Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WILLIAMS
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
19th District
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
STATE OF DELAWARE
C O M M IT T E E S
Education, Vice Chair
T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n , In t e r n e t &
Technology
Housing & Community Affairs
Labor
Veterans Affairs
41 1 LE G IS LA TI VE AVE NU E
DO VE R, DE LA WA RE 19 90 1
It should be noted that HB 130, like statutes in numerous other states including Colorado, Connecticut, Florida,
Minnesota, and Washington, D.C., would separately criminalize all sexual contact, sexual penetration, and
sexual intercourse between health professionals and patients, in addition to criminalizing therapeutic deception.
As a result of the limited reach of the statutes relating to therapeutic deception, the experience of other states
indicates that the two crimes can and do coexist and that the criminalization of one form of conduct does not
mean the problems associated with the other form of conduct are properly addressed by the existing law in
Delaware.
Additionally, your veto message appears to suggest that the enactment of HB 130 would create an injustice, as it
would make sexual contact between health professionals and patients a class F felony, while nonconsensual
sexual contact between adults who are not health professionals is currently a class A misdemeanor. However, it
is not unusual in criminal law to punish conduct committed in a certain manner or by certain actors differently
than if committed in another way or by another actor. For example, in Delaware it is a class A felony for a
person in a position of trust, authority, or supervision over a child to have sexual intercourse or sexual
penetration with a child who has not yet reached his or her sixteenth birthday; yet, that same conduct is a class
C felony for those who do not serve in a position of trust, authority, or supervision over a child.
Your veto message further states that there are already substantial mechanisms in place to deter inappropriate
sexual contact between a health care professional and a patient. These mechanisms, administered through the
licensing boards which regulate health care professionals in Delaware, may result in various sanctions which
could potentially include loss of professional license and/or referral for criminal prosecution. You state that
these Boards are best equipped to assess the circumstances of each case and the level of harm caused to the
patient.
In response to this assertion, I have reviewed the May 2010 Final Report: Independent Review of the Earl Brian
Bradley Case published by Linda L. Ammons, Esq. and commissioned by your office. As you know, this report
was completed in the wake of the Earl Bradley case, and investigated both statutory and administrative
procedures related to physician licensing and regulation in Delaware. Ms. Ammons findings related to the
Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline reveal that, at that time, the board had a poor reputation among both
members of the public and physicians, as there was a perception among doctors and others that the Board
protects the very individuals they are required to regulate. Ms. Ammons made 18 recommendations specific to
this entity, including enhanced efforts to repair the boards reputation among practitioners and the general
public.
Another recommendation called for greater transparency in the hearing processes of the board, and that the
communication of adverse outcomes should be easily accessible public records. Currently, the board publishes
a list of disciplinary actions online. This list is in chronological order by date of action taken, and through
September, 2012, included a brief description detailing the reason for the disciplinary action. Beginning in
October, 2012, the brief description was replaced by statutory citations and references to specific board rules
that a licensee violated. Any member of the public who would like to know more about a specific disciplinary
action against a licensee in the last three years must navigate the Delaware Code, as well as the boards rules in
order to do so. Additionally, it is important to note that both the statute and the rules are living documents, and
can be amended by legislation or action by a future board at any time. Any amendments to either the governing
statute or the rules could render the citations currently referenced on the list of disciplinary actions inaccurate.
One could reasonably conclude from this recent change that the board is attempting to be less transparent with
respect to ensuring the public at large is informed of sanctions against licensees, and as such appears to be in
conflict with efforts to improve the boards overall reputation.
411 Legislative Avenue, Legislative Hall, Dover, DE 19901
Office: 302-744-4351 Fax: 302-739-2313 Email: Kimberly.Williams@state.de.us
As noted above, I believe more work needs to be done with respect to inappropriate and unlawful sexual contact
between health care practitioners and their patients. As a steadfast advocate for victims of sexual violence in the
past, you have expressed your understanding of how difficult it is for victims to come forward and seek justice
against those who have violated their responsibilities as persons in positions of trust by sexually abusing those
in their care. To that end, I respectfully request a meeting with the appropriate members of your staff to
determine a path forward. I very much look forward to hearing their thoughts and concerns as I work on new
draft legislation for the upcoming legislative session.
Sincerely,