Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10-
10-03-
03-10 Request
Request for assistance by office of Los Angeles Supervisor Michael Antonovich in obtaining Complaint numbers
for the Sheriff’s
Sheriff’s Department, County of Los Angeles.
To the Office of the Honorable Michael D Antonovich, Supervisor, County of Los Angeles, California
By email.
Grateful as I ever am for the assistance by your office, absent which I would never have been able to
get any written responses from the Sheriff's Department in matters that are of ongoing concern, I am
again writing to seek the help of your good offices in such matters.
For weeks, I have been making attempts to file Complaints with the Sheriff's Department, but am
unable to obtain Complaint reference numbers, which according to Stephanie Maxberry, Ombudsman
of the County of Los Angeles, are a must for the initiation of a true investigation of the Complaints as
such. Even after assistance by the Office of Ombudsman of the County of Los Angeles for several
weeks, no such Complaint reference numbers were ever issued by the Sheriff's Department.
In the meanwhile, the list of such complaints grew to a total of nine (9) Complaints, listed below, that
are the subject of this request for your help. The full contents of the complaints were already forwarded
by the office of the Ombudsman, Stephanie Maxberry, to the Sheriff's Department. The complaints
pertain to issues that are at the foundation of the Human Rights of all 10 million residents of the County
of Los Angeles, California. Your help in this matter may initiate a process that would help restore
integrity in the justice system of the County of Los Angeles.
Request is for help by your good offices through inquiry on the Sheriff's Department:
Why the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles, California would not issue Complaint
Numbers and investigate the nine (9) Complaints, listed below, which were filed by Dr Joseph Zernik
through the office of Stephanie Maxberry, Ombudsman of the County of Los Angeles, as such?
Respectfully,
Dated: March 10, 2010
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik, PhD
By: ______________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
Page 2/2 March 10, 2010
List of nine (9) Complaints and an Addendum, pertaining to operations of the Sheriff's
Department of the County of Los Angeles, filed with the Ombudsman of the County of Los
Angeles, with request or the issuance of Complaint numbers.
1) Complaint #1 - False arrest and booking data for the falsely hospitalized Attorney Richard Fine,
which the Sheriffs Department refused to correct.
2) Complaint #2 - False or Missing Information Regarding Arrest and Booking of Numerous Inmates
Held by the Sheriffs Department
3) Complaint #3: False Hospitalizations With No Probable Medical Cause, Appearing As Cover Up For
False Imprisonments.
5) Complaint #5 - False arrests and jailing of Joseph Zernik on February 6 and February 19, 2010
6) Complaint #6 - Misprision of Felonies by the Sheriff's Department in re: Armed abduction of Joseph
Zernik by Richard Rodriguez and Javier on February 19, 2010.
7) Complaint #7 - RE: False jailing of Joseph Zernik on February 6 and February 19, 2010 - Disregard
for California Public Records Act, Gov Code Govt Code 6254(f).
8) Complaint #8 - RE: False jailing of Joseph Zernik on February 6 and February 19, 2010 - Alleged
corruption of bail/bond services and large-scale embezzlement of public funds
9) Complaint #9 - RE: False jailing of Joseph Zernik on February 19, 2010 - Robbery of personal
valuables from inmates, and retaliation/harassment/intimidation against victim/witness/informant.
10) Addendum to Complaints #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #8, #9 - False arrests and jailing and hospitalizations
In conjunction with the complaints listed above, please accept the following addendum.
It is alleged that the complaints referenced above, #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #8, #9, all involved conduct of the
Sheriff's Department where inmates were arrested or accepted into jailing with no valid court order or
due process of law; That the Sheriff's Department of Los Angeles County established in recent
decades computer systems which lacked and lack security, validity, and reliability and therefore must
not be deemed as valid court orders or due process of law; That such computer systems were and are
routinely used to affect arrests and jailing with no valid court order or due process of law; That for such
reasons, the Sheriff's Department was and is out of compliance and in violation of the law and/or
regulations.
Therefore, the proposed solution involved publicly accountable validation (certified functional logic
verification) of such computer systems, which were and are employed in determination of Liberty of
persons in Los Angeles County, California.