Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Schmidt, Gary

Tuesday, December 22, 2009 11 :32 AM Lounsbury, Steven

Measure 66-67 draft

d raft-4. pdf

Hi Steven,

Attached is an updated version of the mailing the Board would like to do, based on their edits from today's issues session. Would you or a member of your team please look this over and offer your input before I send to the Secretary of State for final approval? If it is possible to have your review today I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

From: Moreland/ Tracy

Sent: Tuesday/ December 22/2009 10:31 AM To: Schmidt/ Gary

Subject:

1

"'"''''"' Q Q

•

•

•

Schmidt. Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lounsbury, Steven

Tuesday, December 22, 2009 11 :44 AM Schmidt, Gary

RE: Measure 66-67 draft

Gary: Looks fine to me. J think you should send it to the 50S for review. Thank you.

Notice: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or it appears from the context or otherwise that you have received this e-mail in error, please advise me immediately by reply e-mail, keep the contents confidential, and immediately delete the message and any attachments from your system.

Steven Lounsbury

Clackamas County Counsel Public Services Building

2051 Kaen Road

Oregon City, Or 97045

Phone: 503-742-5391

Fax: 503-742-5397 StevenLou@co. clackamas. or. us

For a map and directions go to: http://www.co.clackamas.or.us

From: Schmidt, Gary

Sent: Tuesday, December 22,2009 11:32 AM To: Lounsbury, Steven

Subject: Measure 66-67 draft

Hi Steven,

Attached is an updated version of the mailing the Board would like to do, based on their edits from today's issues session, Would you or a member of your team please look this over and offer your input before I send to the Secretary of State for final approval? If it is possible to have your review today I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

1

From: Moreland, Tracy

Sent: Tuesday, December 22,2009 10:31 AM To: Schmidt, Gary

Subject:

2

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Schmidt, Gary

Tuesday, December 22,20091 :23 PM 'Carla M CORBIN'

Clackamas Revised mailing review Clackamas draft-4.pdf

Hi Carla,

Attached is a revised draft of a Clackamas County mailing for Measure 66 and 67. Would you please review and let me know if it meets the needs of an educational mailing.

May I ask you a mailing question: the County is considering mailing the postcard to registered voters/households who have voted in the last election. Is that an allowable mailing parameter? Can you provide us counsel to that question?

Thanks again for all you help.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

1

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Carla M CORBIN [carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Tuesday, December 22,20092:21 PM Schmidt, Gary

Re: Clackamas Revised mailing review

ADV. 09-105 Clackamas Co. Flyer Measures 66-67.pdf

Gary

My suggested changes are attached. Rather than send the mailer to isolated voters, I would send the mailer to every household. Otherwise a potential registrant or voter might see the isolated mailing as trying to target a specific group and file a complaint.

Let me know if I can help further, Carla

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.c1ackamas.or.us> 12/22/2009 1:22 PM »> Hi Carla,

Attached is a revised draft of a Clackamas County mailing for Measure 66 and 67. Would you please review and let me know if it meets the needs of an educational mailing.

May I ask you a mailing question: the County is considering mailing the postcard to registered voterslhouseholds who have voted in the last election. Is that an allowable mailing parameter? Can you provide us counsel to that question?

Thanks again for all you help.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

BEGIN-ANTISP AM- VOTING-LINKS

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 20406007) is spam:

Spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.us/canitlb.php?i=20406007&m=7f92d5ae6219&c=s

Not spam: http://mhub.co.c1ackamas.or.us/canitlb.php?i=20406007&m=7f92d5ae6219&c=n Forget vote: http://rnhub.co.c1ackamas.or.us/canitlb.php?i=20406007&m=7f92d5ae6219&c=f

END-ANTISPAM -VOTING-LINKS

1

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Schmidt, Gary

Tuesday, December 22,20092:54 PM 'Carla M CORBIN'

RE: Clackamas Revised mailing review

Thank you Carla. Would you please clarify your counsel-should the mailer go to every household in the county, or just every registered voter in the county?

Thank you.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

-----Original Message-----

From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 22,20092:21 PM

To: Schmidt, Gary

Subject: Re: Clackamas Revised mailing review

Gary

My suggested changes are attached. Rather than send the mailer to isolated voters, I would send the mailer to every household. Otherwise a potential registrant or voter might see the isolated mailing as trying to target a specific group and file a complaint.

Let me know if I can help further, Carla

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.clackamas.or.us> 12/22/20091:22 PM»> Hi Carla,

Attached is a revised draft of a Clackamas County mailing for Measure 66 and 67. Would you please review and let me know if it meets the needs of an educational mailing.

May I ask you a mailing question: the County is considering mailing the postcard to registered voterslhouseholds who have voted in the last election. Is that an allowable mailing parameter? Can you provide us counsel to that question?

Thanks again for all you help.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

1

BEGIN-ANTISPAM- VOTING-LINKS

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 20406007) is spam:

Spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.usicanitib.php?i=20406007 &m=7f92d5ae6219&c=s

Not spam: http://mhub.co.c1ackamas.or.us/canitib.php?i=20406007&m=7f92d5ae6219&c=n Forget vote: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or . us/ canitlb.php?i=2 0406007 &m=7f92d5ae6219&c=f

END-ANTISPAM- VOTING-LINKS

2

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Carla M CORBIN [carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Tuesday, December 22,20092:55 PM Schmidt, Gary

RE: Clackamas Revised mailing review

I would send it to every household in the county.

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.clackamas.or.us> 12122/20092:54 PM »>

Thank you Carla. Would you please clarify your counsel--should the mailer go to every household in the county, or just every registered voter in the county?

Thank you.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

-----Original Message-----

From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:21 PM

To: Schmidt, Gary

Subject: Re: Clackamas Revised mailing review

Gary

My suggested changes are attached. Rather than send the mailer to isolated voters, I would send the mailer to every household. Otherwise a potential registrant or voter might see the isolated mailing as trying to target a specific group and file a complaint.

Let me know if I can help further, Carla

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.clackamas.or.us> 12/22/2009 1 :22 PM »> Hi Carla,

Attached is a revised draft of a Clackamas County mailing for Measure 66 and 67. Would you please review and let me know if it meets the needs of an educational mailing.

May I ask you a mailing question: the County is considering mailing the postcard to registered voterslhouseholds who have voted in the last election. Is that an allowable mailing parameter? Can you provide us counsel to that question?

Thanks again for all you help.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

1

BEGIN-ANTISPAM- VOTING-LINKS

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 20406612) is spam:

Spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.us/canitlb.php?i=20406612&m=784a33f67e57&c=s

Not spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.us/canit/b.php?i=20406612&m=784a33f67e57&c=n Forget vote: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.us/canitlb.php?i=20406612&m=784a33f67e57&c=f

END-ANTISP AM-VOTING-LINKS

2

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Schmidt, Gary

Tuesday, December 22,20092:56 PM 'Carla M CORBIN'

RE: Clackamas Revised mailing review

Thanks for your speedy assistance today!

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

-----Original Message-----

From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 20092:55 PM

To: Schmidt, Gary

Subject: RE: Clackamas Revised mailing review

I would send it to every household in the county.

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.clackamas.or.us> 12/22/20092:54 PM »>

Thank you Carla. Would you please clarify your counsel--should the mailer go to every household in the county, or just every registered voter in the county?

Thank you.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

-----Original Message-----

From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 22,20092:21 PM

To: Schmidt, Gary

Subject: Re: Clackamas Revised mailing review

Gary

My suggested changes are attached. Rather than send the mailer to isolated voters, I would send the mailer to every household. Otherwise a potential registrant or voter might see the isolated mailing as trying to target a specific group and file a complaint.

Let me know if I can help further, Carla

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.clackamas.or.us> 12/22/2009 1:22 PM »>

1

Hi Carla,

Attached is a revised draft of a Clackamas County mailing for Measure 66 and 67. Would you please review and let me know if it meets the needs of an educational mailing.

May I ask you a mailing question: the County is considering mailing the postcard to registered voters/households who have voted in the last election. Is that an allowable mailing parameter? Can you provide us counsel to that question?

Thanks again for all you help.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

BEGIN-ANTISPAM -VOTING-LINKS

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 20406612) is spam:

Spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or. us/canitlb.php?i=20406612&m=784a33f67e57 &c=s

Not spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.lls/canit/b.php?i=20406612&m=784a33f67e57&c=n Forget vote: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.us/canitlb.php?i=20406612&m=784a33 f67 e57 &c=f

END-ANTISPAM- VOTING-LINKS

2

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Schmidt, Gary

Tuesday, December 22,20093:31 PM Austin, Jim

FW: Clackamas Revised mailing review

ADV. 09-105 Clackamas Co. Flyer Measures 66-67.pdf

FYI

-----Original Message-----

From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 22,20092:21 PM

To: Schmidt, Gary

Subject: Re: Clackamas Revised mailing review

Gary

My suggested changes are attached. Rather than send the mailer to isolated voters, I would send the mailer to every household. Otherwise a potential registrant or voter might see the isolated mailing as trying to target a specific group and file a complaint.

Let me know if I can help further, Carla

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.c1ackamas.or.us> 12/22/2009 1 :22 PM »> Hi Carla,

Attached is a revised draft of a Clackamas County mailing for Measure 66 and 67. Would you please review and let me know if it meets the needs of an educational mailing.

May I ask you a mailing question: the County is considering mailing the postcard to registered voters/households who have voted in the last election. Is that an allowable mailing parameter? Can you provide us counsel to that question?

Thanks again for all you help.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

BEGIN-ANTISP AM- VOTING-LINKS

1

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 20406007) is spam: .

Spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.us/canitlb.php?i=20406007 &m=7f92d5ae6219&c=s

Not spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.usicanitlb.php?i=20406007&m=7f92d5ae6219&c=n Forget vote: http://mhub.co.c1ackamas.or.us/canitlb.php?i=20406007 &m=7f92d5ae6219&c=f

END-ANTISPAM - VOTING-LINKS

2

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Schmidt, Gary

Tuesday, December 22,20093:31 PM Austin, Jim

FW: Clackamas Revised mailing review

FYI

-----Original Message-----

From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 22,20092:55 PM

To: Schmidt, Gary

Subject: RE: Clackamas Revised mailing review

I would send it to every household in the county.

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.clackamas.or.uS> 12/22/20092:54 PM »>

Thank you Carla. Would you please clarity your counsel--should the mailer go to every household in the county, or just every registered voter in the county?

Thank you.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

-----Original Message-----

From: Carla M CORBIN [mailto:carla.m.corbin@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:21 PM

To: Schmidt, Gary

Subject: Re: Clackamas Revised mailing review

Gary

My suggested changes are attached. Rather than send the mailer to isolated voters, I would send the mailer to every household. Otherwise a potential registrant or voter might see the isolated mailing as trying to target a specific group and file a complaint.

Let me know if I can help further, Carla

»> "Schmidt, Gary" <GSchmidt@co.clackamas.or.us> 12/2212009 1 :22 PM »> Hi Carla,

Attached is a revised draft of a Clackamas County mailing for Measure 66 and 67. Would you please review and let me know if it meets the needs of an educational mailing.

1

May I ask you a mailing question: the County is considering mailing the postcard to registered voters/households who have voted in the last election. Is that an allowable mailing parameter? Can you provide us counsel to that question?

Thanks again for all you help.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

BEGIN-ANTISPAM- VOTING- LINKS

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 20406612) is spam:

Spam: http://mhub.co.ciackamas.or.us/canitJb.php?i=20406612&m=784a33f67e57&c=s

Not spam: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or . us! canit/b.php?i =20406612&m=7 84a3 3 f67 e57 &c=n Forget vote: http://mhub.co.clackamas.or.us/canitJb.php?i=20406612&m=784a33 f67 e57 &c=f

END-ANTISPAM- VOTING-LINKS

2

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Moreland, Tracy

Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4: 12 PM Schmidt, Gary

FW: PRICING FOR POSTCARD

Importance:

High

Here is quote from the vendor that does Citizen News- significantly less expensive- and I told them the time frame we wanted. Lets talk before you go to BCe

From: Gustafson Sharon [mailto:SGustafson@EagleWebPress.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 22,20093:47 PM

To: Moreland, Tracy

Subject: PRICING FOR POSTCARD Importance: High

Hi Tracy,

Here is the pricing for the postcard we discussed:

175,000 Copies 6"X8"

10 PT C1S 4CP/4CP

Printing: $6,167.00

Simplify Mail Prep 174,137 Copies & Delivery to Portland P.O. $1,846.37

Estimated postage: $24,205.00

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Sharon

Sharon Gustqfson Eagle Web Press

P.O. Box 12008 ~ Salem, OR 97309 Office: (800) 800-7980 ext. 302 Fax: (503) 393-4917

E-mail: sgustafson@eaglewebpress.com

Spam Not spam

Forget previous vote

1

Schmidt, Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Moreland, Tracy

Tuesday, December 22, 2009 5:07 PM Schmidt, Gary

card changes

draft-4b.pdf

Here is latest changes

1

r.t5 r.t5 ...c:
~ ~ ,j.,J
Q) Q) ~
u u
Q) '> Q) '> Q) r.t5
til lo-I til lo-I ...c: Q)
....... Q) 'n! Q) a u
cd til til '>
lo-I lo-I 0 ,-,.
'"d Q) '"d Q) ....... lo-I r-
tI +J .j..J Q) sc
~ ~ qI ro til ""0
,j.,J +-'
~ til ~ til U lo-I ~
r§ Q)
lo-I lo-I -E sc
so ~ r- .s Q) t.O
so I=l (,0 I=l lo-I 0 Q)
Jo.<
~ .s '"d ;::I
0 ~ 0 § <Il
. ,...., ...... '"d <"II
;:::I ,......, ;:::I s
,......, Q)
til ...... til Q) ::E
cd S ro S til ~
Q) Q) ;:::I .j..J <Il~
~ N ~ rl ~ ~ Q)
r--- so ':;::l
ro ....
I=l ~ I=l N ro til E-<
0 VT 0 VT til U -!-'
'"d '"d '"d .... 0
Q) Q) 0"""" ~
+-' Q) .j..J Q) ;:::log
0 ,j.,J 0 tl ~
> ro > 4-1 P. hl
CI) S CI) S Q) ft ~
o:u .,...., o:u ...... tI ~ ;::I
::>-.,+-' ::>-.,,j.,J 0
« ID « ~ +-' ro IZl
(/') U -- 4,11. ; ~.~.~

o

Schmidt, Gary

Importance:

Schmidt, Gary

Tuesday, December 22,20095:11 PM Wheeler, Steve

DRAFT Measure 66-67 Update APPROVAL NEEDED

High

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

DRAFT below=Steve, the cost quote is higher to mail to only registered households. Please review this message. Thanks ..

*************************

Dear Commissioners:

We have updated information for you on the Measure 66-67 mailing. Please review and provide your approval by 11 am tomorrow (Wed .• Dec. 23).

The Secretary of State's office recommends a mailing to every household in the county.

Based on your discussion today. you wish to send the mailing to every registered (voter) household in the county.

The estimated cost for mailing the postcard to every registered (voter) household (118,000 households) in the county is $40,000.

The estimated cost for mailing the postcard to every household (175,000 households) in the county is $30.000.

It is more expensive to mail to registered households because address labels are needed and that increases the processing costs.

Our recommendation is to mail the postcard to every household in the county.

Please send me your approval, or other decision. by 11 am Wednesday.

If you have any questions please let me know. Thank you.

1

SchmidtJ Gary

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Schmidt, Gary

Tuesday, December 22,20096:11 PM

Austin, Bob; Bernard, Jim; Lehan, Charlotte; Lininger, Ann; Peterson, Lynn; Wheeler, Steve Gertler, Elissa

Approval Needed--Measure 66-67 Update

Dear Commissioners:

We have updated information for you on the Measure 66-67 mailing. Please review and provide your approval by 11 am tomorrow (Wed., Dec. 23).

The Secretary of State's office recommends a mailing to every household in the county.

Based on your discussion today, you wish to send the mailing to every registered (voter) household in the county.

The estimated cost for mailing the postcard to every registered (voter) household (118,000 households) in the county is $40,000.

The estimated cost for mailing the postcard to every household (175,000 households) in the county is $30,000.

It is more expensive to mail to registered households because sorted addresses are needed and that increases the processing costs.

Our recommendation is to mail the postcard to every household in the county.

Please send me your approval, or other decision, by 11 am tomorrow (Wednesday).

If you have any questions please let me know.

Thank you.

Gary Schmidt

Public and Government Affairs Clackamas County 503-742-5908

1