Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Extensions Comparison CORRECTED

    Uploaded by

    wsdotblog
    105 views1 page
    Earmark funding High Priority Projects House Passed September 30, 2010 $51. Billion No Senate Wednesday debate / vote December 31, 2010 $52. Billion Yes - adds back $8. Billion in contract authority States receive equivalent of annual amount they received under T-LU for earmarks States to distribute ONLY among 6 core programs: IM, NHS, STP, CMAQ, Bridge, Safety States to distribute funding among ALL apportioned programs: 6 core programs plus Metropolitan Planning, Coordinated Border Infrastructure, Recreational

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Earmark funding High Priority Projects House Passed September 30, 2010 $51. Billion No Senate Wednesday debate / vote December 31, 2010 $52. Billion Yes - adds back $8. Billion in contract authority States receive equivalent of annual amount they received under T-LU for earmarks States to distribute ONLY among 6 core programs: IM, NHS, STP, CMAQ, Bridge, Safety States to distribute funding among ALL apportioned programs: 6 core programs plus Metropolitan Planning, Coordinated Border Infrastructure, Recreational

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    105 views1 page

    Extensions Comparison CORRECTED

    Uploaded by

    wsdotblog
    Earmark funding High Priority Projects House Passed September 30, 2010 $51. Billion No Senate Wednesday debate / vote December 31, 2010 $52. Billion Yes - adds back $8. Billion in contract authority States receive equivalent of annual amount they received under T-LU for earmarks States to distribute ONLY among 6 core programs: IM, NHS, STP, CMAQ, Bridge, Safety States to distribute funding among ALL apportioned programs: 6 core programs plus Metropolitan Planning, Coordinated Border Infrastructure, Recreational

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    House Senate

    Bill status Passed Wednesday debate/vote


    Expiration September 30, 2010 December 31, 2010
    Contract Authority $51.3 billion $52.7 billion
    Rescission “fix” No Yes – adds back $8.7 billion in
    contract authority
    Earmark funding
    High Priority Projects States receive equivalent of States receive equivalent of
    annual amount received under T- annual amount they received
    LU under T-LU for earmarks
    State to distribute funding among States to distribute ONLY among
    ALL apportioned programs: 6 6 core programs: IM, NHS, STP,
    core programs plus Metropolitan CMAQ, Bridge, Safety
    Planning, Coordinated Border
    Infrastructure, Recreational
    Trails, Rail-Highway Grade
    Crossings, Appalachian Highways
    Projects of National and Funds go to USDOT for a States receive equivalent of
    Regional Significance; and competitive grant program annual amount received under T-
    National Corridor Projects LU for earmarks. To be
    distributed among the 6 core
    programs
    Transit earmarks Not addressed Not addressed
    Fed share of projects in 2010 Can be 100% Maintains current match
    requirements by program
    General Fund Transfer $14.7 billion to Highway account, $14.7 billion to Highway account,
    $4.8 billion to Mass Transit $4.8 billion to Mass Transit
    account account

    You might also like