Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
10-03-14 Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department: Online Inmate Information Center - Survey of Consecutive Booking Numbers s

10-03-14 Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department: Online Inmate Information Center - Survey of Consecutive Booking Numbers s

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,982 |Likes:
Following previous surveys of the inmates case management system of the Sheriff’s Department of LA County, California, [1] and of Harris County, Texas, [2] which were name-based, attempt was made to survey the Los Angeles system for consecutive inmate booking numbers. The online Inmate Information Center of the Sheriff’s Department of Los Angeles County did not allow search by number. Therefore, such search had to be conducted through the VINE Link system. Two series of booking numbers were queried, 20 in each the “High Series” and “Low Series”, which were previously shown to be issued in parallel by the Sheriff’s Department.

In the Low Series only four (4) out of the twenty consecutive numbers matched an inmate name. In the High Series only five (5) numbers out of twenty consecutive numbers matched an inmate name. In each series, at least one of the non-matched booking numbers corresponded to a known inmate name. Generally, the findings confirmed the networked nature of the various terminals. However, the existence of two series of booking numbers, issued in parallel, remained inexplicable. In addition, departures from consecutive numbers relative to booking time were found. As in past surveys, reliance on non-existent court names was a common finding. For one of the nine (9) named inmates, who was held for fourteen days, no court name or court case number were listed at all. For another named inmate, and invalid case number (99999) was listed.

One could have reasoned that only data for inmates whose offence level was “Felony” were forwarded from the Sheriff’s Department to VINE Link. However, for two (2) of the nine (9) named inmates on VINE Link no Offense Level was listed in the online Inmate Information Center of the Sheriff’s Department at all.

The general nature of the online Inmate Information Center is again found as inconsistent with honest, valid implementation. The option to search the online Inmate Information Center by booking number should be provided – it is a critical safeguard for integrity of such system. Instant survey, like the previous surveys documented the urgent need for publicly-accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of such systems, which are a hazard for the Liberty of all who reside in the respective counties.
Following previous surveys of the inmates case management system of the Sheriff’s Department of LA County, California, [1] and of Harris County, Texas, [2] which were name-based, attempt was made to survey the Los Angeles system for consecutive inmate booking numbers. The online Inmate Information Center of the Sheriff’s Department of Los Angeles County did not allow search by number. Therefore, such search had to be conducted through the VINE Link system. Two series of booking numbers were queried, 20 in each the “High Series” and “Low Series”, which were previously shown to be issued in parallel by the Sheriff’s Department.

In the Low Series only four (4) out of the twenty consecutive numbers matched an inmate name. In the High Series only five (5) numbers out of twenty consecutive numbers matched an inmate name. In each series, at least one of the non-matched booking numbers corresponded to a known inmate name. Generally, the findings confirmed the networked nature of the various terminals. However, the existence of two series of booking numbers, issued in parallel, remained inexplicable. In addition, departures from consecutive numbers relative to booking time were found. As in past surveys, reliance on non-existent court names was a common finding. For one of the nine (9) named inmates, who was held for fourteen days, no court name or court case number were listed at all. For another named inmate, and invalid case number (99999) was listed.

One could have reasoned that only data for inmates whose offence level was “Felony” were forwarded from the Sheriff’s Department to VINE Link. However, for two (2) of the nine (9) named inmates on VINE Link no Offense Level was listed in the online Inmate Information Center of the Sheriff’s Department at all.

The general nature of the online Inmate Information Center is again found as inconsistent with honest, valid implementation. The option to search the online Inmate Information Center by booking number should be provided – it is a critical safeguard for integrity of such system. Instant survey, like the previous surveys documented the urgent need for publicly-accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of such systems, which are a hazard for the Liberty of all who reside in the respective counties.

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Mar 14, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/26/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Dr ZDr ZDr ZDr Z
Joseph Zernik, PhDPO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750;Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
 
Blog:http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs 
10-03-14 LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT INMATE DATABSASE: VINE LINK SEARCHFOR CONSECUTIVE NUMBERS, COMPARED WITH INMATE INFORMATION CENTER SEARCH.
Following previous surveys of the inmates case management system of the Sheriff’s Department of LACounty, California,
[1]
and of Harris County, Texas,
[2]
which were name-based, attempt was made tosurvey the Los Angeles system for consecutive inmate booking numbers. The online InmateInformation Center of the Sheriff’s Department of Los Angeles County did not allow search by number.Therefore, such search had to be conducted through the VINE Link system. Two series of bookingnumbers were queried, 20 in each the “High Series” and “Low Series”, which were previously shown tobe issued in parallel by the Sheriff’s Department.In the Low Series only four (4) out of the twenty consecutive numbers matched an inmate name. In theHigh Series only five (5) numbers out of twenty consecutive numbers matched an inmate name. Ineach series, at least one of the non-matched booking numbers corresponded to a known inmate name.Generally, the findings confirmed the networked nature of the various terminals. However, theexistence of two series of booking numbers, issued in parallel, remained inexplicable. In addition,departures from consecutive numbers relative to booking time were found. As in past surveys, relianceon non-existent court names was a common finding. For one of the nine (9) named inmates, who washeld for fourteen days, no court name or court case number were listed at all. For another namedinmate, and invalid case number (99999) was listed.One could have reasoned that only data for inmates whose offence level was “Felony” were forwardedfrom the Sheriff’s Department to VINE Link. However, for two (2) of the nine (9) named inmates onVINE Link no Offense Level was listed in the online Inmate Information Center of the Sheriff’sDepartment at all.The general nature of the online Inmate Information Center is again found as inconsistent with honest,valid implementation. The option to search the online Inmate Information Center by booking numbershould be provided – it is a critical safeguard for integrity of such system. Instant survey, like theprevious surveys documented the urgent need for publicly-accountable validation (certified, functionallogic verification) of such systems, which are a hazard for the Liberty of all who reside in the respectivecounties.
LINKED:
[1]
Surveys of the online Inmate Information Center of the Los Angeles County, California, Sheriff’sDepartment
,
compared to survey of the Los Angeles County Law Library Catalog.a)http://www.scribd.com/doc/25315610/10-01-16-Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-Department-inmate-data-survey-VINE-vs-Inmate-Information-Center-re-Jose-Martinez-Jose-Rodriguez-s b)http://www.scribd.com/doc/25064776/10-01-11-Sheriff-s-Department-of-Los-Angeles-County-Inmate-Information-Center-data-survey-Jose-Rodriguez-s c)http://www.scribd.com/doc/24809956/10-01-04-Los-Angeles-Sheriff-Department-Inmate-information-Center-data-survey-Jose-Martinez-s d)http://www.scribd.com/doc/24816245/10-01-05-Sheriff-s-Department-of-Los-Angeles-County-Inmate-Information-Center-data-survey-John-Smith-s 
1/33
 
Digitally signed by Joseph H Zernik DN: cn=Joseph H Zernik, o, ou,email=jz12345@earthlink.net, c=USLocation: La Verne, CaliforniaDate: 2010.03.14 10:42:47 -07'00'
 
e)http://www.scribd.com/doc/26618214/10-02-09-VINE-Link-Records-of-falsely-hospitalized-attorneys-Richard-Fine-and-Ronald-Gottschalk-s f)http://www.scribd.com/doc/25067457/10-01-11-Los-Angeles-Law-Library-Catalog-Data-Survey-California-Code-s 
[2]
Surveys of the online Inmate Information Center of the Harris County, Texas.http://www.scribd.com/doc/25251302/10-01-14-Carol-Ann-Davis-and-the-Harris-County-Texas-Sheriff-s-Office-online-Inmate-Public-Information-s 
Contents
:1. Tables: A. Low Series, B. High Series2. Inmate Information Center pages for named inmates found in the current survey.
TablesA. Low Series
NOTE: Names in italic are alias names.
Booking# Name CustodyDateBookedTimeBooked Booking Location Court
11343449No offenders matching your criteriawere found *,**,***2.1343450No offenders matching your criteriawere found31343451No offenders matching your criteriawere found4.1343452No offenders matching your criteriawere found5.1343453No offenders matching your criteriawere found61343454No offenders matching your criteriawere found7.1343455No offenders matching your criteriawere found8.1343456No offenders matching your criteriawere found9.1343457No offenders matching your criteriawere found10.1343458No offenders matching your criteriawere found11.1343459
 
GARCIA
 
ANTHONYCHARLESIn Custody 2/6/10 03:00 1901 PD - ALHAMBRA LOS ANGELES MUNI CT DIV 3212.1343460
 
CHISOLMSHAUNHEKIMAOut ofCustody 2/6/10 03:14 1965 PD - SANTA MONICA13.1343461No offenders matching your criteriawere found14.1343462No offenders matching your criteriawere found15.1343463No offenders matching your criteriawere found16.1343464 COLQUHOUN DEBRA MARIE In Custody 2/6/10 03:33 1972 PD - TORRANCE TORRANCE MUNICIPAL COURT17.1343465No offenders matching your criteriawere found18.1343466 AHMED
 
MOHAMMEDSALAH In Custody 2/6/2010 04:04 1972 PD - TORRANCE TORRANCE MUNICIPAL COURT19.1343467No offenders matching your criteriawere found20.1343468No offenders matching your criteriawere found
2/33
 
B. High Series
 
NOTE: Names in italic are alias names.
 
#Booking#Name Custody Booking Date Booking Location Court
 1.2235341No offenders matching your criteriawere found*,**,***2.2235342No offenders matching your criteriawere found3.2235343No offenders matching your criteriawere found42235344No offenders matching your criteriawere found52235345No offenders matching your criteriawere found62235346No offenders matching your criteriawere found7.2235347 RAYFIELD VICTOROut ofCustody 2/19/2010 19:30 4212 LAPD - 77TH STREET L A SUPERIOR COURT DEPT 1198.2235348 ARIAS
 
ESTEBAN In Custody2/19/2010 22:05 LAN STA - LANCASTER M.D.ANTONOVICH ANTELOPE VLY CT92235349No offenders matching your criteriawere found10.2235350 HERNANDEZ ROBERT In Custody 2/19/2010 18:37 1101 LASD-LANCASTER STATION PATROL11.2235351 HOPPERWILLIAMANTHONYOut ofCustody2/19/2010 19:34 4273 LAPD - JAIL DIVISION No court name, no court case ****12.2235352
 
GONZALEZ
 
PEARL ANN In Custody 2/19/2010 20:52 LKD STA - LAKEWOOD BELLFLOWER COURTHOUSE13.2235353No offenders matching your criteriawere found14.2235354No offenders matching your criteriawere found15.2235355No offenders matching your criteriawere found16.2235356No offenders matching your criteriawere found17.2235357No offenders matching your criteriawere found18.2235358No offenders matching your criteriawere found19.2235359No offenders matching your criteriawere found20.2235360No offenders matching your criteriawere found*Inmate # of JOSEPH ZERNIK, as found in Inmate Information Center.**No match found also when searched on VINE Link by name***Search by name on Inmate Information Center produced the entry****Was held for 14 days.
3/33

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->