Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Federal Courts Are Committing Treason to the Constitution Per Chief Justice John Marshall

The Federal Courts Are Committing Treason to the Constitution Per Chief Justice John Marshall

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 143|Likes:
Published by cfkerchner
11 Oct 2009: The Federal Courts Are Committing Treason to the Constitution Per Chief Justice John Marshall
11 Oct 2009: The Federal Courts Are Committing Treason to the Constitution Per Chief Justice John Marshall

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: cfkerchner on Feb 08, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/01/2011

pdf

text

original

 
The Federal Courts Are CommittingTreason to the Constitution per Chief Justice John Marshall
 
Per the great U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice JohnMarshall, the federal courts and judges are committingtreason to the Constitution by not taking jurisdictionand getting to the merits in the various cases beforethem regarding the Article II eligibility clause questionfor Obama.It is worth keeping in mind the words of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshallwhen he wrote in Cohens v. Virginia 19 US 264 (1821):
"
 It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution.Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States.We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.
"
 Link to the Cohens v. Virginia 19 US 264 (1821) treason quote in case context:http://www.kerchner.com/images/protectourliberty/chiefjusticemarshallwordsontreasontoconstitution.jpgLink to Cohens v. Virginia 19 US 264 (1821) Case Summary:http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1821/1821_0Link to Cohens v. Virginia 19 US 264 (1821) Full Case:http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=19&invol=264 

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
jesheldon2002 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->