PSALM 122 COMMETARY
Written and edited by Glenn Pease
PREFACE
The object of this commentary is to bring together the comments of a number of authors in oneplace to make the study of this Psalm easier for the Bible student. Sometimes I do not have theauthor's name, and if it is known and told to me, I will give credit where it is due. If there is anyauthor who does not wish his wisdom to be included in this study, I will remove it when thatauthor expresses his wish to have it removed. My e-mail is glenn_p86@yahoo.com
ITRODUCTIO
1. Calvin, “In this Psalm David congratulates himself and the whole Church upon the fact, that aseat had at length been appointed for the ark of the covenant, and that God had chosen a placewhere his name should be continually called upon. Afterward, to incite and encourage the faithfulto engage in the worship of the sanctuary, he briefly declares, that the prosperous condition of thepeople depended upon God's having chosen the seat of royalty to be at Jerusalem, from whence itwas his purpose to defend, maintain, and assist his people.”2. Jebb's Literal Translation of the Psalters, with Dissertations, volume 1. Speaking in referenceto the author of the Psalm, and to the opinion held by some critics, that it was composed aboutthe time or' the restoration of the Jews from Babylon, he says --"The extraordinary play uponwords already noticed might argue a later period of composition: [than the time of David]. Still Icannot but think that the title assigning the Psalm to him is borne out by internal evidence of astronger kind. The fond mention of Jerusalem, David's beloved city; the thrones of the house of David; and the recurrence of peace, which was so emphatically promised to David, as the blessingabout to be conferred on his son Solomon, are all circumstances, which, taken in connection,stamp this song with a character evidently belonging to the reign of the royal Psalmist."3. Barnes, “This psalm is expressly ascribed to David, though it is not known why it should beclassed among the “Songs of Degrees.” On the supposition that these were used by the pilgrims in“going up” to Jerusalem to worship, and that they were sung by the way, this psalm would beparticularly appropriate, and is one of the very few, in the entire collection of fifteen, that wouldbe appropriate. This psalm evidently was used on some such occasion, and is beautifully suited tosuch a design. There is no reason to doubt that it is a composition of David, but it is not nowpossible to ascertain at what period of his life, or on what particular occasion, it was composed.DeWette has endeavored to show that the psalm must have been composed at a later period in theJewish history than the time of David. His arguments are:(1) that these “Psalms of Degrees” mostly pertain to a later period, and yet that they are closelyconnected together in sense;(2) that the language indicates a later period than the time of David;