Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
2
3
6
7
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
No.
DECLARATION OF DR. SETH
GUTERMAN IN SUPPORT OF
COMPLAINT AND EX PARTE
MOTION FOR (1) TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND (2)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
vs.
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her
official capacity as U.S. Secretary of
Health and Human Services; Marilyn
Tavenner, as Administrator of the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services; and
Cara M. Christ, as Director of the Arizona
Department of Health Services,
17
Defendant.
18
I, Seth Guterman, MD FACEP, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Indiana University and a Doctor of Medicine, cum laude, from Ohio State University. I
have been a practicing doctor for over 25 years and have been the CEO of Peoples
4
5
In January 2014, CRH purchased the operations of SAMC. The name was
changed to CRH.
4.
(ADHS) has made a total of nineteen site visits to the hospital. In 2012, ADHS made
only two site visits to SAMC. In 2013, ADHS made no site visits to SAMC. Most
10
11
who is Team Leader for medical facilities licensing at ADHS, told CRH in August 2014
12
that CRH was complaint with all policy and procedures but intended to have CRHs
13
hospital license revoked because she just does not like the nurses at CRH.
14
6.
In response, CRH informed Ms. Belden that CRH would seek a hearing
15
before an Administrative Law Judge should she attempt to revoke CRHs license.
16
Afterwards, Ms. Belden backs down and signs a basic agreement that CRH will
17
continue to improve nursing services based upon the agreed upon criteria in a new
18
19
7.
20
8.
From December 2014 to February 2015, the site visits decrease but do not
9.
21
22
cease.
23
24
was surprising to me because the very same nurses work or have worked at other
25
26
10.
On May 8, 2015, CRH received a letter from CMS informing CRH that
CMS was terminating CRHs Medicare provider agreement due to inadequate nursing
services.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
11.
CMS in its termination letter also informed CRH that CRH had 60 days in
Over the next few weeks, CRH attempted on numerous occasions to get in
touch with CMS to discuss its appeal and see whether CRH could do anything in order
to resolve the situation.
14.
Finally, CRH was able to speak with Rufus Arther on July 2, 2015. On
12
July 8, 2015, CRHs representatives flew to San Francisco to meet with Mr. Arther in
13
person to present a plan of correction and discuss the disparity in the level of oversight
14
of CRH.
15
under advisement.
16
15.
Mr. Arther advised CRHs representatives that all factors would be taken
The next day Mr. Arther notified CRH that despite the progress made by
17
the hospital and that fact that CRH is the only comprehensive healthcare facility in
18
Douglas, Arizona, CMS would continue with its plans to terminate CRHs Medicare
19
provider agreement effective July 10, 2015. CRH also advised Mr. Arther that this will
20
cause irreparable financial and operational damage to the hospital and CMSs decision
21
essentially would force the closure of CRH without sufficient due process and before
22
23
16.
24
without access to top quality medical care. CRH is the only hospital in the southeastern
25
border of Arizona for rural citizens in this area. All of the areas fire department
26