Schmidt, Gary Schmidt, Gary Monday, December 21, 2009 3:16 PM ‘Caria M CORBIN’ Moreland, Tracy Clackamas County mailing review final draft.pat Hi Carla, Clackamas County is considering sending a mailing to citizens regarding Measure 66 and 67. Attached is a draft of a potential mailing. Would you please review at your soonest opportunity? Your feedback is greatly appreciated, ‘Thank you. Gary Schmidt Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908Facts About Ballot Measures 66 & 67 Clackamas County Budget For budget year 2009-2010, Clackamas County received $64.4 cailion in slate fu $16.1 million for the Road Fund, to provide road maintenance se $41.2 million for Human Services, supplying the majority’ of the operatin; revenue for Community Health, Clackamas Mental Health Organization and Social Services $7.1 million for Community Corrections, providing supervision and ser- oes la crime vcttns (Sure Clactamas County, Oegn, ual Ye 200200 Adopted Budget) Financial Impacts ‘A yes vate on Measure 66 would uphold the Legislature! 's pa personal tax measure, raising an estimated $472 million. State funds are used education, health care, ouine safety, (Gource: Ballot Titles, Measure 66 and 67) Local education: Loss of $285 mill lion for K-12 school budgets Could result in teacher and staff layoffs, a shorter school ye programs and service cuts, Gource. Oregon Dey Juvenile Court; Loss of $13.7 million for juvenile jus f Beigenesa Oregon. Could result in staff layotis or eliminatiot) Uf diversion pai resol in juve elopec of al ‘Behavior. alcohol programs, and senior citizetiass Hama Sev Evans Co i Girewit Court: Loss 0f $15 4 million forjy to 400 staff members across Oregon and t the court system tiot Being accessible to sl Et gee157- (elegy eR gS sLensa A Important Information for Voters Ww Saeeas au snr40'seweye/2'02O22q SP0L6 YO “AD UORAUE_ peoy usey 1S0Z sauo[situtio> AJUNOD Jo preog ‘Aquno> sewEPe|>, revenue provisions ppovel by the Oregon legislature that will generate $733 million im revenue (o balance tate budget jeserve programs and services, Ballot Measure 67 © Raises $10 corporate minimum tax, business ‘minimum tax and corporate profits tax. (Source: Ballot Title, Ballot Measure 67) How to Vote Ballots must be received at the Clackamas County Elections Office, or a designated ballot-drop location, by 8:00 pm on January 26, 2010. For further informa- tion on Clackamas County elections, contact: wow >> "Schmidt, Gary" 12/21/2009 3:15 PM >>> Hi Carla, Clackamas County is considering sending a mailing to citizens regarding Measure 66 and 67. Attached is a Graft of a potential mailing. Would you please review at your soonest opportunity? Your feedback is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Gary Schmidt Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 303-742-5908Ballot Measures 66 & 67 CLACKAMAS Clackamas County Budget eared For budget year 2009-2010, Clackamas County received $64.4 million in state funds: + $16.1 million for the Road Fund, to provide road maintenance To nob elude, ‘* $41.2 million for Human Services, supplying the majority of the operating revenue for Community Health, Clackamas Mental Health Organization and Social Services * $7.1 million for Community Corrections, providing supervision and ser- vices to crime victims Gource: Clackamas County, Oregon, Fiscal Year 2008-2010 Adopted Budget) Financtat-Impacts A yes vote on Measure 66 would uphold the Legislature's passage of the personal tax measure, raising an estimated $472 million for state services. A yes vote on Measure 67 would uphold the Legislature's passage of the corpo- rate income tax measure, raising an estimated $261 million for state services. State funds are used E&ftcation, health care, public safety, and other services, (Source: Billo Ties, Measure 65 and 67) Anno vote on Measure 66 or 67 would overtam’sthe Legislahureleveteand: could-resultibadgetculein mapy key areas: : Localeducation:Lese-o£$285 million for K-12 school budgets across Oregon. Could result in teacher-and staff layoffs a shorter schost-year-educationa} Prograinsand service cuts, (Source: Oregon Department of Béucation) jovenite Rr o137 million for juvenile justice programs a i oletenes Oregon. G result in juvenile (Source: Oregon Youth Authority, Clackamas County Juvenile Departaten eat anastce Se ir:Leeot $1825 milion for busnap> v srrseureypep nnn smro"seuiey2e/2'00]22q S06 BO ‘AID UOBEID, peow U2ey 150z ssBUO'ssIWIWIOD AJUNCD JO P1eog ‘Auuno sewey2e|5, PE Celene gh ieL sat 2e pees ae Fi Oregon voters will decide te-approvecrdeny two ferret re revenue ions si that iP generate $733 million in revenue te-balanee thastate budgetand preserve programs-and-serviees. rexeases Ballot Measure 66 Tesises tax on household income at and above $250,000 and $125,000 for individual filers and reduces income “Erctusds. | taxes on 2009 unemployment benefits. Milo, IESE det gowrce nator Tite, Bator Measure 6) nereakes Ballot Measute 67 Raisce $10 corporate minimum tax, business a tax and corporate profits tax. Freda Lote our: Ballot Tie Ballot Measure 67) ing Weld Ueooe Howte Vote Ballots must be received at the Clackamas County. Blections Office, or a designated ballot-drop location, by 8:00 pm on January 26,2010. For further informa- tion on Clackamas County elections, contact: www.clackamas.us/elections/ or call 503-655-8510Schmidt, Gary From: ‘Schmidt, Gary Sent: Monday. December 21, 2009 3:46 PM To: "Carla M CORBIN’ Subject: RE: Clackamas County mailing review Hi Carla, You are fast! Thank you so much for the quick review. We'll have an updated version for your review later today or tomorrow. Gary Schmidt Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908 Original Message----- From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:41 PM To: Schmidt, Gary Subject: Re: Clackamas County mailing review Gary Thave reviewed the draft document you submitted. Recommended changes are incorporated into the attached document, This office does not purport to know whether the information presented in this document is accurate. If someone does not agree with your information, the Secretary of State does not have jurisdiction on complaints of false statements, other than in statements that are required by election law. Under ORS 260.532, the matter must be reviewed by the appropriate Circuit Court We cannot advise a governing body whether they have sufficiently addressed all of the changes approval or rejection of a measure could entail or whether or not the statements sufficiently explain the measure and the measure's effects. We cannot offer advice on whether any critical piece of information is missing in the statement a reader may perceive as affecting their position on the measure, and thus could be deemed to reflect on the statement's neutrality If a written complaint is filed with this office alleging violations of election law about a publication by a governing body, we must examine the publication and surrounding circumstances taking these factors into consideration. The complaint may bring forth surrounding facts and circumstances not within the purview of this office to know prior to a complaint. Therefore, our advice letters do not preclude further review of a publication by this office in the event such a complaint is filed. Finally, we advise any public employees answering questions either in person or by phone during their work hours about the measure that each one has a copy of the 2008 Restrictions on Campaigning by Public Employees. They must remember to provide only factual information and not give any indication of bias toward support or opposition of the measure. Let me know if I can help further,Carla >>> "Schmidt, Gary" 12/21/2009 3:15 PM >>> Hi Carla, Clackamas County is considering sending a mailing to citizens regarding Measure 66 and 67. Attached is a draft of a potential mailing. Would you please review at your soonest opportunity? Your feedback is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Gary Schmidt Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908 BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS Teach Canlt if this mail (ID 20391394) is spam: Spam: http://mbhub.co.clackamas.or.us/canit hp? Not spon: hnpumiob an steckames END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKSSchmidt, Gary From: Moreland, Tracy Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:16 PM To: ‘Schmidt, Gary Attachments: dratt-3.patQuounzedag jeprpne wo8ax9 ‘zo2n0g) ‘uoBaiQ sore surexZoxd aonjsnf 10} uoTTUE H'ST$ aMpay + (Geueg ueumnyt Jo qwounzedog AyunoD seurBpelD ‘sa2taIOg WeUINAT Jo UBUNTedD | WOH2IO 29zn0$) “uoarg ssomme sa21Aras UeUINY 105 LOUTH ¢'ZET$ BINpIy Guaunzedog ajruaane Kuno seurepe|> “auowpny yIno, uo8I0 :2onog) ‘uoBaI0 ssore surex8ord aorysn{ apfusan{ 103 UOT Z-ETS$ anpey + (aonvonpa jo 1uamnzedaq woia1g ‘aamog) “woBex0 ssoaze sio8pnq [ooups ZT-¥ 10} uoTTTUE $gz$ aonpay + :PMOD 2.9 10 99 ainseayy Uo aj0a ou (29 pure o9 amseayy ‘sapnL 201, :292N0s) “saotaras xaypo pure ‘Aqayes 211qnd ‘axe yfeay ‘uoReONpe 403 pasn aze spuny ayeag “sorraras azeas 105 UOTE T9zs pareumysa ue Surster ‘omseaur xe} aurosut ayexod109 ayy jo aBessed samnqesi3a7] ay pjoydn pjnom 29 ainseayy uo aoa sak y “santades aye3s 103 UOTTTTUr Zz 7$ poreumse ue Sutstes ‘amseout x8} yeuoszad ap Jo aBessed samyeps1897 amp ploydn prom 99 amseayy uo a30n sad y Eh Aner). a1)(9 anseayy 07a townie Aroweurpaxg pue anny aoqea vamos) ape"T £q siyoid uo ded suorsesodio> autos save x¥y sostey| ‘Sonu ~#91 UoB219 Ur 99Q'00S$ 2240 YIM suoeI0da09 auI0s 10] santionai wo8a1Q [ei01 Jo % 10 Ajpyeuutxardde jo xe}, > iq ySOuL 205 xey UHUNILU OS TS yeiodio9 gT§ dtp s9svoDUy 29 eanseey 3077 q projpeg “wwoursweig roseueydag pile 2put 1qfeq 9:05) (oop'Z$ 84g axp uo) syyou2q IHS -dojduroun Gog uo sexe) aut65u1 soonpax pur S1>py [en -peripur 104 (268° 4q) od0'ScTs pur (%8"r 4a) ooo'oSes. “7 99 exnseoyy sone 1 Ur WOU G67 g-2e9u98 prom, 110013 03 opDap [um si9100 wORIIQ SVERNS Ira steueRD Me mmosneper 2029 Sp oso Kosomc ica Sony coe snouo|ss|uIlO> AwNo> Jo pitog ‘Auuno> seue2215,Schmidt, Gary From: ‘Schmit, Gary Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:33 PM Tor Austin, Bob; Berard, Jim; Lean, Charlotte; Lininger, Ann; Peterson, Lynn; Wheeler, Steve Co: Lounsbury, Steven; Gertier, Elissa; Moreland, Tracy; Femicci, Terry Subject: Measure 66-87 Mailing Review Attachments: ADV. 09-104 Clackamas Co. Flyer Measures 66-67.pdf, M66-67 Draft v3.pdf Dear Commissioners, Attached are two versions of the Measure 66-67 potential mailing. The "ADV.09-104" file is the first draft, reviewed today by the Oregon Elections office. Many edits were recommended. The "M66-67 Draft v.3" is an updated copy, and the version for your review. We will discuss at issues tomorrow (Tuesday). ‘Thank you, Gary Schmidt Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908 —---Original Message From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:earlam.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:41 PM To: Schmidt, Gary Subject: Re: Clackamas County mailing review Gary T have reviewed the draft document you submitted. Recommended changes are incorporated into the attached document. This office does not purport to know whether the information presented in this document is accurate. If someone does not agree with your information, the Secretary of State does not have jurisdiction on complaints of false statements, other than in statements that are required by election law. Under ORS 260.532, the matter must be reviewed by the appropriate Circuit Court, ‘We cannot advise a governing body whether they have sufficiently addressed all of the changes approval or rejection of a measure could entail or whether or not the statements sufficiently explain the measure and the measure's effects. We cannot offer advice on whether any critical piece of information is missing in the statement a reader may perceive as affecting their position on the measure, and thus could be deemed to reflect ‘on the statement's neutrality If a written complaint is filed with this office alleging violations of election law about a publication by a governing body, we must examine the publication and surrounding circumstances taking these factors into consideration. The complaint may bring forth surrounding facts and circumstances not within the purview of this office to know prior to a complaint. ‘Therefore, our advice letters do not preclude further review of a publication by this office in the event such a complaint is filed. Finally, we advise any public employees answering questions either in person or by phone during their work hours about the measure that each one has 2 copy of the 2008 Restrictions on Campaigning by Public !Employees. They must remember to provide only factual information and not give any indication of bias toward ‘support or opposition of the measure. Let me know if I can help further, CarlaFacts About Ballot Measures 66 & 67 Clackamas County Budget For budget year 2009-2010, lackarnas County received $644 million in state funds: $16.1 million for the Road Fund, to provide road maintenance Do nobialude * $41.2 million for Human Services, supplying the majority of the operating Peckuets revenue for Community Health, Clackamas Mental Health Organization z and Social Services + $7. million for Community Corrections, providing supervision and ser- vices to crime victims (Source: Clackamas County, Oregon, Fiscal Year 200-2010 ‘Adopted Budget) CLACKAMAS COUNTY Financial impacts f A yes vote on Measure 66 would uphold the Legislature's passage of the personal tax measure, raising an estimated $472 million for state services. A yes vote on Measure 67 would uphold the Legislature's passage of the corpo- rate income tax measure, raising an estimated $261 million for state services. State funds are used E&fication, health care, public safety, and other services. (Source: Ballot Tites, Messure 66 and 67) Anno vote on Measure 66 or 67 would ovestumsthe Legislatunéevetzand could-sesteHt-in-budgel-cuis.in many key areas: . Ped ‘Local-edueationt-Less-e£$285 million for K-12 school budgets across One. programs.and seruicecuts. (Source: Oregon Department of Education) Javenite eR 137 million for juvenile justice: oe a . ; paper abet ac i ate iedD Oregon. result in juvenile. i (Source: Oregon Youth Authority, Clackamas County fvenile Depart) $182.5 million for human’srrseuepepanva stvao"seweY22)2"°09O29q, $026 YO “AUD YOBIIO Peoy Uaey 1S0Z su@UOYSSIWUIOD AjUNOD Jo PILOg “AUNO' seUIEDDE|D relay ttle eel x Oregon voiers will decide to-approveerdeny two Ir POMUE MCLEE revenue provisions i that WaPoeserate 979 million in revert rbolenee the state budgctand-preserve programsand-serviees. Trertases Ballot Measure 66 Raises tax on household income at and above $250,000 and $125,000 for individual filers and reduces income ncuds | taxes on 2009 unemployment benefits. tw is rmnowie Wa fet (Souice: Ballot Till, Ballot Measure 68) Flue Trereaes Ballot Measure 67 Raises $10 corporate minimum tax, business ‘minimum tax and corporate profits tax. ‘HLL (Source Ballot Tie, Ballot Measure 67) sng Weakd UiOwaot How-to Vote Ballots must be received at the Clackamas County Flections Office, or a designated ballot-drop location, by 8:00 pm on January 26, 2010. For further informa- tion on Clackamas County elections, contact: www.clackamas.us/elections/ or call 503-655-8510Queunzedag jepipne uo8a9 a2mn0g) uoSaiQ ssouse surezBoad aorisnf 10y MOTTTU FCS aONpay Ganuazag ueumy Jo waMNedag LqMoD seuTMpED ‘sor]AZ0g UEUMP Jo JuaUNTedoq WoREI0 *22mos) “woBaiQ SsoIe saAzas ULUINY 10} MOTT CZETS aMpay + Quaunzedag opueang Ayano) searepeyy “Aruoymy yIMo, woB1G :>mN0g) ‘uo8a19 ssone suresBord aoysn{ apuaan{ 105 uoNTU L-ET$ aanpay + (wonwonpg so zsounzedaq wo8s10 ‘am0s) “wo8a19 ssox2e sye8png Jooups ZT-1 10) uo Cgzg aoMpay + “pod 29 10 99 amseayy Uo aja ou (29 puk gg amnstayy ‘sept, JO[[eg IMG) “santaras xaqio pur “Kayes oyqnd ‘are> wapeay ‘uoNeonps 203 pasn axe spuny ayerg “saotazas ayeys 105 uOTTHM LOZ} parewunsa ue Burster ‘omseour xe} aurozut aez0dz09 ayp jo aBessed saznaejsi8e7] ay ploydn prom 29 amseayy uo a10A sak y “saniazas aqeys 107 uo Zz p$ payeumso ue Burstex ‘omseout x83 jeuosiad arp jo aBessed samnqejsi8a7] ayy proydn prom gg amseayy uo ay0A sok y A ee ae.yeas AzojeuRaxg pue appt] ro4Teq ‘99mOS) gLE-T Aq. siyoad Uo fed suoneiodio> awios soyer xe} sastey “santo 01 u0#910, UL 000'00$5 4240 yptM suonrexodio> amos 40} s2nUisAad UoS2I0 [UIO3 Jo ¥,1'9 AjereMXoadde Jo xe iq ySour 103 xe] uUTTETLA OCTS fon syex0d109 OT ayp saseaI IU] 29 eansvoyy ioTeg 39 arnseayy OTUs “UdMDyES KoreuE|dx pure -s04n0§) *(QO'Z$ 3814 9tp UO) syyDUEG usu ~Aojduroum §0z wo saxe4 auao.m seonpax pur s “puarput 103 (%8'T Aq) 000'SCTS PU (%8"t Aq) ODO‘OSTs smuorseuieypep"co O79 S¥OL6 YO “1D VOR “Auuno> soure9>21>Schmidt, Gary Schmidt, Gary Monday, December 21, 2009 5:34 PM ‘Cowan, Danielle: Austin, Jim FW: Measure 65-67 Mailing Review ADV. 09-104 Clackamas Co. Flyer Measures 68-67,pof, M66-67 Draft v3.pdf Original Message From: Schmidt, Gary Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:33 PM To: Austin, Bob; Berard, Jim; Lehan, Charlotte; Lininger, Ann; Peterson, Lynn; Wheeler, Steve Co: Lounsbury, Steven; Gertler, Elissa; Moreland, Tracy; Ferrucei, Terry Subject: Measure 66-67 Mailing Review Dear Commissioners, Attached are two versions of the Measure 66-67 potential mailing. The "ADV.09-104" file is the first draft, reviewed today by the Oregon Elections office. Many edits were recommended. The "M66-67 Draft v.3” is an updated copy, and the version for your review. We will discuss at issues tomorrow (Tuesday). Thank you. Gary Schmidt Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908 Original Message-— From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:41 PM ‘To: Schmidt, Gary Subject: Re: Clackamas County mailing review Gary Thave reviewed the draft document you submitted. Recommended changes are incorporated into the attached document. “This office does not purport to know whether the information presented in this document is accurate. If someone does not agree with your information, the Secretary of State does not have jurisdiction on complaints Of false statements, other than in statements that are required by election law. Under ORS 260.532, the matter ‘must be reviewed by the appropriate Cireuit Court. ‘We cannot advise a governing body whether they have sufficiently addressed all of the changes approval or rejection of a measure could entail or whether or not the statements sufficiently explain the measure and the measure's effects, We cannot offer advice on whether any critical piece of information is missing in thestatement a reader may perceive as affecting their position on the measure, and thus could be deemed to refleet ‘on the statement’s neutrality, Ifa written complaint is filed with this office alleging violations of election law about a publication by a governing body, we must examine the publication and surrounding cireumstanees taking these factors into consideration. The complaint may bring forth surrounding facts and circumstances not within the purview of this office to know prior to a complaint. Therefore, our advice letters do not preclude further review of a publication by this office in the event such a complaint is filed. Finally, we advise any public employees answering questions either in person or by phone during their work hours about the measure that each one has a copy of the 2008 Restrictions on Campaigning by Public Employees. They must remember to provide only factual information and not give any indication of bias toward support or opposition of the measure. Let me know if I can help further, CarlaFacts About Ballot Measures 66 & 67 eee Clackamas County Budget } For budget year 2008-2010, Clackamas County received $64.4 milion i state funds : $16.1 million for the Road Fund, to provide road maintenance Denali actude, + $41.2 million for Human Services, supplying the majority of the operating revenue for Community Health, Clackamas Mental Health Organization and Social Services + $7.1 million for Community Corrections, providing supervision and ser- vices to crime victims (Source: Clackamas County, Oregon, Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Adopted Budget) Firranctat Impacts ‘A yes vote on Measure 66 would uphold the Legislature's passage of the personal tax measure, raising an estimated $472 million for state services. ‘A yes vote on Measure 67 would uphold the Legislature's passage of the corpo- rate income tax meastire, raising an estimated $261 million for state services. State funds are used B&fGcation, health care, public safety, and other services, {Gource: Ballot Titles, Measure 66 and 67) A no vote on Measure 66 or 67 would wveshuntoshe Lagisatiralewetoaid could-sesuitirrbudget-cutein many key areas: Red ‘LecaLeducation:Loss-0£5285 million for K-12 school budgets across Oregon. ould-zesult in-toacher-and.staft-layofts-ashorter schostyear-education programs-and service-cats. (Source: Oregon Department of Education). Re. ee Jasonile Come BSA 1537 million for juvenile justice programs acriss " small adberson patgle Goad Oregon. Ge: result in juvenile-zelapseof criminal behavior . (Gource: Oregon Youth Authority, Clackamas County Juvenile Departaen’) seat ana eset Mec tose $1825 ion fr Furiasr’sewiey2ep'mava stvs0'sewsey2217°02622q S026 UO ‘AID UoRIQ Peoy udey 1502 s1auiois|untuo Alun} Jo pueog ‘Auuno5 sewey>e|> PE lelar tee Rael as a sande rears fs Oregon voters will decide to-approve-or-deny two rete revenue provisions approved-by the Oregorriegisiature that Sef generate $733 million in revenue te-bakanee the-stete badgetand preserveprogrameranc-serviees, rertases Ballot Measure 66 ‘Raiees tax on household income at and above $250,000 ‘and $125,000 for individual filers and reduces income ‘Datudt. | taxes on 2009 unemployment benefits. a0. bs der (Govrce: Balt Tie Ballot Measure 65) Pelee ATrerease Ballot Measure 67 ‘Raises $10 corporate minimum tax; business sninimum tax and corporate profits tax “44st Goute Ballot Tie, Ballot Measre 6) “ek Weued Wirreaat, Hewte-Vete Ballots must be received at the Clackamas County Elections Office, or a designated ballot-drop location, by 8:00 pm on January 26, 2010. For further informa- tion on Clackamas County elections, contact: www.clackamas.us/elections/ or call 503-655-8510Quaunzedag [eprpne wo8a19 :a2mog) ‘uo8ai9 ssoxse surexBord aorjsnf 10) uoTTM FSTS aNpay + (so1a2ag weamy Jo Iwaunzedag KumoD seMMpEL) ‘sa>mLxas HUE Jo.INDUNATEdaG woBDIG ‘271005) “wo8aIQ ssone sadtATas WeUIMY 10} HOTTA SZET$ eNpIy + Quounredeg spuaan tppeay ‘uonenpe 303 pasn aze spuny ayeag ‘sartaras azeys 10} UOT TOZs PareuIAsa we Burstex ‘emseau xe} autour ayez0dz09 ayp jo aBessed samaeysiBo7| arp pjoydn pmom 79 amsvapy wo 3104 soy “sartaras a783s 103 uoyur Z/ p§ payeumTyso ue Burstes ‘omseout xv3 jeuosiad ayp Jo aBessed s,amaepsi8a7 amp ploydn prom 99 amseayy uo ayo sad yMS (gg 2s08e Jor | 5 Qupumyeag Aaoyeurjaxg pur ary ioyegeamos) q.e-T Aq siyoud uo ded suonezodio auios sayes xe) Sostey “santo © “nat uoBa19 ut 900'00Gs 4940 wpiaa suosexodz0> au0s 40} sonuaaaz wo8aaQ) [8403 30 % T"9 Apereumoadde jo%xe ‘uINUMUNU 20 sossatIsNg sour 10} x} umUMTUTLE OTS soystqeass oeey uttnrarur ayerod00 QT aug seseaDUy 29 omseoy 307[°q ainseayy Joyed “uouIayeg Aroyeurydxs ue PLL ole =>mos) (OOP'Zs IS1y 24) UO) siysueq yuu -Aojduzaum g9z. uo sexe) auio>uj soonpar pure &39)y yen “Prater 405 (%8°T Aq) ooo‘szTs pur (ag'T 49) OOO'oSes " Baoge put 3 otuo>uy ployosno4 uo xe sasean UL ‘99 emmseow J0T[¢g -pnubaar ur orm g¢7.¢ ayerus8 pmom 3Ey suorsyaoud 20954 omt 61 apap yf s1a108 408910 IZ9 B99 SoINseoW JO}/Eg SNES mmuepep mmm src seuie>e'09929 | ww SPOLE YO ‘Ald UBD eoy Uaey Iso Ssouoyssautwo> Azuno> Jo pits “Auuno9 swey>e1> JSchmidt, Gary From: Lounsbury, Steven Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:51 PM To: ‘Schmidt, Gary Subject: RE: Measure 68-87 Mailing Review Gary: The SOS also struck the word "important" in their review. You should delete it on page 2 in the green section, Notice: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or it appears from the context or otherwise that you hhave received this e-mail in error, please advise me immediately by reply e-mail, keep the contents confidential, and immediately delete the message and any attachments from your system. Steven Lounsbury Clackamas County Counsel Public Services Building 2051 Kaen Road Oregon City, Or 97045 Phone: 503-742-5391 Fax: 503-742-5397 StevenLou@co.clackamas.or.us For a map and directions go to: http://www.co.clackamas.or.us Original Message From: Schmidt, Gary Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:33 PM To: Austin, Bob; Bernard, Jim; Lehan, Charlotte; Lininger, Ann; Peterson, Lynn; Wheeler, Steve Ce: Lounsbury, Steven; Gertler, Blissa; Moreland, Tracy; Ferrucci, Terry ‘Subject: Measure 66-67 Mailing Review Dear Commissioners, Attached are two versions of the Measure 66-67 potential mailing. The "ADV.09-104" file is the first draft, reviewed today by the Oregon Elections office. Many edits were recommended, The "M66-67 Draft v.3" is an updated copy, and the version for your review. We will discuss at issues tomorrow (Tuesday) Thank you. Gary Schmi Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908 --~-Original Message——- From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:41 PM To: Schmidt, Gary Subject: Re: Clackamas County mailing reviewGary Thave reviewed the draft document you submitted. Recommended changes are incorporated into the attached document. This office does not purport to know whether the information presented in this document is accurate, If someone does not agree with your information, the Secretary of State does not have jurisdiction on complaints of false statements, other than in statements that are required by election law. Under ORS 260.532, the matter must be reviewed by the appropriate Circuit Court We cannot advise a governing body whether they have sufficiently addressed all of the changes approval or rejection of a measure could entail or whether or not the statements sufficiently explain the measure and the measure's effects. We cannot offer advice on whether any critical piece of information is missing in the statement a reader may perceive as affecting their position on the measure, and thus could be deemed to reflect on the statement's neutrality. If a written complaint is filed with this office alleging violations of election law about a publication by a governing body, we must examine the publication and surrounding circumstances taking these factors into consideration. The complaint may bring forth surrounding facts and circumstances not within the purview of this office to know prior to a complaint. Therefore, our advice letters do not preclude further review of a publication by this office in the event such a complaint is filed. Finally, we advise any public employees answering questions either in person or by phone during their work hours about the measure that each one has a copy of the 2008 Restrictions on Campaigning by Public Employees. They must remember to provide only factual information and not give any indication of bias toward support or opposition of the measure. Let me know if I can help further, CarlaSchmidt, Gary From: Peterson, Lynn Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 7:30 PM To: ‘Schmidt, Gary Subject: RE: Measure 66-67 Mailing Review ‘The final version looks awesome! From: Schmidt, Gary Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:33 PM Austin, Bob; Bernard, Jim; Lehan, Charlotte; Lininger, Ann; Peterson, Lynn; Wheeler, Steve Co: Lounsbury, Steven; Gertler, Elissa; Moreland, Tracy; Ferrucei, Terry Subject: Measure 66-67 Mailing Review Dear Commissioners, Attached are two versions of the Measure 66-67 potential mailing. The "ADV.09-104" file is the first draft, reviewed today by the Oregon Elections office. Many edits were recommended. The "M66-67 Draft v.3" is an updated copy, and the version for your review. We will discuss at issues tomorrow (Tuesday). Thank you, Gary Schmidt Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908 Original Message~ From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:41 PM To: Schmidt, Gary Subject: Re: Clackamas County mailing review Gary Thave reviewed the draft document you submitted. Recommended changes are incorporated into the attached document. This office does not purport to know whether the information presented in this document is accurate. If someone does not agree with your information, the Secretary of State does not have jurisdiction on complaints of false statements, other than in statements that are required by election law. Under ORS 260.532, the matter must be reviewed by the appropriate Circuit Court. We cannot advise a governing body whether they have sufficiently addressed all of the changes approval or rejection of a measure could entail or whether or not the statements sufficiently explain the measure and the measure's effects. We cannot offer advice on whether any critical piece of information is missing in the statement a reader may perceive as affecting their position on the measure, and thus could be deemed to reflect on the statement's neutrality.If'a written complaint is filed with this office alleging violations of election law about a publication by a governing body, we must examine the publication and surrounding circumstances taking these factors into consideration. The complaint may bring forth surrounding facts and circumstances not within the purview of this office to know prior to a complaint. Therefore, our advice letters do not preclude further review of a publication by this office in the event such a complaint is filed Finally, we advise any public employees answering questions either in person or by phone during their work hours about the measure that each one has a copy of the 2008 Restrictions on Campaigning by Public Employees. They must remember to provide only factual information and not give any indication of bias toward support or opposition of the measure. Let me know if I can help further, CarlaSchmidt, Gary Moreland, Tracy ‘Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:31 AM Schmidt, Gary draft-4 patGuaunzedeq jeprpne uoBaig ‘2unos) ‘uosarQ sso surex801d_ aorsn{ 103 woHTTU p'STs aonpay (sonatas ueumyy Jo wounzedeg Amo seureype|y ‘sa>1A79§ WEN] yo quunsedaq wo8e1O ‘aomos) "UOBIIQ) $8023 sodiadas ueUMY 10} VOI CZTS OMpay Guaunzedag epuaane uno seurespe{) ‘Kauoyny nog uoSaxQ ‘e1n0$) ‘UOBaIQ Sssore surexB0rd_ aonsn{ apueant 203 vow Z-ET§ aanpay (coneonpg jo 1wounzedeq 08219 29103) -uoBerQ ssoz2¥ sy93pnq [ooups ZT-y 703 OTT ¢gz$ aanpay :P[NOD 19 10 99 amMseayy uo ajoa ou Ran ea a ko} (29 pue gg aunseayy ‘spit Joye 22m0s) “santas raypo pur ‘Kayes 2x qnd ‘azeo ypqeay ‘worReanpa 203 pasn axe spung ayeag “sarraras a7e1s 10} UOTE T9Z$ payeumsa ue Suysrex ‘omseaus xe} auo3ut azezodio2 ays yo aBessed samaeysi07 ay proydn pmom 19 amseoyy uo 2304 say “sed1A1as a}83S 10} UOT] “(1 ZZp$ payeuryse ue Bursres ‘amseaur xe} Jeuosiad ay jo aBessed samaepsi857 a Proydn prom 99 aanseayy wo ay0a sak y