Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scott F. Grannis
March 18, 2010
1
NAPM - Orange County
The thinking one year ago:
2
NAPM - Orange County
The thinking today:
3
NAPM - Orange County
Friedman’s “Plucking Model” of growth says U.S. could
grow over 6% per year for the next 4 years
16
U.S. Real GDP
10
3.1% p.a. growth trend
from 1966 on
4
NAPM - Orange County
Stocks have a lot of upside potential as well
2000 2000
S&P 500 Index
1000 1000
6.8% p.a.
100 trend 100
8% p.a.
trend
5
NAPM - Orange County
Key tenets of Supply-Side theory
6
NAPM - Orange County
The challenges we face today
7
NAPM - Orange County
Monetary policy is extremely accommodative
8%
6%
Real Fed Funds
4%
2%
0%
1-10 Slope
-2%
8
NAPM - Orange County
Bank reserves are a potential inflation time bomb
1400
Adjusted Bank Reserves
1000
Quantitative Easing
Y2K 9/11
100
9
NAPM - Orange County
Gold is sending a strong inflationary signal
2000
Real Gold Price
1000
700
500
400
300
Source: Bloomberg, BLS http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com
1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008
10
NAPM - Orange County
The dollar is very weak
135
Real Broad Dollar Index
125
115
105
average
95
85
11
NAPM - Orange County
Commodity prices are rising
500
CRB/Reuters Spot Commodity Index
400
300
12
NAPM - Orange County
Oil is expensive, but not a killer
150
Real Crude Oil Prices
100
70
40
20
10
13
NAPM - Orange County
Inflation is alive and well
200
Producer Price Index
3.5%
inflation
'04-
100 1.7% inflation
'83-'03
9% inflation
0-1% '74-'82
inflation
'60-'65 4% inflation
'66-'73 Source: BLS
30
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
scottgrannis.blogspot.com
14
NAPM - Orange County
But bonds are priced to slow growth (2-3%)
6.0%
Strong 10-yr Treasury Yields
5.5%
Growth
5.0%
Average
4.5% Growth
4.0%
Slow Growth
3.5%
3.0%
Recession
2.5%
2.0% Depression
1.5% & Deflation
Source: Bloomberg scottgrannis.blogspot.com
1.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
15
NAPM - Orange County
Federal government spending has surged
30%
Federal Government Finances
25%
Spending
20%
15%
Revenues
10%
5%
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Treasury; rolling 12-month periods; Feb '10 est.
0%
1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009
scottgrannis.blogspot.com
16
NAPM - Orange County
Total government spending is at a post-War high
60
U.S. Government Spending, % of GDP
50
40
30
20
10
17
NAPM - Orange County
A deficit >10% of GDP is a real problem
3% Surplus/Deficit % of GDP
surplus
0%
deficit
-3%
-6%
-9%
$1.5 trillion
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Treasury
-12%
1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008
scottgrannis.blogspot.com
18
NAPM - Orange County
Higher tax rates would likely slow growth and fail to
generate sufficient revenues
Tax Rates, 3
% of Income C
1
0%
Tax Revenues
19
NAPM - Orange County
Consider the evidence
100%
Tax Rates vs. Tax Revenues 90%
20%
80%
70%
15%
60%
Tax Revenues Top Tax Rate 50%
10% 40%
30%
5% 20%
10%
Source: Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Treasury, OMB scottgrannis.blogspot.com
0% 0%
1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
20
NAPM - Orange County
Profits have doubled since ‘98, but equities are flat
1400 28
Corporate Profits vs GDP
1000 20
Profits
500 10
Nominal GDP
21
NAPM - Orange County
Corporate PE ratios are below average
35
NIPA P/E Ratio
30
25
20
average
15
10
Source: Bloomberg, NIPA; based on most recent quarterly NIPA profits and S&P 500 prices
0
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com
22
NAPM - Orange County
Credit spreads are still quite high
2000
Corporate Spreads
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000 High Yield
800
600
400
Investment Grade
200
0
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Source: Merrill Lynch Corporate Master Index scottgrannis.blogspot.com
23
NAPM - Orange County
Swap spreads lead, and are back to normal
140
5-year Swap Spreads
120
100
80
60
40
20
24
NAPM - Orange County
80
Capital Goods Orders
70
60
50
40
25
NAPM - Orange County
Manufacturing is rebounding
10%
67
ISM Index (NAPM) vs. GDP
8%
62
ISM
6%
57
4%
52
2%
47
0%
42 Real GDP
-2%
37 -4%
Source: Institute for Supply Management, Bureau of Economic Analysis
32 -6%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
scottgrannis.blogspot.com
26
NAPM - Orange County
130
Global Industrial Production
120
110
Eurozone U.S.
100
90
Japan
80
27
NAPM - Orange County
240
Inflation-Adjusted Home Prices
220
200
180
160
140
120
Source: Case Shiller, BEA; last data point Dec. '09 scottgrannis.blogspot.com
100
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
28
NAPM - Orange County
Residential construction appears to have bottomed
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
29
NAPM - Orange County
Mortgage rates are very low
10%
30-yr Fixed Mortgage Rates
9%
8%
Jumbo
7%
6%
5%
Conforming
30
NAPM - Orange County
Conclusions
31