Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
TAITZ v OBAMA - 10 - 2010-02-26 - Defendants Motion to Dismiss

TAITZ v OBAMA - 10 - 2010-02-26 - Defendants Motion to Dismiss

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 3,270|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
02/26/2010 10 MOTION to Dismiss & supporting memorandum by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 Cook MD Ga order July 16, 2009, # 2 Exhibit 2 Cook MD Ga docket, # 3 Exhibit 3 Cook 11th Cir docket, # 4 Exhibit 4 Rhodes WD Tex order, # 5 Exhibit 5 Rhodes MD Ga docket & orders, # 6 Exhibit 6 Rhodes 11th Cir docket, # 7 Exhibit 7 Barnet 9th Cir docket)(Burch, Alan) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
02/26/2010 10 MOTION to Dismiss & supporting memorandum by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 Cook MD Ga order July 16, 2009, # 2 Exhibit 2 Cook MD Ga docket, # 3 Exhibit 3 Cook 11th Cir docket, # 4 Exhibit 4 Rhodes WD Tex order, # 5 Exhibit 5 Rhodes MD Ga docket & orders, # 6 Exhibit 6 Rhodes 11th Cir docket, # 7 Exhibit 7 Barnet 9th Cir docket)(Burch, Alan) (Entered: 02/26/2010)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Feb 26, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/14/2011

pdf

text

original

 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA )ORLY TAITZ,))Plaintiff,)Civil Action No.: 10-0151 (RCL))v.))BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,))Defendant.))
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant, Barack H. Obama, respectfully moves to dismiss this action for lack of  jurisdiction. As explained in the attached memorandum, Plaintiff seeks to challenge thequalifications of President Obama for office. Her complaint, like the others she has litigated ascounsel for various clients, fails to present a justiciable claim for several reasons, primarily her lack of standing and the inherently political nature of her claims. Plaintiff also seeks a preliminary injunction and the attached memorandum also serves as Defendant’s oppositionthereto. Because this motion seeks to dispose of the entire case, counsel for Defendant did notattempt to obtain pro se Plaintiff’s position on this motion.February 26, 2010Respectfully submitted, RONALD C. MACHEN JR., D.C. Bar #447889United States Attorney/s/RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, D.C. Bar # 434122Assistant United States Attorney
Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 10 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 20
 
2/s/ALAN BURCH, D.C. Bar # 470655Assistant United States Attorney555 4th St., N.W.Washington, D.C. 20530(202) 514-7204, alan.burch@usdoj.gov
Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 10 Filed 02/26/10 Page 2 of 20
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA )ORLY TAITZ,))Plaintiff,)Civil Action No.: 10-0151 (RCL))v.))BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,))Defendant.))
DEFENDANT’S COMBINED MEMORANDUMIN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND INOPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Defendant, Barack H. Obama, respectfully provides this combined memorandum of  points and authorities in (1) support of his motion to dismiss this case, and (2) opposition toPlaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (R.8). Plaintiff lacks standing to bring her claims,as has been thoroughly established by the several other federal courts in which she has litigatedsubstantially similar claims. For this reason alone, her case should be dismissed and her requestfor preliminary injunction denied. As to her motion for a preliminary injunction, she seeks therecusal of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia from representing thePresident in this civil lawsuit as well as the release of a number of documents purportedly relatedto a vague series of allegations associated with her representations about the President’seligibility for office. None of these requests have any merit.
Background
Although, to Defendant's knowledge, this is Dr. Taitz’s first case in which she serves asPlaintiff, this is not her first bite at the apple, or even her second: she has unsuccessfully
Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 10 Filed 02/26/10 Page 3 of 20

Activity (4)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->