John Dodds: Gravity causes Climate ChangeSupplement 1 R2 to Ch2 of John Dodds Wobble Theory of Global Warming 1

John Dodds: Gravity Causes Climate Change

Variable Incoming Energy, NOT CO2, causes Cooling & Warming

.(Supplement 1 Rev 2 to Ch 2 of John Dodds Wobble Theory of Global Warming)(© J Dodds Feb 15, 2010, and Oct 5 2009 atwww.scribd.com)(http://www.scribd.com/doc/19476991/John-Dodds-Wobble-Theory-of-Global-Warming-atwww.scribd.com contains the more complete 150 page “Wobble Theory” paper )

ABSTRACT

This paper disproves the IPCC and Global Computer Models global warming analyses and offers alternate theories. It identifies:1.

that the IPCC fails to follow basic principles of science when it misrepresents the Greenhouse Effect (GHE) and claims that simply adding Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) to the air results in warming, when theoriginal Arrhenius paper says that you must add an energy photon to a GHG to get GHE warming.2.

that the quantities of energy entering the Earth, not the amount of GHGs, dictates how much of GHE warming can occur 3.

that the physical conditions on Earth maintain an EXCESS of the GHGs in the air over that needed tosatisfy the limited energy available for the GHE, thus invalidating the IPCC claim that just adding moreGHGs means warming. This voids the idea of AGW& the justification for the Kyoto Treaty and Cap &Trade CO2 emissions control (see “Excess CO2 Scenario” paper at www.scribd.com)4.

that the various forces of gravity from the sun moon and planets, and the gravitational potential energy provide additional energy into the Earth that was not considered in the IPCC analyses. This energy ismuch greater than the solar insolation used as the sole source by IPCC. The identification of these added energy sources also solves a major problem with the Milankovitch Theory that solar insolation did not provide sufficient energy to be able to cause ice age magnitude cooling. Identifying that these energysources were not used by the IPCC invalidates the IPCC analyses.5.

that the timing (60 year, 900 year etc natural cycles) and spatial distribution of the energy from gravityand gravitational potential energy is imposed on the Earth by orbital variations and eccentricity. Thisexplains the time variations of the Earths temperature, and why the Earth’s temperature moves north tosouth and back, in the NAO, PDO, El Nino/La Nina cycles. This will allow better predictability of futureclimate changes droughts and hurricanes/cyclones etc.

This paper is structured in the following parts

1.Greenhouse Effect Mis-Application of the Science by IPCC 2.Other Energy Sources: Gravity and Gravitational Potential Energy - 100 year impacts 3.Longer Term Impacts -1000s of years 4.Shorter Term Impacts -1 to 10 years 5.Off Ecliptic (Sun-Earth) Plane Impacts on El Nino/La Nina etc

(http://www.scribd.com/doc/19476991/John-Dodds-Wobble-Theory-of-Global-Warming-atwww.scribd.com contains the more complete 150 page “Wobble Theory” version of the paper )© John Dodds Feb 2010. This paper is copyrighted with all rights reserved and may not be reproduced forpublication without permission. Contact the author at email:JDoddsGW@sbcglobal.net The abstract alone may be reproduced for publication, only with reference to this “Gravity Causes ClimateChanges” paper and the “Wobble Theory” paper both available atwww.scribd.com,.

John Dodds: Gravity causes Climate ChangeSupplement 1 R2 to Ch2 of John Dodds Wobble Theory of Global Warming 2

GHE Mis-Application by IPCC & Computer Models

The IPCC says (AR4, CH1, WG1., p116) "The Sun powers Earth’s climate, radiating energy at very shortwavelengths, predominately in the visible or near-visible (e.g., ultraviolet) part of the spectrum. ... Adding more of agreenhouse gas, such as CO2, to the atmosphere intensifies the greenhouse effect (GHE), thus warming Earth’sclimate." These two statements are

patently false

, and extremely misleading.First the much larger forces of gravity from the sun, moon, and planets acting on the Earth, result in a continuous

energy input

(& output in order to maintain equilibrium temperatures) to the earth. The energy manifests itself asEarth rotation, movements of the oceans and liquid core in tides and currents etc, and friction and the Earth KineticEnergy as measured by temperature. In addition orbital movement of the Earth relative to the sun moon and planetsresults in a

Gravitational Potential Energy

that also adds to or removes Earth’s kinetic energy resulting intemperature variations. The energy from gravity is much larger than the 1366W/m^2 energy from

solar insolation

used by IPCC as the sole source of incoming energy in the evaluation of global warming. The energy from gravity,the energy available from Potential Energy and the energy from solar insolation will all result in Earth energymaximums at the same time, when Earth is closest to the gravity sources, primarily the Sun, Jupiter and Venus.Second, Arrhenius in 1896 said that adding an energy photon to a Greenhouse Gas (GHG), results in the Greenhousewarming effect (GHE). It requires all THREE components to get warming. Failure to add the energy photon resultsin a violation of the Law of Conservation of Energy. An object can not warm itself up in violation of the 2

Law of Thermodynamics without adding the extra energy. Simply adding a GHG will not create warming, unless it absorbsa photon. These errors negate all conclusions by the IPCC models.The IPCC interpretation misapplies the Arrhenius scientific theory to the Earth. Rather than adding a GHG causingwarming per the IPCC, it is the increased addition of energy photons to the already existent EXCESS of GHGs inthe atmosphere, that will cause an increase in the GHE warming. The absorption spectrum at those energies issaturated for WV, CO2 and Methane with competes with WV. There is thus excess GHGs in the air at thoseenergies. Since there is already excess, (above what is needed for the GHE,) then the GHE is LIMITED and dictatedby the available energy, not by the amount of GHGs. And that energy is already used up by the existing about 30Cof the greenhouse effect at the world average temperature of 287K.A simple proof is that the GHG Water Vapor, exists and results in 85-98% of the ~30C Greenhouse effect. IF moreenergy were available then it would have already used the excess GHG water vapor in the air and oceans to create alarger GHE contribution, until there was no excess GHG available (i.e. the oceans would have boiled away!).Similarly when the GHG water vapor humidity triples locally from a nominal 33% to 100% when it rains, thetemperature from the GHE does not triple to a 90C WV contribution, because there is no extra absorbable energyavailable. We just get excess water vapor in the air. A similar argument applies to CO2 which is available to plantsat 16C rather than at the 900C of a CO2 that has absorbed a photon. The IPCC “rule” that more GHG means morewarming does NOT work. The available energy dictates the GHE, not the amount of GHG or CO2, in spite of thepopular mis-interpretation of the Greenhouse Effect. The IPCC interpretation is a gross fraudulent misrepresentationof the scientific reality.Thus the IPCC conclusion that limiting the amount of CO2 or GHG emissions in order to control the temperaturealso does not work. Reducing CO2 emissions will only reduce the amount of EXCESS CO2 in the air, thus makingit harder for plants to grow. Since reducing emissions will not reduce the temperature then the justification for usingmuch more expensive “clean” power in place of cheaper CO2 emitting power sources also is not scientifically justifiable. The demonization of Carbon is a gross miscarriage of reality.Further evidence disproving the idea that more GHGs causes more warming is the fact that on a daily basis the solarinsolation energy coming in varies from zero (at night- when the outgoing energy is provided by the Earth radiatingenergy from its surface) to 1366W/m^2. The Earth temperature thus passes through equilibrium twice daily(contrary to James Hansen’s claim that the Earth is at a dis-equilibrium until the CO2 is removed). In the morningthe energy-in increases, the ground warms, the use of more GHGs increases, the GHE increases and thetemperature warms. At night or when the temperature decreases from the maximum, less energy is transported inand out, the GHE decreases, and the amount of GHGs used for energy transport to space decreases and the amountof excess GHGs increases. BUT in spite of the increase of available GHGs the temperature DECREASES. TheIPCC statement that more GHGs means more warming is a LIE. In fact, by a ratio of the modified (for gray bodies)Stefan-Boltzmann Law (SBL) of energy transported at a given temperature, at the average temperature of 287K,less than half of the GHGs available in 1922 when the hottest recorded temperature 58C was measured (when CO2

John Dodds: Gravity causes Climate ChangeSupplement 1 R2 to Ch2 of John Dodds Wobble Theory of Global Warming 3

was at ~280ppm) are actually in use for the GHE. There is basically always EXCESS GHGs, both WV and CO2 inthe air.Furthermore, since all of the available outgoing energy of a frequency that can be absorbed by the GHGs will beabsorbed, then the IPCC et al concepts of “feedback” effects resulting in even more warming are physicallyimpossible. There is literally no extra energy available to be absorbed by the added excess “feedback” GHGs. Thisalso eliminates the concept of a runaway greenhouse effect. The energy photons powering the warming do not exist.The only way to get more photons is to increase the solar insolation, increase the gravity effects, decrease the storedpotential energy (all by getting closer to planetary masses) or by adding thousands times more man made chemicalor nuclear energy.The futility of CO2 emissions control is further demonstrated by an evaluation of the contributors to the Earthstemperature. The Earths 287C average temperature consists of about 30 C from the GHE nanosecond energy delay, (delaying a photon, not trapping it, warms the air) andabout 257C from other ground sources (either radioactive decay or gravity etc. )Of the variable 30C GHE, 85% (25.5C) to 98% (29.4C) comes from water vaporLeaving 0.6 to 4.5C from ALL the CO2. (& all others)Since half or more of the CO2 is in excess ,then this must be removed before it will impact the GHE.Whereas if we just add more it will not add more temperature.So now lets say we remove all the CO2 from the air to lower the temp by 0.6 to 4.5C (an impossibilitysince more will just come out of that dissolved in the ocean). What happens to plant growth and food production thatdepends on the availability of CO2? Have we just killed off mankind?The figure 1-1 below shows the GHE temperature effect as a function of GHG concentration graphically.. It shouldbe noted that if the energy coming in is limited then no matter how much of the absorbing GHG there is in the air,there can be no increase in the number of absorptions at any given time. There is no additional energy photon to beabsorbed.