Congregation Divided Over Design -- but Not the Divine
LA Times Initiatives
rows of pews, say they embody the ideas of the Second Vatican Council. Held between 1962 and 1965, thecouncil introduced a series of reforms to Roman Catholic practice, many of which were designed to increaseparticipation by the laity.But modern church architecture was not mandated by the council, said Steve Diggins, the 45-year-old filmeditor who heads the preservation guild.On Sundays, Diggins drives to St. Charles from his home in Burbank. "One of the reasons people come to St.Charles Borromeo is they are so unhappy with renovations at their own local church," he said."We support Vatican II," said Diggins. "This is not a debate over doctrine We are not connected with theLatin Mass people," he said, referring to dissenting Catholics who continue to hear Mass in Latin and rejectthe Second Vatican Council in other ways.Diggins, who minored in theology at Loyola Marymount College, said that he thinks the "zeitgeist of the '60s"is a factor in plans to change St. Charles. And he notes that since the renovation flap began, some parishregulars eager for incense and other traditional "smells and bells" associated with Catholic ritual have left St.Charles for nearby St. Ann Melkite Church, a Byzantine-style church of the Greek Catholic rite.Diggins and fellow guild members say they treasure St. Charles because the church, as it is now, supportstheir faith. Its dark beauty, its hush, the way the eyes of the faithful are drawn to the large crucifix — all helpthem turn their thoughts to Christ's redemptive sacrifice, they say.Jay Willis of North Hollywood said that making major changes in the church "really stabs at the core of ourbelief."St. Charles — named for a 16th-century Catholic reformer who wrote extensively on ecclesiastical design —was designed by J. Earl Trudeau, an architect from Alhambra, and is noted for its artful Stations of the Crossand the majestic carved canopy, or baldacchino, over the main altar.In an interview, Gallagher said St. Charles "is not a modern building. It's a Spanish baroque building. Wehave no intention of changing the look and the warmth of the building."That said, Gallagher acknowledged that some features of the interior would likely change in the near future.Any significant alterations must be approved by Cardinal Roger M. Mahony and his liturgy committee, hesaid.If he failed to propose some reconfiguration, Gallagher said, the archdiocesan committee would probably ask:"What have you done to rearrange the worship area in line with the Second Vatican Council?"Jim Drollinger, one of half a dozen members of the art and architecture committee appointed by Gallagher tostudy possible changes, said he is "very much for" certain modifications to the interior. But, he said, he thinksthe preservationists have misconstrued the extent of proposed changes."We're literally talking about coming up with a slightly different arrangement of the sanctuary area that'sreflective of current liturgical practice," he said. "In no way will we be changing the style of décor that we'reso in love with here."Despite such assurances, the anti-renovation forces fear that radical change is imminent."Their feelings are very real to them, but we don't just make changes in our church based on people'sfeelings," said Gallagher.As for the guild, it is encouraging supporters to write to Rome to express their opposition to major alterations:"We're praying," said Diggins, "and we'll continue to fight."
If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-religst.charles7jun07,1,2495229.story?coll=la-headlines-california (2 of 3) [6/7/2003 12:33:34 AM]