Governor Proposes $1.2 Billion Spending Increase
I am concerned that thegovernor has proposeda state budget for the
coming fiscal year that ismuch more than taxpay
-
ers can afford, especially
given that he is asking
for more taxes totaling$874 million.
The governor is askingthat consumers and busi-
nesses pay more taxes
in order to ensure thatfuture budgets - after the
governor is out of office- are not dangerouslyunderfunded.Unfortunately, we faceseveral economic chal
-
lenges:
•Recent economic re-ports have indicated that
General Fund revenuecollections have fallen
short of projections for22 consecutive months
through February 2010.
•
Pennsylvania is be
-
hind last year’s revenuecollection estimates byabout $476.7 millionduring the first eightmonths of the 2009-10fiscal year.
•
By June 30, the
governor estimated that
the Pennsylvania budgetcould experience a short
-
fall of as much as $525million.Faced with such chal
-
lenges, budgeting is verydifficult for the GeneralAssembly, but apparentlynot for the governor.On Feb. 9, he proposeda $29.03 billion budgetfor fiscal year 2010-11.This includes $26.27 billion in anticipatedGeneral Fund revenueand $2.76 billion infederal stimulus money,which runs out after thisfiscal year. This amounts
to a spending increase of
4.6 percent more than thelast fiscal year.The proposal assumes$850 million in addition
-
al federal bailout moneythat has not yet been ap
-
proved by Congress.
Different Year, Different Proposed Taxesfrom Governor
As taxpayers might expect, Gov. Ed Rendell once again proposed new taxes to pay for spending – $874 million worth.As with any budget, all ideas should beconsidered and debated, but the first thingwe need to do is make the state’s depart
-
ments even more efficient and prioritize our spending accordingly.Of the $874 million in new revenue re
-
quested:
•
$531.5 million of these new taxeswould be a result of broadening thestate sales tax to include currentlyuntaxed items.
o The governor has proposed that 74 previously untaxed categoriesbecome taxed.o The annual sales tax a consumer pays will likely increase.o This plan is unlike the planadvanced by Rep. Sam Rohrer (R- Berks), who has proposed for many years that the sales tax be used to lower property taxes, not to pay for general expenses incurred by the state.
•
$140.2 million in taxes affecting businesses, including the removal of a sales tax discountincentive for them.
o Last fiscal year, the governor fought for a change in a key business tax – theCapital Stock and Franchise Tax – that cost businesses $374 million.
•
$41.6 million tax on smokeless tobacco and cigars, amounting to 30 percent of the saleprice.
o This was proposed last year and failed to gain any traction among legislators. It is about the same rate that cigarettes are taxed now.
•
$160.7 million in taxes on natural gas extraction.
o Pennsylvania has done incredibly well executing an idea advanced by House
Republicans that leases Marcellus Shale lands. This program brought in $180
million so far.o The governor has proposed two distinct new taxes on Marcellus Shale drilling,
the first is a 5 percent tax on the value of natural gas at the wellhead, plus a 4.7-cent tax per 1,000 cubic feet of gas extracted.
Rep. Glen Grell (R-Cumberland, left) discusses thestate budget with Rep. Day during a recent com-mittee hearing in Harrisburg.
gday@pahousegop.com
Add a Comment