Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jones v Obama Complaint CV10-01075 GAF

Jones v Obama Complaint CV10-01075 GAF

Ratings: (0)|Views: 104|Likes:
Published by Juan del Sur
This action (Jones v Obama) seeks a declaratory and permanent injunction order against the Defendant. The widely viewed public evidence for this action is based on this foundation of public evidence of: 1) In the Defendant's own autobiography he states his birth father was NOT a U.S. citizen 2) On national TV viewed by millions of people the Defendant accepted the title of "Nobel Peace Prize" and the money that came with it 3) the Defendant issued an Amended Executive Order #12425 which is found on the White House's web page; and more…
This action (Jones v Obama) seeks a declaratory and permanent injunction order against the Defendant. The widely viewed public evidence for this action is based on this foundation of public evidence of: 1) In the Defendant's own autobiography he states his birth father was NOT a U.S. citizen 2) On national TV viewed by millions of people the Defendant accepted the title of "Nobel Peace Prize" and the money that came with it 3) the Defendant issued an Amended Executive Order #12425 which is found on the White House's web page; and more…

More info:

Published by: Juan del Sur on Mar 16, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/23/2010

pdf

text

original

 
Case 2:10-cv-01075-GAF-PJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 64
1
RuthJones
2
opportunitythink@yahoo.comP.O. Box 596
3
Beverly Hills, California
90213
4
no phone
5
mprose
678
ttl
-<
,
{.:
or
.....
f'"
_::0
~"'-
.-'"
:..
~;:i:~
0""
~-.::
t
.
tJ
l~
i
~
-
:::I
...,
g
-
'"
....
P
f11
:-':~-
-0
0
r-O:'
::Jt
1"111 ( ,
'"
_4
c...>
01'
G
fA;
~j-
1:0
'
...
910
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT
OF
CALIFORNIA
1213
RUTH JONES,
14
PLAINTIFF
v.
15
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
16
II;
AKA
BARRY SOETORO,STEVE DUNHAM,BARACK
17
STEVE OBAMA,JlNKNOWN
18
NAME DOE
l~t;!n
hisIndividual Capacity
as
a
19
regular
person;
In
his
20
Individual Capacity
as
the
21
presumed president of
the
United
States;
and in
his
22
Official Capacity
as
a
23
presumed president of
theUnited
States,
24
DEFENDANTCASE NUMBER
CV10 -0
1
0
7 5
L1/tr
({"J'vJ~)
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR
INJUNCTIVE AND
DECLARATORY
RELIEF
25
26
27
28
Short
Statement
of
the
Claim
(Pursuant
to
L.R.
8-1)
1
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY
RELIEF
 
Case 2:10-cv-01075-GAF-PJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 64
2;~2!20i~
3:~~~~;
~G
_32£e~rt
~~
l~l~;~
I.,i\Snler :
KPAbt:.
LLH
l-L
~'a~o.
~l!
~UIii
JDI~ES
c:LVHhHtl7~
2elB-t~5ge0
5 -
ClVII
Filing
F~eil;
AmDunt
:
.~0.~0
2:C')i0-CHF5
2610-51000c
Ai':'IJUnt
:
::~Vle-01q]75
20Hl-38f,4\}~
AmGtdt
!
Cct~t
PaYf!l?nt
 
Case 2:10-cv-01075-GAF-PJW Document 1 Filed 02/12/10 Page 3 of 64
1
1.
This
action
seeks
a
declaratory
and
permanent
injunction
order
2
against
the
Defendant.
The
widely viewed
public
evidence for
this
3
action
is based
on this
foundation
of
public evidence
of:
1)
In
the
4
Defendant's own autobiography
he
states
his
birth
father was
NOT
a U.
5
S.
citizen
2)
On
national
TV
viewed
by
millions
of
people
the
Defendant
6
accepted
the
title of
"Nobel
Peace
Prize"
and the
money
that
came
with
7
it
3)
the
Defendantissued
an
Amended
Executive
Order
#12425 which
8
is
found
on the
White House's
web page;
and
4)
on national
TV
before
9
10
millions
of
people
the
Defendant
accepted
and
acted
as the
Chairpersonof
the
United
Nations.
The Defendant made use of
the
word, "EXCEPT":
11
it
was used to
denyhis
eligibility, "No
person
except
a
natural
born
12
Citizen
...
shall
be eligible
to
the
office
of
thePresident
.
,"
<Article 2,§1
13
14
clause
5)
and in
his amended
Executive
order of
12425
the
Defendant
15
removed
the
security
provisions for Plaintiff, from
the
order
by
deleting
16
the
word
"except"
in
the
beginning,
changing
the entire
meaning
so
17
that
all
security
for
the
United
States andits
citizens
are
no
longer
18
protected...
'except
those
provided
by
Section
2(c), Section 3,
Section
4,
19
Section
5,
and
Section 6
of
that
Act"
and
the
semicolon
that
immediately
20
precedes them"
,
Amended
executive
order
#12425.
The Defendant's
21
"amended"
order
took
away
the
word
except
and
provided
immunities
22
and
protection
for
an
International
Criminal
Police
Organization
23
(INTERPOL)
underother
governments
giving
away
the
sovereignty
of
24
the
U. S.
The
Plaintiff
has
Constitutional
standing
to
bring
this
25
complaint
before
this
court
under
U. S.
Constitution
Article 3
because
it
26
involves a
'Constitutional
Controversy'
and
over
throw of
the United
27
States
Government
by
destroying
the
Constitution
and thePlaintiffs
28
2
VERIFIED COMPLAINT
FOR
INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY
RELIEF

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->