Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Types of universals
To begin with, the American linguist Noam Chomsky has a significant contribution
to the development of the concept “language universals”. He suggested that since
every human being has the language ability innately there is and has to be some
genetic bone that makes the phenomenon possible. His views are somehow focused
on the biological aspect of the issues. And he offers two types of universals which
serve his purposes: formal and substantive universals. The formal universals are
simply the rules of languages, the principles which operate it. They are directly
connected to the possible form a grammar can take. Substantive universals, on their
behalf, describe any mental object which can universally be present in grammars, or
at least if not used, available. To put it another way, substantive universals are like
building blocks which “fill” the language: the vocabulary.
Sometimes, there could be a fact that is valid for each and every language in the
world. Linguists call this an absolute universal. Example: all languages have at
least 2 vowels. And when a particular feature can be found in many or almost all, or
most languages, we have a non-absolute universal (also known as near-absolute
or tendency). Example: most languages have nasal phones.
IMPLICATIONAL vs. NON-IMPLICATIONAL
Some universals are stated without the need of any references to any other
properties of the different languages. They do not require another property of the
language in order to exist as universals. Example: all languages have nouns, verbs
and objects which will be used to form a sentence in one way or another. These
universals are called non-implicational and they are usually like general facts
which are valid for each and every language. On the contrary, there is a type of
universals which are based on some kind of logical connection between two other
universals (no matter if these universals are absolute or non-absolute). These are
the implicational universals. Their formula is: if a language has A, it also has B. It is
very important both parts of the formula to represent either absolute universals or
non-absolute universals. Mixtures within the implicational universals are incorrect.
When we are talking about universals in phonology we begin with the fact that a
language must have at least two vowels. We could go one step further and
hypothesise that if there are only three vowels in a language, they must be the
three cardinal vowels in greatest opposition to each other => /a/ and /u/ or /i/, which
according to Kelz (1976) is the case in Guarani. If there are four, either /e/ or /o/ will
be added; if five, they will be /i, a, u, e, o/, which is the case in Spanish.
Berlin and Kay (1969) examined a large number of languages and found a
remarkable regularity in the distribution of basic colour terms all over the world. This
has to do with semantics and the following example is known as “Sequential order
of colour terms” or “The colour theory”. All languages have at least two basic colour
terms, i.e. those displaying the greatest attention such as “black” and “white” (or
“dark” and “light”). If a language has three terms, the third is “red”. If four or five,
they are either “yellow” or “green” or both. The sixth term is “blue”. The next
term is “brown” and subsequently we get four possibilities from either “purple”,
“pink”, “orange” or “grey”.
All languages have lexical words and distributional words (minimal free forms).
All languages distinguish between grammatical units of at least three sizes, word,
phrase and clause.
Most languages have an alveolar stop, and most have the high front vowel.
If a language has front rounded vowel phones, it will usually have front spread and
back rounded vowels.
SUMMARY
Bibliography:
CELL
LININTRO
Elly Zareva