The Tea Party Movement

The news media constantly talk about Tea party movement. People are mad at their government as
they have a right to be. We don’t want corrupt government or oppressive government.
Government should serve the people not special interest groups or big corporations. This
doesn’t mean that everything the government does or everything private enterprise does is
evil. Extremists want to eliminate all of the government or all of private enterprise. That course of
action cause people to potentially lose their savings, their homes, their jobs, their education, their
health care, and death can surely occur. The Tea party activists portray themselves as a revitalization
of the liberty movement. Most of the critics of the Tea Party movement are liberals who view them as
a recreation of the old extremists decades ago that wanted rights to be suppressed. What is the truth?
In these situations, the truth is in between the 2 extreme views of the Tea Party Movement. I think that
many of them want real reforms in America and others are just radicals plus bigots (as evident on
some of them being accused of calling Senator John Lewis the N word and calling Barnie
Frank the F word. This comes about when both men support Barack Obama’s health care bill.
That was evil and wrong. Whether you agree or disagree with health care reform, these actions
are unjustifiable). I‘m consistent, because I don‘t agree with calling Tea Party protesters slurs
either as some in the Left Paradigm have done. Congress Clyburn said he heard people saying
things that he haven't heard since March 15, 1960. He said the behavior was absolutely
shocking. These racist cowards should be glad I wasn’t there. With events like these, it’s time
for rational people like me and others to be independent from these so-called movements
(and just promote real issues and be free minded). Some people try to use many of the sincere
people from the Tea Party to be infiltrated by the Republican Party. The truth is that the Tea
Party was originally made up by independents, conservatives, and Libertarians
who were tired of the 2 party monopoly in the American political system. Yet,
some of these Tea Party people need to realize that respect for labor, respect
for the struggles of the poor, and true tolerance for all human beings are just
as much a critical necessity in building up our national culture just as are
economic reforms. Economic reforms in America are needed like wiping out derivatives,
replace our current debt-based money system with a debt free money system (that focuses on
interest free money to fund the production of public goods), and pretty much end the war on
terror completely as that action can be utilized to save money. Other solutions include the
preservation of social services (or safety net) to help those in need, real health care reform, build
up our infrastructure (since an economy can’t function without infrastructure. You need roads,
factories, farms, and other technologies to survive in the 21st century Western world), and to
allow Congress not the privately-controlled Federal Reserve (the FED issues a fractional reserve
system that increases interest that strips the value of dollar currency) to control our currency.
These policies have been common place among numerous Presidents like George Washington, John
Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, John F. Kennedy (whose Space Program
inspired the modernization of the Computer system), and others. Even President Franklin Delano
Roosevelt (although he wasn’t perfect) was correct to oppose British Imperialism & imperialism in
general that Churchill wanted according to FDR’s son Elliot Roosevelt. This was during WWII. FDR
wanted those nations in Africa, India, and China to transform their destinies from the oppressive,
racist system of colonialism into the liberty based system of nationalism. FDR passed the Glass
Steagall Act of 1933. This Glass Steagall Act provided standards for Chartered Banks in the
form of prohibiting them from Speculating with Depositor Money. It was legitimate and it
was only repealed in 1999 under Bill Clinton, the Republican Congress, and intense lobbying
including deception by Larry Summers.
It’s been recently found in the past 25 years that some in Britain prevent authentic German resistance
groups from ending Hitler’s Nazi Empire even before WWII ended. This is documented in the book of
“The Ghosts of Peace: 1935-1945,” whose author was Richard Lamb (Great Britain: Michael Russel,
1987). John Wheeler-Bennett, who was deputy to Bruce Lockhart, head of the Political Warfare
Executive (PWE) of the Foreign Office (and a close friend of Eden's), was adamantly opposed to
aiding anti-Hitler Germans. Breitman charges that the British ``simply hoarded'' the vital
information they were accruing, on transport and other aspects of the infrastructure of the
Holocaust. Some have accused Churchill of being lax in reacting to the Holocaust and other issues
as an excuse to harm Germany not only the Nazis (which aren‘t a representation of true Germany.
Hitler was an Austrian not a German). That is why the war crimes by the military against the civilian
location of Dresden in Germany occurred. Derivatives promoted the international bankers to harbor
obscene speculation in the economy that contributed to the 2007-2010 recession. Derivatives weren’t
the only reason for the recession though. Some mention about why not use the gold standard? The
problem with the gold standard is that not everyone will embrace gold, gold can be volatile as
a currency, and gold can deflate the economy. Deflation is when the value of money goes
down and money supply contracts. Therefore, deflation increases the risks of a recession.
Recession regularly occurs when GDP goes down and unemployment increases, then a trough occur.
The trough is the total bottom of economic disintegration among the business cycle. The controller of
the system or the elite can keep gold scare. Therefore, global gold output is insufficient to keep up
with economic growth, and this can decline the amount of money in circulation compared to total
output of production. The elite control most of the gold of the money and can receive
profits from it in high value if it was the sole currency in a nation. The big bankers in
the late 1800’s yearned for a gold only based currency in the USA according to the
excellent researcher Bill Still. The Rockefellers even aided Ludwig von Mises when he came
into the U.S. in 1940 with a grant.

Friedrich von Hayek is another architect of the flawed Austrian Economic system.
See, Hayek claimed to be for freedom, but Hayek believed in strict monetarism,
near-total deregulation, and Pan-European federalism. Pan European federalism is
nothing more than an entity that’s akin to the European Union. His famous book is
entitled, “The Road to Serfdom.” The Austrian School had been founded by Carl
Menger (1840-1921), a retainer of the Hapsburg and Wittelsbach royal houses of
Austria and Bavaria. Menger was a fanatical opponent of Prussia's industrialization
policies, which were modeled on the American System of Political Economy.
Deregulation and unbridled speculation is akin to the Austrian Economic credo.
Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, von Hayek, Mises, Lawrence Summers, etc are all economic
Austrians that destroyed regulations to avoid conflict of interest. They promoted unbridled
speculation with the taxpayer's money (or any money they could and can find). I do believe
that some of these fascist extremists indeed want folks to die in the streets by
cutting services, eliminating all forms of welfare, etc. (to just promote their
economic fetish) when the government exists to promote “the general welfare of
the people.” Some people promote gold as a means to tie it to the 9/11 truth movement.
There is one reality in history that you can have interest free money plus this have built up the
great resources of America for centuries. Franklin's Colonial Scrip, Washington's Continental
(even though this was inflated into oblivion, if we take the money supply out of the hands of the
bankers) and of course Abe Lincoln's Greenbacks are examples of this. Lincoln threw 30%
interest gold out of the window plus using interest free Greenbacks to fund the Union side of the
war. Gold can be a store of value, but it has been exploited by manipulation and it can't be used
to compensate the growth of the whole population of an economy. Bill Still’s “The Secret of
Oz” film proved that alternative modes of economic transactions worked before. One
example is the tally sticks that was utilized for over 90% of England’s money for
about 700 years. The Bank of England’s curator John Keyworth admitted to this reality.
Keyworth admitted that the average tally sticks (that was debt-free) was the length between a
man’s thumb and forefinger. This is a small size, so it would be convenient for every day
exchanges. Even early America has no gold for financial exchange. They created their own
homegrown paper money. It was issued by colonial governments without debt and it worked very
well to allow colonies in the USA to prosper. The British passed the Currency Act of 1764,
which banned America’s colonial currency and ordered Americans to pay their taxes in fiat gold
or silver coins. The result of this was a depression as said by Benjamin Franklin:
“…In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended,
and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were
filled with unemployed…The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on
tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the Colonies
[their] money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction…” So, to Benjamin
Franklin, the British Empire banning American debt free currency was on big reason for the
existence of the American Revolution. Later, Americans used the debt free Continental currency.
This allowed George Washington to pay American troops and pursue a revolution against the
British Empire, which was the most powerful empire in the world at that time. It was only during
the last half of the Revolutionary war that the continental currency became wildly debauched.
Why? The reason was that the British parked ships in Boston Harbor with complete printing
presses on board where they massively counterfeited the new American currency. The British
spent it into circulation, which driving up demand and prices everywhere. These were the
circumstances that led George Washington to lament towards the end of the Revolutionary
war: "…a wagon load of money will scarcely purchase a wagon load of provisions.” Real
economic history proves that a gold only currency can cause issues pertaining to real economic
stability. Vincent Vickers once mentioned that:

"That the true wealth of the nation does not consist in the hoarded gold of the
Bank of England, nor in the book-entries standing to the credit of merchant
bankers. The wealth of the nation lies in its capacity to produce goods, and its
capacity to consume goods, and its capacity to exchange its surplus goods for
necessary importations from other countries. If the City of London, with its banks,
its gold, banknotes, and its money, were suddenly to sink into the bowels of the
earth and be no more, the country would go on, and, with incredible rapidity,
would recover from the shock and build a new and perhaps a better City. But if
the country vanished, the City of London would be dead for ever. In the last
resort, production and consumption could continue without money; but money
would be useless dross without production and consumption."

Even during the Great Depression, the value of gold was unstable according to the
following Congressional report: “…My investigation convinced me that during the last
quarter of a century the average production of gold has been falling off considerably. The
gold mines of the world are practically exhausted. There is only about $11,000,000,000 in
gold in the world, with the United States owning a little more than four billions. We have
more than $100,000,000,000 in debts payable in gold of the present weight and fineness. .
. As a practical proposition these contracts cannot be collected in gold for the obvious
reason that the gold supply of the entire world is not sufficient to make payment."

-- Congressional Record, Congressman Dies, March 15, 1933.

Some Tea Party individuals brought into the deception any regulation is evil. United States
history was never based on the Government staying completely out of the economy since our
first President, George Washington, who was dedicated to infrastructure projects. There are
certainly bad regulations in society that ought to be eliminated. Even the proposals in
Congress wanting to regulate or harm the Internet during times of emergencies are wrongly
proposed regulations obviously. The Internet ought not to be controlled by the government at
all. This doesn’t mean that good regulations are non-existent. A good regulation prevents
fraud and other corrupting influences in U.S. society. One example of a valid regulation is
how a pilot’s license is a prerequisite in flying an airplane of a major airline (This can saves
lives in general). Anarchists of course usually advance no regulation whatsoever, which is
nefarious and increases the risk of chaos. Totally unregulated & unrestricted capitalism (that
Adam Smith promoted) have caused issues in America via eliminating safeguards put in
place by the elected U.S. government to protect the citizenry. You don’t constrict wealth,
constrict production, and constrict services that are vital in the development of humanity,
especially during a time of a recession or a depression. Likewise, the totally restricted and
atheistic Communism system doesn’t work to effectively solve problems either. Allowing our
economic system to collapse as advanced by some is extremist since you do something to
assist those suffering or are in need. So, my mind is having revolutionary changes on
economic issues in 2010 especially. I‘m glad for it and I‘m glad to be broken from the Matrix
of the Austrian/Keynesian economic paradigm. This paradigm is about the lie that you
must follow either Austrian economics or Keynesian economics without alternatives.
This paradigm promotes the lie that the poor are responsible for much of the ills in our
society.

Ron Paul says that by just cutting all expenditures, then the economy will recover over time.
Ok, so what happens to all those people in between, between the moment all those
expenditures are cut and the moment that the system is able to give a decent living, survival
for every citizen? So dying or getting ill is then the consequence of Ron's Paul "Austrian"
economics. Many folks used to strongly support Ron Paul until they figured out his economic
policies. The highest thing there is on this planet is keeping each other alive, and to make
sure everybody is able to have access to medical assistance. This also entails making sure
your friend, family member or you are not dying. So, government, good government, should
do everything it can, no matter the costs, to save one's life. You can spend $1 trillion on a war
or on a bail out, but you cannot spend that same amount for example to save the lives of
100,000 ill people. A well running society will be between socialism and pure libertarianism.
The Tea Party Movement came into prominence in 2008 when the Libertarian Party of Illinois planned
to hold an April 15, 2009 anti-tax “Boston Tea Party” in Chicago. In February of 2009, it grew more
popular. Even CNBC personality Rick Santelli speaking from the floor of the Chicago stock
exchange criticized Obama's economic policies and wanted Americans to be Tea party
members. Back in 2006, Libertarian Party members formed the idea of the Boston Tea Party.
They wanted Americans to have a pro-freedom party that wanted libertarian solutions. I don't
agree with all libertarian ideals as I'm pro-life, I reject Austrian Economics, etc. Although, I
know that numerous libertarians are Pro-Life. The neo cons embrace hypocrisy. The reason is
that some of them believe that the government can’t be trusted to run a post office, but the
government can fairly run a court system without nearly any errors (whereas the prison
industrial complex continues to exist with the oppressive 3 strikes rule in places like California.
A lot of neo cons support the prison system as it is today). The neo cons justify this evil by
saying we need to be “tough on crime,” which hasn‘t worked effectively to radically
improve our judicial system for decades. The Drug War have made complications in our country
as well beyond the civil liberty violations occurring against American citizens. Instead of being
tough on crime, we should be fair and compassionate when dealing with crime. Some of
the neo cons believe that the government should intervene militarily in a preemptive fashion
(whose violence of war killed millions of Iraqis, Afghanis, etc.), but the government shouldn’t
be reigned in to protect our civil liberties (via banning the Patriot Act, banning warrantless
spying, etc). So, I will never be a neo-conservative. I like being Independent.

Thomas DiLorenzo is a Jesuit trained follower of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He's an
apologist for the Confederacy and hates the agenda of Abraham Lincoln. Thomas E.
Woods Jr. is a neo-Confederate member of the League of the South. The Roman Catholic
Lew Rockwell is the Chairman of the Mises Institute. Thomas E. Woods supports
traditional Catholicism as well. He served as Ron Paul's congressional chief of staff from 1978
to 1982. Thomas is a apart of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Many of the von Mises Institute's
neo-Confederate ideas have contributed to Ron Paul's thinking. Paul even spoke at a secession
conference hosted by the Institute in 1995. CNP member Gary North is apart of Rockwell’s
circle as well. The Council on National Policy or the CNP acts as a false alternative to the
CFR when some of its famous members were CFR members like Arnaud de Borchgrave,
Edward Teller, Guy Vander Jagt, and J. Peter Grace. Whether people wanted to believe or
not, the leadership of the Confederacy was a key apart of European elite’s goal of trying to divide
up the Union. Southern secession documents clearly show that the Confederacy’s main goal was
the formation of slaveholding fiefdoms (not just about trade issues, etc.). In its “Declaration of
the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the
Federal Union,” South Carolina, the first state to secede stated that they wanted a confederation
of slaveholding states. So, the promotion of slavery is undoubtedly linked to the Confederacy.
State Commander John M. Woods recognized the revisionism for what it really was. In a 1915
speech to the Grand Army of the Republic of Massachusetts, Woods state that: "the men and
papers that shape public opinion in the South, and the women as well, are leaving no stone
unturned to blot out the words 'civil' and 'rebellion' in all official papers, school books, and
histories relating to the War of 1861-65 and call it officially the War Between the States."
According to Woods, the Southern social engineers were lying about the issue of states' rights
and were intentionally ignoring the fact that "human slavery was the cause" of the conflict.
Woods further stated: "No fair historian can find the slightest justification for secession and
treason. The just penalty of the latter is death." Whereby DiLorenzo overlooks the good things
that Abraham Lincoln did (like advancing Greenbacks, wanting to develop infrastructure
like the creation of the modern Train system, and being glad that slavery was banned in his
2nd Inaugural address), while over exaggerating Lincoln's errors. Ironically, Thomas J.
DiLorenzo wrote in favor of the robber barons, which some of whom advocated eugenics,
monopolies, & economic exploitation of the citizenry. Some of them or the international
bankers that DiLorenzo praises financed Communists and the Nazis. DiLorenzo supports
the Rockefellers. The Rockefeller family aided the creation of the UN & numerous political
organizations, and funded think-tanks that exists today. The Rockefellers have mixed
business, politics and religion. The World Council of Churches, Interfaith movement etc.,
all have Rockefeller policies found in them in advancing the agenda of the new world order.
Cartels that exist as near monopolies are not apart of true capitalism. If those robber
barons were such a morally great people and capitalists according to Thomas J. DiLorenzo,
then why is it that his same school and economic streaming is attacking the privately owned
Federal Reserve which is funded and created by exactly those names and people? The truth
is that Thomas embraces contradictions on this issue. Thomas even endorses Bill
Gates. The Melinda and Bill Gates Foundations advances abortion,
sterilization, dangerous vaccines, and other evil policies in the Third World
plus globally. These policies are heavily promoted by the corporatists that
Thomas DiLorenzo don‘t want you to know. The Boston Tea Party wanted to reduce the
size and scope of government on all issues and in all levels. Soon, establishment Republicans stole
the idea and tried to make it their own. Even Ron Paul's media coordinator Steven Gordon went on
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow to say that former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich (with ties to
the CFR, Newt Gingrich wants free speech limitations, and is apart of the Bohemian Grove. Gingrich's
influence was a New Ager who preached the end of industrialization) and Arkansas governor Mike
Huckabee are trying to hijack the Tea Party movement. With New Gingrich especially, you have one
major intellectual leader of the neo-conservative movement. Recently in December of 2009, Newt
Gingrich endorsed the evil policy of wanting Muslim people to be profiled (his profiling is based on
behavior too. Mike Gallager and Rep. Peter King of New York desire the same thing as well).
Gingrich is apart of the American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institute. He said that scrutiny
should exist against people named Abdul, Ahmed, or Muhammad in the aftermath of the Umar Farouk
Adbulmutallab incident.

Other Republicans embraced the idea (of the Tea Party movement transpiring as nothing more than a
conduit of the RNC) like RNC Chairman Michael Steele, Sarah Palin, and Rep. Michele Bachman
from Minnesota. They want the Tea Party to merge with the Republican hive mind system. Sarah
Palin supports the national Tea Party convention in Nashville. She claims that it will focused on limited
government, common sense, and personal responsibility. Some Republicans want Tea Party
members to be Republicans. Yet, Tea Party members should be independent and not tow the line
of the Republicans or Democrats. Ironically, George W. Bush and the Republicans increased the
debt, expanded the government spending (contrary to conservative and libertarian ideals), and
supported the 700 billion bailout of Wall Street (with little assistance to the rest of Americans
in an authentic fashion). Bush and the Republicans also invaded 2 sovereign nations. These wars
killed more than 1 million Iraqis. A myriad of Democrats have supported the 2 wars as well. War
crimes have occurred in both wars. The Republicans and Democrats have executed policies that
attacked the Constitution and Bill of Rights like the Patriot Act, etc. If the Tea Party leadership
embrace the Republican National Committee platform, then it will transform itself from
embracing independence into a puppet tool to promote a nefarious agenda (like bailouts for
bankers without adequate assistance to those with housing issues, government taxation in the
wrong areas, perpetual war, and attacks on the Constitution plus the Bill of Rights). Some neo-
cons want Sarah Palin to run against Barack Obama in 2012. Palin might lose since many
Americans wouldn't like Palin being a puppet of the neo cons. A Republican Presidency like a
Democratic Presidency will have war mongering and bad economic policies. Real Tea Party activists
and supporters need to reject Palin, Huckabee, Gingrich, and the Republicans out of hand. All human
beings should have their independent thinking without hive thinking.

Sarah Palin wants the Tea Party movement to merge with the Republican party. Sarah recently gave
speech about the movement. She was speaking to a crowd of Republican faithful in Arkansas
on Tuesday. Palin praised the movement and the corporate media claims that she rules this
movement. She wanted Independents to pick a party, which is deceptive since the 2 party
system is a duopoly of faulty choices. Palin declared that America is mired firmly in a 2
party system and the Tea Party has to make a choice. “Now the smart thing will be
for independents who are such a part of this Tea Party movement to, I guess, kind of
start picking a party,” Palin said. “Which party reflects how that smaller, smarter
government steps to be taken? Which party will best fit you? And then because the Tea
Party movement is not a party, and we have a two-party system, they’re going to have to
pick a party and run one or the other: ‘R’ or ‘D’.” Palin is manipulating some in the Tea
Party. Palin then commented that the Republican party platform best reflects the beliefs of
the Tea Party movement. Her remarks or statements are related to her continued invocations of
former President Ronald Reagan. Reagan talked about values, but he didn't walk it on every occasion.
Ronald Reagan increased the size of government (contrary to preaching about smaller government).
President Ronald Reagan spent more money than his predecessors (which were borrowed at interest
from bankers). President Ronald Reagan funded death squads in Latin America and warned the
Sandinistas would be marching through Texas if the Pentagon didn't stop them. He
squandered billions of dollars on projects like Star wars. Reagan didn't even support
sanctions against South Africa for its promotion of apartheid in the 1980's that Congress
override his veto. The Republican President George W. Bush ran up the deficit and the
national debt to historical levels. He started 2 wars that so far resulted in the murder of over 1
million people. Bush and the neocons trashed the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. This was
done under the pretense of the global war on manufactured terrorism. The rendition policy
that Bush supported kidnapped people around the world and flew them to torture dungeons
under the guise of "rendition." Government didn't shrink under the leadership of Bush and the
Republicans. Most Americans didn't see their taxes reduced or eliminated. A seat in the
Arkansas Palin speech was $175 per seat. Sarah Palin showed her true colors as being a pro-war neo
con. Palin said that a nuclear weapon in the hands of regime or terrorist group was the biggest threat
to the country (especially talking about Iran. She believed that the country's debt also negatively
affected national security). One threat in America is the huge debt owed to international bankers that
have decimated the middle class, shipped jobs to Third World nations, and can impoverish future
generations. Iran is not a threat to America. The USA attacked its neighbors and other nations for
centuries. Some in the Tea Party realize that Sarah Palin is a Trojan Horse being used stir the
movement into being an arm of the Republican Party basically. The Bilderberger & Governor Rick
Perry and establishment neocons have deliberately target grass roots constitutionalists (via dirty trick
campaigns in trying to stop the growing liberty movement). “Our office was contacted by a national
personality, a household name, who told us that they were in a green room at a national public event a
few weeks ago with Rick Perry. The individual was shocked when Perry said directly that there were
three people who ‘got under his skin’ and who ‘had to be dealt with’ immediately,” Paul Joseph
Watson wrote on February 17. Some feel that Karl Rove, who is a Republican political strategist, may
steer Rick Perry's response against his critics. Rove is known for dirty tricks. Rove used dirty tricks
against the political enemies of Richard Nixon (especially during Nixon's 1971 Presidential campaign
according to Wayne Madsen from 2002). Rove is still an asset for the Republicans. Individuals from
the Tea party should realize that they are being manipulated by the puppet Sarah Palin. The Tea Party
should have their independence and not be swept by the Republicans (asserting their
constitutionalist/libertarian roots).

It doesn't take a genius to see that the Western elite use economically corrupt policies to
exploit and steal the wealth from the people the world over (including using starvation,
robbery, murder, and theft of resources). People talk about the middle class all of the time.
Although, the poor should take great consideration in order for us to build the U.S. as well not
just the middle class. The middle class in America expanded greatly after the Industrial
Revolution. They have wealth, power, and influence. Some of them in times past didn't know
about or care about the plight of the world's majority poor. Then, the economic recession hit in
the 21st century harming them as well not only the poor. One big reason for this economic
situation is the debt crisis. The over reliance on credit cards have caused issues ever since the
modern credit card was invented by the Bank of America in 1958 (which evolved into Visa). In
2004, PBS published a special report on the “secret history of credit cards.” One of the
researchers explained that, “The almost magical convenience of plastic money is critical to
our famously compulsive consumer economy,” as “With more than 641 million credit cards
in circulation and accounting for an estimated $1.5 trillion of consumer spending, the U.S.
economy has clearly gone plastic.” It's not a secret that credit card companies benefit from
people getting more credit cards adding debt after debt (even if a person pays their credit
card payments on time). This debt trap isn't just being promoted against the middle class
via credit cards. It's promoted by the IMF and World Bank in Third World nations as well
in the guise of structural adjustment. Much of the income for the middle class has been
stagnant since 2001. Some want to blame the consumers for this, but it isn't true. Many banks
like the Bank of America encouraged the debt based consumption culture and engaged in far
riskier debt-based transactions on a global scale. These developments caused the global financial
crisis. Subsequently, the banks, like Bank of America, were given a blank check by the
government that bought their bad debts, and are now going to charge the taxpayers (of which the
Bank of America report states they need to “work off a chunk” of their own personal debt). They
forgot to mention that the taxpayers would also be paying off the bankers’ debts, too. Colleges
have students have huge college debt and trouble finding jobs too. Even when government bailed
out the finance industry, they failed to radically reform or regulate any of the problems in
financial markets that created the crisis. Also, “some rescue plans have pushed banks to maintain
their lending practices of the past.” Ironically, Geithner and others claim to want economic
solutions when they are allies of Wall Street (that contributed to the financial crisis in the first
place via the derivatives bubble). Laurence Summers once said that middle class tax cuts won't
exist, but he won't rule it out recently. Some extremists want austerity measures to cut services,
cut job creating programs, etc. that won't increase economic growth long term at all.
Transnational corporations are certainly gaining more power in these times via globalization (or
allowing the big banks not nation-states control the majority of the economic decisions in
the world. This is related to Global Governance. A professor in college told us that he likes
global governance and global government explicitly). This process has been facilitated by the
major nations of the world, primarily the United States. Globalization has in turn led to the
formation of a truly global ruling class. David Rothkopf refers to this global class as the
‘Superclass’ and has concluded that it is a class consisting of roughly 6,000 individuals or
roughly one member of the ‘Superclass’ for every one million people. It's very hypocritical for
the neo cons to rail against Big Government when they support big Government to expand
the military expenditures & police state policies in American society. Bush inherited a $230
billion budget surplus from Clinton, which he quickly turned into large deficits. There certainly
needs to be radical solutions like legitimate regulations, banning derivatives, cracking down on
corporate corruption (that includes Goldman Sachs even investing in Barack Obama), cutting
down an enormous military budget to fund services in our society (to assist especially the poor &
the middle class), a rebuilding of our nation infrastructure, etc. This economic struggle for
financial justice is big part of the Patriot movement. It’s what our ancestors died for.

Michael Savage is obviously controlled opposition. He is a famous radio talk show host known for
using incendiary rhetoric. He was educated from college. Recently, he showed his true colors to the
show. Savage mocked those who believe that 9/11 was an inside job done by the Western intelligence
community (with ties to the Papal Hierarchy and the Jesuit Order). This 9/11 evil act
was done to perpetuate the war on terror. This war on terror has been genocidal against Sunni & Shia
Muslims including soldiers as well from America, etc. Savage even refused to see the truth that both
Democrats and Republicans are controlled by the same people via the CFR, big Foundations, and
other groups. Savage now supports the Roman Catholic Church and Pope Pius XII. Pius XII was
ungodly and was involved in the genocide in WWII. Savage claims that Pius XII saved thousands of
Jewish people during the Nazi-SS Eurasian Jewish Holocaust. This story has been promoted by
Robert Graham, Robert Lieber, and Augustin Cardinal Bea. The Jesuits and Savage attack anyone
exposing the Vatican link to World War 2. The Nazi and Bavarian Roman Catholic Heinrich
Himmler based his SS/Gestapo on the Jesuit order. Savage obsessed with Communism when
Hitler and Stalin had a temporary alliance with each other. Communism was added and
abetted by the international bankers (like J. Peter Grace, David Rockefellers, and other
Pilgrims) in order make central command and control against more people the world.
Communism was used as a bulwark against real Nationalism from spreading in the Third
World. Pius XII sent Hitler a birthday card every year of his dictatorship. Catholic Monisgnor
Ludwig Kaas was the Chairman of the German Central Party and he supported Hitler's election
in 1933. Knight of Malta Franz von Papen help brought Hitler to power with Papal Knights
influenced him (over President Hindenburg). Von Papen was the Vice Chancellor to oversee
the activities of Hitler's Empire. Von Papen was the one in 1933 who help negotiate the Reich
concordat for Hitler along with the assistance of Cardinal Secretary of State Eugenio Pacelli.
This concordat has never been revoked to this very day. So, Savage relies on 3 pro-Ecumenical
sources in defending of Pius XII's false religion and crimes. Some Jewish people have been
brainwashed to support Pius XII like Labor Zionist Golda Meir (Rudolf Katsner was caught working
with Nazi SS Colonels Adolf Eichman and Kurt Bech to send over 400,000 Hungarian Jews to
Auschwitz at the end of 1944. Ben Hecht's "Perfidy" exposed this treason. Kastner allied with Israeli
President David Ben Gurion). Albert Einstein was said by Savage to defend Pius XII when he
modernized the Big Bang Theory (which has been never proven conclusively and it's been promoted
by his mentor Belgian Jesuit Georges-Henri Lemaitre. Albert supported heliocentricity instead of
geocentricity). There is the Chief Rabbi of Rome, named Israel Zolli. When the Nazi-SS/Gestapo Lt.
Colonel Herbert Kappler eliminated Rome’s old Jewish ghetto sending over 1,000 Jews to Auschwitz,
the Chief Rabbi refused to denounce Pius XII. When WWII was over, the rabbi changed his name
from Israel to Eugenio after Pius XII's real name of Eugenio Pacelli. That was wrong. Not to
mention that the Papacy was involved in the Ustashi massacres killing over 600, 000 Jewish
people, Serbs, and Gypsies in Yugoslavia during WWII. Pius XII worked with Jesuit Superior
General Wlodimir Ledochowski. The Jesuit Order has been promoting the fight against
Protestants and Baptists with their wicked Council of Trent document. Michael Savage is a
person either ignorant of real history or a traitor to his own Jewish people since the Papacy
slaughtered Jewish people more than any other creed in history. Michael Savage is an Universalist
believing that all major religions are valid. So, he need to repent of his sins and believe in the real
gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. He shouldn't be pro-Papacy at all.

Lee Rogers wrote that Council for National Policy interests are backing the Kentucky Senate
Campaign of Rand Paul. The CNP is an organization that have corporate ties with links to figures
who desire a new world order, the Vatican, and the global elite. They meet 3 times a year and
their membership list includes people from the right side of the Left/Right paradigm. Famous
people who are members or spoke to this group include George W. Bush, John Ashcroft, Dick
Cheney, Bill Frist, Tom Delay, Pat Robertson, and others. The CNP have big links to the John
Birch Society (it's a controlled opposition group that is paranoid about Communism when
Communism like cartel capitalism are funded by the Anglo-American elite, the Vatican/Jesuit
network, Black Nobility bloodlines, etc. Some believed that the JBS was originally financed by
Rockefeller money). Even Dr. Stan Monteith is apart of the CNP. Left gatekeeper Huffington
Post has an article saying that Paul's campaign is supported by Gun Owners of America. The GOA
is right to promote gun rights as a form of individual liberty, but its leader Larry Pratt is a
member of the CNP. Pratt has been linked to the Council for Inter-American Security, which is a
group that was responsible for helping organize the Reagan Administration's policy towards
Latin-America which included the implementation of death squads throughout the 1980s. Pratt
served as the group’s Secretary along-side Pat Buchanan who was also a high level figure in this
group. CNP member Steve Forbes supports Paul's campaign. Lastly, Paul has also received a
donation that was described as “generous” from Sarah Palin’s political action committee. Palin
was a speaker in front of the Council for National Policy back in 2008 prior to becoming
John McCain’s Vice Presidential running mate on the 2008 Republican ticket. Some believe that
the CNP gave the nod to her before she was made a Vice Presidential candidate. The CNP is in
the Republican establishment infiltrating people. Globalists try to control both paradigms of
political ideologies in order to control the outcome of political races, etc.

Do you want to trust these people? My answer is No. To them,

you’re an extremist for really exposing the new world order
agenda. The deceiver Glen Beck is especially slick. He denies the
danger of the fluoridation (and other poisons) in our water supply.

The Tea Party Movement is a force to be reckon with. 2 extremes are common
classifications of this movement. One extreme views everything in the Movement as
correct and the other extreme views the whole movement as racist (as promoted by Bill
Maher), which is a disrespectful slander of course. Ironically, some of the same people
who made that slanderous use of offensive sexual slurs against Tea Party leaders. Now,
Meghan McCain is apart of the Left/Right paradigm. She is the daughter of John
McCain. She said that the Tea Party is full of racists, when I'm sure that the vast
majority of Tea Party participants aren't racists. She said these words on the View. She
believed that people are turned off by the Tea Party Movement and Sarah Palin. The
truth is that young people are turned off by extremists like Meghan McCain and the
neo-conservatives not just Sarah Palin. Palin is a puppet and she calls for attacking Iran,
which has no legitimate value at all in improving the relationship surrounding the
Middle Eastern region. Iran doesn't directly threaten America and likewise Iran's true
freedom ultimately ought to be executed by the Iranian people. The corporate media
is loving the words of Meghan since it furthers political agitation and divides
Americans more (similar to the rhetoric of Rush Limbaugh, SPLC leader Potok, Bill
O'Reilly, Glen Beck, and Keith Olbermann). McCain criticized Tom Tancredo, who
called for a literacy test for voters during the $500 admission Tea Party fest in Nashville
last week. “People who would not even spell the word vote or say it in English put a
committed socialist ideologue in the White House… named Barack Hussein Obama,”
Tancredo told the those gathered at the Republican Tea Party convention. Of course, I
don't agree with Tancedo's policy at all. The reality is that the literary tests were
common features of racist practices against black Americans to deny them the right to
vote. Tom Tancredo is known for his extremely bigoted views on disagreeing with
even legal immigration. Only neo-Malthusians, deceived folks, and other globalists
want the regular people to be restricted of their rights. Tancredo on foreign policy
issues is a Republican neo con. He used to be the member of the House of
Representatives from Colorado's 6th Congressional district. He not only believes in
undeclared wars that violate Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution, but also
suggested in 2005 that it would be OK to wipe the Muslim holy city of Mecca off the
map in response to al-Qaeda. Trancedo believes that Miami is like a Third world city, which is
offensive and bigoted. He opposes even some legal immigration when legal immigration has been
blessing in the mosaic of American culture. As President John F. Kennedy eloquently written in the
1950’s, immigrants harbor a crucial backdrop in improving the cultural and political aspects of
American society in general.

*Beyond that, the goal in improving our nation should be to have re-industrialization,
economic modernization, full employment, and rising standards of living for all
people. Wealth is influenced by many factors like the efficiency of producing goods
dedicated to many aims like infrastructure, transportation, and other components. These
actions were a preeminent part and parcel of dedicated leaders like Governor Winthrop of
the Massachusetts Bay Colony that instituted a sovereign currency & advanced industry,
Benjamin Franklin that founded the modern post office system in America, or even
George Washington organizing his infrastructure projects. These are the historical facts
that the extremists (whether they are radical Austrian or Keynesian economists)
don't want you to know. This economic system is apart of the American System that trail
blazed the functions of prosperity & enriched our capabilities that reside in our country.

The establishment is certainly using the neo con side of Glen Beck and the Ron
Paul/Alex Jones side (representing the JBS/CNP funded clique) as a means to get as
many well meaning conservatives as possible into the Left/Right paradigm. Ron Paul
talks about auditing the Federal Reserve and restoring the Constitution, but he won't
talk about promoting the General Welfare of this nation (or proposing a wide spectrum
filled solutions to help the poor, etc.). Ron Paul advances the official story in pertaining to
9/11. Alex Jones criticized Beck, but follow in his footsteps by promoting Ecumenicalism,
omitting subjects, and disrupting events. Jack Blood was a former inside in the Alex Jones
camp. He filled in with Alex Jones. Blood was so disgusted with Jones' actions that he had no
choice, but to have legitimate criticisms about Alex Jones. Jack Blood said that Jones would
call him late at night trying to figure out ways to destroy other individuals in the truth and
freedom movement that were critical of him (especially in Texas). Jack Blood also revealed
that Alex Jones is an incredibly unstable individual who can’t hold his liquor (and would
often try to start fights with other people after he’s had a few drinks). He also revealed that
many of the autographed copies of his film Terrorstorm that Jones sold as part of a
promotion were not autographed by him, but instead were autographed by members of
his staff. Blood also said that he smoked marijuana with Alex Jones and Alex Jones'
crew would go into a strip club despite Jones being married. If these accusations are
true, then that is something else. Alex Jones certainly disrupted a recent rally in Austin,
Texas. He falsely accused the protesters as being apart of COINTELPRO. The
protesters wanted to disagree with the corruption in the federal government (including
the ATF. The protesters wanted to promote the Second Amendment being pro-gun). Earnest
and passionate local advocates for individual liberty led by John Bush of Texans for
Accountable Government organized a peaceful protest rally on Monday afternoon in
opposition to the Austin Police Department’s involvement with the BATF in attempts to
illegally shut down private gun sales at gun shows in Austin. Later, Alex Jones used his
bullhorn to drown out others from others. The speakers said that they can‘t hear. Alex Jones
tried to intimidate a rally organizer by saying get out of my face in profane language. A
female protester told Alex that: “…We wanted to give you a speaking spot, but instead
of working with us, you came in and started yelling…” Alex couldn’t refute the women,
but said if she was a Democratic Party operative, which is false. This tactic by Jones is done
making real Patriots looking like lunatics (which real Patriots are not of course) being divided
unnecessarily. This intimidating behavior by Jones against Catherine Bleish (who is not a
COINTELPRO agent) is disrespectful especially a man of his age. Now, Alex Jones will
reluctantly vote for Debra Medina. Medina lost the primary to the Bilderberger & Republican
Rick Perry. This piece of work Alex Jones believes that if you disagree legitimately with the
doctrines of Catholicism, you’re Catholic bashing. That’s a lie since the Vatican embraces
un-Christian heresies (like the veneration of images, accepting the Rosary, calling Mary the
Queen of Heaven, believing that bread in communion transforms into God which is
blasphemy, and the Papacy calls the Pope Holy Father which is another blasphemy) and
that’s the truth. That Ecumenical Alex Jones is something else. Alex Jones supports
Ron Paul’s agenda, the John Birch Society, and Austrian Economics too.
That tells you much about him. We don’t need egomania in trying to get solutions in
our country at all. There are also slick theocrats like Al Cronkite. He promotes racist and
anti-Jewish rhetoric. He slams New Testament Christianity for without which he wouldn’t of
been a “professing Christian.” He lies and claims that any Christian wanting religious
freedom in society and allow people to pick their own creed is akin to promoting
humanism. No, it’s not. Even the Bible is clear that the job of a Christian isn’t to rule
the Earth politically in government (as he falsely maintains), but it’s to spread the
Gospel to all Creation helping people. The pro-theocrat Al Cronkite says that we ignore
Old Testament. We don’t ignore it. We put it context. Sorry, Al, but we don’t go around and
form a theocracy as the New Testament rejects. Even in the OT, God grieved about the
Israelites wanting a King in Israel. The OT have animal sacrifices and we don’t have that
anymore. The OT have people that traveled to the Temple for religious ceremonies. Now, we
have the church for that. So, the Old Testament isn’t superior to the New Testament per se,
but the NT a continuation of the Word of God that ought to be given respect. We have a
better commandment and a new covenant with the NT indeed. Al Cronkite’s words are
nothing more than a discredited, radical Reformed ideology. This ideology is contrary to the
authentic freedom of conscience and the freedom of religion. I believe in religious freedom
as people died for that right, so we could live in this country today. Theocracies like
communist dictatorships are contrary to the essence of a real civilization and authentic
liberties.

The Coffee Party is Left paradigm organization that is trying to ironically mimic the
agenda of the Tea Party Movement. They exist with “left favor” if you will. People have
criticized the group as being an pro-Obama front group. The Coffee Party claims to
promote cooperation with the government. They believe in the following words from
their Coffee Party USA website: “…We recognize that the federal government is not the
enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will, and that we must participate in
the democratic process in order to address the challenges that we face as Americans. As
voters and grassroots volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions,
and hold accountable those who obstruct them…” They are correct to endorse the proposition
that solutions are indeed vital in our country. They are wrong to just acquiesce and prescribe
the ideal that we must support the government unconditionally. The markets have been
corrupted for centuries and the government have been corrupted as well. A better solution
would be a promotion of efficient, legitimate government not total governmental control over
every aspect of society. The Coffee Party ignores some of the legitimate grievances of many
Tea Party members that demand that the government ought to adhere to the Bill of Rights &
the Constitution of the United States of America. The federal government ought to exist
as a function to promote the General Welfare of the people, but it should be
regulated just like the markets in preventing it from doing what it wants
whenever it wants to. They believe in the collective will, which ignores the power of the
individuals. There is nothing wrong with working in a group to solve complications, but
you can’t deny the value of the individual either. The Coffee Party claims to be
grassroots without influence of partisans and lobbyists. This isn’t totally true, because
the Coffee Party USA’s founder is an Obama campaign operative named Ms. Annabel
Park. She is 41 years old. She supported the Barack Obama campaign too. She is a former
Strategy Analyst at the New York Times. The NY Times once supported much of the Iraq
War. Park calls the Tea Party movement a derogatory, sexually offensive slur (This is proven
from her tweets on Twitter). This slur have been utilized by Keith Olbermann, who works for
MSNBC. GE owns MSNBC and GE is a military industrial complex corporation that sells
attack helicopters and other war instruments benefiting the Pentagon in an economically rich
fashion. This is being a hypocrite and contrary to her supposed promise of tolerance of
ideologies. According to William A. Jacobson, the Coffee party is a covert part of a neo-
Barack Obama campaign trying to co-opt the Tea Party Movement. It’s also done to gravitate
and try to get people like us to join them (who are not swept up by the Glen Beck plus the
neo con Republicans infiltrating much of the Tea Party months ago). Glen Beck, Sarah Palin,
and their ilk want the Tea Party to follow the Republican party platform. This platform
supports more war and favors (plus bailouts) to the Wall Street plutocrats. To be fair,
numerous people apart of the Coffee party movement sincerely desire legitimate reforms in
the American government. Many of them have positive intensions. That can‘t be denied. The
Coffee Party movement (in its leadership) is a new deception in a new decade. They
are in the Left side of the Left/Right paradigm. Yet, we can use the same response to
them by mentioning concretely that the love of individual liberty, the honor of
economic populism, the respect of civil liberties, opposing monopolies, allying with
the Bill of Rights, respecting human life in all stages, and having the true love of all
of the human race without calling our fellow human beings sexual slurs are more
important than having a cup of coffee.

I knew something was up with the Hutaree story made by the mainstream media. Know, the truth
about them is further known. CNN falsely said that the Hutaree cult was some how connected to
the Michigan Militia website and the Tea Party Movement (even though I don't agree with them
on every issue). Yet, the link between the Michigan Militia and the Hutaree group is not there.
Many of the Tea Party activists have legitimate concerns about the government. Even I realize
that not everyone in the Tea Party group want terrorism. The Hutaree wanted to kill cops, which
is wrong. Some feel that certain people are exploiting these events in order to suppress free
speech in America. The Hutaree group had a sick obsession with killing children. Many of them
are probably mentally ill. One Hutaree member made a YouTube video dressed in camouflage
and waving a machine sun speaking in a sinister altered voice. Some in the mainstream media
want to use the raids to imply that every militia and Tea Party groups shares the Hutaree cult's
violent agenda. On CNN, Potok claimed that anyone believe that some people wanting a new
world order system is an extremist. That's a lie of course. The Michigan Militia website
condemned Hutaree for its extremism. They condemned violence against law enforcement
people as well. The CNN report featured a long lingering shot of a web page advertising an
upcoming Tea Party event while the correspondent discussed charges of killing police officers
using explosives. While the Hutaree allegedly planned to abduct and kill police officers as well
as bombing their funerals, the Michigan Militia openly condemns “attacks or threats of any sort
directed against our elected representatives or law enforcement officers.” Also, when is open
carry of guns or promoting the Second Amendment evil or terroristic? They aren't.

Some in CNN trying portray patriots as terrorists don't work. Ironically, Anderson Cooper is
from the Astor bloodline, he was trained to be a CIA agent (when the CIA initiated acts of real
terrorism against the Third World and others since their creation in 1947), and he is promoting
this propaganda. I remember Anderson Cooper from being a host in Channel One in
the mid-late 1990’s when I was in Middle and early high school. He had gray hair
back then. Back in those days, we were told in school to look at Channel One
programming. I‘ve seen Lisa Ling and Craig David back then in Channel One too.
His network and other used the lies (dealing with weapons of mass destruction) that carried
forward over million Iraqis. CNN is even hyping up false information about Iran's nuclear energy
program. They are no different than FOX in this regard. FOX is overt with their propaganda &
false stereotypes. CNN is more covert with it. Suppression of free speech done by the left
gatekeepers is just as wrong as suppression of civil liberties done by the neo conservative crowd.
The media is very hypocritical when they compare political dissent with terror when they
supported real acts of terror globally for over 50 years. The government exploits the Hutaree's
decoys as an excuse to demonize Christians (especially if you believe in prophecy), anyone
exposing the new world order agenda, and people who disagree with the establishment's
propaganda. Potok is a liar by saying that no elites want world government when elites have
called for a one world government by their own quotes for decades. The SPLC acts like a
disagreement to policies of government is akin to a hate crime. Their views certainly contradict
their own supposed goals of promoting civil rights. The Wall Street Journal reported that the
FBI had an informant in the Hutaree group and participated in the alleged conspiracy to
kill law enforcement officers. In sworn testimony, Thomas William Piatek is described
as a Cooperating Witness and an undercover FBI agent. The FBI's Detroit's office didn't
comment on this issue. If this is true, this isn't surprising since FBI people infiltrated like
minded groups for years. A FBI informant worked in the Fort Dix Army New Jersey
terror plot. “The only terrorist conspiracy was one planted and nurtured by the informant,”
declared defense attorney Rocco Cip during the trial. The FBI’s role in the case was admitted by
a provocateur. “The FBI informant paid to infiltrate a band of suspected terrorists in South Jersey
said yesterday that he offered to organize their attack on U.S. soldiers, but only because he
wanted to build trust and find out more about the group,” the Star-Ledger reported on November
11, 2008. A FBI informant worked in the Miami Seven case. Of course, Hal Turner is a FBI
agent according to the third highest ranking FBI official in NYC. Turner admitted that he was
recruited by the FBI's Newark based Joint Terrorism Task Force. He was paid in excess of
$100,000 by the FBI during his almost 5 years as an informant. According to research conducted
by Alexandra Natapoff of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, the FBI maintains an army of at
least 15,000 “confidential informants,” while the DEA admits to having 4,000 snitches. This is a
small part of the entire informants working for state and local police agencies. The lesson here
is that violence is wrong. Yet, we should never be ashamed and intimidated by the
corporate media or anyone else in what we believe in. I believe in exposing proposed
FEMA Camps, the new world order agenda, and other evils. The government might be
reading these words, but my views are clear. The establishment can never crush real
independent, thought provoking thought. They can never crush the Truth. I believe in
being pro-life, being pro-Nationalism, being for National sovereignty, being for the
Second Amendment, and believing in personal liberties.

Some Tea party members are racists and extremists (as proven by some disrespectful
signs being proven by Youtube and other sources). Tea Party member Buffalo
businessman Carl Paladino, a multimillionaire, was caught recently using racial slurs against
black people in words and photos. He was trying to run for the NY gubernatorial race. The
organizer of the Buffalo Tea Party is standing behind Paladino. That’s a disgrace, but this is
typical. A spokesman for state GOP Chairman Ed Cox, condemned Paladino: "The racially
and sexually inappropriate nature of Mr. Paladino's emails is disturbing to say the least, and
stands in stark contrast to what the Republican Party stands for and the values it promotes."
The founder of the Ohio Tea Party group, Sonny Thomas, wrote on his twitter page racial
slurs against Hispanic people and this coward disrespected his own son, who is part Hispanic.
His twitter name is SpringboroTea. The majority of Tea Party participants aren't bigots.
Yet, there is another dynamic to this story. There are provocateurs acting like extremists
or bigots to disrupt Tea Party movements. These provocateurs are either Fed agents or
some individuals that want to crash the party literally. One example of this activity is
when Muskogee Tea Party leader Jamison Faught received a call. This caller was a man.
He tried to make Jamison to agree to shoot the President. Faught refused to do so.
Faught said that the man used a blocked phone number and asked him if he was the
head of the Muskogee Tea party. Faught didn't want to carry a gun at a rally to promote
safety. Faught called the Muskogee County Sheriff, the District Attorney’s office, the
U.S. Marshals and the Muskogee Police Department, because the man threaten the life
of the President (which is a felony). It's hard to see if a non-provocateur racist would
broadcast threats against the President over the phone with Faught since he would
immediately report him to the authorities. Faught denies that the Tea Party is racist
against African Americans, or against the federal government. Many anarchists want to
stage false flags too in tax rallies to try to frame all of the Tea Party movement as violent
racists. “Law-abiding Tea Partiers are apparently being infiltrated and made to look
extreme,” writes Andrew W. Griffin of the Oklahoma Watchdog. “Growing evidence
points to provocateurs that bring to mind the protests of the Vietnam War era and
COINTELPRO.” The mainstream media loves it when tax protests could erupt into
disruption and violence. Shills have used violence to get people demonized like the
Hutratree militia or a radical Muslim group. Most of the Tea party people have been
non-violent. One of the biggest shills around was phony conservative radio host Hal
Turner. Turner was a FBI informant, who made death threats against federal judges in
Illinois and lawmakers in Connecticut. The supposed white supremacist worked for the
agency from 2002 until 2007. “His job was basically to publish information which would
cause other parties to act in a manner which would lead to their arrest,” Michael Orozco
told the Associated Press. The call was put through a leading Tea Party representative
in Oklahoma, which is near the place of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. This
bombing was been done by the FBI/Elohim City directed puppet Timothy McVeigh.
There is a recent controversy over a creation of a Oklahoma militia to counter the
growing federal power in the state. Some want to crush the Tea Movement in Oklahoma
and throughout the country. The Oath Keepers organization withdraw from a "Restore
the Constitution" rally in Virginia because participants in the march were spewing
violent rhetoric and threatening to brandish guns during the event. The establishment
media desire this activity to occur in order to exploit events to demonize
Constitutionalists as extremists with gun fetishes. A shill outfit called the Crash the Tea
Party has its leader named Jason Levin. He wants to organize leaders in 65 cities in
order to "infiltrate and dismantle" the Tea Party rallies. There might be dirty tricks
involved in these rallies. This will show how real tea partiers will act and the corporate
media shouldn't take the bait. The Axiom For Liberty blog has put together a useful
guide on how to deal with provocateurs in the event of them attempting to cause
mayhem at today’s protests. The key thing is to never lose your temper and always keep
the anarchists, feds, or whomever they be within the confines of a camera lens so that
their false flags can be exposed for all to see. I don't agree with all of the views of the
Tea Party movement (like their views on economics & poverty and their rhetoric about
people with whom they disagree with), but some of their views are legitimate (like
individual liberty). In the panorama of views, they have a right to peacefully express
their points of view. That is essentially apart of the First Amendment.
I want to write about Lloyd Marcus (who is from Baltimore) for a long time. Now, I
have that chance. He is the famous black man wearing a cowboy hat. Lloyd regularly
sings & dances in Tea Party rallies. He's a man in my mind that's naive about a lot of
things. He believes in the neo conservative agenda in a more slick fashion than a Glen
Beck or a Sean Hannity. Now, he made a recent stereotypical, half truth filled article
about the black church. The black church in general have made great, lasting
contributions in American society. That's evidently true. Now, Lloyd Marcus writes that
the Black church collectively has a commitment to President Barack Obama. I don't
agree with that. Some churches do have that, but not all black churches. A church
should be independent of adhering not to the Republicans or to the Democrats
unconditionally. They should be free and independent. He is right on some things. He's
right to bring up the fact that most African American voters voted for Barack Obama,
and that abortion is morally wrong. Any abortion is a tragedy. Obama is very much
pro-abortion. I don't agree with his support of even partial birth abortion. People are
starting to realize that abortion is heavily effecting the black community (and black
people from across the political spectrum realize this). Abortion negatively effects many
people too of different ethnicities. It is important to ask legitimate questions about
Barack Obama. I don't support Barack Obama on every issue, but I don't hate the man. I
don't believe in showing vitriol against the man like some extremists do. Lloyd feels that
Obama doesn’t love America. I’m sure Barack Obama loves America. Lloyd is correct
that in mentioning that we should not made an idol of man whether that man is Bush or
Obama. Lloyd Marcus denies that some neo cons and Republicans want to suppress black
America. He's naive on that since Governor McDonnell of my state of Virginia is trying
to get austerity cuts in education, and many Tea Party protests have shown offensive,
racist signs. Rand Paul doesn't say whether he wants private businesses to discriminate
against people, and there are other examples of this extremism. He said that Barack
Obama supports gay marriage, but he doesn't totally. He supports civil unions, but he
opposes the Federal Defense of Marriage Act. He supports states deciding on this issue.
This issue is controversial and the federal government has no right in my mind to
influence a person's marriage decision via coercion. A person can agree or disagree with
the make up of marriage though. All people should have the same rights as found in the
Bill of Rights & Constitution. Lloyd Marcus's greatest error is his whole agenda on
entitlements. He supports the Austrian economic agenda believing that the free market
alone will solve poverty or nearly all other socio-economic issues (or Lloyd has that "Let
them eat cake" or "get up by your bootstraps" type of mentality). That is wrong. He
distorts the Bible in supporting his views too. Regardless of what he writes, the rich
regardless get over tax laws by allowing the poor to pay many taxes (on the local, state,
and federal level). This isn't class agitation, but this is class reality. He admits that the
government should support giving and charity. Yet, Lloyd needs to realize that the
government constitutionally providing the General Welfare of the people isn't stealing
wealth via redistribution. It's a common feature of the function of government. Paying
taxes to fund services isn't theft, but it's the fruit of work. Taxes shouldn't be
extremely high (especially against the poor). Although, at the same time, taxes exist as
a constitutional reality as found in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. You need
roads, bridges, schools, etc. to survive as a nation. Charity isn't enough to fund these
entities. He lies and say that regulation is the enemy. No, too much regulation is wrong.
Yet, moderate regulation is a key component to limit fraud and abuse in the
government plus the corporate world. Some regulations are bad and some are good.
The financial meltdown-inducing quadrillion-dollar derivatives bubble could never
have existed without the repeal of a particular government "regulation" -- namely the
Glass-Steagall Act. The idea that an unregulated market for goods, services and
financial products leads to prosperity, equal opportunity and fairness spits in the face of
history. The Bible says that if a man does not work, he should not eat (II Thessalonians
3:6-12) in the context of an able bodied person. Yet, the Bible don't say to allow your
neighbor to die in streets either. The Good Samaritan story as told by the Lord Jesus
Christ exposing the right of a person to assist another person in desperate need. See,
Lloyd Marcus believes in the Malthusian lie that we allow those who can't work
(because of disability, age, illness, etc.) to not receive any governmental assistance. This
can make some of them die in the streets literally. Sorry, I don't think like that. We have
compassion sent toward all men regardless of their background. Malachi 3:5, have God
saying that he is “AGAINST THOSE WHO OPPRESS THE HIRELING IN HIS
WAGES?" Marcus won't mention that verse since he doesn't agree with promoting real
labor rights in this country. Jesus Christ said ‘YOU CANNOT SERVE GOD AND
MAMMON,’ the love of money! THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL
EVIL." Jesus as Lloyd mention did say that the poor will be with us, but that isn't an
excuse to not help the poor. James 2:5 says “God has chosen the poor of this world.”
Verse 6 tries to remind the Christian church that rich men are their OPPRESSORS. The
Bible condemns the corruption of the rich from Genesis into the book of Revelation.
Jesus said He came to preach His Gospel to the poor (Mt 11:5). See, Lloyd Marcus has a
distorted view of poverty as being a sole condition of morals instead of a condition that
ought to be fought against. Also, I don't agree with President Barack Obama on every
issue, but he had tax cuts in the middle class and the super rich regularly don't pay
huge taxes now. Lloyd Marcus talks about big government. The government should be
just efficient to protect and help people. Since Lloyd wants to show the Bible, here’s
another verse of the Bible about our responsibility to help the poor (in Proverbs 14:31):

“…He that oppresseth the poor reproacheth his Maker: but he that honoureth
him hath mercy on the poor…”

The government should be an active tool to promote the critical existence of our
country. Marcus makes the deception that America is a Christian nation when no where
in the Constitution mentions this. The Constitution doesn’t mention the name of Jesus
Christ at all. The Christian Chris Pinto has a new DVD coming out proving that much of
the Founding Fathers were occultists and Freemasons (not true Christians as exposed by
their secret quotes. Benjamin Franklin was a member of the Hells Fire Club, Thomas
Jefferson condemned the Bible, and Thomas Paine hated mainstream religion
completely. The Hell Fire Club have had orgies, occult rituals, and other forms of
debauchery). America wasn't a Christian nation since the First Amendment forbids an
establishment of religion by the government. Lloyd Marcus need to reject that sanitized,
make believe history he embraces of America. Although, America back then did have
Christians though. He talks about Obama canceling the 21st annual "National Day of
Prayer" ceremony at the White House which was started by President Truman in 1952.
Obama stated his reason as "not wanting to offend anyone." The real issue is how we
shouldn't worship a nation, but worship God alone. There is nothing wrong with prayer
of course. Lloyd Marcus expects me as a black man to follow the Tea Party movement
completely when they contradict my own personal belief systems of infrastructure
development, real educational growth (without the race to the bottom tactics),
conservation or environmental protection, real health care reform, help to the poor
beyond just charity, real economic populism, and the promotion of total human civil
liberties. Sorry, I don‘t need neo-imperialism, monetarism, and austerity
propaganda. I believe in the Second Amendment or gun rights. Still, I don't agree with
cutting real services from the poor while our military budget is extremely bloated in its
expenditures. There has to be a safety net to maintain financial plus socio-economic
stability in the lives of the citizens of this country. I will pass on dancing to the tune of
the Tea Party. I won't be a Republican or a Democrat. I like being an Independent. It feel
invigorating. I don’t accept every stance of President Barack Obama on every issue, but
the Republicans are no different (they just have a different flavor of nefarious
corruption). Even the anti-immigration extremist Peter Brimelow is praising Lloyd
Marcus. Lloyd has been threaten and harassed by people, which I don’t agree with. Every
human being has a right to their own political views without violence or harassment from
other people. Lloyd Marcus refuses to talk about slavery, etc. Jesse Lee Peterson is worse
than Lloyd by saying that most black people lack moral character (and Jesse said that the 32rd
Degree Scottish Rite Freemason Kramer using the N word doesn‘t bother him. Sean Hannity
loves Jesse Lee Peterson. FOX News shows race baiting rhetoric too like the Michelle
Obama fist pound even though most Republicans & most Democrats aren‘t bigots. Bill
O‘Reilly said that Professor Lamont looks like a crack dealer). I do respect civil
liberties. So, I don’t agree with the Supreme Court’s recent decision that
uphold laws against provided what is classified “material support” to
terrorists. “Material support” is a very ambiguous designation and can be
interpreted as even an activist trying to have a non-violent dialogue with
adversaries. The High Court majority essentially ruled that mere interaction
with those branded terrorists is a serious crime, no matter what one’s
intentions. It is criminal (in the Supreme Court ruling) to give such groups
any advice whatsoever – even if the advice is to find non-violent means of
reaching their political goals. This is another example of fascism basically.
Lloyd Marcus fails to see that life is social, not just individual. Now, Lloyd Marcus calls
himself an unhyphenated American and that's his right. I disagree with this since I am
more than an American. I live here, but I am a black American and an African
American. My roots are from Africa. I have every right to not be ashamed of my
black African heritage. I have the First Amendment & the moral right to call
myself whatever I wish. I AM AN AFRICAN. He's a hypocrite by not wanting to be
called an African American, but he's President of a group called the NAACPC (or
National Association for the Advancement of Conservative People of Color). Life is
bigger than some Left/Right paradigm that Lloyd Marcus seems to promote. This
brother needs to wake up. Life is about being independently minded, telling the world
about what you are, and being aware of the truth.

Greg Palast has been apart of the economic populist movement for years. Palast recently
talked about the Greek crisis and the global debt crisis. Palast is an investigative reporter. He
exposed the globalists in the IMF, the WTO, and the World Bank using financial corruption
to harm the citizenry worldwide. There are transnational economic parasites that try to being
nations to ruin. He found World Bank documents that laid out the banksters' game plan of
using their power to harm sovereign nations. Palast wrote that the elite use bribery in poverty
stricken nations for the sale of public assets to oligarchical corporations and private foreign
banks. This illegal money of the traitorous leaders are sent into secret Swiss bank accounts
many miles away from the citizens of those nations (whose livelihoods and incomes are
stripped in the process). The 2nd step is caused the hot money cycle called by Stiglitz. This is
how the cycle works, as described by Palast, “Cash comes in for speculation in real estate and
currency, then flees at the first whiff of trouble. A nation’s reserves can drain in days, hours.
And when that happens, to seduce speculators into returning a nation’s own capital funds, the
IMF demands these nations raise interest rates to 30%, 50% and 80%.” Step two is mainly
about hijacking of pension funds, gutting employment benefits, and other social safety nets that
people work all their lives for. Therefore, the criminal oligarchs hypnotize a nation to sleep, strip
its clothes, and then rape it. This relationship is about economic rape by transnational bankers.
They rape of public assets, rape of pension funds, rape of electrical and water systems, stealing
currencies (and other resources that makes a nation alive and secure. When a nation wakes up
about this bad relationship, then some people cause panic in the streets because of desperation.
The IMF and the World Bank has been involved in corruption too (causing a rise in food and gas
prices). There was other commodities that kept a nation running from day to day on an even keel.
This step eventually leads to what Palast calls “Step-Three-and-a-Half,” and what Stiglitz brands
as “The IMF riot.” It is attributed to the IMF because they basically engineer the collapse
through their crippling policies and proposals for social spending cuts, which create the
conditions for riots, public rage and civil unrest. These riots have occurred in Indonesia,
Argentina, and now in Greece in 2010. There are violence and mayhem. Then, troops beat up
kids and protesters. The corporations keep the assets and leave these areas in many cases. The
4th step of this evil according to Greg Palast deals with monopoly corporatist trade police under
the rules of the WTO and the World Bank. This is the poverty reduction strategy under the guise
of a free market capitalism system. This systematic tearing nations apart was done by the
IMF/World Bank/WTO policies. Some of them have done it to African and Latin American
nations and now they want to handle the European and North American nations. Their new tricks
are backed up by the military. Recently, Germany, America, England, and France supported the
IMF’s call for a global bank tax, which would be dedicated to a fund that would secure the
payment of future bank bailouts. Canada is the only nation in the Western hemisphere to oppose
the tax. But it is not the only nation in the world. Brazil, Japan, Switzerland, and Australia are
also voicing their dissent. Even Simon Nixon from the Wall Street Journal wrote that proposed
IMF bank tax doesn't address the structural problems in the global financial system (and should
not be implemented). Nixon wants proper regulation of the sector. Simon Nixon want higher
capital requirements and radical structural reform to handle our economic crisis. Allister Heath
doesn't want the IMF plans either. There should be a democratically mature reform like smart
regulation of credit and financial institution. There ought to be the reintroduction of
public banking, the reduction of public subsidies to undeserving corporations and
banks, and the reinstatement of the principles of free economic competition. Lastly,
there should be the termination of the IMF, World Bank, and WTO. The IMF, the
World Bank, and the IMF want an oligarchical grip on nations and peoples. They
want to deprive them of all prosperity and economic plus political independence.
There are people like Cliff Cincaid, who legitimately expose the extreme
views of some LaRouche followers, the evils of Communism, and the new
world order. Yet they demonize anyone that disagrees with the official story
of 9/11. They also demonize anyone disagreeing with neo-conservative
propaganda (or people that disagree with Ronald Reagan). Cliff needs to
understand that Ronald Reagan was a deception. Ronald Reagan was pro-
Vatican (as Knights of Malta filled his cabinet. He worked with Pope John
Paul II), he was a honorary 33rd Degree Freemason, and his allies were
complicit in the Iran Contra scandal. President Ronald Reagan cut services
in austerity policies, and he fought against the legitimate Glass-Steagall Act.
The late President Ronald Reagan increased the economic debt & deficit.
Ronald Reagan signed anti-gun and anti-life legislation (Population
control, evil forms of family planning, abortion and sterilization to
achieve population control ARE TOOLS OF BOTH PHYSICAL AND
CULTURAL GENOCIDE). Reagan signed those forms of legislation during his
Governorship of California back in the late 1960’s. One of the first attacks
made by then President Ronald Reagan against Labor occurred when
Ronald Reagan fired the striking air traffic controllers and dissolved their
union in 1981. That was an abuse of power on Reagan’s part. These are all
documented facts. Now, Cliff Kincaid was apart of the CNP since 1988. He
claims to have left the group. The Council on National Policy’s goal has been
to infiltrate conservatives to promote a pro-Republican/pro-neo con
philosophical agenda. The CNP have links to the John Birch Society (that
Alex Jones loves), Coors, etc. Cincaid worked with the CNP member,
Knight of Malta, and Iran Contra agent Oliver North. He once even agreed
with Moon for a while. Moon was a false leader who called himself the
Messiah and made other outrageous statements before. The CNP founders
and leaders have links to the Knights of Malta, the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Unification Church of Sun Myung Moon, the Church of
Scientology, Freemasonry, the CIA, Nazis, the Church Universal &
Triumphant, the Ku Klux Klan, Templeton Foundation, Racists and other
cults plus other organizations. People already know that Alex Jones refuse
to expose the Council on National Policy. Many of his regular guests have
ties to the intelligence community, the Jesuits, the Council on National
Policy, or the Vatican. The Council on National Policy was created in 1981
by Tim LaHaye. The CNP have infiltrated much of the Tea Party
Movement too. Jones refuses to expose the CNP since the CNP is a group
that is a nexus point that is related to the Ron Paul disinformation
agenda. Their ilk can talk a good game about the Federal Reserve’s errors,
but some of them are apologists for the corruption of BP. It is definitely true
that the liberals or the conservatives don’t have moral or intellectual
superiority over me over anyone else for that matter. It’s important to
maintain our independence, so we don’t worship political
philosophies. The truth sometimes is beyond total, unyielding
adherence to philosophy. It’s an adherence to numerous moral
absolutes and unalienable realities that dictate the essence of a truly
blessed human personality.

No real Christian or anyone period should ally with a secretive, theocratic

group like the Council on National Policy. The preaching of the Gospel is a
real goal of a Christian not trying to use political tactics as a means to
ferment coercion against people‘s liberties. The CNP is a controlled
opposition organization. Its members even include Dr. Stanley Monteith. You
can’t fool me Cliff and I know my history succinctly. Cincaid believes
in the war on terror whereby we kill mostly Muslim people in order
have some “tranquility” in the world. Not to mention that the CIA, the
ISI, and other entities either created or funded much of the Muslim
radical groups for decades. This is proven by Livingstone, Peter
Goodgame, and tons of other scholars. If you want real tranquility, it’s
better to have diplomacy, real trade, and communication than perpetual
warfare (which was rejected by JFK by that way in the time of 1963). The
laissez faire stuff isn’t effective in creating economic prosperity and the
recent economic crisis establishes that reality. Some middle-class so-called
“Conservatives” have joined sides with some of the upper class Elites. Now,
together they unjustly blame the poor for the injustices that have appeared
as globalization has taken over. It isn’t the poor’s fault for this nefarious
system, but it’s the elitists manipulating markets and enacting schemes to
harm human beings. That’s the real issue. The neo-con propagandists (like
Glen Beck, Laura Ingraham, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Sean
Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, etc.) CONSTANTLY BOAST AND POUND THE NOTION
THAT 'Individualism' and 'pulling by our bootstraps,' ARE THEIR IDEALS.
There is nothing wrong with being an individual, but I won’t be selfish
while being an individual though. Yet, these same LIARS AND
TRICKSTERS have no problem promoting the throwing of TRILLIONS OF
U.S. DOLLARS TO SUPPORT the anti-Sunni/anti-Shia Crusade in the
Middle East.

Exposing the Pilgrim Society is fine with me too. Bonesman & Pilgrim Averill
Harriman was the Governor of New York. Columbia, Harvard, and not just
Yale University recruit future elitists. The Pilgrim Society is higher in power
than even the Skulls and Bones. For example, Pilgrim Floyd Bostwick
Odlum was a billionaire. He sold short stocks before the October 1929
crash. He worked with the President Harry Truman. History News Network,
May 9, 2004, said of him--that: “A powerful financial wizard and
industrialist, personally convinced Ike to seek the office. The Odlum papers
are at the Eisenhower Library.” American National Biography, published
under the aegis of the American Council of Learned Societies, 1999 edition,
volume 16, page 623 said of Odlum that:

---“He built the Atlas Corporation into one of the world’s greatest investment
corporations, controlling many companies in a vast array of industries.”

Time Magazine, September 12, 1942, said Odlum “buys everything for 50
cents on the dollar.” In 1954 he bought the nation’s biggest uranium
deposit in Utah---the Hidden Splendor mine. Odlum was also the dominant
shareholder in Standard Uranium. Cincaid even defends some of the wicked
policies of the previous Bush & Cheney regime. It isn’t just them either.
People like Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann claim to support freedom, but they work
for the war wongering GE corporation. They demonize people who are Pro-life and some of
their ilk even support the anti-free speech Fairness Doctrine. Instead of going into the
reactionary route of solving problems, I prefer in believing in taking care of veterans,
promoting jobs growth, making the government to help people that need help, and give
opportunities for people in education. I believe in improving our health system, fighting
against any form of bigotry & injustice, and creating economic reform (dealing with
productivity, real currency, and the growth of our aggregate supply & GDP per capita
especially) that benefits all people not just an elite class. There ought to be a
reformation of our foreign policy system. Preserving civil liberties and opposing torture
are fine with me as well. It’s bigger than Communism though Communism is evil. So, I will
see that the bigger picture beyond just left and right. It’s about true freedom vs. tyranny.

Barack Obama is far from a socialist when his administration is replete with members from the
CFR, Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, and the Federal Reserve (made up of the
corporate establishment). Obama’s policies are pro-Wall Street. What is socialism? Socialism is
making the government control all of the means of production in an economy even by seizure
or theft in some cases. So, we don't live in a totally socialist country. We lived in a mixed
economy where private services and governmental services exist in one nation of America (as
mentioned in the Constitution I might add). The propaganda about Barack Obama
being a Muslim, being a socialist, and being lax on terror issues (which are
all lies) gives the President “left cover” thereby the real solutions are
ignored. This doesn‘t mean that legitimate criticisms about the policies
pertaining to President Barack Obama are nonexistent. These real criticisms
are Barack Obama‘s support of the Patriot Act, being wishy washy on trying
to do the right thing in using a legal U.S. court system to try Khalid Sheik
Muhammad without a military tribunal, the existence of Czars, the radical
pro-abortion & population control agenda of the Presidency, President
Barack Obama’s support of rendition, the cap and trade bill (that can harm
our standard of living. This ignores the real environmental issues of GMO
foods, deforestation, endangered species, toxic waste dumping, chimeras,
smog, the fluoridation of our waters, ocean pollution, lead poisoning, and
other real issues. The Trilateral Commission and the corporate elite fund
man-made global warming hysteria too), and the immoral U.S. attacks in
Pakistan. Ironically, Meghan McCain's father was supported by these same bankers and
establishment leaders during his failed 2008 Presidential race. Rhetoric coming from the (which
Republicans attempt to own) Tea Party “will continue to turn off young voters, and anybody who says
different is smoking something,” said McCain’s daughter. Meghan forgot that much of the original Tea
Party did discuss about legitimate issues. Now, much of them have been hijacked by neo cons and
Republicans. Also, Meghan should know that revolutions composed of people of every age group not
just young people. Benjamin Franklin was in his 70s when he supported the American Revolution.
Meghan McCain didn't want to question the 9/11 attacks (as represented by Charlie Sheen's letter, but
I don't agree with Sheen on every issue). True activism isn‘t age discriminatory. Meghan McCain
forgotten that more young people are Pro-Life in America like me than the
previous generation. Meghan McCain have legitimate criticism against some issues, but she
supports the corporate-funded movement of abortion, the war on terror, and the left side of the
Left/Right paradigm. You shouldn’t compromise since the establishment loves compromise. It’s time
to be strong and fight for what we believe in.

Appendix A: The NAACP and the Tea Party

I didn't want to write about the NAACP vs. the Tea Party controversy until some time
came about. I desired to take a step back and evaluate the whole situation in a succinct
fashion. I wanted my intensions to be firm in describing the truth, yet succinctly accurate in
the means to describe my personal opinions on this issue. For thousands of years, the issue of
race is crystallized in our society. It can unite and divide people. It's a means of meaningful
discussion and it can be exploited for political gain. The NAACP resolution was simply a call
for the Tea Party to reject racist elements in its organization. It didn't even call all of the Tea
Party as being equivalent to a racist clique. The proposed resolution so far is rather quaint or
non-threatening. The Tea Party existed in 2008 as a means to oppose the bailouts and
promote their philosophies of limited government, individual liberty, and opposing
government spending. Most of the Tea Party Movement consists of libertarians,
conservatives, and independents. Most of the Tea Party people are not racist. On the other
hand, numerous evil signs have been scattered in their rallies. The question is what is the Tea
Party Movement's future and the future existence of the NAACP as its pertains to trying to
make more improvements in American society. Many Tea Party leaders have denounced
racism. Many NAACP leaders have some legitimate programs in dealing with crime,
mentoring, education, and other programs. Ironically, both groups aren't perfect. The Tea
party has been infiltrated by the pro-CNP Heritage Foundation, Freedom Works, and
numerous establishment Republican elites. Many NAACP leaders have been Freemasons in
the past and some have been members of the Boule. The NAACP refuse to take a position on
abortion one way or the other despite Pro-life citizens calling them to do so. The NAACP in
its leadership aren’t criticizing the CIA evil history & their influence in our government, the
agitation for war in Iran, and ending imperial war now. The NAACP once sued Wells Fargo
for its corrupt tactics against the black community. It stopped the suit when the NAACP and
Wells Fargo agreed to allow Wells Fargo to co-lead sponsor the NAACP convention and
monitor its lending practices. The NAACP is 100% pro-Democrat in its political orientation
(The elite always tries to stir black people & all people into their 2 party system. The
American Enterprise Institute is just a corporate as the Democratic Leadership Council.
While many Republicans don‘t give a care about real concerns as it pertains to the black
community. These concerns include incarceration, the drug war, Africom, health care,
joblessness, student loan debts, and other issues). Yet a real human being should not be
beholden to any major political party completely. A real human being has the right to be
Independent and think for his or her self on deciphering political matters. You don't have to
give blind support to the Democratic party to prove appreciation for your cultural identity
when both of those major parties have done their dirt. I reject the status quo. A major
weakness of the Tea Party is that some of them embrace contradictions (like they feel that big
government is evil, but they support the Big Government in other arenas). These arenas
include the military, prisons, the police, public hospitals, and Homeland Security. The DHS
violate our civil liberties constantly. They bash the social safety net, but they love their Social
Security and Medicare. Their taxes haven't radically gone up either. Ronald Reagan Said 40
Years Ago That America Would Become Communist If Medicare Was Passed. Well 40 Years
Have Passed And We Have Still 3 Branches Of Government And We Are A Democratic
Republic Intact. A major weakness of the NAACP is that they refuse to believe that strongly
condemning abortion on demand is no vice. Not to mention that inherit political allegiance to
one party (or another) isn't apart of a means to develop comprehensive solutions. Recently,
Mark Williams made a stereotypical, racist letter. The letter (sent in fictional way to Abraham
Lincoln under the guise of a NAACP leader) made the stereotype in racist terms that black
people who are liberal or progressive obsess with government spending, don't want black
people to have responsibility, and they want black people just to be lazy. I don't agree with
progressives on every issue. Although, even I know that progressives don't agree with the
idea that government can solve every problem. They feel that active government is apart of
the solution to help citizens' standard of living in various stages (which is true). Mark
Williams used derogatory words too in his letter in order to inflame the debate instead of
cordially making known his positions. Refuting Williams is easy. He needs to realize that
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution clearly shows that the government can spend money to
help people, promote sciences & the arts, and other active duties to improve society.

Mark Williams needs to know that taxes aren't radically raised now and that the poor
pay plenty of local taxes, consumer taxes, Social Security taxes, and other forms of
taxation. He forgets that a Wall Street bailout may be wrong. Nevertheless, government
spending to help unemployed citizens out or to build up infrastructure are not immoral either.
People from across the political spectrum do believe in self-help, yet life is more complex
than that. Sometimes assistance is needed toward all people, which is the reality that
reactionaries like Mark Williams don't understand. Giving people unemployment benefits
and having job creation are real ways to have financial growth. Also, freedom is fine
with me, yet the markets without any safeguards can create an economically oppressive
atmosphere. You have to have some safeguards and regulations to protect human beings.
Also, Mark Williams forgets that the Constitution promotes the idea of the government
enhancing the General Welfare of the people. Most people on welfare are not blacks (they are
white people) and welfare used in the right fashion can be a blessing to any suffering human
being. So, some in the Tea Party Movement need to clean up its own house before calling the
NAACP racist. Mark Williams is a hypocrite. He denies being a racist, but he called
President Barack Obama in these words: "...Indonesian Muslim turned welfare thug and a
racist in chief..." He also said that: "...Political correctness is going to kill us. Political
correctness led to 9/11, political correctness led to Barack Hussein Obama — political
correctness is a societal HIV. (America has) a full-blown case of AIDS and we’re the
cure,” Williams said. So, there you have it. Mark Williams is a deceiver and a neo-con racist.
Tea Party Express Chairman Mark Williams stepped down recently. He reap what he has
sown. I do realize that minorities are in the Tea Party rallies, but reality doesn't change the
reality that we're dealing with today. The reality is that a minority of racists (with signs
comparing Obama to a Witch-Doctor) are in the Tea Party rallies. The Tea Party didn't exist
in most of the Bush Years. Even NAACP leader Jealous have exposed this reality. The good
news is that the Tea Party and the NAACP controversy can allow real issues to come into
the table more often (like the Drug War, diseases, the prison system, being against austerity
measures, our civil liberties, education, health, private corporate corruption that the Tea
Partier rarely talk about, etc.). We lose tax revenue, because of corporations hid their taxes in
tax havens. The Tea Party don't report on this corporate piracy. Maybe this controversy can
be a blessing in disguise. I’m not going to be a Republicans, because they have shown their
fruit with their policies. Then you have a person like that Mormon Glen Beck intimidating
people. Now, you’ve got Mormons “evangelizing” in urban neighborhoods where I’m from
in Southeastern Virginia. Beck is a liar and his new lie is that he is trying to sanitize Dr.
Marin Luther King. Beck is trying to portray King as some malleable conservative when he
wasn’t. Unfortunately, even the sister Alveda King fallen for the neo-con propaganda from
Beck. The truth is that Dr. King was a man who believed in economic justice, the
redistribution of social and political power to help those in poverty, and he opposed the
Vietnam War. King rejected the lying bootstraps philosophy when government
intervention spanning centuries was legitimately done to make true compensation a
reality in the USA. Dr. King opposed Communism for its ethical relativism & political
totalitarianism, but he also rejected unregulated Capitalism since it promoted
selfishness & greed (including economic exploitation of the Third World. Anybody can
give money to a beggar. You should give not only money, but investment, reconstruction,
and developmental tools to assist people suffering worldwide). Dr. King fought for the
poor and fought for working people. Using taxpayers’ dollars legitimate to help another
isn’t theft since it’s apart of the Constitution to levy taxes to fund services (as found in
Article I, Section 8). See, Glen Beck refuse to talk about tax breaks for corporations,
corporate greed, etc. Dr. Martin Luther King express the need to fight for economic
justice, to fight against poverty, etc. (not just being against racial discrimination) in these
following quotes:

"The time has come for an all-out world war against poverty. The rich nations must use their
vast resources of wealth to develop the underdeveloped, school the unschooled, and feed the
unfed. Ultimately a great nation is a compassionate nation. No individual or nation can be
great if it does not have a concern for "the least of these." – The Quest for Peace and
Justice, December 11, 1964.

"But we must see that the struggle today is much more difficult. It's more difficult today
because we are struggling now for genuine equality. And it's much easier to integrate a lunch
counter than it is to guarantee a livable income and a good solid job. It's much easier to
guarantee the right to vote than it is to guarantee the right to live in sanitary, decent housing
conditions. It is much easier to integrate a public park than it is to make genuine, quality,
integrated education a reality. And so today we are struggling for something which says we
demand genuine equality." – The Other America, April 14, 1967.

"…this is America's opportunity to help bridge the gulf between the haves and the have-nots.
The question is whether America will do it. There is nothing new about poverty. What is new
is that we now have the techniques and the resources to get rid of poverty. The real question
is whether we have the will." – Remaining Awake Through a Great Revolution,
March 31, 1968.

Regardless of what Dana Loesch says, it‘s Constitutional for the government to provide
the General Welfare to the people. Dana seems to think that legitimate social programs
is apart of Marxist principles, which is false. It‘s apart of an outgrowth of human
compassion and human progress. It‘s not class warfare. See, reactionaries have used
deregulation, outsourcing of jobs, and other evil policies to widen the gap between the
rich and the poor (during the Reagan years under his Austrian economics). Increasing
opportunities should exist among the public and private sector not only the private sector
that Loesch wishes. Dana saying that Peter Beinart doesn‘t know economic is really silly.
Economics dictates that you need some spending to grow aggregate demand to grow
the economy. Legitimate assistance toward people isn‘t oppression at all. There are
people nationwide that have no choice but to get food stamps (not because of laziness.
Many services like food stamps are keeping people alive literally), but because bad
economics have increased joblessness in America. So, Dr. Martin Luther King wasn’t a
coward nor a politically correct leader. Beck doesn’t talk about these things since it’s against
his neo-conservative ideology. Glen Beck advances the status quo when he agrees with the
Patriot Act & refuse to expose fluoridation in our water supply. This doesn't mean we accept
mainstream liberal propaganda. Left Gatekeepers are just as bad as reactionaries. The Left
Gatekeepers may use some nice sounding words, but many of them accept the war in
Afghanistan, abortion, population control, and other nefarious principles. See, in many
occasions, the liberal gatekeepers will use rhetoric in order to gain control of communities
(and sidetracking the communities instead of allowing communities to find independent
solutions in solve their own problems. Communities should be run by the people not by
some establishment liberals or establishment conservatives). So, I don't need to acquire
fear about the world. I just want justice to be greatly executed aggressively throughout the
whole world. It’s time to be men and women. You should reject that degenerate,
manipulative box of neo-conservative and liberal establishment paradigms.

Shirley Sherrod experienced a huge controversy and a sophisticated smear

campaign. Her words were taken out of context. Andrew Beibart (who is a Tea Party
supporter) used words that Shirley Sherrod said out of context to make the Barack
Obama administration originally fire her. Sherrod said (about a story in 26 years ago
and she wasn’t in a federal job in that time at all) that a white farmer falsely had a
superior attitude and she at first wanted to not give the farmer her full assistance.
Later, she realized that she was in error and that poverty has no color barrier. In
other words, oppression can harm black people and white people in the theatre of
agriculture. So, she continue to say that she fulfilled her duties to help the white
farmers in saving their land. This is what exactly occurred. Also, she admitted that
she didn’t discriminate against the white farmer. Therefore, Shirley Sherrod is no
where near equivalent to the racists found in the Tea party at all. She didn’t say a
wild slur, didn’t compared anybody to a witchdoctor, or called anyone a
Communist under false pretexts. The NAACP originally criticized Shirley Sherrod,
but apologized to her because they say that they were hoodwinked by FOX News
(and some Tea Party people). The truth is that the reactionaries in the Tea party
don‘t want to believe that the government can help people. They worship the free
market and anything private. So, we should reject reactionaries and embrace the
truth. The truth is that there is no sin in using the government to help our fellow
human beings. She gave a story or parable about how people should see that the
elite will harm poor people of any race. So, Shirley Sherrod shouldn’t be thrown
under the bus at all. Shirley Sherrod is of course not a racist. She worked for equality
and civil rights for decades. She and her relatives were apart of SNCC. She said that:
“…That's when it was revealed to me that it's about poor versus those who have.
And not so much about white. It is about white and black, but you know -- it
opened my eyes…” The USDA should reconsider their actions and Shirley Sherrod
should get her job back completely. She deserves an apology. There are other
questions about if Vilsack knew of others who received the call for Sherrod to resign.
People like Beibart aren’t representative of real conservatives that want liberty in the
country. Real liberals, real conservatives, real independents, and real libertarians
want the best for America without unnecessary smears or agitation. Shirley Sherrod
was courageous in defending her comments against the backdrop of unfair attacks.
The teaching moment hear is that we should promote building jobs, improve
education, building our infrastructure, reject bigotry of any kind, have criminal
justice, and prevent any attempt to take this country back to an archaic existence.
*The response to the Tea Party crowd isn't hatred. We know that hatred and resentment
toward anyone results in a never ending cycle of distortion, non-objectivity, and it
incorporates no love for our fellow man. Hate is never a real outgrowth of rational
thinking. Rational thinking is true love for human beings irrespective of how people treat
or perceive you as. Being born what you are is a blessing for all people are born in the
image of God. We should love them even with our disagreements on some issues with the
Tea Party Movement. In the 21st century, we have to go try to find more better solutions
and this isn't about harboring a sort of stereotypical opinion about people. It's certainly
about advocating a comprehensive approach in solving the important issues in our
American and world society. I still believe in opposing outsourcing of jobs, austerity, and
the war on terror though. I realize how the game is being played and I won’t fall for any
trickery.

When you get older, sometimes your perspectives getting more clearer. My
perspective about life in general is getting more clearer in this new decade of the
2010s. Now, it’s time for our generation to assert ourselves. We know the
past. We also know that the future can be better than the corruption that
occurred before our time. Being wise to the circumstances in life, yet never
diminishing the pure thinking of righteousness is great goal for us as human beings to
aspire to. I will not let my past hinder my spiritual growth. I want to have a long
longevity, but I’m not afraid of death. In this life, you got to constantly rise above the
negative events in your life and count the blessings that you have. I will never forget
the creeds that my parents, relatives, and ancestors taught me. I will treat
everyone around me equally and I will stand up for myself when necessary
with succinct words excluding bitterness. The ball is in our generation today. It’s
our turn now and the older generation is passing away. It’s our turn. I mediate on God
and focus on being a better man everyday.

By Timothy