Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
TAITZ v OBAMA - 15 - REPLY to opposition to motion - gov.uscourts.dcd.140567.15.0

TAITZ v OBAMA - 15 - REPLY to opposition to motion - gov.uscourts.dcd.140567.15.0

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,201 |Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
03/11/2010 15 REPLY to opposition to motion re 8[RECAP] MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for CM/ECF password filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(rdj) (Entered: 03/12/2010)
03/11/2010 15 REPLY to opposition to motion re 8[RECAP] MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for CM/ECF password filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(rdj) (Entered: 03/12/2010)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Mar 12, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/25/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 15 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 15
Dr.Orly
Taitz, esq29839
Santa
Margarita
Parkway, STE
100
Rancho Santa
Margarita
CA 92688Tel: (949) 683-5411;
Fax
(949) 766-7603
E-Mail:
drtaitz@yahoo.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
§
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
Dr. ORL Y TAITZ, ESQ,
PRO
SEPlaintiff,§HONORABLE
ROYCELAMBERTH
v.
Barack Hussein Obama,
11
1213
Defendant.§ PRESIDING
§
Civil Action: 10-151
RCL
§
§ REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO
§
§ PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
§
§ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
§
§
14
15
I
Motion
for
leave
of
court
to
add
Ronald
Machen,
JR,
US Attorney,
Rudolph
16
Contrehras,
Assistant US Attorney, Alan
Burch,
Assistant US
Attorney
as
17
additional defendants
and add
a
Cause
of
Action
for RICO-Racketeering
18
Influenced
Corrupt
Organizations as
an
Additional cause
of
action in
the
first
19
Amended
Complaint.
20
1.
RICO
21
One
of
the reasons for
need
for recusal
of
the US attorney's office, is a conflict
of
22
interest between the interests
of
the main client
of
the
US
Attorney's office-People
of
Z3
the United States
of
America and interests
of
the Defendant Barack Hussein Obama.
24
The number one function
of
the US Attorney's office is to protect us, the public
25
from criminal activity, violation
of
criminal statutes, fraud and treason.I have presented in
my
Quo Warranto complaint
not
only ample evidence
of
J]
Barack Obama usurping the position
of
the President and Commander in Chief, but
28
ECEIVED
MAR
1 1
2010
Taitz v Obama. Reply to Opposition to Application for Preliminary Injunction
Clerk,
U.S.
District andBankruptcy Courts
1
 
1
2
3
456
7
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16171819
Xl
21
?2
23
2425
26
Case
1:
10-cv-00151-RCL Document 15 Filed
03/11/10
Page 2 of 15
of
him violating federal statutes, defrauding Social Security and engaging in identitytheft in using social security number
_4425.
I have provided affidavits from licensed investigators,
as
well as an officialSelective Service printout, showing him using this Social Security number, eventhough it was assigned to another individual, born in 1890 and assigned in CTbetween 1976-1977, while Obama resided in HI, and in light
of
the fact that Obamawas never a resident
of
CT.This evidence
is
so overwhelming, that it doesn't even require additionalinvestigation.
Pursuant to
US
Code Title 18,
Part
1,
Chapter
1
§
4 -Misprision
of
Felony
§
5-121.05. Compromise
of
felony ; withholding information; receivingcompensation from person arrested
or
liable to arrest; permitting escape.
It
is
unlawful for any private detective,
or
any member
of
the policeforce,
or
for any other person to compromise a felony
or
any otherunlawful act,
or
to participate in, assent to, aid
or
assist any personsuspected of crime to escape a full judicial examination by failing to giveknown facts
or
reasonable causes of suspicion,
or
withholding anyinformation relative to the charge
or
suspicion from the
proper
judicialauthorities;
or
in
any manner to receive any money, property, favor,
or
other compensation from,
or
on account of, any person arrested
or
subject to arrest for any crime
or
supposed crime;
or
to permit any suchperson to
go
at
large withou(due effort to secure an investigation
of
suchsupposed crime. And for any violation of the provisions
of
this section,
or
either of them, such member of the police force,
or
private detective,
or
other person guilty thereof, shall be deemed as having compromised afelony, and shall be thereafter prohibited from acting as an officer
of
said police force,
or
as a private detective, and shall be prosecuted to theextent
of
the law for aiding criminals to escape the ends
of
justice.Title 18,
Part
1,
Chapter
1
§
3.
Accessory after the fact:
Z7
Whoever, knowing
that
an offense against the United States has been
281
committed, receives, relieves, comforts
or
assists the offender in
order
to hinder
Taitz v Obama. Reply to Opposition to Application for Preliminary Injunction
2
Note: SS# was not redacted as filed with Court. Redactedbefore republication.
 
Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 15 Filed 03/11/10 Page 3 of 15
1
2
3
456
7
8
9
or
prevent his apprehension, trial
or
punishment,
is
an
accessory after the fact.Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act
of
Congress,
an
accessoryafter the fact shall be imprisoned not more
than
one-half the maximum term
of
imprisonment
or
(notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more
than
one-halfthe maximum fine prescribed for the punishment
of
the principal,
or
both;
or
if
the principal
is
punishable by life imprisonment
or
death, the accessory shall beimprisoned not more
than
15
years.
US attorneys' actions in not prosecuting this matter goes beyond merenegligence, it falls within the realm
of
misprision
of
felony, compromising
of
felony
10
and aiding and abetting commission
of
felony, predicate acts, which will tie in theabove US attorneys to
Mr.
Obama and sufficient for RICO legal action.
11
12
13
These actions
of
Obama and US attorneys have exposed me to further severe
14
emotional distress, assaults, insults, death threats, and numerous hate crimes relating
15
to my legal actions, representing my clients and
myself
and trying to protect the
16
public at large from this massive fraud committed by Obama and currently aided and
17
abetted by US attorneys.
18
2. As felonies were reported, the court itself cannot ignore those issues
and
19
obligated to investigate
20
Evidence reported in the complaint and the application for preliminary injunction
21
provides affidavits
of
licensed investigators as well as Selective service official
22
printout, which clearly indicate use
of
multiple social security numbers, social
23
security fraud, identity theft, fraud
as
well as high likelihood
of
a number
of
other
24
white color crimes by the defendant.
At
this point
if
the court does not grant theapplication or dismisses the complaint, the court itself will be guilty
of
aiding and
2526
abetting all
of
the above crimes and misprision
of
felonies. As such the court has no'lJother alternative, but to proceed with the discovery, and proceed expeditiously.
28
3.
The court
is
entitled to obtain Defendant's Records.
Taitz v Obama. Reply to Opposition to Application for Preliminary Injunction
3

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
funnyhaha71 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->