High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
Reply to Zaid Hamid’s Video while he was defending Yusuf Kazzab
A new video of 58 minutes is posted on youtube in which zaidhamid is defending Yusuf Kazzab and says that he “just knew yusuf as so many people knew him and Yusuf Ali was a big“scholar of Islam” but Khabrain news paper dragged him intocourt with the help of some Molvis because of money”.At the end of video zaid hamid also requests the students notto show this video in public but advises them to show this to “satisfy” only to those students who were in confusion because just 1 week before some students destroyed zaid hamid’sprogram in Islamic University Islamabad because of Yusufkazzab issue. Zaid Hamid was not expecting that one of themwill upload this video on internet and even that 2
nd
yearmedical student was threatened by Zaid Hamid group whouploaded this video but all went in vein and zaid hamid was noway left to accept it officially.Zaid hamid shown some documents as ‘proof’ ( not readable tocamera) and claimed some points which we ll discuss one byone below providing the proof that Zaid Hamid’s video andclaims are full of lies and conspiracy.All readers are requested to please 1
st
watch the video of zaidhamid (3 parts) on this link and then start reading this page.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXkZ3dvOscsNow we discuss with evidences all above points one by one.
1- Only “Khabrain” reported Yusuf Kazzab Case?
Zaid Hamid claims again and again in video that Only Khabrainreported news of yusuf kazzab and no single newspaper ofPakistan covered it and even no news is from any other newspaper because ‘Khabrain reporter’ Mian Ghaffar had someissue of money with yusuf kazzab. According to zaid hamid “khabrain ne chaar molvi sath mila ke yusuf ko phansa dya”.
Reply:-
We again use the book “Fitna yusuf Kazzab” ( published inOctober 1997 containing all reports and articles regarding yusuf kazzab’s case) and see in 1997 when yusuf was just putin trial and he was not killed, what the writer says on it.
This is very first page of that book after title. The writerArhsad Quraishi ( died in 2003 May Allah bless him Jannah)first says thanks to Daily Takbeerand the editor of Takbeer“Sarwat Jamal Asmai” then He says thanks to reporter ofDaily Ummat “Muhammad Tahir” then he says thanks to ZiaShahid and Mian Ghaffar of KabrainOn next page he gives a list of Pakistani news papers andmagazines whose reports and articles were included in thisbook and all of them covered the yusuf kazzab’s story. And wesee thattop of the list is Takbeer, not Khabrain.
The fact
is this that yusuf kazzab’s claim to be MuhammadSAW naoozbillah was first reported byWeekly Takbeer anddaily Ummat in Karachi.( most of Yusuf’s followers were inKarachi and Lahore)See another Page of the same book
If only and only Khabrain (according to zaid hamid) washighlighting this issue and no other news paper reported itthen why compiler of all news reports in a book is again writingthe name of weekly Takbeer first and then Khabrain?And he also gives a list of more than 6 news papers andmagazines which reported yusuf kazzab as false Prophet andthe top of the list is Takbeer, not Khabrain.We should know that Weekly Takbeer was the hot favoritemagazine in 1990’s because of its courageous policy even thefounder of this magazine Salah ud deen was killed by KarachiMafias but they did not stop to expose the truth on differenthot issues.Daily Ummat Karachi is also well known because of its Islamistpolicy.After reading news in Karachi newspapers, Khabrain startedits own investigations because khabrain had started its newedition from Multan so Khabrain assigned this matter toEditor of Khabrain Multan Mian ghaffar ( zaid hamid says hima reporter instead he was editor of Khabrain Multan). Mianghaffar met yusuf kazzab in lahore and got his point of view
Add a Comment
MuneebJamalleft a comment
MuneebJamalleft a comment
yumnaaleft a comment
yumnaaleft a comment
yumnaaleft a comment