Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Summary of the Sessions-McCaskill Discretionary Spending Amendment

Summary of the Sessions-McCaskill Discretionary Spending Amendment

Ratings: (0)|Views: 234 |Likes:
Published by clairecmccaskill

More info:

Published by: clairecmccaskill on Mar 05, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Sessions-McCaskill Discretionary Caps Amendment
Caps discretionary spending levels for Fiscal Years 2011-2014 at the level thatwas passed in the Budget Resolution for FY2010. The FY 2010 budget allows forapproximately 2% increases per year in both defense and non-defense spending
Specifies spending levels for “defense” and “non-defense” programs until 2014
Due to the current state of the economic emergency, FY2010 is exempt from thecaps
Contains a $10 billion per year “emergency fund” for unforeseen emergencyspending
Requires a two-thirds vote of 67 Senators to waive the annual caps for emergencyspending above $10 billion
Does not apply to funding for any military action in which Congress hasauthorized the use of force (including Afghanistan and Iraq)
This approach is very similar to what the president has called for in his State othe Union address
The amendment has the endorsement of a number of fiscal accountability groupsincludingConcord Coalitionand theCommittee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
 Myth vs. Fact on the Sessions-McCaskill discretionary spending cap amendment:
Sessions-McCaskill would prevent the federal government from responding toemergencies.
$10 billion a year are automatically dedicated to emergency spending. In caseof emergency funding beyond the $10 billion 67 votes are needed to override theamendment. Emergency appropriations for 9/11, the 2004 Tsunami, andHurricane Katrina all passed with overwhelming support in the Senate (93 votesor more).
The Sessions-McCaskill amendment would prevent Congress from adequatelyfunding the missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Funding for Iraq, Afghanistan, or the War on Terror is not affected by the caps.Funding for authorized conflicts like these is not subject to the 67 vote threshold.
The Sessions-McCaskill amendment would prevent Congress from caring forVeterans.

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->