Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10-03-13 Richard Fine: Letter To MR Carrizosa, California Administrative Office of The Courts, Re: Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick S

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    73 views2 pages
    Philip R. Carrizosa Office of Communications Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th floor San Francisco CA 94102-3688 Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588 After 4 p.m. and weekends: 415/407-4615 philip.carrizosa@jud.ca.gov The favor of a response within 2 business days was requested. RE: Richard Fine: California Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA Dear Mr Carrizosa: Thank you again for your past help in clarifying information pertaining to the California Administrative Office of the Courts. I again request your help. In recently published online notes in several forums, I alleged dishonest and/or fraudulent conduct by Attorney Kevin M McCormick of the law-firm of Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham, relative to his appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine at the US District Court, Los Angeles. I further alleged that his conduct was key to affecting the ongoing false hospitalization of Attorney RICHARD FINE - a political dissident. [1], [2], [3] Following the online postings at the ABA Journal, I received unauthenticated, unverified communications, which lead to the formulation of the following five (5) hypothetical assertions: 1) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK's wife, Attorney BRENDA MCCORMICK, was Court Managing Attorney for the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura. 2) Appearances of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were not pursuant to his engagement by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. 3) Appearances of KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were pursuant to his engagement by the California Administrative Office of the Courts, an arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or through related entities. 4) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM was never authorized as Counsel of Record by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. 5) Engagement of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM by the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or related entities. included a stipulation prohibiting Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK from communicating with the Intervening parties - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - regarding Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK's appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914). Request is for confirmation on behalf of the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Chairman of the Judicial Council, California Chief Justice Ronald George, the five (5) hypothetical assertions, listed above, regarding engagement of Attorney Kevin McCormick to appear in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition. Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine CC: 1. McCormick, Brenda - by email 2. McCormick, Kevin - by email 3.Yaffe, David and the LA Superior Court - by fax 4. Others of Interest

    Original Title

    10-03-13 Richard Fine: Letter to Mr Carrizosa, California Administrative Office of the Courts, re: Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick s

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Philip R. Carrizosa Office of Communications Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th floor San Francisco CA 94102-3688 Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588 After 4 p.m. and weekends: 415/407-4615 philip.carrizosa@jud.ca.gov The favor of a response within 2 business days was requested. RE: Richard Fine: California Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA Dear Mr Carrizosa: Thank you again for your past help in clarifying information pertaining to the California Administrative Office of the Courts. I again request your help. In recently published online notes in several forums, I alleged dishonest and/or fraudulent conduct by Attorney Kevin M McCormick of the law-firm of Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham, relative to his appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine at the US District Court, Los Angeles. I further alleged that his conduct was key to affecting the ongoing false hospitalization of Attorney RICHARD FINE - a political dissident. [1], [2], [3] Following the online postings at the ABA Journal, I received unauthenticated, unverified communications, which lead to the formulation of the following five (5) hypothetical assertions: 1) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK's wife, Attorney BRENDA MCCORMICK, was Court Managing Attorney for the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura. 2) Appearances of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were not pursuant to his engagement by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. 3) Appearances of KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were pursuant to his engagement by the California Administrative Office of the Courts, an arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or through related entities. 4) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM was never authorized as Counsel of Record by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. 5) Engagement of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM by the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or related entities. included a stipulation prohibiting Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK from communicating with the Intervening parties - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - regarding Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK's appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914). Request is for confirmation on behalf of the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Chairman of the Judicial Council, California Chief Justice Ronald George, the five (5) hypothetical assertions, listed above, regarding engagement of Attorney Kevin McCormick to appear in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition. Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine CC: 1. McCormick, Brenda - by email 2. McCormick, Kevin - by email 3.Yaffe, David and the LA Superior Court - by fax 4. Others of Interest

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    73 views2 pages

    10-03-13 Richard Fine: Letter To MR Carrizosa, California Administrative Office of The Courts, Re: Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick S

    Uploaded by

    Human Rights Alert - NGO (RA)
    Philip R. Carrizosa Office of Communications Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th floor San Francisco CA 94102-3688 Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588 After 4 p.m. and weekends: 415/407-4615 philip.carrizosa@jud.ca.gov The favor of a response within 2 business days was requested. RE: Richard Fine: California Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA Dear Mr Carrizosa: Thank you again for your past help in clarifying information pertaining to the California Administrative Office of the Courts. I again request your help. In recently published online notes in several forums, I alleged dishonest and/or fraudulent conduct by Attorney Kevin M McCormick of the law-firm of Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham, relative to his appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine at the US District Court, Los Angeles. I further alleged that his conduct was key to affecting the ongoing false hospitalization of Attorney RICHARD FINE - a political dissident. [1], [2], [3] Following the online postings at the ABA Journal, I received unauthenticated, unverified communications, which lead to the formulation of the following five (5) hypothetical assertions: 1) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK's wife, Attorney BRENDA MCCORMICK, was Court Managing Attorney for the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura. 2) Appearances of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were not pursuant to his engagement by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. 3) Appearances of KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were pursuant to his engagement by the California Administrative Office of the Courts, an arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or through related entities. 4) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM was never authorized as Counsel of Record by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. 5) Engagement of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM by the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or related entities. included a stipulation prohibiting Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK from communicating with the Intervening parties - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - regarding Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK's appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914). Request is for confirmation on behalf of the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Chairman of the Judicial Council, California Chief Justice Ronald George, the five (5) hypothetical assertions, listed above, regarding engagement of Attorney Kevin McCormick to appear in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition. Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine CC: 1. McCormick, Brenda - by email 2. McCormick, Kevin - by email 3.Yaffe, David and the LA Superior Court - by fax 4. Others of Interest

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Dr Z Digitally signed by

    Joseph H Zernik
    DN: cn=Joseph H
    Joseph Zernik, PhD Zernik, o, ou,
    email=jz12345@e
    PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; arthlink.net, c=US
    Location: La
    Verne, California
    Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net Date: 2010.03.13
    15:35:57 -08'00'
    Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs

    10-03-13 Letter to Mr Philip Carrizosa, Office of Communications, Judicial Council of California re:
    Richard Fine
    Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:22:33 -0800
    To: "Carrizosa, Philip" <Philip.Carrizosa@jud.ca.gov>
    From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Richard Fine: California Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin
    McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA
    Cc: "McCormick, Brenda" <Brenda.McCormick@ventura.courts.ca.gov>, "McCormick, Kevin M"
    <kmccormick@bentonorr.com>, "Attention: Judge David Yaffe and the LA Superior Court C/O John Clarke, Clerk"
    <2136217952@metrofax.com>

    March 13, 2010

    Philip R. Carrizosa
    Office of Communications
    Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts
    455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th floor
    San Francisco CA 94102-3688
    Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
    After 4 p.m. and weekends: 415/407-4615
    philip.carrizosa@jud.ca.gov
    The favor of a response within 2 business days was requested.

    RE: Richard Fine: California Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin
    McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA

    Dear Mr Carrizosa:

    Thank you again for your past help in clarifying information pertaining to the California Administrative Office of the
    Courts. I again request your help.

    In recently published online notes in several forums, I alleged dishonest and/or fraudulent conduct by Attorney Kevin M
    McCormick of the law-firm of Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham, relative to his appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-
    01914) - the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine at the US District Court, Los Angeles. I further alleged that his
    conduct was key to affecting the ongoing false hospitalization of Attorney RICHARD FINE - a political dissident. [1], [2],
    [3]

    Following the online postings at the ABA Journal, I received unauthenticated, unverified communications, which lead to
    the formulation of the following five (5) hypothetical assertions:
    1) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK's wife, Attorney BRENDA MCCORMICK, was Court Managing Attorney for the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura.
    2) Appearances of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were not
    pursuant to his engagement by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
    LOS ANGELES.
    3) Appearances of KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were pursuant to his
    engagement by the California Administrative Office of the Courts, an arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or
    through related entities.
    4) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM was never authorized as Counsel of Record by the Intervenors in
    Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
    5) Engagement of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM by the California Administrative Office of the
    Courts, and arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or related entities. included a stipulation prohibiting Attorney
    KEVIN MCCORMICK from communicating with the Intervening parties - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS
    ANGELES - regarding Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK's appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914).
     Page 2/2 March 13, 2010

    Request is for confirmation on behalf of the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Chairman of
    the Judicial Council, California Chief Justice Ronald George, the five (5) hypothetical assertions, listed above,
    regarding engagement of Attorney Kevin McCormick to appear in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas
    corpus petition.

    Truly,

    Joseph Zernik, PhD


    http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
    http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
    http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
    http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
    Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

    CC:
    1. McCormick, Brenda - by email
    2. McCormick, Kevin - by email
    3.Yaffe, David and the LA Superior Court - by fax
    4. Others of Interest

    LINKED:

    [1] The American Bar Association's motto is: "Defending Liberty, Pursuing Justice"

    [2] ABA Journal article and comments: 70 Year Old Lawyer Hits One-year Mark In Jail In Contempt
    http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/70-year-old_lawyer_hits_one-year_mark_in_jail_in_contempt_case/#comments

    [3] March 13, 2010 ABA Journal article and comments: 70 Year Old Lawyer Hits One-year Mark In Jail In Contempt, as
    copied:
    http://inproperinla.com/10-03-13-aba-journal-article-on-richard-fine-and-comments-s.pdf

    You might also like