec. 658, 696 N.E.2d 1229 (1998). Sufficient evidence has notbeen presented in this case, and therefore the request should be denied.

Share & Embed

More from this user

Add a Comment

Characters: ...