WILLIAM ROBERT PILKEY, pro se
#06633-081
Federal Prison Camp
1900 Simler Avenue
Big Springs, Texas 79720

Plaintiff William Robert Pilkey (hereinafter \u201cPlaintiff\u201d)
currently confined at the Federal Prison Camp, Big Springs,
Texas, seeks to bring this action in forma pauperis without
prepayment of fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1915. This Court, by
Order entered on January 13, 2006, dismissed this case because
Plaintiff had not supported his in forma pauperis application
with institutional account statements within the time required by
an earlier Order of December 6, 2005. Subsequently, Plaintiff
moved for reconsideration, submitting the required documentation,
which this Court now considers. Plaintiff eventually submitted

November 9, 2005. Also, on the very same day, this Court
received three other complaints from Plaintiff. See Pilkey v.
Lappin, 05-5417, Pilkey v. Lappin, 05-5418, and Pilkey v. Lappin,
05-5419. Another complaint by Plaintiff was received by the
Court on October 24, 2005. See Pilkey v. Monmouth County
Correctional Institution, 05-5073.

following parties as defendants: \u201cWarden\u201d; \u201cMedical
Administrator\u201d; \u201cAssistant Medical Director\u201d; \u201cAll Physician's
Assistants and Doctors that Gave Medical Treatment to Plaintiff.\u201d
See Compl. at 1. Plaintiff (1) left the F.C.I. Cumberland in
March of 2003, see id. at 22, but (2) submitted his Complaint to
this Court on November 9, 2005, that is, almost two and a half
years later.

Civil rights claims, such as that presented here, are best
characterized as personal injury actions and are governed by the
applicable state's statute of limitations for personal injury
actions. See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 280 (1985).
Accordingly, New Jersey's two-year limitations period on personal
injury actions, N.J. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 2A:14-2, governs Plaintiff's
claims. See Montgomery v. DeSimone, 159 F.3d 120, 126 & n.4 (3d

his (1) affidavit of indigence and institutional account
statement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1915(a) (1998); (2) his
complaint (hereinafter \u201cComplaint\u201d); (3) a memorandum of law
(hereinafter \u201cMemorandum\u201d); and (4) various attachments and
exhibits.

of three qualifying dismissals within 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1915(g), as of
the date of this Opinion and accompanying Order, the Court will
grant Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1915(a) (1998) and order the Clerk of the
Court to file the Complaint. Plaintiff named various prison
officials at the F.C.I. Fort Dix and at the F.C.I. Cumberland as
defendants in this action.

Cir. 1998); Cito v. Bridgewater Township Police Dept., 892 F.2d
23, 25 (3d Cir. 1989). Under N.J. Stat. Ann. \u00a7 2A:14-2, an
action for an injury to the person caused by a wrongful act,
neglect, or default must be commenced within two years of accrual
of the cause of action. See Cito, 892 F.2d at 25; accord Brown v.
Foley, 810 F.2d 55, 56 (3d Cir. 1987). Unless their full
application would defeat the goals of the federal statute at
issue, courts should not unravel states' interrelated limitations
provisions regarding tolling, revival, and questions of
application. See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. at 269. Since
Plaintiff's instant Complaint was submitted to this Court almost
six months after the applicable period of limitations expired,
Plaintiff's claims against the staff of F.C.I. Cumberland are
time barred, and Plaintiff\u2019s claims against the F.C.I. Cumberland
are not considered by this Court.3

Plaintiff's submission, this Court dismisses Plaintiff's
Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted.

Plaintiff's Complaint, a twenty-nine page diary, which does
not constitute a short and plain statement as required by Rule
8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is as detailed as
it is rambling and confusing; it lists Plaintiff\u2019s physical
sensations and thoughts, poses rhetorical questions and
replicates dialogues between the Plaintiff and various employees
at Fort Dix. Day\u2013by-day (and, on occasion, hour-by-hour), the
Complaint traces various ailments either suffered or believed to
be suffered by Plaintiff and, as a whole, appears to allege that
the treatment the Plaintiff received--or was not provided with--