IMPACT REPORT 2009

Greenpeace takes action to defend

the natural world and promote peace. CONTENTS
g INTERVENING 3
We are lawyers, lobbyists, scientists, How a plot of land can stand in the way of a third runway
sailors, researchers and above all
g INVESTIGATING 6
activists united by a common mission How undercover work led to rainforest protection
to protect our environment.
g EXPOSING 7
What the real cost is of renewing nuclear weapons
Our effectiveness lies in our unique
independence from government g DOCUMENTING 9
How we enabled scientists to carry out vital research in the Arctic
and corporate funding. This is only
possible through the generous and g LOBBYING 11
Making a positive impact on energy policy in the UK
incredibly appreciated support by
individuals like you. g ACTING 14
Taking action during the UN Copenhagen summit

g TRANSFORMING 15
Working with industry to protect the world’s oceans

g CONFRONTING 18
How we stood up against rainforest destroyers

g GLOBAL IMPACT 19
Taking action throughout the year, around the world

g SUPPORTING 21
How individuals make our achievements possible

Cover image: Greenpeace in Greenland. Our ship the MY Arctic
Sunrise alongside the front section of the Petermann glacier.
©Cobbing/Greenpeace
There are various Greenpeace reports referenced in this publication. If you would like to
receive a copy by post or email please contact Louise Krzan on 020 7865 8175 or at
louise.krzan@uk.greenpeace.org
Design: paul@hellopaul.com

1
 Hello and welcome to our impact report for 2009.

It was an incredibly busy year for Greenpeace,

and a successful one too.

Here in the UK and internationally we saw some great

steps forward on some of the most pressing issues
facing our planet. From the rainforests of Brazil to the supermarket shelves
of tuna, we’ve seen real progress.

our new International Executive Director, (pictured below). From South Africa,
Kumi comes to Greenpeace with a strong background of social justice campaigning.

Our independence from government and corporate donations is central to our

ability to act. And we safeguard this independence vigorously. At the same time,
we are totally dependent on you, and all the other people who are generous
enough to support our work through donations of money and time. I hope you

John Sauven
Executive Director, Greenpeace UK

‘I am proud to become part of an organisation that is ready to stand up

to power, to master the science, to debate with the politicians, and to use
all peaceful means possible to create a green and more equitable world’
Kumi Naidoo
International Executive Director
1
 Greenpeace is made up of
28 independent offices in over
40 countries across the world.

Greenpeace UK Limited is our campaigning and direct action organisation,

and as such unable to be a charity.

Greenpeace Environmental Trust is a registered charity, number 284934.

Our research laboratories, managed by Greenpeace International,

are based at Exeter University.

2
 intervening

Airplot is becoming a runaway success. Anna Jones, climate campaigner,

describes how we worked with lawyers to secure Airplot, the piece of land
we bought to stand in the way of airport expansion.

Sitting slap-bang in the middle of Heathrow’s
proposed third runway site, our patch of land
known as Airplot now represents a growing
collective of people resisting the expansion
plans of aviation giant, BAA.
Launching Airplot was time critical. After
months of preparing, we announced
our purchase just two days before the
government gave the initial go ahead to
the runway.
The media went crazy for the story and
within just a few hours over 12,000
people had joined Alistair McGowan, Emma
Thompson and Zac Goldsmith as beneficial
owners. I’m so proud that this small plot
of land now unites over 65,000 of us in
the quest to stop airport expansion.
At full capacity, a third runway would make
Heathrow the biggest single source of
greenhouse gases in the UK. Meeting the
government’s own climate emissions targets
would become impossible. They could
double by 2050. This is why I’m so
passionate about Airplot and our ultimate
goal of curbing aviation expansion.
There are also the people of Sipson to
consider: a village of 700 homes and
businesses that would be flattened.
Working alongside the residents has been
critical. This includes creating an allotment
and an orchard on the Airplot site.
Plotting ahead
g We must continue to defeat the plans
for Heathrow and ensure that we stop
other airports from expanding.
g We must strengthen a wider resistance
movement of people who are prepared
to take direct action against climate
policies that are destroying the planet.
g We must overturn the government’s
Aviation White Paper in favour of a
sustainable transport policy
WHAT NEXT?
A third runway is not inevitable. Our
intervention means that as owners of the
site we will give evidence at the planning
inquiry and resist compulsory purchase of
Airplot. This includes taking nonviolent direct
action if we have to.
At the start of 2010 we launched an
architectural, and public, competition to
design a structure that will fortify the plot
should BAA begin construction.
Main right: Alistair McGowan stands on our
plot of land in Sipson. ©Rezac/Greenpeace
Bottom right: Evening Standard coverage of
the Airplot launch.
g Join the plot and get campaign
updates at www.airplot.org.uk

‘The speed of the public response to this campaign has been simply astonishing…
The Government’s attempts to bulldoze over public opinion will be blocked at every turn.’
John Sauven
3
investigating
Paulo Adario, our campaign manager in the Amazon, explains
how an international investigation of the cattle industry led to
a huge victory for the rainforest.
By collating three years of undercover
research into a groundbreaking report
Greenpeace proved how huge swathes of
Amazon rainforest were being destroyed
to make way for cattle herds and slaughter
houses.
We investigated how big companies were
clearing the forest to graze cattle and how
the beef and leather produced, travelled
across the world to become consumer goods
including shoes, meat pies and car seats.
Taking on multi-million dollar beef and
leather companies was a tall order for us, but
essential if we were to transform the industry
and protect the Amazon. So that is what
we did.
Main left: Cattle grazing on deforested land,
Brazil. ©Beltra/Greenpeace
Small top left: A rancher with his cattle in Pará
State, Brazil. ©Funari/Lineair
Small second left: Workers butcher cattle in
Marfrig slaughterhouse facility. ©Funari/Lineair
How did we unpick the supply
chain?
g We used satellite data to produce maps
correlating the cattle ranches and
slaughter houses with evidence of new
deforestation.
g We traced the beef and leather as it left
farms in the Amazon and travelled to
Europe, China and beyond.
g We collated confidential trade and
company data in order to analyse the
entire supply chain and prove which
companies were involved along the way.
In June 2009 we published our in depth
investigation as a report called ‘Slaughtering
the Amazon’, which linked international
household brands to destruction of the
rainforest. Together with the influence of
our supporters who emailed, phoned and
donated money, we succeeded in persuading
big brands like Clarks, Timberland and
Wal-Mart to stop sourcing beef and leather
from Amazon destruction.
‘When you talk to Greenpeace,
it’s hard to argue with what they’re saying’.
President of Wal-Mart Brazil, Héctor Núñez
The result
Within just three months, four of the biggest
beef and leather companies had met our
demands and agreed not to buy from ranches
that destroy the rainforest. Our investigation
led to the start of a major transformation
of the supply chain and a clear victory, with
deforestation for cattle ranching no longer
acceptable in the market place.
WHAT NEXT?
We need to make sure that the companies
keep to their commitments and continue
to strive for better management of their
supply chain.
We must also continue pressuring farmers
to register and map their ranches, so we
can monitor if any new deforestation takes
place. This is one of the ways we can ensure
the long-term protection of the Amazon
from the biggest drivers of deforestation,
including cattle and soy.
6
 EXPOSING

Replacing our nuclear weapons system, Trident, comes with a hefty price tag and one
the government didn’t want us to know about. That is why Greenpeace spent funds
on a rigorous investigation into the true costs, explains peace campaigner Louise Edge.
Globally we are now seeing foreign policy The report, ‘In the Firing Line’, detailed our What next?
analysts, senior military and politicians findings and we circulated this widely. As well In 2010 we must use every forum to make
including Obama, believing that the continued as laying out the financial evidence the report the case that spending billions on nuclear
possession of nuclear weapons for defence argued that the world has changed since weapons will not make us safer. With our
is a major source of insecurity. This makes Trident was first introduced. The Cold War supporters we will be:
the UK government’s plans to renew Trident is over. Today we face completely different g Making it clear to political leaders that the
all the more outrageous and explains why threats to our national security including public does not support replacing Trident.
we ramped up this campaign in early 2009. diminishing resources and, above all, g Lobbying political parties to include the
climate change. question of Trident replacement in a full
Uncovering government review of our defence and foreign policy
spending plans A growing number of politicians backed our post election.
Over a number of months we patiently report publically including Michael Ancram, g Pressuring the UK to agree concrete
analysed government papers, parliamentary ex-Shadow Defence Minister and Vince disarmament measures at the crucial
questions, and specialist reports. We also Cable, Shadow Chancellor, as well as military global Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
spoke to experts on military expenditure and advisor, General Sir Hugh Beach. (NPT) review conference in May.
soon identified glaring black holes in
the ‘official’ cost projections. We are also pleased to report a continued
delay in any investment decisions being
Our research showed the lifetime cost of made for the Trident replacement project.
Trident to be approximately £97 billion,
a lot more than the £15-20 billion official
government figure. Running costs of over
£2 billion a year, and several strands of
procurement costs had been omitted.

7
‘It is time to... stop the spread of nuclear weapons
and to reduce the arsenals from another era.
This is the moment to begin the work of seeking
the peace of a world without nuclear weapons.’
Barack Obama, US President, speech in Berlin, July 2008

n
0b2
5-
£1
T
EN
EM
UR
OC
PR
Running costs
£56.9-68.3bn

TOTAL Omitted by the

government
£97bn £14.65-19.65bn
 documenting
Photojournalist Nick Cobbing joined leading scientists aboard our
icebreaker ship, pictured below near the border between Greenland
and Canada, to document the impacts of climate change in the arctic.

lu ck y to w or k w it h G re enpeace for over

“I ’ve been th e arctic landscape
15 ye a rs no w a nd to sa y
ot he r- w or ld ly d oe sn ’t even begin to
is vast and
describe it.
g th is ep ic ex pe d it io n I lived alongside
Durin in g cl im a te scientists
some of th e w or ld ’s le a d
gla ci ol og is ts . T og et he r we documented the
and co lle ct ed vital data on
changing la nd sc a pe s a nd
, ic e fl ow , gl a ci al m elt and more”.
9
sea temperature
This is Dr Jason Box on the first leg
of the tour. He’s gathering samples
of cryocronite (ice impurities) from
the lower section of the Petermann
glacier. He’s looking to see if lead,
which darkens the ice, is present.
This is one of the beautiful ravines
that cross the surface of Petermann.
Fitting radar equipment to a string
of kayaks enables scientists to
penetrate the ice with a signal that
bounces back to reveal the underlying
structure of the glacial ice.
We were only able to venture onto
the ice once the ship was secured.
Here polar explorer Eric Philips is
rigging the mooring lines around a
solid bollard of ice on the front of
the Petermann glacier.
By lowering a CTD (conductivity,
temperature and depth) device into
the water at different locations,
Dr Jason Box records data to later help
inform how far currents are travelling.
By fixing a GPS unit to the surface
of Petermann glacier Alan Hubbard,
a glaciologist from the University of
Aberystwyth, measures the accurate
direction and speed that the glaciers
move. It involves drilling deep into
the ice with an ice auger and battery
powered drill.
10
 lobbying
In 2009 we witnessed a dramatic shift in government
energy policy. Our strategy worked and Robin Oakley,
head of our climate team, explains how.
Over the last 12 months we have clearly
influenced energy policy on many different
levels – from mobilising thousands of people
to take individual action, to lobbying intensely
at the corporate and government level.
We continued collaborating with Oxfam, the
World Development Movement and many
more organisations to build a broader coalition
of support for clean and efficient energy
production. Developing guidelines for carbon
emission limits on power stations was just
the first step.
We also launched the ‘Big If’ campaign which
mobilised thousands of people to demand
that Ed Miliband, Energy Minister, makes the
right decisions on coal policy. This campaign
also saw people pledge to take direct action
to stop plans for the first new power station
in over 30 years, at Kingsnorth.
A DOUBLE WIN
g By the end of 2009, E.ON had shelved
plans for a new coal plant at Kingsnorth.
They blamed the global recession, but
the impact of our campaigning was
widely acknowledged.
g Meanwhile we forced a government
u-turn on coal. In April, Ed Miliband
announced a policy requiring any new coal
plant to capture a portion of its emissions.
11
This isn’t the end; we need to see the
government rule out all the emissions,
but it has stopped plans for the dirtiest
new coal plants in their tracks.
Pushing the alternatives
It’s not just about stopping the wrong energy
choices, we’ve also been working to give
good energy a stronger chance to succeed.
This includes launching a report in Parliament,
with Friends of the Earth, WWF and RSPB,
showing how the National Grid is more WHAT NEXT?
than capable of managing the variable input We’ve had an amazing year but we still
created by wind power. need to go further. It’s critical that the
government introduces stronger policy
Our country is home to some of the best – an emissions law that rules out the worst
engineers, mechanics and construction carbon polluters. We also need to secure
professionals in the world. Their expertise similar policy in the EU.
is crucial if we are to harness the massive
potential that new technologies like offshore We will campaign to make the UK into a
wind have to offer. global champion for clean energy solutions.
We must ensure UK commitments are
delivered, and show the rest of the world it
can be done.
Small top right: Activists hand out copies of the Greenpeace manifesto to MPs during the
action on Parliament. ©Sandison/Greenpeace
Small second right: Activists meet and challenge Ed Milliband with the ‘Big If’ campaign outside
the Library in his constituency. ©Buus/Greenpeace
Main far right: Over 50 Greenpeace activists occupy the roof of the UK Parliament building
demanding the government rethink its climate policies. ©Cobbing/Greenpeace
acting
Copenhagen did not deliver all that we wanted, but it was a defining moment in history.
Our director John Sauven explains, despite the frustrations, what we achieved.
The UN climate change meeting in
Copenhagen provided a concrete milestone
for our work and resulted in leaders from the
world’s biggest polluting countries agreeing
to take action on cutting their emissions. We
knew that a strong and legally binding deal
was unlikely, but persuading world leaders
to attend and take personal responsibility for
action on climate change was critical.
A global force
Throughout 2009, Greenpeace activists
helped mobilise millions of people around the
world to demand a strong global agreement
to avert dangerous climate change.
From scaling Mount Rushmore with a clear
message for Obama to show leadership, to
personally lobbying ministers and special
advisors around the world, Greenpeace
worked to keep world leaders’ attention on
Copenhagen. In fact, ahead of the summit
I met Prime Minister Gordon Brown three
times in one week.
As delegates arrived in Copenhagen we were
already there – campaigners and volunteer
activists. Our new International Executive
Director Kumi Naidoo addressed an opening
rally of 100,000 people and, in cooperation
with other NGOs, delivered a petition signed
by over 12 million people to the Prime
Minister of Denmark.
We also worked hard, inside and outside
the conference centre, to keep the meeting
on track. A key moment was when we
obtained a secret memo written by the
Danish government uncovering how they
were working behind the scenes to weaken
the outcome of the talks. Due to massive
press coverage, Denmark was exposed and
had to back off.
But, unfortunately, the world’s leaders lacked
the political will to deliver. As I said on the
day - this ‘deal’ contains no legally binding
targets. And the targets that are there need
to be significantly more ambitious.
It’s clear we have a lot of work ahead
of us, both nationally and internationally,
but with supporters by our side we
remained determined and focused on
our goal of slashing emissions and tackling
climate change.
What does this mean now?
While a global agreement would have made
our job easier, we remain committed to
holding our governments accountable for
their lack of action, both at home and on the
world stage. 
It remains critical that we push for an
increase in energy efficiency, renewables and
an end to reliance on dirty energy supplies.
This should be seen as a huge opportunity to
create new industries, new jobs, and make us
more energy secure.
Main: Activists send a clear message to summit
delegates by rigging a banner from the stern
of our ship the Beluga II, visible to those arriving
at Copenhagen airport. ©Åslund/Greenpeace
Small far left: Activists placed adverts depicting
apologetic and aged President Obama and
Gordon Brown, dated 2020, throughout
Copenhagen International Airport.
14
 TRANSFORMING
From the high seas to the supermarket shelves, oceans campaigner Willie Mackenzie
describes how we transformed the tuna industry and helped protect our oceans.
Whether it’s sushi or sandwiches we have a
huge appetite for tuna in the UK. But large
scale fishing methods are putting certain
species under strain and damaging our entire
ocean ecosystem.
The rhino of the ocean
Atlantic bluefin tuna is now critically
endangered due to overfishing. Yet it is
still being served up in some of our most
exclusive fish restaurants.
We raised the alarm last July by publicly
shaming the restaurants trading in
endangered species. One of our key targets,
exclusive sushi restaurant Nobu, felt the heat
when presenter Stephen Fry went on the
offensive: ‘It’s astounding lunacy to serve
up endangered species for sushi. There’s no
justification for peddling extinction, yet that
is exactly what Nobu is doing in restaurants
around the world’
We also worked closely with campaigner
Charles Clover whose film ‘The End of the
Line’ gives bluefin a starring role. Screened
around the world, and promoted by us, the
film created a surge in concern for how our
fish is caught and pressured many retailers
to improve their policies.
15
Throughout the year we also lobbied
politicians to increase protection for bluefin
and edged closer to its inclusion under the
‘CITES’ Endangered Species Agreement.
France, Germany and the UK are all backing
the move and the Mediterranean’s biggest
bluefin tuna trader, Mitsubishi, has already
taken action by voluntarily decreasing the
amount of fish it buys.
Changing their tuna?
Closer to home, our league table revealed
how sourcing the UK’s favourite tinned fish,
skipjack tuna, was destroying marine life.
Large scale, unselective fishing methods
capture tonnes of unwanted species including
sharks and turtles, which are thrown back into
the sea, dead or dying.
Since publishing our league table
and pressuring retailers, we’ve seen
improvements in the way skipjack tuna is
caught and labelled. Marks and Spencer,
Waitrose, Sainsbury’s, Co-op and ASDA
have all increased the amount of pole
and line caught tuna they stock, and in
December John West released their new
sustainability policy.
WHAT NEXT?
By influencing the supply chain, we’ve
created a surge in demand for sustainably
sourced tuna. Now we need to keep up the
momentum and ensure tinned tuna brands
deliver on ocean friendly policies
We’ll also be working for a positive outcome
at a CITES meeting in the spring, and
continue pushing for a network of protected
marine reserves, off limits to all unsustainable
practices around the world.
Main right: Fishermen use the more selective
‘pole and line’ fishing method to catch skipjack
tuna in the Indian Ocean. ©Hilton/Greenpeace
Small top right: This Ecuadorian purse seiner’s
bycatch includes juvenile yellowfin tuna and
green sea turtles. ©Hofford/Greenpeace
Small second right: A turtle is at risk of
being caught while swimming around a fish
aggregating device, belonging to the Ecuadorian
purse seiner, pictured above. ©Hofford/Greenpeace
confronting

In 2009 we increased our work with local people

to confront the companies destroying Indonesia’s
rainforests and peatlands. David Ritter, biodiversity
campaign manager, explains how.

The rainforests of the Kampar peninsula in
Sumatra store some two billion tonnes of
carbon, growing on peat that is up to 15
metres deep. Under Indonesian law it’s illegal
to clear forests on peatland that is more than
three metres deep.
However, our investigations revealed that
palm oil and paper companies are flouting this
law and playing a key role in making Indonesia
the third largest emitter of greenhouse gases
in the world.
Standing together
Our team in Indonesia identified key villages
where people are forced to cope day-to-day
with companies ripping up their forest and
disregarding their lives. We took time
to understand their concerns and agreed
to set up a temporary base called the Climate
Defenders Camp on the edge of one of
the plantations.
The camp provided a focus for journalists
and, importantly, a base for activists taking
non violent direct action. We blocked
machinery and built dams where companies
were draining, burning and clearing peatland
swamp forest for plantations. Local police
tried to evict us, but our strong links with the
community meant that over 1,000 people
prevented them. Local people made it clear
that it was the plantation companies they
should be removing – not Greenpeace.
WHAT NEXT?
In response to our confrontations, the 2010 offers the best opportunity yet
Indonesian government suspended all to break the link between palm oil and
permits held by APRIL, one of the largest deforestation. Getting Unilever to stop
pulp and paper companies operating in trading with Sinar Mas was a huge victory.
the Kampar Peninsula. We now need to push other well known
brands to stop buying from rainforest
Changing the market place destroyers.
Meanwhile our work persuading big brands
to stop buying palm oil from the worst We must also continue pushing for a
destroyers had huge success. We finally moratorium in Indonesia on any further
saw Unilever step up and cancel its contracts destruction for palm oil, pulp and paper.
with the worst offender and biggest palm
oil supplier, Sinar Mas.

Left: Police photograph an activist chained to an excavator at the site of rainforest clearing by plantation company, APRIL. ©Rante/Greenpeace
Top right: Indonesia’s rainforests provide critical habitat for endangered species like the Sumatran tiger. ©Compost
Second right: Activists halt drainage of peatland by constructing dams on canals made by the plantation companies. ©Rante/Greenpeace

18
 GLOBAL IMPACT
Argentina, JANUARY:
Victory! After years of lobbying and
taking non violent direct action, the
Forest Law to reduce deforestation
is now in effect. ©Pantoja/GP
DENMARK, december:
Our activists join the 15 million
strong movement demanding a
fair, ambitious and legally binding
treaty at the climate summit in
Copenhagen. ©Pago/GP
19
Greece, February:
Our Quit Coal campaign results
in a commitment from Greece to
rewrite its energy plan to exclude
coal and nuclear power in favour of
renewable energy. ©Gleizes/GP
UK, NOVEMBER:
Finally the UK Marine Bill is passed,
including vital new legislation
committing the government to
create a network of protected areas
in our seas. ©Newman/GP
nigeria, march:
We investigate the true destination
of ‘recycled’ electronic waste, and
expose toxic dumping grounds
in Nigeria and other developing
countries. ©Buus/GP
PaCIFIC, OCTOBER:
Our ship the Esperanza exposes
Taiwanese vessels illegally
transferring tuna at sea, in an area
proposed as a marine reserve to
conserve tuna populations. ©Hilton/GP
With our supporters’ help Greenpeace is able to take action for a
green and peaceful planet in over 40 countries across the world.

CHINA, MARCH: CANADA, APRIL: UK, JUNE:

By projecting onto Yong Ding
Gate, activists call on President
Hu Jintao to personally attend the
Copenhagen climate Summit in
December. ©Li/GP
After our 12 year campaign, the
government of British Columbia
finally protects the Great Bear
Rainforest – also known as ‘Canada’s
Amazon’. ©Aikman/GP
Activists climb into the sea and
intercept a coal freighter bound for
Kingsnorth power station, providing
another blow to utility company E.ON’s
plans to invest in new coal. ©Rezac/GP

IVORY COAST, SEPTEMBER: US, SEPTEMBER: AUSTRALIA, AUGUST:

Oil trading company Trafigura settle
out of court after we expose their
attempt to cover up the dumping of
caustic sludge in the city of Abidjan.
©Åslund/GP
Following our occupation of a
potential radar site in the Czech
Republic, Obama announces part of
their National Missile Defence System
will not go ahead after all. ©Greenpeace
Greenpeace shuts down major coal
export terminal l in Queensland on
the eve of the Pacific Islands Forum
in Cairns. ©Pratten/GP

20
 SUPPORTING
Supporters are our strength and our lifeblood. We do not accept donations from governments
or business. The moment we do, we lose our independence and freedom to speak out.

Over 100,000 people gave £8,344,000 in 2008, making our work, and our independence, possible.
Thank you.

Greenpeace Expenditure in 2008

Campaign expenses £ 5,265k
Campaign information costs £ 916k
Subscriptions and donations – direct expenses £ 765k
Investment in recruiting new supporters to Greenpeace – net expenses £ 445k
General marketing costs £ 806k
Administration and central management expenses £ 473k

Greenpeace Income in 2008

Regular Subscriptions £ 7,135k
The largest part of Greenpeace’s income comes direct from individual supporters,
in the form of regular monthly and annual subscriptions paid by bank transfer
Groups £ 29k
Income raised by the campaign groups around the country
Other subscriptions and donations £ 1,180k
Also includes income from legacies and other fundraising
Profit on merchandising, publishing, and commercial events £ 63k
These commercial trading activities also serve to publicise Greenpeace to a wider audience
Grants from other Greenpeace organisations: £ 652k
Interest Receivable £ 44k
Greenpeace makes no investments beyond holding cash in interest-
bearing bank accounts, available for our campaigns whenever the need arises

To receive a full copy of the latest audited accounts please contact Louise Krzan on 020 7865 8175 or email at louise.krzan@uk.greenpeace.org.
21
SUPPORTING
From Dundee to Cornwall, 2009
saw over 2,000 volunteers take
action to protect our planet Greenpeace is made up of
and promote peace.
40 countries across the world.
VOLUNTEER ACTION
From tree planting to Rainbow Warrior open
days, our invaluable volunteer network of
active supporters continued to play a vital
role in delivering our campaigns across
the country.

ONLINE ACTION
Almost 100,000 actions were taken by
Greenpeace supporters online last year.
This included lobbying Ed Miliband to stop
a new generation of dirty coal power stations
and signing up to be beneficial owners
of our Airplot to stop runway expansion
at Heathrow.

To join our network of volunteer activists or to find out more about

the people in your area helping to deliver Greenpeace campaigns,
please visit our website at
www.greenpeace.org.uk/active
Greenpeace UK Limited is our campaigning and direct action organisation,
To take regular action online
and assubscribe to our
such unable newsletter
to be a charity.at
www.greenpeace.org.uk/ebulletin
Greenpeace Environmental Trust is a registered charity, number 284934.

Top right: An activist paints aOur

giant research
Manga style laboratories, managed
cartoon opposite the by Greenpeace International,
Japanese embassy
as part of a protest to demand criminal charges are dropped against two activists that
are based at Exeter University.
face jail for exposing corruption within the whaling industry. ©Bodycombe/Greenpeace
Bottom right: The 20th Waveney Fair is held in Suffolk by supporters. It is a successful
fundraising event for Greenpeace and helps engage the public in our campaigns.
©Bodycombe/Greenpeace

2 22
CANONBURY VILLAS
LONDON
N1 2PN
020 7865 8100
www.greenpeace.org.uk