Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
HOLLISTER v SOETORO (APPEAL) PER CURIAM ORDER Filed [1233799] Discharging Order to Show Cause - Transport Room

HOLLISTER v SOETORO (APPEAL) PER CURIAM ORDER Filed [1233799] Discharging Order to Show Cause - Transport Room

Ratings: (0)|Views: 66|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
03/08/2010 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1233799] discharging order to show cause filed 10/20/09; dismissing as moot motion to substitute reply brief; denying motions for judicial notice; denying motion for leave to file an amicus brief and denying motion for oral argument. Judge Henderson, Tatel and Garland [09-5080, 09-5161]
03/08/2010 Open Document PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1233799] discharging order to show cause filed 10/20/09; dismissing as moot motion to substitute reply brief; denying motions for judicial notice; denying motion for leave to file an amicus brief and denying motion for oral argument. Judge Henderson, Tatel and Garland [09-5080, 09-5161]

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Mar 08, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/08/2010

pdf

text

original

 
United States Court of Appeals
F
OR
T
HE
D
ISTRICT OF
C
OLUMBIA
C
IRCUIT
 ____________ 
No. 09-5080September Term 2009
08-cv-02254Filed On:
March 8, 2010Gregory S. Hollister, Appellantv.Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a naturalperson; de facto President in posse; and as de jure President in posse, also known as BarackObama, et al., Appellees------------------------------Consolidated with 09-5161
BEFORE:
Henderson, Tatel, and Garland, Circuit Judges
O R D E R
Upon consideration of the motion to substitute reply brief, the response thereto,and the reply; the motion for judicial notice filed September 23, 2009, in No. 09-5161;the Clerk’s order to show cause filed October 20, 2009, the response thereto, and thereply; the joint motion for judicial notice, the response thereto, and the reply; thecorrected motion by Lawrence J. Joyce and Philip J. Berg for leave to file an amicuscuriae brief in support of appellants, the lodged corrected brief, appellants’ opposition tothe motion, and the reply; the motion for oral argument, the response thereto, and thereply; and the corrected joint appendix and the briefs submitted by the parties, it is
ORDERED
that the order to show cause be discharged. It is
FURTHER ORDERED
that the motion to substitute reply brief be dismissed asmoot in light of appellants’ filing of a corrected reply brief on January 7, 2010. It is
FURTHER ORDERED
that the motions for judicial notice be denied. Thematerials submitted by appellants are irrelevant to the disposition of these appeals.See Larson v. Dep’t of State, 565 F.3d 857, 870 (D.C. Cir. 2009). It is
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1233799 Filed: 03/08/2010 Page: 1

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->