Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • ALLEN V SOETORO (APPEAL) - ORDER - Appeal Dismissed - Transport Room

    Uploaded by

    Jack Ryan
    227 views1 page
    03/10/2010 3 Order filed (MARY M. SCHROEDER, HARRY PREGERSON and EDWARD LEAVY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [7259618] (SC)

    Original Title

    ALLEN v SOETORO (APPEAL) - ORDER - Appeal Dismissed - Transport Room

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    03/10/2010 3 Order filed (MARY M. SCHROEDER, HARRY PREGERSON and EDWARD LEAVY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [7259618] (SC)

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    227 views1 page

    ALLEN V SOETORO (APPEAL) - ORDER - Appeal Dismissed - Transport Room

    Uploaded by

    Jack Ryan
    03/10/2010 3 Order filed (MARY M. SCHROEDER, HARRY PREGERSON and EDWARD LEAVY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [7259618] (SC)

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Case: 10-15290 03/10/2010 Page: 1 of 1 ID: 7259618 DktEntry: 3

    FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2010

    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK


    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

    KENNETH L. ALLEN, No. 10-15290

    Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-00373-FRZ


    District of Arizona,
    v. Tucson

    BARRY SOETORO, AKA Barack H.


    Obama, AKA Barry Obama; et al., ORDER

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

    A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over

    this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable.

    See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221,

    222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all

    parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal

    is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

    MF/Pro Se

    You might also like